| Literature DB >> 32512808 |
Muhammad Azimuddin Roselan1,2, Siti Efliza Ashari1,2,3, Nur Hana Faujan1,2,3, Siti Munirah Mohd Faudzi1,4, Rosfarizan Mohamad5.
Abstract
Tyrosinase inhibitors have become increasingly important targets for hyperpigmentation disease treatment. Kojic monooleate (KMO), synthesized from the esterification of kojic acid and oleic acid, has shown a better depigmenting effect than kojic acid. In this study, the process parameters include the speed of high shear, the time of high shear and the speed of the stirrer in the production of nanoemulsion containing KMO was optimized using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), as well as evaluated in terms of its physicochemical properties, safety and efficacy. The optimized condition for the formulation of KMO nanoemulsion was 8.04 min (time of high shear), 4905.42 rpm (speed of high shear), and 271.77 rpm (speed of stirrer), which resulted in a droplet size of 103.97 nm. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the fitness of the quadratic polynomial fit the experimental data with large F-values (148.79) and small p-values (p < 0.0001) and an insignificant lack of fit. The optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO with a pH value of 5.75, showed a high conductivity value (3.98 mS/cm), which indicated that the nanoemulsion containing KMO was identified as an oil-in-water type of nanoemulsion. The nanoemulsion remains stable (no phase separation) under a centrifugation test and displays accelerated stability during storage at 4, 25 and 45 °C over 90 days. The cytotoxicity assay showed that the optimized nanoemulsion was less toxic, with a 50% inhibition of cell viability (IC50) > 500 μg/mL, and that it can inhibit 67.12% of tyrosinase activity. This study reveals that KMO is a promising candidate for the development of a safe cosmetic agent to prevent hyperpigmentation.Entities:
Keywords: cytotoxicity; formulation; hyperpigmentation; in vitro; kojic monooleate; nanoemulsion; optimization; response surface methodology; tyrosinase inhibitory activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32512808 PMCID: PMC7321202 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25112616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Experimental data actual and predicted values of the droplet size of the kojic monooleate (KMO) nanoemulsion.
| Standard | Run | Independent Variables | Droplet Size (nm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time of High Shear (min) | Speed of High Shear (rpm) | Speed of Stirrer (rpm) | Actual | Predicted | ||
| 1 | 1 | 8.04 | 4905.40 | 220.27 | 118.14 | 119.40 |
| 2 | 16 | 16.96 | 4905.40 | 220.27 | 145.50 | 145.22 |
| 3 | 3 | 8.04 | 6094.60 | 220.27 | 132.47 | 132.11 |
| 4 | 20 | 16.96 | 6094.60 | 220.27 | 118.30 | 117.24 |
| 5 | 13 | 8.04 | 4905.40 | 279.73 | 103.16 | 104.08 |
| 6 | 11 | 16.96 | 4905.40 | 279.73 | 148.00 | 148.22 |
| 7 | 10 | 8.04 | 6094.60 | 279.73 | 116.80 | 116.94 |
| 8 | 15 | 16.96 | 6094.60 | 279.73 | 121.79 | 120.39 |
| 9 | 17 | 5.00 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 116.03 | 114.80 |
| 10 | 18 | 20.00 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 138.00 | 139.42 |
| 11 | 8 | 12.50 | 4500.00 | 250.00 | 128.00 | 126.67 |
| 12 | 12 | 12.50 | 6500.00 | 250.00 | 112.43 | 113.96 |
| 13 | 9 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 200.00 | 131.50 | 131.70 |
| 15 | 19 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 113.00 | 111.82 |
| 16 | 2 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 112.67 | 111.82 |
| 17 | 4 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 111.45 | 111.82 |
| 18 | 14 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 110.73 | 111.82 |
| 19 | 5 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 112.60 | 111.82 |
| 20 | 6 | 12.50 | 5500.00 | 250.00 | 110.53 | 111.82 |
Figure 1Scatter plot of predicted droplet size values versus actual droplet size values from three-factor central composite design (CCD).
