Literature DB >> 32505541

Oxidative stress pathways of air pollution mediated toxicity: Recent insights.

Roopesh Singh Gangwar1, Graham H Bevan1, Rengasamy Palanivel1, Lopa Das1, Sanjay Rajagopalan2.   

Abstract

Ambient air pollution is a leading environmental cause of morbidity and mortality globally with most of the outcomes of cardiovascular origin. While numerous mechanisms are proposed to explain the link between air pollutants and cardiovascular events, the evidence supports a role for oxidative stress as a critical intermediary pathway in the transduction of systemic responses in the cardiovascular system. Indeed, alterations in vascular function are a critical step in the development of cardiometabolic disorders such as hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerosis. This review will provide an overview of the impact of particulate and gaseous pollutants on oxidative stress from human and animal studies published in the last five years. We discuss current gaps in knowledge and evidence to date implicating the role of oxidative stress with an emphasis on inhalational exposures. We conclude with the identification of gaps, and an exhortation for further studies to elucidate the impact of oxidative stress in air pollution mediated effects.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Lung inflammation; Oxidative stress; Particulate matter; Reactive oxygen species; Redox reaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32505541      PMCID: PMC7327965          DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Redox Biol        ISSN: 2213-2317            Impact factor:   11.799


Introduction

Air pollution is the leading environmental risk factor in the world today. Particulate matter <2.5 μm (PM2.5) is the most commonly implicated constituent that causes a disproportionate number of global deaths and contributes significantly to global disability. The global burden of disease study report indicated that ambient outdoor air pollution, particularly PM2.5, was the fifth leading risk factor for global mortality in 2015, with cardiovascular deaths accounting for highest number of these deaths [1,2]. Recent work suggests that the impact of ambient air pollution may be even higher using integrated exposure response function curves [3]. Alterations in oxidative stress were the earliest pathophysiologic mechanism described in response to air pollution exposure in humans and animal models, and indeed alterations in pulmonary oxidative stress and vascular function are thought to be critical initiating events [4]. In this review, we will focus on the studies supporting the impact of air pollution and its particulate and gaseous constituents on oxidative stress. We will address to what extent alterations in oxidative stress are responsible for mediating systemic responses and diseases such as atherosclerosis and cardiac hypertrophy in response to air pollutants. We will discuss the impact of prevention measures to reduce oxidative stress in response to air pollution exposures and provide a perspective on remaining gaps in the field.

Air pollution sources, composition, regulatory thresholds and cardiovascular events

Ambient air pollution is heterogeneous complex mixture of both particulate matter (PM) and gaseous components, that vary considerably by season, source, and atmospheric conditions [5,6]. PM originates from a variety of sources including anthropogenic origins such as power, automobile exhaust, combustion, mining, industrial sources, fine dust from earth, road and tire abrasion, construction work and agricultural sources. Numerous factors determine the toxicity of particles including site of deposition (upper or lower airways, which is turn depending on particle size and reactivity), solubility, bio-persistence and leachable components [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. Due to these heterogeneous compositional attributes, particle classification on physicochemical parameters is a challenge and therefore the most common method to classify PM particles is based on size; coarse PM < 10 μm (PM10), fine PM < 2.5 μm (PM2.5), and ultrafine PM < 0.01 μm (PM0.1) (Fig. 1.). Ultrafine PM usually contains transition metal ions, organic compounds mostly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and are well known to penetrate the systemic circulation [7,8,11]. The typical range of ambient concentrations for several air pollutants, according to the latest U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the European Commission regulatory criteria, have been previously discussed [[12], [13], [14]]. Satellite based techniques use the optical properties of aerosol column (Aerosol optical depth, AOD) to produce indirect estimates of ground-level pollutant concentrations and were the basis of global burden of disease estimates for air pollution. Satellite and ground-level measurements for particle levels highly correlate and are available for every location on earth at a ~1 × 1 km resolution [15]. Among the gaseous pollutants tropospheric, or ground level, ozone (O3) has the most evidence linking it to health effects [2,5,16,17]. O3 is a secondary pollutant resulting from chemical reactions between oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. The current U.S. NAAQS, standard for O3 is 70 ppb averaged over 8h. However, multiple epidemiological studies show an increased risk of asthma exacerbations and cardiopulmonary mortality at levels below 70 ppb [2,18]. It is important to mention here that although “criteria” pollutants are regulated individually through limits on emissions and/or ambient air quality standards set by the government, the overall effects of air pollution are driven by the mixture. These pollutants may, in turn, interact with other aspects of the physical environment, socioeconomic and biologic factors (exposome) to ultimately determine health effects (pollutome).
Fig. 1

Particulate Matter Air Pollution: source and health effects. Air pollution standards were obtained from WHO 2005 air quality guidelines (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69477/1/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf). PM2.5, particulate matter <2.5 μm; PM10, particulate matter <10 μm.

Particulate Matter Air Pollution: source and health effects. Air pollution standards were obtained from WHO 2005 air quality guidelines (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69477/1/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf). PM2.5, particulate matter <2.5 μm; PM10, particulate matter <10 μm.

Sources of ROS generation and methodological considerations

Given the fact that air pollution is inhaled, the initial locus of redox stress is typically the airways and lungs. Indeed, there is an extensive literature on generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in airway epithelial cells and macrophages of the lung and have been reviewed extensively elsewhere [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]]. The mechanism by which pulmonary oxidative stress triggers inflammation, along with the involvement of immune and non-immune cells is complex and varies depending on site, model, duration and composition [24]. In humans this is complex, with the ultimate response being affected by particle fate (e.g. lung clearance versus retention), intracellular distribution, sequestration, and ultimately on multiple host factors including susceptibility [24]. The evidence to date suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in response to PM2.5 could either involve disruption of cellular redox signaling and/or upregulation of endogenous ROS production resulting in exaggerated responses. Endogenous ROS, as described in some excellent reviews [25], may be generated from diverse sources including mitochondrial respiratory chain, NADPH oxidases (NOXs), nitric oxide synthases (NOS), cyclooxygenases, lipoxygenases, xanthine oxidase, and cytochrome P450s[19, 26, 27]. Chemical transformation of thiols and fatty acids (•NO2 and •NO); lipid peroxidation, ketone and endoperoxide fatty acid products, reactive aldehyde formation; oxidation of thiols to disulfides or sulfoxides and DNA base oxidation can also occur. The lung endogenous defenses include the airway epithelial cells, protective surfactant material comprising of a complex mixture of proteins and phospholipids and anti-oxidants that are constantly replenished and alveolar macrophages. An imbalance in the levels of antioxidants, either from depletion or from exhaustion, such as glutathione, ascorbate, and tocopherol with subsequent depletion of reduced cofactors such as NADPH may result in potentiation of oxidative stress. The alveolar macrophages continually phagocytize particulate matter and over long periods at high levels of exposure may be unable to proliferate and replenish, evidence for which is emerging (discussed later in this review). Investigators have used primarily three different approaches to understand the health effect of PM exposure, a). in vitro/ex vivo using simple cell culture exposed to PM particles, b). intra-tracheal or intranasal mode of exposure which are not physiologic but provide insights on pulmonary and systemic effects c). inhalational exposure to concentrated ambient particles. Data obtained from in vitro/ex vivo studies using cell lines or primary cells although useful in defining the specific cellular pathways modulated by PM exposure, provide limited insights into transduction of PM induced systemic responses. Many of these cells may never encounter particulates especially at the concentrations commonly used [9,28,29]. Intra-tracheally/intranasally administered PM often results in uneven intrapulmonary distribution of the particles and may not mimic inhalational exposure. PM exposure using particle concentrator systems is a preferred approach as it allows physiologic route of exposure over prolonged time to mimic real-world conditions. Both a limitation and strength is that only certain particle size ranges are typically concentrated, contrary to ambient air which contains a mixture of particle sizes and gases. Inhalational exposure typically is performed in rodent models and although likely to provide valuable information about mechanisms, can sometimes make extrapolation to human pathology difficult, since rodent models differ in their breathing patterns, nasal anatomy and filtering mechanisms. Human exposure studies are typically performed only for over a few hours and do not provide a perspective on chronic exposure. Panel studies in humans and analysis of surrogate end-points also provide windows into potential pathways, but are associative.

