| Literature DB >> 35550027 |
Guangrong Yang1, Dapeng Zhou1, Renyuan Wan1, Conglian Wang1, Jin Xie1, Cunqiang Ma2,3, Yongmei Li4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ancient tea plantations with an age over 100 years still reserved at Mengku Town in Lincang Region of Yunan Province, China. However, the characteristic of soil chemicophysical properties and microbial ecosystem in the ancient tea plantations and their correlation with tea-leaves chemical components remained unclear. Tea-leaves chemical components including free amino acids, phenolic compounds and purine alkaloids collected from modern and ancient tea plantations in five geographic sites (i.e. Bingdao, Baqishan, Banuo, Dongguo and Jiulong) were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), while their soil microbial community structure was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing, respectively. Additionally, soil microbial quantity and chemicophysical properties including pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), soil organic matter (SOM), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen (AN), available phosphorous (AP) and available potassium (AK) were determined in modern and ancient tea plantations.Entities:
Keywords: Amino acids; Ancient tea plantation; Microbial community structure; Phenolic components; Soil fertility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35550027 PMCID: PMC9097118 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03633-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 5.260
Fig. 1Geographical distribution (A) and basic situations (B) of five various sampling sites including Bingdao, Banuo, Baqishan, Dongguo and Jiulong. Note: The altitude, slope, temperature, humidity and light intensity were determined by UG903 GPS position indicator (Jiahua Co. Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu, China), XW PD001 Digital Level (Xingwangyuda Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) and Vantage Pro 2 Automatic Meteorological Station (Davis Instruments, San Francisco, CA, USA), respectively. These results indicated the similarity of altitude, slope, temperature, humidity and light intensity between modern and ancient tea gardens of each sampling site
Chemical indicators of tea-leaves in modern and ancient tea plantations, respectively
| Item | Modern tea plantations | Ancient tea plantations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ( | Rang | Mean ( | Rang | |
| Water extraction (%) | 49.74 ± 2.65 | 48.65 ~ 50.84 | 50.82 ± 2.09 | 49.96 ~ 51.69 |
| Free amino acids (%) | 2.81 ± 0.36 | 2.65 ~ 2.96 | 3.43 ± 0.30*** | 3.31 ~ 3.55 |
| Tea polyphenols (%) | 29.47 ± 1.44 | 28.87 ~ 30.06 | 30.83 ± 1.77** | 30.10 ~ 31.56 |
| Polyphenols/Amino acids ratio | 10.74 ± 2.03 | 9.90 ~ 11.58 | 9.08 ± 1.23*** | 8.57 ~ 9.59 |
| Caffeine (mg g− 1) | 40.21 ± 3.93 | 38.59 ~ 41.83 | 42.78 ± 3.33* | 41.40 ~ 44.15 |
| Gallic acid (mg g−1) | 0.09 ± 0.18 | 0.01 ~ 0.16 | 0.56 ± 0.11*** | 0.51 ~ 0.60 |
| C (mg g−1) | 15.74 ± 4.94 | 13.70 ~ 17.78 | 13.85 ± 5.45 | 11.60 ~ 16.11 |
| EC (mg g−1) | 28.34 ± 7.60 | 25.20 ~ 31.47 | 30.10 ± 10.33 | 25.84 ~ 34.36 |
| EGC (mg g−1) | 18.20 ± 5.45 | 15.95 ~ 20.44 | 30.47 ± 3.52*** | 29.02 ~ 31.93 |
| ECG (mg g−1) | 85.66 ± 19.44 | 77.64 ~ 93.69 | 75.04 ± 20.66 | 66.51 ~ 83.57 |
| GCG (mg g−1) | 5.45 ± 1.50 | 4.83 ~ 6.07 | 4.35 ± 1.78* | 3.61 ~ 5.08 |
| EGCG (mg g−1) | 53.40 ± 6.28 | 50.81 ~ 55.99 | 44.92 ± 4.70*** | 42.98 ~ 46.86 |
| Total catechins (mg g−1) | 200.79 ± 35.87 | 191.98 ~ 221.60 | 198.74 ± 37.51 | 183.25 ~ 214.22 |
| Non-ester catechins (mg g−1) | 62.28 ± 16.70 | 55.38 ~ 69.17 | 74.43 ± 15.51* | 68.02 ~ 80.83 |
