Literature DB >> 32504198

The burden of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19: charting the uncharted.

Antonio Landi1, Stefano De Servi2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32504198      PMCID: PMC7274268          DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02393-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a pandemic of unprecedent proportions, overwhelming worldwide healthcare organizations. The complex pathophysiological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary infection and their impact on cardiovascular system are rapidly evolving, shedding lights on the role of “pro-thrombotic state” in critically ill patients. Indeed, elevation of lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer and fibrin degradation products, thrombocythemia and prolonged thrombin time are common findings, suggesting that cytokine storm leads to coagulation cascade activation and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in severe COVID-19 patients. Emerging evidences, coming from small post-mortem studies, seem to support a link between virus infection and thrombotic complications, with pathological evidence of high rate of pulmonary micro-thrombosis. Moreover, areas of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage may be found, as final consequence of coagulation factors depletion and DIC. The mortality rate of patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is nowadays up to 30%, requiring a careful assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk in order to set a real fit-tailored treatment. Recently, several observational studies investigated the prevalence of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU (Table 1). Klok and colleagues analyzed 184 critically ill ICU patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, a selected population at high risk of thrombotic complications [1]. Despite all patients received antithrombotic treatment (at least thromboprophylaxis regimen), they found a remarkable cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications (31%) in this population. Of note, pulmonary embolism was the most common cause (81%), followed by other venous thromboembolic (VTE) and arterial thrombotic events. This high rate of thrombotic complications in severe COVID-19 is of utmost importance, although current recommendations suggest only prophylactic dose of heparin once daily. On the other hand, systemic and multiorgan involvement in advanced phases of COVID-19 pneumonia may lead to renal failure, liver dysfunction, thrombocytopenia and coagulation disorders, which increase bleeding hazard.
Table 1

Main characteristics of studies enrolling critically ill patients with COVID-19

Klok et al. (n = 184) [1]Lodigiani et al. (n = 61) [2]Helms et al. (n = 150) [3]Thomas et al. (n = 63) [4]
Age (years)—mean64 (SD 12)61; IQR (55–69)63; IQR (53–71)59 (SD 13)
Male sex (%)139 (76%)49 (80.3%)122 (81.3%)44 (69%)
Body weight (kg, SD)87 (16)BMI ≥30 in 17/57 (29.8%)n.a88 (20)
Active cancer (%)5 (2.7%)2 (3.3%)9 (6.0%)1 (2%)
Therapeutic anticoagulation at admission (%)17 (9.2%)2 (3.3%)n.a1 (2%)
Invasive mechanical ventilation (%)n.an.a150 (100%)52 (83%)
Heparin treatment (%)
 Prophylactic184 (100%)a59/61 (96.7%)105 (70%)63 (100%)
 Therapeutic02/61 (3.3%)45 (30%)0
Median D-dimer (mg/L)n.an.a2.27 [1.16–20.0]394 [122–3627]
Thrombotic complications
 Pulmonary embolism25 (13.6%)2/48 (4.2%)25 (16.7%)5 (7.9%)
 Other venous thromboembolic events3 (1.6%)6/48 (12.5%)3 (2.0%)1 (1.6%)
 Arterial thrombotic events3 (1.6%)4/48 (8.3%)4 (2.7%)2 (3.2%)

aRegimens differed between centers and doses increased over time

Main characteristics of studies enrolling critically ill patients with COVID-19 aRegimens differed between centers and doses increased over time Lodigiani et al. described a cohort of patients in a single center ICU in Italy, of which 8/48 (16.7%) developed thromboembolic complications (including VTE, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome), although all patients received heparin treatment [2]. A multicenter French study of 150 COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU found a prevalence of thrombosis of 43%, despite prophylactic or therapeutic heparin treatment [3]. Thomas et al. investigated a cohort of 63 COVID-19 patients from a tertiary center in United Kingdom and found that the cumulative incidence estimate of VTE events was 27% (95% confidence interval 10–47%) and arterial thrombosis 4% (95% CI 1–12%) [4]. Baseline characteristics, heparin treatment and thrombotic complications of studies investigating the prevalence of thrombotic complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are summarized in Table 1 [2-4]. However, in real clinical practice, facing COVID-19 pneumonia and its related VTE events, thrombotic risk assessment should be carefully adjusted and counterbalanced with bleeding risk. To this regard, Padua Prediction Score (PPS), which was developed to predict VTE events in hospitalized medical patients, may be supportive in decision-making process of optimal heparin treatment (conventional prophylaxis doses versus therapeutic regimen) in severe COVID-19 patients. As shown in the Fig. 1, a PPS of 4 or more identifies patients at high risk of VTE. The predictive ability of PPS has recently been evaluated in a cohort of 1.026 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 [5]. High-risk patients with PPS ≥4 were older and more prone to be admitted to ICU (12% in PPS ≥4 versus 1% in PPS <4; OR 12.82, 95% CI 5.00–32.91; p < 0.0001) or to undergo mechanical ventilation (14% in PPS ≥4 versus 1% in PPS <4; OR 13.17, 95% CI 5.56–31.19; p < 0.0001) than low-risk patients. Moreover, mortality rate was higher in COVID-19 patients with PPS ≥4 [5].
Fig. 1