Pathophysiologic insights into mechanisms of air pollution oxidant stress

Oxidative stress as an underlying basis of vascular toxicity

The vascular endothelium is a critical barrier that modulates a myriad of exposures and prevents inflammation, thrombosis and vascular injury through a variety of pathways. A principal pathway involves the generation of nitric oxide (NO.) [30]. Alteration in vascular function to a large extent has its genesis in the dysregulated generation of excess ROS and the reaction of superoxide with NO. to form the highly reactive intermediate peroxynitrite (ONOO). The rate of this reaction is 10-fold compared to dismutation of superoxide by superoxide dismutase (rate constant 5–10 × 109/M/s) [31]. ONOO- may act as a vasoconstrictor and also more like a cytotoxic molecule that cause oxidative damage. It can also cause uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and tyrosine nitration of prostacyclin synthase, decreasing endothelial function. The S-nitrosylation of target proteins following NO. release, results in a stable post-translationally modified product that directly regulates function of proteins [32]. Defective nitrosylation has been linked to endothelial barrier dysfunction, abnormal release of NO. and may represent an important link between risk factors and cardiovascular disease [32].

Systemic vascular oxidative stress with air pollution exposure

Table 1 summarizes some of the key in vivo studies from 2017 onwards (a prior review has discussed prior papers in great detail [33]), describing the health effects of PM2.5 utilizing whole body exposure system and intratracheal/intranasal instillation of concentrated ambient PM2.5 particles. Key findings from these studies establish that air pollution exposure manifests in rapid systemic effects often within hours. Recent findings from human studies suggest that inhaled nanoparticles and their constituents could rapidly cross the alveolar membrane in lung and appear systemically [34]. In rodents, both sub-acute and chronic exposure to air pollution alone and/or in conjunction with other agents has contributed to increased superoxide (O2•−) production, potentiation of vasoconstrictor responses and inflammation. O2•− production in response to chronic PM2.5 exposure was neutralized by NAD(P)H oxidase inhibitor apocynin and NOS inhibitor N-omega-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), suggesting that coupling of O2•−-with nitric oxide to reduce the latter's bio-availability to NADPH oxidases, may be an important mechanism responsible for inducing adverse vascular effects [35,36]. Concentrated PM2.5 exposure resulted in increased microvascular adhesion of inflammatory monocytes in the adipose microcirculation together with perivascular deposition of mononuclear cells, with deficiency of Nox2 and Tlr4 improving vascular responsiveness [37,38]. There is limited evidence comparing the effect of ultrafine PM vs PM2.5 in inducing systemic oxidant stress. However, one study demonstrated that exposure of ApoE-/- mice to ultrafine particles leads to greater atherosclerosis compared to PM2.5 [39]. Exposure to ultrafine particles have higher systemic penetration, and may also result in inhibition of anti-inflammatory potential of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and greater systemic oxidative stress as evidenced by up-regulation of Nrf2-regulated antioxidant genes, lipid peroxidation products in the plasma and liver, and increased hepatic malondialdehyde [39,40]. Recent data with whole body exposures add to the overall literatures suggesting systemic effects including alterations in oxidant stress, metabolism, inflammation and central nervous system effects (Table 1). These results seem to generally confirm the relationship between oxidant stress inflammation and systemic organ dysfunction.
Table 1

In vivo animal studies inflammation and/or oxidative stress with whole body inhalational or intratracheal/intranasal PM2.5, diesel exhaust and ozone exposures.

