Petra Haberzettl1, Daniel J Conklin1, Wesley T Abplanalp1, Aruni Bhatnagar1, Timothy E O'Toole2. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY. 2. From the Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Obesity Center, Institute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, KY. tim.otoole@louisville.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is associated with the depletion of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), as well as vascular injury and dysfunction. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether PM2.5 exposure leads to significant impairments in EPC function. Hence, we studied the effects of PM2.5 on EPC-mediated recovery of vascular perfusion after hindlimb ischemia and examined the mechanisms whereby PM2.5 exposure affects EPC abundance and function. APPROACH AND RESULTS: In comparison with EPCs isolated from mice breathing filtered air, EPCs from mice exposed for 9 consecutive days (6 hours per day) to concentrated ambient PM2.5 (CAP) had defects in both proliferation and tube formation. However, CAP exposure of mice overexpressing extracellular superoxide dismutase (ecSOD-Tg) in the lungs did not affect EPC tube formation. Exposure to CAP also suppressed circulating EPC levels, VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-stimulated aortic Akt phosphorylation, and plasma NO levels in wild-type but not in ecSOD-Tg mice. EPCs from CAP-exposed wild-type mice failed to augment basal recovery of hindlimb perfusion when injected into unexposed mice subjected to hindlimb ischemia; however, these deficits in recovery of hindlimb perfusion were absent when using EPCs derived from CAP-exposed ecSOD-Tg mice. The improved reparative function of EPCs from CAP-exposed ecSOD-Tg mice was also reflected by greater expression of Mmp-9 and Nos3 when compared with EPCs from CAP-exposed wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to PM2.5 impairs EPC abundance and function and prevents EPC-mediated vascular recovery after hindlimb ischemia. This defect is attributed, in part, to pulmonary oxidative stress and was associated with vascular VEGF resistance and a decrement in NO bioavailability.
OBJECTIVE: Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution is associated with the depletion of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), as well as vascular injury and dysfunction. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether PM2.5 exposure leads to significant impairments in EPC function. Hence, we studied the effects of PM2.5 on EPC-mediated recovery of vascular perfusion after hindlimb ischemia and examined the mechanisms whereby PM2.5 exposure affects EPC abundance and function. APPROACH AND RESULTS: In comparison with EPCs isolated from mice breathing filtered air, EPCs from mice exposed for 9 consecutive days (6 hours per day) to concentrated ambient PM2.5 (CAP) had defects in both proliferation and tube formation. However, CAP exposure of mice overexpressing extracellular superoxide dismutase (ecSOD-Tg) in the lungs did not affect EPC tube formation. Exposure to CAP also suppressed circulating EPC levels, VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-stimulated aortic Akt phosphorylation, and plasma NO levels in wild-type but not in ecSOD-Tgmice. EPCs from CAP-exposed wild-type mice failed to augment basal recovery of hindlimb perfusion when injected into unexposed mice subjected to hindlimb ischemia; however, these deficits in recovery of hindlimb perfusion were absent when using EPCs derived from CAP-exposed ecSOD-Tgmice. The improved reparative function of EPCs from CAP-exposed ecSOD-Tgmice was also reflected by greater expression of Mmp-9 and Nos3 when compared with EPCs from CAP-exposed wild-type mice. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to PM2.5 impairs EPC abundance and function and prevents EPC-mediated vascular recovery after hindlimb ischemia. This defect is attributed, in part, to pulmonary oxidative stress and was associated with vascular VEGF resistance and a decrement in NO bioavailability.
Authors: Thomas Kampfrath; Andrei Maiseyeu; Zhekang Ying; Zubair Shah; Jeffrey A Deiuliis; Xiaohua Xu; Nisharahmed Kherada; Robert D Brook; Kongara M Reddy; Nitin P Padture; Sampath Parthasarathy; Lung Chi Chen; Susan Moffatt-Bruce; Qinghua Sun; Henning Morawietz; Sanjay Rajagopalan Journal: Circ Res Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Katherine A Gallagher; Zhao-Jun Liu; Min Xiao; Haiying Chen; Lee J Goldstein; Donald G Buerk; April Nedeau; Stephen R Thom; Omaida C Velazquez Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: C Arden Pope; Richard T Burnett; George D Thurston; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; Daniel Krewski; John J Godleski Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nino Künzli; Michael Jerrett; Wendy J Mack; Bernardo Beckerman; Laurie LaBree; Frank Gilliland; Duncan Thomas; John Peters; Howard N Hodis Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Timothy E O'Toole; Xiaohong Li; Daniel W Riggs; David J Hoetker; Ray Yeager; Pawel Lorkiewicz; Shahid P Baba; Nigel G F Cooper; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Inhal Toxicol Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 2.724
Authors: Hye Ryeong Bae; Mark Chandy; Juan Aguilera; Eric M Smith; Kari C Nadeau; Joseph C Wu; David T Paik Journal: Trends Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 8.049
Authors: Daniel W Riggs; Nagma Zafar; Sathya Krishnasamy; Ray Yeager; Shesh N Rai; Aruni Bhatnagar; Timothy E O'Toole Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Hong S Lu; Ann Marie Schmidt; Robert A Hegele; Nigel Mackman; Daniel J Rader; Christian Weber; Alan Daugherty Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 8.311