Padua Prediction Score (PPS) for venous thromboembolic risk assessment. Assigning 1–3 points to each determinant, a score ≥4 identifies patients at high risk of thromboembolic complications. MI myocardial infarction, VTE venous thromboembolism, BMI body mass index

Padua Prediction Score (PPS) for venous thromboembolic risk assessment. Assigning 1–3 points to each determinant, a score ≥4 identifies patients at high risk of thromboembolic complications. MI myocardial infarction, VTE venous thromboembolism, BMI body mass index Dealing with lights and shadows of this pandemic and uncertainties regarding optimal anti-thrombotic strategies, a one-size-fits-all strategy cannot be applied in patients admitted to ICU and an individualized approach should guide the complex management of these patients in a fine balance between ischemic and bleeding complications. Thrombotic hazard should be counterbalanced with bleeding risk, especially in advanced stages of COVID-19 disease. Further studies are warranted to develop or validate novel prediction systems, aiming to guide the challenging and fast-evolving management of COVID-19 critically ill patients.
  5 in total

1.  Thrombotic complications of patients admitted to intensive care with COVID-19 at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  W Thomas; J Varley; A Johnston; E Symington; M Robinson; K Sheares; A Lavinio; M Besser
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  Attention should be paid to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the management of COVID-19.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Ruchong Chen; Chunli Liu; Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruidi Tang; Chunli Tang; Nuofu Zhang; Nanshan Zhong; Shiyue Li
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 18.959

3.  Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy.

Authors:  Corrado Lodigiani; Giacomo Iapichino; Luca Carenzo; Maurizio Cecconi; Paola Ferrazzi; Tim Sebastian; Nils Kucher; Jan-Dirk Studt; Clara Sacco; Alexia Bertuzzi; Maria Teresa Sandri; Stefano Barco
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julie Helms; Charles Tacquard; François Severac; Ian Leonard-Lorant; Mickaël Ohana; Xavier Delabranche; Hamid Merdji; Raphaël Clere-Jehl; Malika Schenck; Florence Fagot Gandet; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Vincent Castelain; Francis Schneider; Lélia Grunebaum; Eduardo Anglés-Cano; Laurent Sattler; Paul-Michel Mertes; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  F A Klok; M J H A Kruip; N J M van der Meer; M S Arbous; D A M P J Gommers; K M Kant; F H J Kaptein; J van Paassen; M A M Stals; M V Huisman; H Endeman
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.944

  5 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary embolism and screening for concomitant proximal deep vein thrombosis in noncritically ill hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Chiara Lazzeri; Manuela Bonizzoli; Andrea Franci; Filippo Socci; Adriano Peris
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Red blood cell exchange for SARS-CoV-2: A Gemini of therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Sean M Hacking
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  Combined lung and cardiac ultrasound in COVID-related acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Chiara Lazzeri; Manuela Bonizzoli; Stefano Batacchi; Filippo Socci; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Adriano Peris
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Inflammation on Selected Organ Systems of the Human Body.

Authors:  Marta Kopańska; Edyta Barnaś; Joanna Błajda; Barbara Kuduk; Anna Łagowska; Agnieszka Banaś-Ząbczyk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Utilization of machine-learning models to accurately predict the risk for critical COVID-19.

Authors:  Dan Assaf; Ya'ara Gutman; Yair Neuman; Gad Segal; Sharon Amit; Shiraz Gefen-Halevi; Noya Shilo; Avi Epstein; Ronit Mor-Cohen; Asaf Biber; Galia Rahav; Itzchak Levy; Amit Tirosh
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Routine measurement of d-dimers on suspected SARS-CoV2-infected patients does not lead to significant increase in radiological investigations.

Authors:  Mikkel Brabrand; Søren Bie Bogh; Marianne Fløjstrup; John Kellett; Tim Cooksley; Christian H Nickel
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  "COVID-19: diagnosis, management and prognosis": a new topical collection of Internal and Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Riccardo Polosa; Michele Spinicci; Domenico Prisco
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  COVID-19, coagulopathy and venous thromboembolism: more questions than answers.

Authors:  Marco Marietta; Valeria Coluccio; Mario Luppi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.472

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.