StudyAnimals and modelAir pollutantMajor outcomeRef.
CONCENTRATED AMBIENT PM2.5 (CAP) USING A WHOLE-BODY EXPOSURE SYSTEM
Chu C et al., 2019Rats and wild type or Nrf2 k/o miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 9–12 weeksReal-time sub-chronic PM2.5 inhalation induced depressive-like responses. Toxic elements deposition in brain might contribute to the depressive-like response. NLRP3 signal pathway regulated by Nrf2 take part in depression caused by PM2.5.[115]
Rao X et al., 2019Wild-type and Adra2b-transgenic miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 3 monthsAdra2b overexpression induced 115(TLR2, TLR4, and IL-6) in the brains of mice exposed to PM2.5. There were increased frequencies of activated effector T cells and increased expression of oxidative stress-related genes, such as SOD1, NQO1, Nrf2, and Gclm in Adra2bTg mice compared with wild-type mice.[116]
Zhou J et al., 2019Male BALB/c miceCombined effects whole body exposure to PM2.5 and cold stress – 4 weeksPM2.5 exposure and cold stress led to an increased inflammation and redox levels in mice, exacerbates asthma in mice by increasing the percentage of TH2 T cells. Increased TH2 T cells are correlated with hyperacetylation of H3K9 and H3K14 in IL-4 gene promoter in CD4+ T cells and in IL-4 gene promoter in CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, a significantly increased P300 and decreased HDAC1 were detected in CD4+ T cells.[117]
Wan Q et al., 2019ApoE−/− miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 12 weeks (daily average PM2.5 was 57.4 ± 25.6 μg/m3)Chronic PM2.5 exposure results in promoting progression of atherosclerosis, and increased serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, TC and LDL-C. Whereas, serum levels of IL-10, TGF-β, and CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ TRegs population in splenocytes, Foxp3 protein and mRNA expressions in descending aorta and spleen were decreased in the PM2.5 group compared to the FA group.[118]
Ding S et al., 2019C57BL/6J miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 5 monthsChronic PM2.5 exposure caused elevated inflammatory cytokines and TGF-β1 in BALF and induced lung inflammation and fibrosis. PM exposure triggered autophagy-related-NLRP3 inflammasome in lung. Resveratrol (RES) treatment abolished PM-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis, and NLRP3 activation.[119]
Ding S et al., 2019C57BL/6J mice, fed with STD or HFDWhole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 5 monthsChronic airborne PM2.5 exposure impaired oxidative homeostasis, caused inflammation, induced hepatic steatosis, increased the expression of hepatic Nrf2 and Nrf2-regulated antioxidant enzyme gene in mice. The combination of PM exposure and HFD treatment caused a synergistic effect on the changes of lipid accumulation oxidative stress, inflammation in the mouse liver.[120]
Du X et al., 2019ApoE−/− mice, (6 weeks old) fed with normal chow (NC) or high-fat chow (HFC) for 10 weeks, then exposed to PM2.5Whole body exposure to PM2.5 or FA for 16 weeksThe PM exposure resulted in cardiac dysfunction and injury in both NC and HFC groups. Increased CD11c+ and decreased CD206+ macrophages were seen in the bone marrow and of the PM exposed mice. Increased circulating TNF-α, decreased IL-10 and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, which characterized by elevated protein expression of NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-1β and IL-18 was observed in the myocardium of PM exposed mice.[55]
Xu MX et al., 2019Male mice (C57BL/6)Whole body exposure to moderate PM2.5 (115 ± 1.5 μg/m3) or severe PM2.5 (230 ± 2.5 μg/m3) FA for 24 weeksLong-term PM2.5 exposure increases lipid accumulation and hepatic-function loss, oxidative stress, increased insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, peripheral inflammation and dysarteriotony in PM2.5 exposed mice. Suppression of inflammatory response and oxidative stress restrains abnormal lipids metabolism in vitro.[121]
Wang H et al., 2018Wild-type and AMPKα2−/− miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 (mean daily concentration ~64 μg/m3) or FA for 6 monthsAMPK is protective in chronic PM2.5 exposure-induced adverse health effects. Chronic exposure to PM2.5 resulted in severe lung injury, left ventricular dysfunction, higher levels of fibrotic genes, collagen in heart and lungs, lower levels of peroxiredoxin 5 (Prdx5), increased oxidative stress and inflammation in AMPKα2−/− mice.[56]
Qiu Y et al., 2017Male C57BL/6J miceWhole body exposure to PM2.5 for a duration of 10 weeksPM2.5 exposure to mice (fed normal chow diet) repressed hepatic transcriptional regulators involved in fatty acid oxidation and lipolysis, and thus promoted hepatic steatosis. However, PM2.5 exposure relieved hepatic steatosis in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Further investigation revealed that PM2.5 exposure, induced hepatic autophagy in mouse livers via MyD88-mediated inflammatory pathway.[122]
INTRATRACHEAL/INTRANASAL PM2.5 EXPOSURE
Yang, J et al., 2019Kunming mice and ratsInstillation of PM2.5 (20 mg/kg body weight) or saline (0.9%), every other day for 3 monthsPM2.5 exposure can activate the inflammatory reaction and induce immune dysfunction. Exposure to PM2.5 resulted in lung intracellular edema, increased number of microvilli and lamellar bodies, inflammatory cells (neutrophils, polylymphocytes and eosinophils), and increased levels of IL-4, TNF-α and TGF-β1 in the tissues.[123]
Feng B et al., 2019Male Wistar rat treadmill training followed by 3 PM2.5 instillationIntratracheal instillation of 10 mg/ml of PM2.5 at 300 μl/kg body weight of rat, on every other day in week 7PM2.5 instillation decreased NO bioavailability. Exercise training promoted HDL function, prevented endothelium dysfunction induced by PM2.5 instillation and significantly reduced the body weight of rats.[124]
Peng J et al., 2019Female Balb/c miceIntratracheal instillation of PM2.5 (1, 10, 50 or 100 μg in 50 μl sterile PBS) or PBS.The surfactant protein A (SA-P) protein concentration and mRNA expression, showed a tendency to first rise then descend in response to the increase of PM2.5 concentration. With the increase of the PM2.5 concentration ROS production and inflammation infiltration are substantially accumulated. The damage under the high concentration of PM2.5 exposure was well rescued by N-acetylcysteine as an oxidant inhibitor to antagonize ROS.[125]
Duan S et al., 2019BALB/c miceIntratracheal instillation of PM2.5 (4.0 mg/kg BW) for 5 daysPM2.5 exposure, induced characteristic abnormal ECG changes, increased inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis in the heart tissue and increased the expression of α-SMA, NLRP3 activation-associated proteins of NLRP3, IL-1β, IL-18, Cleaved caspase-1 p10, and Cleaved IL-1β were upregulated in heart tissue of PM2.5 exposed mice.[126]
Xu M et al., 2019C57/BL6 miceIntranasal instillation of 50 μl of PM2.5 (7.8 mg/kg) or PBS for 2 daysTRPV1 and TRPA1 channels play an important role in PM2.5-induced lung inflammation and AHR. The inhibition of the TRPA1 channel or combined inhibition of TRPA1 and TRPV1 channels resulted in decreased inflammatory cytokine levels in BALF and decreased oxidant levels in the lung. The inhibitory effect on PM2.5-induced lung injury was mediated through regulating the mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins and inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB and NLRP3/caspase-1 pathway.[127]
Su R et al., 2019Sprague-Dawley (SD) ratsIntranasal instillation of PM2.5 from summer and winter (0.2–2.7 mg/kg WB) or PBS, in 500 μl volumePM2.5 exposure triggered oxidative stress and ERS in spleen tissues of SD rats, and lead to apoptosis via upregulation of CHOP and caspase-12, and activated the autophagy of spleen in a concentration-dependent manner.[128]
DIESEL EXHAUST (DE) EXPOSURE (ULTRAFINE PARTICLES)
Kim HS et al., 2020Female BALB/c mice exposed 1 h/day, 5 days/weeks, 4–8 weeksDEP exposure using ultrasonic nebulizer, 1 ml/min and 1- to 5-μm particle size.DEP exposure provokes an imbalance of the immune system via dysregulated inflammatory markers, predicted to disrupt protective responses against harmful exogenous substances in the body.[42]
Wang X et al., 20194-weeks old C57BL/6J mice, exposed to DEP before conception, during pregnancy and fed normal chow or a high-fat diet.Intratracheal instillation of diesel exhaust PM2.5 (DEP) (200 μg in 50 μl) or sterile normal saline (50 μl)Prenatal exposure to DEP programmed the hepatic steatosis in adult male offspring via SREBP-1c and PPAR-α pathway, and induced hepatic steatosis in offspring of mice fed normal chow food. Prenatal exposure to DEP alleviated the hepatic steatosis in offspring of mice fed high fat diet.[129]
Shi R et al., 2019BALB/c miceIntratracheal instillation of 50 μl aqueous suspensions of 0.5 mg DEPThe study demonstrated that naringin had regulating effects on the DPM-induced abnormal secretion of the respiratory tract. DEP inhibited airway surface liquid secretion and increased the viscosity of the liquid. Naringin attenuate DPM-induced injury, reduce liquid viscosity by reducing MUC5AC and total protein secretion, increase DPM-induced CFTR, AQP1, and AQP5 mRNA and protein expression, positively regulate apical CFTR insertion and promote CFTR activation by increasing intracellular cAMP.[130]
Zheng X et al., 2019C57BL/6 mice Single dose of DEPIntratracheal instillation of 100 μg DEP/mouse and sacrificed after 30 min, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h.Single exposure to DEP induced transient oxidative stress in the lungs, with time-dependent effects on Nrf2 and antioxidant enzymes and phase II enzymes. 6 h post DEP exposure, ROS peaked, most of the enzymes were activated, and the histology showed the lungs were damaged. At 12 h, ROS returned to normal level and CAT activity decreased, while protein expression of Nrf2, HO-1, NQO1, GCLC, and GCLM increased, and the lungs were recovering from damage.[41]
De Grove KC et al., 2018C57BL/6J miceIntranasal instillation of DEP alone, HDM alone or combined DEP + HDMCombined exposure to DEP + HDM showed synergistic response and increased IL-33 and ST2 expression in lung, elevated inflammatory responses and bronchial hyperresponsiveness compared to saline, DEP alone or HDM alone exposure.[131]
Liu J et al., 2018Male 8-weeks old CD-1 miceDEP exposure in chambers (350 μg/m [3] TPS) for 5 h/day and clean FA for 19 h/day throughout the 7-day exposureDE exposure induced the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and apoptosis of endothelial cells in pulmonary artery and induces pulmonary arterial hypertension in mice. DE inhalation exposure induced an accumulation of CD45+ lymphocytes and CD68+ macrophages surrounding and infiltrating pulmonary arteriole. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-13 produced by T helper 17 (Th17) and Th2 cells were markedly elevated in lung tissues of mice after DE inhalation exposure.[132]