ANOVA results for the effect of all independent variables.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean | Significant | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 2850.06 | 9 | 316.67 | 148.79 | <0.0001 | significant |
| A | 731.78 | 1 | 731.78 | 343.82 | <0.0001 | |
| B | 195.15 | 1 | 195.15 | 91.69 | <0.0001 | |
| C | 82.68 | 1 | 82.68 | 38.85 | 0.0002 | |
| AB | 827.84 | 1 | 827.84 | 388.95 | <0.0001 | |
| AC | 167.81 | 1 | 167.81 | 78.85 | <0.0001 | |
| BC | 0.011 | 1 | 0.011 | 5.286 × 10−3 | 0.9436 | |
| A2 | 400.66 | 1 | 400.66 | 188.25 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | 123.53 | 1 | 123.53 | 58.04 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | 228.97 | 1 | 228.97 | 107.58 | <0.0001 | |
| Residual | 19.16 | 9 | 2.13 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 13.44 | 4 | 3.36 | 2.94 | 0.1337 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 5.71 | 5 | 1.14 | |||
| Corrected Total | 2869.22 | 18 |
Regression coefficient results for the final reduced model.
|
| 1.46 |
| 0.9933 |
|
| 121.11 |
| 0.9866 |
|
| 1.20 |
| 0.9494 |
|
| 145.07 |
| 41.710 |
Figure 2Response surface showing the effect of (a) time of high shear and speed of high shear; (b) time of high shear and speed of stirrer; (c) speed of high shear and speed of stirrer.
Validation set for verification of the final model obtained.
| Independent Variable | Droplet Size (nm) | RSE (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (min) | B (rpm) | C (rpm) | Actual | Predicted | |
| 10.00 | 6000 | 250.00 | 115.31 | 113.16 | 1.90 |
| 12.00 | 5600 | 225.00 | 116.08 | 117.39 | 1.16 |
| 10.00 | 5800 | 300.00 | 117.82 | 116.51 | 1.12 |
| 13.00 | 5600 | 250.00 | 113.06 | 111.97 | 0.97 |
Constraints of numerical optimization.
| Constraints | Goal | Lower Limit | Upper Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time of high shear (A) | In range | 8.04 | 16.96 |
| Speed of high shear (B) | In range | 4905.40 | 6094.60 |
| Speed of stirrer (C) | In range | 220.27 | 279.73 |
| Droplet size | Minimize | 102.60 | 183.02 |
Optimum formulation of KMO nanoemulsion.
| Independent Variable | Droplet Size (nm) | Desirability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (min) | B (rpm) | C (rpm) | Actual | Predicted | |
| 8.04 | 4905.41 | 271.82 | 103.97 | 103.71 | 0.988 |
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of nanoemulsion containing KMO.
Physical stability of optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO under different storage temperatures (4, 25 and 45 °C) and centrifugation test.
| Storage Temperature (°C) | Storage Stability (days) | Centrifugation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 60 | 90 | ||
| 4 | / | / | / | / | |
| 25 | / | / | / | / | / |
| 45 | / | / | / | / | |
/ = stable/no physical change.
Figure 4Physical stability of the optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO in terms of (a) droplet size; (b) zeta potential; (c) polydispersity index (PDI).
Figure 5Graph of 1/r2 versus storage time (s).
Figure 6Graph of r3 versus storage time (s).
Figure 7Graph of viscosity (Pa.s) versus shear rate (s−1).
Flow behavior indices (n), consistency coefficients (k), and regression coefficients (R2) of the optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO.
| Sample | k | n | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO | 10.227 | 0.366 | 0.996 |
Figure 8Fifty percent inhibition of cell viability (IC50) of optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO against 3T3 cell line.
Figure 9Inhibitory activity of tyrosinase enzyme by KMO and optimized nanoemulsion containing KMO.
Figure 10Inhibitory activity of tyrosinase enzyme at 20,000 µg/mL.
Figure 11Chemical structure of kojic monooleate (KMO).
Summary of independent variables and their coded levels.
| Independent Variables | Unit | Coded Level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | −1 | 0 | +1 | +2 | ||
| A | min | 5.00 | 8.04 | 12.50 | 16.96 | 20.00 |
| B | rpm | 4500.00 | 4905.40 | 5500.00 | 6094.60 | 6500.00 |
| C | rpm | 200.00 | 220.27 | 250.00 | 279.73 | 300.00 |