Literature DB >> 32291094

Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19.

F A Klok1, M J H A Kruip2, N J M van der Meer3, M S Arbous4, D A M P J Gommers5, K M Kant6, F H J Kaptein7, J van Paassen4, M A M Stals7, M V Huisman7, H Endeman5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolism due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation. Reports on the incidence of thrombotic complications are however not available.
METHODS: We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital.
RESULTS: We studied 184 ICU patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia of whom 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020. All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis. The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%). PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%). Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.
CONCLUSION: The 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high. Our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are strongly suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, even in the absence of randomized evidence.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Deep vein thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Stroke; Thromboprophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32291094      PMCID: PMC7146714          DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


COVID-19 may predispose to both venous and arterial thromboembolic disease due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse intravascular coagulation (DIC) [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Remarkably, thrombotic complications have hardly been described [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Precise knowledge of the incidence of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients is important for decision making with regard to intensity of thromboprophylaxis, especially in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who are at highest thrombotic risk. We evaluated the incidence of the composite outcome of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombotic complications in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 2 Dutch university hospitals and 1 Dutch teaching hospital. Our composite outcome consisted of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or systemic arterial embolism. Importantly, in all participating hospitals, diagnostic tests were only applied if thrombotic complications were clinically suspected. We calculated the cumulative incidence of the composite outcome, as well as for the venous and arterial thrombotic complications separately. The index date was the moment of ICU admission. Patients were followed until ICU discharge, until they died, or until April 5th 2020, whichever came first. We performed backward conditional regression analyses to identify relevant determinants. The Institutional Review Boards of the participating hospitals waived the need for informed consent due to the observational nature of our study. We studied 184 patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia (Table 1 ) admitted to the ICU between March 7th and April 5th 2020. Of those, 23 died (13%), 22 were discharged alive (12%) and 139 (76%) were still on the ICU on April 5th 2020. The median duration of the observation per patient was 7 days (IQR 1-13). All patients received at least standard doses thromboprophylaxis, although regimens differed between hospitals and doses increased over time (Table 2 ). The cumulative incidence of the composite outcome was 31% (95%CI 20-41%; Fig. 1 , Table 3 ), of which CTPA and/or ultrasonography confirmed VTE in 27% (95%CI 17-37%) and arterial thrombotic events in 3.7% (95%CI 0-8.2%). PE was the most frequent thrombotic complication (n = 25, 81%). Age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.05/per year, 95%CI 1.004-1.01) and coagulopathy, defined as spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time > 3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time > 5 s (aHR 4.1, 95%CI 1.9-9.1), were independent predictors of thrombotic complications.
Table 1

Characteristics of included patients.

Age (Mean, standard deviation)64 (12)
Male sex (number, %)139 (76)
Body weight (mean, standard deviation)87 (16)
Active cancer (number, %)5 (2.7)
Coagulopathy during admissiona (n, %)70 (38)
Therapeutic anticoagulation at admission (n, %)17 (9.2)
Renal replacement therapy during admission (n, %)23 (13%)

Defined as: spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) >3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) > 5 s.

Table 2

Local protocol for thromboprophylaxis in participating centres for patients admitted to the intensive care unit during the study period.

Site
Leiden University Medical Centernadroparin 2850 IU sc per day or 5700 IU per day if body weight > 100 kg
Erasmus University Medical CenterNadroparin 5700 IU per day; nadroparin 5700 IU sc twice daily from April 4th 2020 and onwards
Amphia Hospital BredaNadroparin 2850 IU sc per day or 5700 IU per day if body weight > 100 kg;nadroparin 5700 IU sc per day from March 30th 2020 and onwards
Fig. 1

Cumulative incidence of venous and arterial thrombotic complications during the course of intensive care unit admission of patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia.

Table 3

Description of thrombotic complications.

Type of eventNumber of casesRelevant details
Pulmonary embolism25

18 cases with at least PE in segmental arteries, 7 cases PE limited to subsegmental arteries

Other venous thromboembolic events3

1 proximal deep-vein thrombosis of the leg

2 catheter related upper extremity thrombosis

Arterial thrombotic events3

All ischemic strokes

Note: acute pulmonary embolism was diagnosed with CT-pulmonary angiography, deep vein thrombosis/upper extremity vein thrombosis was diagnosed with ultrasonography, strokes were diagnosed with CT.