Cole TB et al., 2017C57Bl/6 miceWhole body exposure to DEP (250–300 μg/m3) or FA for 6 h.Acute DEP exposure caused significant increases in lipid peroxidation and of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-3, IL-6, TNF-α) in various brain regions (particularly olfactory bulb and hippocampus). DE exposure also caused microglia activation, as measured by increased Iba1 (ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1) expression, and of TSPO (translocator protein) binding.[133]
Li YJ et al., 2017Nrf2+/+ and Nrf2−/− C57BL/6J miceMice were exposed to DEP in inhalation chambers for 56 days, from 28 days before and 28 days after the bleomycin injectionInhalation of DE induced significant inhibition of airway clearance function and the proinflammatory cytokine secretion in macrophages, an increase in neutrophils, and severe lung inflammatory injury, which were greater in Nrf2−/− mice than in Nrf2+/+ mice.[134]
OZONE GAS MIXTURES
Fuentes N et al., 2019C57BL/6J female and male miceExposed animals to 1 ppm of ozone or FA for 3 hOzone exposure resulted in increased airway hyperresponsiveness and expression of inflammatory genes. Response to ozone was higher in females and were affected by gonadectomy and 17β-estradiol treatment in a sex-specific manner. Gonadectomy reduced ozone-induced expression of lung IL-6 and MIP-3 in females, which was restored by treatment with 17β-estradiol.[135]
Zhang JH et al., 2019Balb/c mice, Ova induced asthma modelOzone mixed with air for 3 h at a concentration of 3 ppm in a sealed Perspex containerOzone exposure increased ROS release and asthma exacerbation and elevated neutrophil lung infiltration. Ozone increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production as well as the percentage of IL-17+ γδT cells.[136]
Xu M et al., 2019C57/BL6 miceOzone exposure (2.5 ppm, 3 h).Acute ozone exposure (single 24 h) induces mitochondrial dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Inflammasome activation has a critical role in the pathogenesis of ozone-induced airway inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Ozone exposure resulted in increased total cells in BAL including neutrophils and eosinophils, and BAL inflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, KC, and IL-6).[137]
Li F et al., 2018C57/BL6 miceMice were exposed to ozone (2.5 ppm, 3 h) or FA twice a week for 6 weeksBoth mtROS and NLRP3 inflammasome play a role in ozone-induced lung inflammation while only NLRP3 is involved in ozone-induced emphysema. Ozone-exposed mice had increased BAL total cells, increased lung inflammation, and levels of IL-1β, KC and IL-6, enhanced oxidative stress with higher serum 8-OHdG concentrations, emphysema with greater mean linear intercept (Lm), airway remodeling with reduced lung functions.[138]
Zhong et. al., 2016Diabetes prone KK mice exposed to ozone or filtered air.Ozone (0.5 ppm) exposure for 13 consecutive weekdays (Monday to Friday, 4 h/day).Repeated Ozone inhalation induces oxidative stress, adipose inflammation and insulin resistance. Ozone increased monocytes/macrophages in both blood and visceral adipose tissue. Systemic CD4+ T cell activation enhanced by the exposure of O3. Multiple inflammatory genes including CXCL-11, IFN-gamma, TNF alpha, IL-12, and iNOS up-regulated in visceral adipose tissue.[139]
Ying et. al 2016Male KKAy mice were exposed to ozone or filtered air for 13 daysOzone (0.5 ppm) exposure or FA for 13 consecutive weekdaysPro-inflammatory CD11b(+)Gr-1lo7/4hi macrophages increased in adipose but unchanged in blood. Fasting insulin and HOMA-IR in ozone-exposed animals reduced without change in glucose. Paradoxic increased insulin signaling in skeletal muscle/liver. Ozone associated with weight loss and reduced plasma leptin that may have confounded results.[140]
Pafett et al., 2015Male Sprague-Dawley ratsOzone (1 ppm) for 4 hOzone exposure augmented BAL cells and neutrophil count and numbers of circulating neutrophils and macrophages. Coronary artery constriction in response to serotonin was pronounced in ozone exposed rats with endothelial dysfunction (ACh) that was corrected in the presence of superoxide dismutase and prevented by SOD/catalase as well as NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin.[141]
COMPARATIVE STUDIES
Tong H et al., 2019Female C57Bl/6 mice exposed to diesel exhaust (DE)Mice were exposed to either freshly emitted DE, photochemically altered diesel exhaust (aged DE), or FA for 4 h using an environmental irradiation chamberFresh DE (contained 460 μg/m [3] of PM, 0.29 ppm of NO2 and no O3), significantly decreased LVDP, dP/dtmax, and dP/dtmin compared to FA, while aged DE (consisted of 330 μg/m [3] of PM, 0.23 ppm O3 and no NO2) significantly reduced LVDP and dP/dtmax. Acute inhalation to either fresh or aged DE lowered LVDP and dP/dt, with a greater fall noted with fresh DE, suggesting that the composition of DE may play a key role in DE-induced adverse cardiovascular effects in female C57Bl/6 mice.[142]
Hasari MS et al., 2018Female WT mice exposed to smog generated in the Mobile Reaction Chamber (MRC)Mice were exposed to simulated high PM/low ozone (SA-PM) or low PM/high ozone (SA-O3) smog atmosphere for 4 h.This study demonstrates that a single exposure to smog causes cardiac effects in mice. The responses of SA-PM and SA-O3 are similar, but the latter is more potent in causing electrical disturbances and breathing changes potentially due to the effects of irritant gases, which should therefore be accounted for more rigorously in health assessments.[143]
Wong EM et al., 2018Normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive (SH) Wistar-Kyoto rats exposed to PM and OzoneExposed to one of the following atmospheres: FA, UFPM (~250 μg/m3), O3 (1.0 ppm), or UFPM + O3 (~ 250 μg/m3+1.0 ppm) combined for 6 h, followed by an 8 h FA recovery period.SH rats were particularly susceptible to O3 exposure, exhibiting increased injury scores in terminal bronchioles and epithelial degeneration in large airways. UFPM-exposure groups had minimal histologic changes. The chemical composition of UFPM was altered by the addition of O3, indicating that ozonolysis promoted compound degradation. O3 increased the biologic potency of UFPM, resulting in greater lung injury following exposure[144]
Aragon MJ et al., 2016C57BL/6 mice exposed to varied complex mixturesMice exposed to a single (6-h) road dust, MVE (a combination of gasoline and diesel engine emissions) PM, MVE gases, road dust plus ozone, road dust plus MVE, and hardwood smoke for 24 hRoad dust and wood smoke exposures were most potent at inducing inflammatory gene expression, while MVE atmospheres and wood smoke were most potent at impairing vasorelaxation to acetylcholine. Responses are consistent with recent reports on MVE toxicity, but reveal novel serum bioactivity related to wood smoke and road dust. These studies suggest that the compositional changes in serum and resultant bioactivity following inhalation exposure to pollutants may be highly dependent on the composition of mixtures.[45]
Wang G et al., 2015Wistar rats exposed to PM2.5, Ozone or both togetherRats were inhaled 0.8 ppm ozone or air for 4 h and then placed in air for 3 h following intratracheal instillation with 0–3.2 mg/rat PM2.5 in sterile saline (0.25 ml/rat), repeated twice per week for 3 weeksThe study demonstrated that inflammation and oxidative stress were involved in toxicology mechanisms of PM2.5 in rat lung and ozone potentiated these effects induced by PM2.5. PM2.5 exposed group showed increased total cells in BALF than control and a dose-dependent increase in TNF-α, interleukin-6, lactate dehydrogenase, and total protein of BALF. Exposure to ozone alone resulted in increased TNF-α. On the other hand, ozone enhanced PM2.5-induced inflammatory changes and pathological characters in rat lungs. SOD and GSH-Px activities in lung were reduced in PM2.5-exposed rats with and without prior ozone exposure compared to control.[145]
In vivo animal studies inflammation and/or oxidative stress with whole body inhalational or intratracheal/intranasal PM2.5, diesel exhaust and ozone exposures. Diesel exhaust (DE) exposures have been shown to induce oxidant stress and systemic inflammation. These have been previously reviewed and therefore only recent studies highlighted (Table 1). For example, Zheng et al., 2019, found that intratracheally instilled, single exposure of diesel exhaust particles induced transient oxidative stress in the lungs of mice. ROS peaked at 6 h, with time dependent regulation of Nrf2 and antioxidant enzymes and phase II enzymes in the DEP exposed mice [41]. In a very recent report, Kim et. al. 2020, reported that DE exposure results in gene expression (nasal cavity) that in turn provokes an imbalance of the immune system via dysregulated inflammatory markers (S100A9, S100A8, CAMP, and IL20)42 (Table 1). Ozone is another important constituent of ambient air pollution. Most ozone exposure studies published to date are acute exposures and demonstrate rapid (hours) endothelial dysfunction and abnormal vasoconstriction. Mechanistically, a rapid depletion of NO with concomitant decrease in aortic eNOS levels that can be, reversed with O2•− scavengers (Table 1) are some key events contributing to the above stated pathology. Some studies suggest the presence of serum factors to be responsible for inducing endothelial dysfunction and neuronal inflammation. Others have suggested an endothelial locus of generation of putative factors that circulate to perpetrate systemic vascular and neuronal injury, these findings need to be confirmed [43]. In a primate study, acute exposure to ozone (0.5 ppm) resulted in increased aortic mitochondrial damage [44]. Evidence from one short-term 2-day study supported findings that no additive effects were noted in ozone and diesel exhaust. The downside of all these studies is that the concentrations of O3 used in rodent studies (0.5–1 ppm) are far from the concentration of doses used in human studies or for that matter the regulatory standards (current U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard is 0.075 ppm averaged for an 8 h period while the European Commission has set a standard at 0.057 ppm). (Table 1). There have been direct comparative studies examining the differential impact of gases on vascular function but have tested limited end-points. In one study brief 6 h exposures to the plasma of various emissions demonstrated that plasma from road dust and wood smoke exposure were most potent in inducing in-vitro inflammatory gene expression and impairment of vasorelaxation to acetylcholine [45] (Table 1).