| Ester catechins (mg g−1) | 144.51 ± 22.38 | 135.28 ~ 153.75 | 124.31 ± 22.91** | 114.85 ~ 133.76 |
| Non-ester/ Ester catechins ratio | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ~ 0.46 | 0.60 ± 0.05*** | 0.57 ~ 0.62 |
Note: Polyphenols/Amino acids ratio = Tea polyphenols content/ free amino acids content; Total catechins were the summation of C, EC, EGC, ECG, GCG and EGCG contents; Non-ester catechins were the summation of C, EC and EGC contents; Ester catechins were the summation of ECG, GCG and EGCG contents; Non-ester/ Ester catechins ratio = Non-ester catechins content/Ester catechins content
And all data were present by mean value ± standard deviation. The range was the mean value at 95% confidence coefficient. Significance difference levels: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 determined by the independent-samples T-test using SPSS 20.0 for Windows
Soil physical properties and microbial population in modern and ancient tea plantations, respectively
| Item | Modern tea plantations | Ancient tea plantations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ( | Rang | Mean ( | Rang | ||
| pH value | 4.59 ± 0.13 | 4.53 ~ 4.64 | 4.47 ± 0.21* | 4.38 ~ 4.55 | |
| CEC (cmol kg−1) | 9.13 ± 3.34 | 7.75 ~ 10.51 | 12.15 ± 2.84** | 10.98 ~ 13.33 | |
| SOC (g kg−1) | 38.67 ± 12.56 | 33.49 ~ 43.86 | 51.31 ± 8.29*** | 47.89 ~ 54.73 | |
| SOM (g kg−1) | 65.93 ± 21.88 | 56.90 ~ 74.96 | 88.66 ± 13.20*** | 83.21 ~ 94.11 | |
| TN (g kg−1) | 1.19 ± 0.49 | 0.98 ~ 1.39 | 1.68 ± 0.45** | 1.50 ~ 1.87 | |
| TP (g kg−1) | 0.257 ± 0.122 | 0.206 ~ 0.307 | 0.502 ± 0.162*** | 0.435 ~ 0.569 | |
| TK (g kg−1) | 6.59 ± 1.19 | 6.10 ~ 7.08 | 5.21 ± 2.67* | 4.11 ~ 6.31 | |
| AN (mg kg−1) | 100.55 ± 26.04 | 89.80 ~ 111.29 | 128.88 ± 36.09** | 113.99 ~ 143.78 | |
| AP (mg kg−1) | 10.64 ± 3.41 | 9.23 ~ 12.05 | 18.19 ± 2.49*** | 17.16 ~ 19.22 | |
| AK (mg kg−1) | 132.76 ± 14.57 | 126.74 ~ 138.78 | 151.49 ± 41.24* | 134.46 ~ 168.51 | |
| Bacteria (×106CFU g−1) | 20.88 ± 7.72 | 17.70 ~ 24.07 | 20.22 ± 3.86 | 18.63 ~ 21.81 | |
| Fungi (×103CFU g−1) | 8.22 ± 1.63 | 7.54 ~ 8.89 | 11.25 ± 3.54*** | 9.79 ~ 12.71 | |
| Actinomycetes (×107CFU g−1) | 9.77 ± 7.15 | 6.82 ~ 12.72 | 10.18 ± 4.75 | 8.22 ~ 12.15 | |
CEC Cation exchange capacity, SOC Soil organic carbon, SOM Soil organic matter, TN Total nitrogen, TP Total phosphorus, TK Total potassium, AN Alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, AP Available phosphorus, AK Available potassium
All data were present by mean value ± SD. The range was the mean value at 95% confidence coefficient. Significance difference levels: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001 determined by the independent-samples T-test using SPSS 20.0 for Windows
Fig. 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA, A) showed the remarkable difference of soil bacterial community composition between modern and ancient tea plantations in five sampling sites including Bingdao, Baqishan, Banuo, Dongguo and Jiulong, and their relative abundance differences in the top 22 phyla (B) through independent-samples T-test, respectively
Fig. 3Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA, A) showed the remarkable difference of soil fungal community composition between modern and ancient tea plantations in five various sampling sites, and their relative abundance differences in the top 12 phyla (B) through independent-samples T-test, respectively
Fig. 4Internal relationships of soil environmental factors to bacterial (A) and fungal (B) community composition at the phylum level in tea plantation through redundancy analysis (RDA)