| Literature DB >> 32514187 |
Haiyun Zi1, Yonglei Jiang2, Xiaomao Cheng1, Wanting Li1, Xiaoxia Huang3.
Abstract
The rhizospheric microbial community is one of the major environmental factors affecting the distribution and fitness of plants. Ancient wild tea plants are rare genetic resource distributed in Southwest China. In this study, we investigated that rhizospheric bacterial communities of ancient wild tea plants along the elevational gradients (2050, 2200, 2350 and 2500 m) in QianJiaZhai Reserve of Ailao Mountains. According to the Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16 S rREntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32514187 PMCID: PMC7280300 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66173-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Physiochemical values of the rhizospheric soil in different elevations.
| Indexes | Elevations (m) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2050 | 2200 | 2350 | 2500 | |
| TP (g/kg) | 0.80 ± 0.10b | 1.52 ± 0.06a | 1.40 ± 0.09a | 1.84 ± 0.28a |
| AP (g/kg) | 0.19 ± 0.01b | 0.20 ± 0.01ab | 0.22 ± 0.01ab | 0.24 ± 0.01a |
| SOM (g/kg) | 70.44 ± 24.77c | 157.29 ± 11.82ab | 112.03 ± 24.22bc | 203.78 ± 19.88a |
| N% | 0.49 ± 0.06c | 0.95 ± 0.05a | 0.74 ± 0.06b | 0.92 ± 0.09ab |
| C% | 5.91 ± 0.86b | 12.28 ± 0.63a | 9.81 ± 0.82a | 12.31 ± 1.37a |
| C/N ratio | 11.84 ± 0.57b | 12.95 ± 0.35ab | 13.16 ± 0.27a | 13.31 ± 0.27a |
| NH4+-N (mg/kg) | 29.83 ± 1.07c | 48.95 ± 2.11a | 45.60 ± 3.02ab | 39.84 ± 4.01b |
| NO3–N (mg/kg) | 14.25 ± 0.89b | 20.62 ± 2.02a | 14.22 ± 0.44b | 18.83 ± 1.85a |
| Soil moisture% | 58.82 ± 6.94a | 64.40 ± 6.13a | 68.88 ± 2.60a | 60.24 ± 2.25a |
| Soil pH | 4.56 ± 0.04a | 4.62 ± 0.37a | 4.58 ± 0.37a | 4.64 ± 0.60a |
Data are indicated as mean ± standard error (SE), n = 5; diverse small letters ‘a’ and ‘b’ show the statistically significant difference in elevation gradients using one-way ANOVA tests (P < 0.05); TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus, SOM, soil organic matter; N, total nitrogen; C, total carbon; NH4+-N, ammonium nitrogen; NO3–N, nitrate nitrogen.
Figure 1Classified summation of the relative abundance of bacterial phyla and genera in the different elevations. (a,e) The relative abundance of bacterial phyla in the different elevations; (b,f) The relative abundance of bacterial phyla in the different elevations; (c) Mean relative abundances of bacteria phyla in all samples. (d) Mean relative abundances of bacteria genus in all samples. The taxa are arranged as per total relative abundance across all samples, and only bacterial phyla (genera) with relative abundance≥1% was listed, and those with relative abundance<1% were summarized as others. The most abundant phyla (genera) at the bottom and the least abundant phyla (genera) at the top of the y-axis; Similarly, the phyla (genera) names in the legend are arranged from the most abundant at the bottom to the least abundant at the top.
Figure 2Variation of mean pairwise distance (MPD), mean nearest taxon distance (MNTD) and their standardized effect sizes (ses.MPD, ses.MNTD) of bacterial communities at different elevations.
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of microbial communities at different elevations using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity.
Figure 4Co-occurrence network analysis of rhizosphere bacterial of ancient wild tea plants at different elevations in Qianjiazhai Reserve. The red and blue color of each connection between two nodes is positive and negative relationships of Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Figure 5Linear relationships between Alpha diversity and physicochemical properties. (a) The Chao1 estimator-C%; (b) The Chao1 estimator-N%; (c) The Chao1 estimator-NH4+-N; (d) The phylogenetic diversity-C%; (e) The phylogenetic diversity-N%; (f) The phylogenetic diversity- NH4+-N.
Partial Mantel test results for the correlation between bacterial community composition and soil characteristics along the elevational gradients.
| Variables | NH4+-N | C | N | TP | SOM | C/N | AP | NO3–N | Soil pH | SM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | −0.02 | 0.02 | |||
| 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.86 |
TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus, SOM, soil organic matter; N, total nitrogen; C, total carbon; NH4+-N, ammonium nitrogen; NO3–N, nitrate nitrogen.
Figure 6Redundancy analysis between soil characteristics and rhizobacteria. (a) bacterial phyla level (b) bacterial genera level. TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus, SOM, soil organic matter; N, total nitrogen; C, total carbon; NH4+-N, ammonium nitrogen; NO3–N, nitrate nitrogen; SM, Soil moisture; pH, soil pH.