Cardiac oxidant stress in response to air pollution exposure

Very early observations by Gurgeiera and Gonalez-Fletcha have shown that short term inhalation (5-h) of concentrated ambient PM2.5 but not inert carbon results in oxidative stress, determined by in situ chemiluminescence in the and heart, but not liver. Increase in chemiluminescence in the heart showed strong association with Fe, aluminum, silicon, and titanium levels in the particles [46]. Five-hour exposure to CAPs induced oxidant stress that was associated with slight but significant increases in heart water content and to tissue-specific increases in the activities of the antioxidant enzymes catalase and superoxide dismutase. This observation suggested that episodes of increased particulate air pollution not only have potential for oxidant injurious effects but may also trigger adaptive responses such as cardiac hypertrophy. This has indeed been seen in chronic exposure studies where a strong association of PM2.5 to cardiac hypertrophy has been noted [47,48]. Further cessation of exposures has the potential of reversing these changes. Chronic exposure to PM for 15 weeks resulted in increased -blood pressure, -heart weight, -cardiac expression of hypertrophic markers (ACTA1 and MYH7) and decreased cardiac stroke volume in spontaneously hypertensive rats and withdrawal from PM exposure restored these parameters to normal [47]. Qin et. al., intratracheally exposed mice to PM2.5 and observed reversible cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis in mice of different age groups [49]. In this study, PM-exposed 4-weeks and 10-months old mice developed cardiac fibrosis while 10-months old mice demonstrated cardiac diastolic dysfunction, elevated heart rate/blood pressure, and cardiac systolic dysfunction. PM2.5 exposure also resulted in increased expression of cardiac fibrosis markers (Col1a1, Col3a1), NOX-4, and TGFβ1, and generated more ROS in the myocardium of both the 4-week-old and 10-month-old mice. The withdrawal of PM2.5 exposure restored the cardiac function, blood pressure, heart rate, collagens expression, and malonaldehyde (MDA) levels in hearts of mice of both age groups [49]. Evidence from recent studies strongly support the argument that exposure that PM2.5 led to systolic disfunction, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in mice [48,[50], [51], [52]]. Fibrosis is the aftermath of chronic inflammation and it has been shown that macrophages play a key role in development of fibrosis [53,54]. In a recent mechanistic study, Su et. al., exposed C57BL/6 mice to PM2.5 or filtered air for 8 or 16 weeks and pointed out that cardiac hypertrophy developed in PM2.5 exposed mice is regulated by PI3K/Akt/FoxO1 pathway and the role of cardiac macrophages in fibrosis development [48]. FoxO (a transcription factor regulated by Akt) regulates several cellular functions, including survival, metabolism, proliferation, and differentiation that play key roles in regulating cardiac hypertrophy [48]. Du et. al., 2019, found that PM2.5-induced cardiac injury is mediated by macrophages polarization and NLRP3 inflammasome activation using ApoE-/- mice exposed to PM2.5 for 16-weeks [55]. In this study authors found increased CD11C+ and decreased CD206+ macrophages in bone marrow, elevated levels of circulating inflammatory cytokine TNF-α and decrease of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in PM2.5 compared to FA exposed mice. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome was also observed in the myocardium of PM2.5 exposed mice as evidenced by elevated protein expression of NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-1β and IL-18 in the myocardium [55]. AMPKα2−/− mice chronically exposed for 6 months, showed higher expression of pro-fibrotic genes, increased collagen deposition, lower levels of peroxiredoxin 5 (Prdx5), and increased oxidative stress and inflammation in the hearts and lungs PM2.5 exposed mice [56]. All these results suggest that oxidative stress, inflammation and tissue damage are direct sequelae of exposures and could represent targets for intervention.

Mechanisms by which pulmonary oxidative stress is systemically transduced

The underlying mechanisms by which pulmonary oxidative stress leads to systemic inflammation in response to air pollution is still not fully understood, but almost certainly involves the lung. There are several studies demonstrating an effect of PM2.5 in inducing a systemic inflammatory response through the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines into the circulation from lung immune cells [37,57]. Early studies from Terashima et. al. demonstrated that human alveolar macrophages incubated with latex particles of different sizes (0.1, 1, and 10 μm) or inert carbon particles produced inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (M-CSF and MIP) in response to phagocytosis and the response was similar (regardless of size) to when they were exposed to particle suspensions of residual oil fly ash (ROFA), ambient urban particles (EHC 93), suggesting that the act of phagocytosis, irrespective of other considerations was responsible for inflammatory cytokine production [58]. Furthermore, the types of cytokines were comparable to that seen with exposure to high levels of PM10 particles based on plasma samples collected in subjects in Singapore during and following a South Asian haze (mean PM10 levels of (125.4 ± 44.9 versus 40 ± 14.3 mg/m3, haze versus post haze) [58]. In a subsequent publication, the role of alveolar macrophage in this response was further investigated by incubating isolated human alveolar macrophages in tissue culture medium either with or without the presence of colloidal carbon and measuring the effect of the supernatants on the release of polymorphonuclear cells from the bone marrow [59]. The supernatant of alveolar macrophages incubated with colloidal carbon shortened the transit time of release of cells through the bone marrow, when compared with the supernatant from the unstimulated alveolar macrophages or with cell culture medium alone. These experiments provided the first evidence that air pollution through pulmonary alveolar macrophage dependent chemokine release stimulated the release of inflammatory cells into the systemic circulation. Subsequently we and others demonstrated that pattern recognition receptors such as TLR4 were involved in the release of Ly6Chi monocytes from the bone marrow likely via CCR2/CCR5 dependent mechanisms [37]. In a recent report we investigated the differential contribution of tissue resident alveolar macrophages and bone marrow-derived infiltrating monocytes to persistent lung inflammation in mice exposed to PM2.5 for 4 or 32 weeks (Gangwar RS. et al., 2020, Scientific Reports, under review). We used special chimeric (CD45.2/CD45.1) mice in which chest was shielded before irradiation (to protect the resident lung macrophage and monocyte population) followed by bone marrow transplantation from CD45.1 mouse. We found that short term PM2.5 exposure (4-weeks) induces an influx of bone marrow-derived monocytes to lungs, with no contribution to the tissue resident alveolar macrophage population, while chronic (32-weeks) PM2.5 exposure resulted in recruitment of bone marrow-derived alveolar macrophages in inflamed lung, coupled with increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation of the tissue resident alveolar macrophage. Transcriptomic analysis of isolated tissue resident and bone marrow alveolar macrophages from 4 and 32-weeks exposed mice, revealed a time-dependent pattern of differentially expressed genes with PM2.5 exposure with a pro-inflammatory bias (Gangwar RS. et al., 2020, Scientific Reports, In press), (Fig. 2). We examined the effects of chronically inhaled PM2.5 on pulmonary and systemic inflammation and role of CCR2 and CXCR3 in two separate experiments [60,61]. These findings, suggest a robust innate and adaptive immune activation in response to the air pollution that is dependent on chemokine mechanisms.
Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of key changes in the lung inflammation in chronic PM2.5 exposure. Chronic exposure to PM2.5 results in release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the blood circulation that leads to infiltration of Ly6chi monocytes in the lungs from bone marrow. Continual exposure to PM2.5 cause persistent inflammatory environment in the lungs that resulted in increased apoptosis of tissue resident alveolar macrophage and differentiated of recruited BM-monocytes into BM-alveolar macrophages.

Schematic illustration of key changes in the lung inflammation in chronic PM2.5 exposure. Chronic exposure to PM2.5 results in release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the blood circulation that leads to infiltration of Ly6chi monocytes in the lungs from bone marrow. Continual exposure to PM2.5 cause persistent inflammatory environment in the lungs that resulted in increased apoptosis of tissue resident alveolar macrophage and differentiated of recruited BM-monocytes into BM-alveolar macrophages. Phospholipids and surfactant proteins present in the bronchioloalveolar fluid are an important line of defense that are continually replenished to provide a potent barrier against air pollution. Chronic ongoing exposure to air pollution may obviate the necessity of surfactant defenses in order to prevent increase in oxidatively modified derivatives such as 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (PAPC) and 7-ketocholesterol from contributing to endothelial barrier dysfunction, inflammatory cell recruitment, allowing facile transgression of air pollutants, chemokines and other secondary mediator signals to the bone marrow and systemic circulation [37].These mediators may also enhance oxidative stress in the vasculature resulting in TLR4 activation in monocytes and macrophages [62,63]. Consequently, depletion of TLR4, NOX2 or p47phox have all been shown to attenuate ROS generation, reduce inflammatory monocyte infiltration into vasculature and improve vascular function in response to inhalational exposure to concentrated PM2.5 [37,64]. PM2.5 exposure-induced formation of 7-ketocholesterol, its bio-distribution in LDL and subsequent uptake by scavenger receptor CD36, and entrapment within plaque macrophages may represent a paradigm for air pollution mediated endothelial dysfunction and potentiation for atherosclerosis [65,66]. Two studies provide evidence that pulmonary surfactant antioxidant barrier may be critical in modulation of systemic responses [67,68]. First, PM2.5 induced reduction in Akt/eNOS signaling in the aorta in 9 days exposure was effectively reversed by the antioxidant TEMPOL or via overexpression of lung-specific extracellular SOD (ecSOD) [67]. ecSOD in this animal model is driven by a Surfactant C promoter targeting it to cells that produce Surfactant C. Second study, similar to 9-day exposure to CAP reduced endothelial progenitor cell numbers (EPCs) and downregulated VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-stimulated aortic Akt phosphorylation suggesting that impairment of endothelial regeneration owing to depletion of endothelial progenitor cells may represent an important mechanism of sustained endothelial dysfunction. Additionally, the study reported blunted plasma NO levels in wild-type mice but not in mice overexpressing extracellular superoxide dismutase (ecSOD-Tg) in the lungs. Finally, EPCs from CAP-exposed wild-type mice failed to augment hindlimb perfusion when injected into unexposed mice subjected to hindlimb ischemia. In contrast, EPCs derived from CAP-exposed ecSOD-Tg mice restored hind limb ischemia [68]. PM2.5 exposure confers activation of sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic inflammation that is consistent with abnormal blood pressure responses [69]. PM particles can permeate the central nervous system and induce inflammation in areas that responsible for blood pressure regulation and metabolic control [13,25,70,71]. Receptors such as TRPA1 (transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily A, member 1) in airway sensory neurons can also sense the environmental toxicants and aerogenic oxidants, resulting in neurogenic inflammation [72]. It has been shown that inhibition of central IKKβ prevented peripheral inflammation and abnormalities in insulin resistance and improved whole body metabolism [63,69].