Characteristics of included patients. Defined as: spontaneous prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) >3 s or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) > 5 s. Local protocol for thromboprophylaxis in participating centres for patients admitted to the intensive care unit during the study period. Cumulative incidence of venous and arterial thrombotic complications during the course of intensive care unit admission of patients with proven COVID-19 pneumonia. Description of thrombotic complications. 18 cases with at least PE in segmental arteries, 7 cases PE limited to subsegmental arteries 1 proximal deep-vein thrombosis of the leg 2 catheter related upper extremity thrombosis All ischemic strokes Note: acute pulmonary embolism was diagnosed with CT-pulmonary angiography, deep vein thrombosis/upper extremity vein thrombosis was diagnosed with ultrasonography, strokes were diagnosed with CT. Despite systematic thrombosis prophylaxis, the 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in ICU patients with COVID-19 infections is remarkably high and well comparable to the VTE incidence in other patient categories with overt DIC [5]. Notably, none of our patients actually developed DIC. What are the consequences of our observations? First, they represent a conservative estimation, because the majority of patients was still on the ICU and therefore at risk after the described observation period. Also, VTE is more difficult to recognize in intubated patients with a higher threshold to perform diagnostic imaging tests because of strict isolation. If VTE screening had been applied, the incidence could have been even higher. We have to acknowledge that due to the design of the study, we could not adjust our findings for the actual administered doses of nadroparin, nor study the effect of the changes in the local protocols for thromboprophylaxis indicated in Table 2. In view of this, our findings reinforce the recommendation to strictly apply pharmacological thrombosis prophylaxis in all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, and are suggestive of increasing the prophylaxis towards high-prophylactic doses, e.g. going from enoxaparin 40 mg OD to 40 mg BID, even in the absence of randomized evidence. Finally, we propose that, rather than treating all patients with COVID-19 infections at the ICU with therapeutic anticoagulation, physicians should be vigilant for signs of thrombotic complications, and order appropriate diagnostic tests at a low threshold [5].

Author contributions

FAK, MJHAK and MWH designed the study based on the observations of HE and DAMPJG. FAK, MJHAK, FHJK, MAMS, NJMvdM and KMK gathered data. FAK and MVH performed the analyses drafted the first version of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and agree with the final version.
  5 in total

Review 1.  How I treat disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Authors:  Marcel Levi; Marie Scully
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Di Wu; Huilong Chen; Weiming Yan; Danlei Yang; Guang Chen; Ke Ma; Dong Xu; Haijing Yu; Hongwu Wang; Tao Wang; Wei Guo; Jia Chen; Chen Ding; Xiaoping Zhang; Jiaquan Huang; Meifang Han; Shusheng Li; Xiaoping Luo; Jianping Zhao; Qin Ning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

  5 in total
  1636 in total

1.  Atypical Deep Cerebral Vein Thrombosis with Hemorrhagic Venous Infarction in a Patient Positive for COVID-19.

Authors:  L Chougar; B Mathon; N Weiss; V Degos; N Shor
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  CT-derived pulmonary vascular metrics and clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Pietro Spagnolo; Andrea Cozzi; Riccardo Alessandro Foà; Angelo Spinazzola; Lorenzo Monfardini; Claudio Bnà; Marco Alì; Simone Schiaffino; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-06

3.  Subacute stent thrombosis in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Mohamed Ayan; Swathi Kovelamudi; Malek Al-Hawwas
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-09-08

4.  Ascending aortic thrombus with multiple emboli associated with COVID-19.

Authors:  Portia Schmidt; Javier Vasquez; Bryce Gagliano; Alastair J Moore; Charles S Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Neurologic Involvement in COVID-19: Cause or Coincidence? A Neuroimaging Perspective.

Authors:  A Pons-Escoda; P Naval-Baudín; C Majós; A Camins; P Cardona; M Cos; N Calvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Neurovascular Complications in COVID-19 Infection: Case Series.

Authors:  A M Franceschi; R Arora; R Wilson; L Giliberto; R B Libman; M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Medication use during COVID-19: Review of recent evidence.

Authors:  T S Brandon Ng; Kori Leblanc; Darwin F Yeung; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Thrombosis of the Portal Vein and Superior Mesenteric Vein in a Patient With Subclinical COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Jasneet Randhawa; Jasveen Kaur; Harneet S Randhawa; Sifatpreet Kaur; Harinderpal Singh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 9.  Review of Pharmacotherapy Trialed for Management of the Coronavirus Disease-19.

Authors:  Kimberly Hall; Fuhbe Mfone; Michael Shallcross; Vikas Pathak
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2021-06

10.  Skin manifestations of COVID-19 resembling acute limb ischemia.

Authors:  Madeline Heald; John Fish; Fedor Lurie
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.