Literature DB >> 3250334

Starch-based conditioned flavor preferences in rats: influence of taste, calories and CS-US delay.

G Elizalde1, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

Six experiments examined the rat's preference for flavors associated with hydrolysed starch (Polycose) solutions. Hungry rats developed a preference for a flavor (CS+) mixed into a saccharin-sweetened 16% Polycose solution over a flavor (CS-) mixed in saccharin-water. The addition of acarbose, a drug which inhibits starch digestion, to the Polycose solution blocked the flavor preference. This finding indicates that it is the postingestive rather than the taste properties of Polycose that condition flavor preferences. Rats also developed a preference for a CS+ flavor that preceded the ingestion of a Polycose solution by 10 min. This flavor conditioning, however, was not obtained in all experiments. Some CS flavors may be more effective than others in producing conditioned flavor preferences over a delay. Preference conditioning over a delay was facilitated when the rats had previously learned that the taste of the US (Polycose) was not associated with rapid caloric repletion; this was accomplished by giving the rats prior exposure to a Polycose + acarbose solution. Rats with such pre-exposure learned to prefer a CS + flavor that preceded by 10 to 60 min the consumption of a Polycose solution (without acarbose). The results demonstrate that calorie-based flavor preferences can be conditioned over a delay, but conditioning is influenced by the nature of the CS and US stimuli used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3250334     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6663(88)80002-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  10 in total

1.  Flavor avoidance learning based on missing calories but not on palatability reduction.

Authors:  Robert A Boakes; Angela E Patterson; Dorothy W S Kwok
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Unconditioned stimulus devaluation effects in nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Vincent Campese; Vincent M LoLordo; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

3.  Development of leptin resistance in sucrose drinking rats is associated with consuming carbohydrate-containing solutions and not calorie-free sweet solution.

Authors:  Ruth B S Harris
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Yeh-Min Yiin; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-12-21

5.  Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer.

Authors:  Felisa González; Enrique Morillas; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Role of lipolysis in postoral and oral fat preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  The CS-US delay gradient in flavor preference conditioning with intragastric carbohydrate infusions.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Debra Blusk Drucker; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-05

8.  The role of viscosity in flavor preference: plasticity and interactions with taste.

Authors:  Sarah E Colbert; Cody S Triplett; Joost X Maier
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.985

9.  Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Kristine B Bonacchi; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

10.  Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.