PM exposure: oxidative stress, anti-oxidant mechanisms and redox balance

While there is a plethora of information on oxidant stress in response to air pollution exposure, in-depth information on regulation and expression of anti-oxidant defenses in PM2.5 in vivo exposure model is relatively sparse. In the event of oxidative stress, the major antioxidant defense mechanisms including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase, catalase, glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), thioredoxin reductases, hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1), NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO-1) and methionine sulphoxide reductases] and non-enzymatic entities (such as glutathione, vitamins A, C, and E, and flavonoids) are induced to restore cellular redox homeostasis [[73], [74], [75], [76]]. The enzymatic defense mechanisms are regulated at the transcriptional level by Nrf2 (nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2) transcription factor and its associated gens [77]. Nrf2, a basic leucine zipper protein coded by NFE2L2 gene in humans, is the master transcription factor, that regulates the transcriptional induction of antioxidant response elements, (ARE). AREs protect against oxidative stress induced by injury and inflammation. The major detoxication enzymes such as SOD, glutathione S-transferase A2 (GSTA2), and NQO1, contain ARE in their promoter region and during oxidative stress, Keap1, dissociates from Nrf2, releasing it to bind to the ARE of the target anti-oxidant genes [25,78,79]. The magnitude of antioxidative response depends upon several factors namely duration of exposure, PM concentration and toxicity, and susceptibility of the subjects to air pollutants. For instance, during low level of oxidative stress antioxidants may increase in the early phase to limit the oxidative damage while chronic exposure, or highly toxic air pollutants may cause exhaustion of endogenous antioxidant responses. Rats exposed to PM2.5 for two weeks showed vascular oxidative stress and up-regulated expression of Cu/Zn-SOD and Mn-SOD in the pulmonary artery and also a reduction in eNOS and vasorelaxation [80]. Xu et al. demonstrated increased mRNA expression of Nrf2 and downstream genes Nqo1 and Gclm in mice chronically exposed to PM2.5 for 10 months [81]. The contribution of locus and tissue specific Nrf2 in attenuating PM2.5 effects are important questions and would need to be examined. Ex vivo Gene expression analysis of PM2.5 exposed airway epithelial cells (obtained from normal individuals) showed Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress response as one of the top pathways [82].

E. Evidence of particulate matter air pollution association with oxidative stress/vascular dysfunction in humans

Evidence from panel studies and large epidemiologic databases

Several human studies demonstrate that acute exposure to air pollution can induce systemic oxidative stress that depend on numerous factors including chemical composition of the air pollutants, associated co-pollutants and host susceptibility [25]. A variety of exposures including wood smoke (4-h exposure to concentrated wood smoke associated with increased urinary excretion of 8-iso-prostaglandin2α); PM2.5 exposure (increased malondialdehyde (MDA) in women but not men in Copenhagen) [83,84]. A recent study evaluated lipid peroxidation markers amongst healthy volunteers traveling from Los Angeles to Beijing. Accompanying a significant rise in PM and ambient air pollution was the concentrations of 6 lipid peroxidation biomarkers: 5-, 12-, and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid as well as 9- and 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoicacid levels. However, 8-isoprostane was not significantly elevated [85]. Concentrations of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) have also been shown to increase following exposure to ambient air pollution. A study in Belgium correlated proximity to a major road and increases in airway macrophage carbon load with oxLDL. Each increase of 0.25 μm2 (interquartile range) of carbon load was associated with an increase of 7.3 U/L (95% CI: 1.3–13.3 U/L) plasma oxLDL and each doubling in distance from patient residence to major roads was associated with a 2.9 U/L (95% CI: −5.2 to −0.72) decrease in plasma oxLDL [86]. Concentrations of oxLDL were found to be independently associated with iron and nickel content of PM2.5 in one study of students relocating to an urban location [87]. Changes in vascular function in panel studies have demonstrated significant associations between multiple acute time windows across a range of concentrations including most recently with very high exposure levels in China (Table 2). Evidence from both the MESA-Air and the Framingham cohort have demonstrated that long-term exposures to ambient levels of PM2.5 are linked to compromised brachial endothelial function [88,89]. Collectively this supports the concept that air pollution exposure in humans through changes in oxidative stress causes vascular endothelial dysfunction. Recently, HDL oxidation index, oxidized LDL (low-density lipoprotein), and malondialdehyde were associated with PM2.5 exposure in 74 adults apart of the Beijing AIRCHD study (Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Healthy Adults) [90]. There have been inadequate studies on the impact of effect modifiers that may determine individual patient susceptibility. Polymorphisms in oxidative stress-related genes (such as GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1, HFE C282Y, CAT and Hem-oxygenase) have been found to be associated with the vulnerability to PM2.5 [25]. Heart rate variability (HRV) on exposure to PM2.5 has been associated with glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) allele as has the GT long tandem repeat polymorphism but not the short in the heme-oxygenase-1 (HO1) promoter [91,92]. Similarly, HFE C282Y and CAT (rs2300181) modified the effects of PM2.5 on plasma homocysteine, a marker of inflammation well associated to cardiovascular disease [93]. However, multiple studies have failed to show antioxidant gene variant impact on the effect of PM2.5 on blood pressure [94,95].
Table 2

Human studies on association of endothelial dysfunction/oxidative stress with air pollution.

StudyPopulation /cohortAir pollutantMajor outcomeRef
PANEL STUDIES
Lin et al., 2019Los Angeles, USA26 nonsmoking, healthy adults10 weeks in Beijing in the summers of 2014 and 2015. association of PM2.5 with panel of circulating biomarkers indicative of lipid peroxidation and inflammationTraveling from a less-polluted to a more-polluted city induces systemic pro-oxidative and proinflammatory effects. Changes in the levels of 5-, 12-, and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid and 9- and 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid as well as paraoxonase and arylesterase activities in the blood, in association with exposures to PAH metabolites, might have important implications in preventive medicine as indicators of increased cardiovascular risk caused by air pollution exposure.[85]
Li et al., 2019, Beijing, China73 healthy adults were followed-up with 4 repeated study visits in 2014–2016.ambient air pollution (black carbon, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide) concentrations, HDL function metrics, and parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress were measured in study participantsA significant decrease in HDL cholesterol efflux capacity of 2.3%–5%, associated with PM2.5 levels was observed. Higher ambient air pollutant levels were associated with significant reductions in circulating HDL cholesterol and apoA-I, elevations in HDL oxidation index, oxidized LDL, malondialdehyde, and high-sensitivity C-reactive proteins.Higher ambient air pollution concentrations were associated with impairments in HDL functionality, potentially because of systemic inflammation and oxidative stress[90]
Zhang et al., 2016California, USA93 elderly non-smoking adults. Reactive hyperemia index (RHI), was measured weekly for 12 weeksRoad way distance Ambient PM2.5 and black carbonRHI was inversely associated with ambient PM2.5, black carbon, NOx, and carbon monoxide. An interquartile range change increase (1.06 μg/m(3)) in 5-day average black carbon was associated with decreased RHI, -0.093 (95% CI: -0.151 to -0.035)[146]
Pope CA 3rd et al., 2016 Utah, USA24 persons recruited for each of 3 consecutive winter/spring study periods in UtahCirculating markers of endothelial apoptosis and inflammation in relation to ambient PM2.5 during winter inversion periods in UtahElevated levels of endothelial microparticles (annexin V+/CD41/CD31+). Decreased VEGF, PDGF, RANTES, GROα and VEGF and an increase in TNFα, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α/β, IL-6, and IL-1β), and markers of endothelial adhesion sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1.[147]
Mirowsky et al., 2017 Durham, NC, USA15 individuals with established from a prospective cohort with CAD presenting to the cardiac catheterization lab at Duke University (CATHGEN cohort)Daily measurements of O3 and PM2.5 from central monitoring stations. Circulating markers of endothelial function (PAI-1, tPA), brachial endothelial function, diameter and inflammation (IL-6) with various lag structuresPer 0.014 ppm (interquartile) increase in ambient ozone and various lag structures (0–5), tissue plasminogen factor and PAI-1 increased (6.6%, 41% respectively); neutrophil, monocytes and IL-6 also positively correlated. The large-artery elasticity index (−19.5%, 95% CI = −34.0, −1.7), and the baseline diameter of the brachial artery (−2.5%, 95% CI = −5.0, 0.1) were negatively correlated with ozone levels.[148]
Ambroz et al., 2016, Czech Republic342 nonsmoking mothers, 344 newborns,PM2.5 exposure, Blood/urine was collected in the summer and winter season to account for differences in air pollutionPM2.5 concentrations significant predictor for 8-oxodG and 15-F2t-IsoP levels. In the polluted region, PM2.5 was a significant predictor of oxidative DNA damage. Winter season and exposure to air pollution predicted lipid oxidation in newborns.[149]
Li et al., 2016,Boston, Massachusetts, USA2035 participants, were not current smokers and had at least one valid measurement of plasma myeloperoxidase or urinary creatinine‐indexed 8‐epi‐PGF2α.PM2.5, black carbon (BC), SO42−, NOx and O3 exposurePositive associations of short-term PM2.5 and BC exposure with myeloperoxidase; 2- to 7-day moving averages of PM2.5 and sulfate were positively associated with 8‐epi‐PGF was observed. Stronger positive associations of black carbon and sulfate with myeloperoxidase were observed among participants with diabetes than in those without.[150]
Byun et al., 2016, Quincy, Massachusetts, USA48 healthy menPM2.5 exposureInteraction of PM2.5 exposure and D-loop mtDNA promoter was significantly associated with adverse effect of heart rate variability. Blood mtDNA methylation levels were negatively associated with PM2.5 exposure and modified the adverse relationships between PM2.5 exposure and heart rate variability outcomes.[151]
DeJarnett et al., 2015Kentucky, USAA cross-sectional study measuring circulating angiogenic cells in 316 participants with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk and roadway distanceRoad way distance Ambient PM2.5 and black carbonCD31(+)/AC133(+), AC133(+), CD34(+)/AC133(+) cell numbers after adjustment of co-variates, negatively associated with roadway distance suggesting a relationship between vascular repair and traffic exposure[152]
Wu et al., 2015Beijing, China40 male university studentsAmbient PM2.5PM2.5 iron and nickel were positively associated with Ox-LDL. There were a 1.9% increase and a 1.8% increase in OxLDL, for each interquartile range increase in iron (1-day, 0.51 μg/m3) and nickel (2-day, 2.5 ng/m3) in PM2.5, respectively.[87]
CONTROLLED EXPOSURE STUDIES
Liu et. al. 2015, Toronto, Canadasingle-blind randomized crossover trial, 50 healthy young non-smoking volunteersAmbient coarse (2.5–10 μm; mean, 213 μg/m3), fine (0.15–2.5 μm; mean, 238 μg/m3) and ultrafine particles (<0.3 μm; mean, 136 μg/m3) for 130 minOne-hour post-exposure, for every 100-μg/m3 increase, coarse particles increased circulating VEGF, fine particles elevated urinary malondialdehyde and ultrafine particles augmented urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine.Ambient particles with various sizes/constituents may influence systemic biomarkers differently. Endotoxin in ambient particles may contribute to vascular mediator changes and oxidative stress.[153]
Byrd, J.B. et. al. 2016, Michigan, USA29 healthy young adults underwent a randomized double-blind crossover study involving 2-h exposures to concentrated ambient coarse PMCourse ambient coarse PM exposure versus filtered air over 2 h (164.2 ± 80.4 μg/m3)Both systolic (1.9 mm Hg) and diastolic (1.9 mm Hg) blood pressure levels were higher throughout coarse PM compared with filtered air exposure. Heart rate variability, endothelial function, and arterial compliance not significantly affected.[154]
Human studies on association of endothelial dysfunction/oxidative stress with air pollution.

Controlled exposure studies

Several studies exhibit rapid vascular dysfunction that manifests as conduit or microvascular endothelial dysfunction or transient reversible constriction of a peripheral conduit vessel owing to acute exposures to PM2.5 and dilute diesel exhaust. (Table 2). While many of these studies did not include oxidant stress markers the genesis of rapid endothelial function, changes may involve rapid degradation of NO. but often compensated by increased production of NO. In a classic experiment performed with diesel exhaust (DE)exposures in humans as part of a randomized double-blind crossover study, nonsmokers were exposed to DE or filtered air, and microvascular function tested using plethysmography in the forearm during intrabrachial infusions of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, in the presence of a NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA) co-infused with the NO donor SNP to maintain basal blood flow (NO clamp). Following DE inhalation, plasma nitrite concentrations increased (68 ± 48 versus 41 ± 32 nmol/L; P = 0.006) despite similar L-NMMA–induced reductions in basal blood flow compared to air [96]. In the presence of the NO clamp, acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, caused local dose-dependent vasodilatation of the forearm, that was not affected by diesel exhaust inhalation (P > 0.05 for both). However, following exposure to diesel exhaust, systemically administered L-NMMA caused a greater increase in blood pressure (P = 0.048) and central arterial stiffness, suggesting that, reduced NO bioavailability secondary to air pollution exposure, cannot be adequately compensated for by increased basal NO generation [96]. PM2.5 has not always been shown to induce endothelial dysfunction, underscoring the importance of composition, individual susceptibility and methods of determining endothelial function among many factors that determine vascular responses [97]. Consistent with this, some studies conclude that PM2.5 exposure diminished conduit artery endothelial-dependent vasodilatation in a delayed fashion post 24 h [98]. PM2.5 mass and TNF-α levels have both been associated with the level of endothelial dysfunction, suggesting that systemic inflammation induced by PM particles and the degree of pollution are likely responsible. While ozone exposures have been shown to impair conduit vessel endothelial function in panel studies, the results from one randomized study seems to indicate lack of acute effects on brachial endothelial function. In summary, the available evidence supports an effect of particulate air pollutants on endothelial function in both conduit and resistance vessels including the coronary circulation. Moreover, chronic exposure may be responsible for endothelial dysfunction from changes in arterial stiffness and afterload that may translate into persistent hypertension. Both low and high levels of traffic related air pollutants are well associated with incident hypertension [99,100]. Similarly, persistent variations in endothelial function and blood pressure may confer susceptibility to atherosclerosis. In the largest study linking chronic exposures to coronary artery calcium (MESA-Air cohort, n = 6795 across 6 U S. regions), each 5 μg/m3 increase in long-term PM2.5 exposure was associated with a greater progression of CAC (4.1 Agatston units/year). PM2.5 was not associated with IMT progression in this study [101].

Insights from prevention studies

The effect of several dietary supplements have been studied in relation to the effects of air pollution on cardiovascular system [102]. Because oxidative stress is a major initiating pathway with a relationship between levels of pollutants and anti-oxidant systems, many studies have focused on antioxidant supplementation [103]. Vitamin C supplementation prevents acute lung effects induced by NO2 and ozone exposure and has been shown to modify the relationship between PM10 and COPD/asthma hospitalizations [[104], [105], [106]]. In a study of coal power-plant workers in Brazil, 6 months of vitamins C and E normalized oxidative stress markers (e.g., SOD, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and glutathione S-transferase) [107]. In a randomized trial in Detroit, one-time vitamin C supplementation did not affect acute BP effect of concentrated PM on blood pressure [108]. At least one study has shown that antioxidant supplementation (vitamin C and NAC) increased vasoconstriction in response to diesel-exhaust inhalation [109]. At the population level, a recent study of more than half a million individuals in the United States followed for 17 years showed that Mediterranean diet was associated with attenuation of the association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular events [110]. In a recently published randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 65 healthy young adults in China, fish-oil supplementation (2.5 g/day) prevented PM2.5 increase in blood markers of inflammation, coagulation, endothelial function, oxidative stress, and neuroendocrine stress response [111]. Thus, while there is protective effects of vitamins and nutrient supplementation against air pollution effects, these effects are often with short term administration on surrogate end-points. Further research is needed to identify whether additional dietary supplements or specific diet can attenuate or prevent the effects of air pollution.

Current challenges in elucidation of the role of oxidant stress in air pollution toxicity

The underlying mechanisms by which PM-induced oxidant stress responses mediate inflammation and exert biological effects are very complex. There are three broad strenuous questions listed below related to delineating the exact role of ROS in the air pollution mediated pathologies and these need to be kept in consideration while defining the mechanism involved in air pollution mediated adverse health complications.

Sources of oxidant stress

Oxidant stress can directly originate from the PM including redox cycling of PM components as well as through various intracellular sources. There are several animal studies that provide evidence for the contribution of endogenous cellular sources that manipulation of ROS pathways through knock out or other models modulate effects of air pollution exposure that have been reviewed previously [25]. Cellular Contributions From Immune Cells and Non-Immune Cells: The exact contribution of reactive oxygen species from immune cells versus non-immune cells such as endothelial and epithelial cells is important to understand the locus of effects and in identifying the potential therapeutic targets [23].

Transduction of PM-induced pulmonary oxidative stress in mediating systemic responses

Elements present the PM could directly induce oxidative damage in the pulmonary system. The initial inflammation and ROS generated in the lung is beneficial to remove the deleterious stimuli and initiate tissue repair. However, the protracted inflammation in the lung and dysregulated ROS and antioxidant response may lead to systemic effects. The role of pulmonary oxidative stress and various damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) including, oxidatively modified lipoproteins, oxDNA, ssRNA, dsRNA, HMGB1 and mitochondrial protein and their impact by binding to various receptors (Toll-like receptors [TLRs] and RAGE) in triggering systemic cytokine and chemokines are also important areas of research [23,[112], [113], [114]].

Conclusions and future studies

In conclusion, oxidative stress is a critical intermediator in the transduction of systemic toxicity associated with air pollution exposure. The role of endogenous antioxidant defenses particularly, with chronic exposure will need further exploration. The importance of personal protective measures in reducing air pollution exposure and their effects on key oxidative stress pathways and anti-oxidant defense mechanisms are important areas in future research.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.
  151 in total

Review 1.  The innate and adaptive immune response induced by alveolar macrophages exposed to ambient particulate matter.

Authors:  Ryohei Miyata; Stephan F van Eeden
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Mitochondrial ROS and NLRP3 inflammasome in acute ozone-induced murine model of airway inflammation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Authors:  Mengmeng Xu; Lei Wang; Muyun Wang; Hanying Wang; Hai Zhang; Yuqing Chen; Xiaohui Wang; Jicheng Gong; Junfeng Jim Zhang; Ian M Adcock; Kian Fan Chung; Feng Li
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2019-06-27

3.  Effect of early particulate air pollution exposure on obesity in mice: role of p47phox.

Authors:  Xiaohua Xu; Zubin Yavar; Matt Verdin; Zhekang Ying; Georgeta Mihai; Thomas Kampfrath; Aixia Wang; Mianhua Zhong; Morton Lippmann; Lung-Chi Chen; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Qinghua Sun
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution Is Associated With Endothelial Injury and Systemic Inflammation.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Aruni Bhatnagar; James P McCracken; Wesley Abplanalp; Daniel J Conklin; Timothy O'Toole
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  AMPKα2 deficiency exacerbates long-term PM2.5 exposure-induced lung injury and cardiac dysfunction.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Xiyue Shen; Guoxiong Tian; Xili Shi; Wei Huang; Yongguang Wu; Lei Sun; Can Peng; Shasha Liu; Ying Huang; Xiaoyu Chen; Fang Zhang; Yingjie Chen; Wenjun Ding; Zhongbing Lu
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 6.  Dietary and pharmacological intervention to mitigate the cardiopulmonary effects of air pollution toxicity.

Authors:  Haiyan Tong
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-05-14

7.  Exercise training prevented endothelium dysfunction from particulate matter instillation in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Baihuan Feng; Rongzhen Qi; Jianing Gao; Tong Wang; Hongbing Xu; Qian Zhao; Rongshan Wu; Xiaoming Song; Jianjun Guo; Lemin Zheng; Ran Li; Wei Huang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Exercise does not ameliorate cardiac dysfunction in obese mice exposed to fine particulate matter.

Authors:  Jacob A Grimmer; Vineeta Tanwar; Dane J Youtz; Jeremy M Adelstein; Stephen H Baine; Cynthia A Carnes; Lisa A Baer; Kristin I Stanford; Loren E Wold
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Inhalation Exposure to PM2.5 Counteracts Hepatic Steatosis in Mice Fed High-fat Diet by Stimulating Hepatic Autophagy.

Authors:  Yining Qiu; Ze Zheng; Hyunbae Kim; Zhao Yang; Gary Zhang; Xiangyang Shi; Fei Sun; Changya Peng; Yuchuan Ding; Aixia Wang; Lung-Chi Chen; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Qinghua Sun; Kezhong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Personal PM2.5 exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood.

Authors:  Mette Sørensen; Bahram Daneshvar; Max Hansen; Lars O Dragsted; Ole Hertel; Lisbeth Knudsen; Steffen Loft
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  23 in total

1.  Solar and geomagnetic activity reduces pulmonary function and enhances particulate pollution effects.

Authors:  Kritika Anand; Carolina L Z Vieira; Eric Garshick; Veronica Wang; Annelise Blomberg; Diane R Gold; Joel Schwartz; Pantel Vokonas; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 2.  Impacts of Environmental Insults on Cardiovascular Aging.

Authors:  Yang Lan; Shaowei Wu
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Prenatal Ambient Ultrafine Particle Exposure and Childhood Asthma in the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  Rosalind J Wright; Hsiao-Hsien Leon Hsu; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Brent A Coull; Matthew C Simon; Neelakshi Hudda; Joel Schwartz; Itai Kloog; John L Durant
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 30.528

4.  How long-term air pollution and its metal constituents affect type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence? Results from Wuhan Chronic Disease Cohort.

Authors:  Meijin Chen; Qiujun Qin; Feifei Liu; Yixuan Wang; Chuangxin Wu; Yaqiong Yan; Hao Xiang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 8.431

5.  Extracellular vesicles enclosed-miR-421 suppresses air pollution (PM2.5 )-induced cardiac dysfunction via ACE2 signalling.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Tianhui Wang; Wei Rui; Jinxin Xie; Yuling Xie; Xiao Zhang; Longfei Guan; Guoping Li; Zhiyong Lei; Raymond M Schiffelers; Joost P G Sluijter; Junjie Xiao
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2022-05

6.  Clinical Manifestations and Changes of Haematological Markers among Active People Living in Polluted City: The Case of Douala, Cameroon.

Authors:  Tiekwe Joseph Eloge; Ongbayokolak Nadine; Dabou Solange; Phélix Bruno Telefo; Isabella Annesi-Maesano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ambient air pollution exposure during the late gestational period is linked with lower placental iodine load in a Belgian birth cohort.

Authors:  Kristof Y Neven; Congrong Wang; Bram G Janssen; Harry A Roels; Charlotte Vanpoucke; Ann Ruttens; Tim S Nawrot
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 8.  Brain arteriolosclerosis.

Authors:  Brittney L Blevins; Harry V Vinters; Seth Love; Donna M Wilcock; Lea T Grinberg; Julie A Schneider; Rajesh N Kalaria; Yuriko Katsumata; Brian T Gold; Danny J J Wang; Samantha J Ma; Lincoln M P Shade; David W Fardo; Anika M S Hartz; Gregory A Jicha; Karin B Nelson; Shino D Magaki; Frederick A Schmitt; Merilee A Teylan; Eseosa T Ighodaro; Panhavuth Phe; Erin L Abner; Matthew D Cykowski; Linda J Van Eldik; Peter T Nelson
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Environmental Epigenetics of Diesel Particulate Matter Toxicogenomics.

Authors:  Stephanie M Bilinovich; Kristy Lewis; Barbara L Thompson; Jeremy W Prokop; Daniel B Campbell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Age and Gender Effects on Genotoxicity in Diesel Exhaust Particles Exposed C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Joong Won Lee; Jin Sik Kim; Hee Jae Lee; Ji-Hye Jang; Ja-Hyun Kim; Woo Jong Sim; Yong-Beom Lim; Ji-Won Jung; Hyun Joung Lim
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.