Giuseppe Terrazzano1,2, Sara Bruzzaniti3,4, Valentina Rubino1,2, Marianna Santopaolo3, Anna Teresa Palatucci1, Angela Giovazzino2, Claudia La Rocca3, Paola de Candia5, Annibale Puca5, Francesco Perna6, Claudio Procaccini3,7, Veronica De Rosa3,7, Chiara Porcellini2, Salvatore De Simone3, Valentina Fattorusso2, Antonio Porcellini4, Enza Mozzillo2, Riccardo Troncone2,8, Adriana Franzese2, Johnny Ludvigsson9, Giuseppe Matarese10,11, Giuseppina Ruggiero12, Mario Galgani13,14. 1. Dipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi di Potenza, Potenza, Italy. 2. Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. 3. Laboratorio di Immunologia, Istituto per l'Endocrinologia e l'Oncologia Sperimentale G. Salvatore, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Naples, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. 5. Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico MultiMedica, Milan, Italy. 6. Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. 7. Unità di Neuroimmunologia, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy. 8. European Laboratory for the Investigation of Food-Induced Disease, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. 9. Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University and Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. 10. Laboratorio di Immunologia, Istituto per l'Endocrinologia e l'Oncologia Sperimentale G. Salvatore, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Naples, Italy. giuseppe.matarese@unina.it. 11. Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. giuseppe.matarese@unina.it. 12. Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. giruggie@unina.it. 13. Laboratorio di Immunologia, Istituto per l'Endocrinologia e l'Oncologia Sperimentale G. Salvatore, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Naples, Italy. mario.galgani@unina.it. 14. Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy. mario.galgani@unina.it.
Abstract
An unresolved issue in autoimmunity is the lack of surrogate biomarkers of immunological self-tolerance for disease monitoring. Here, we show that peripheral frequency of a regulatory T cell population, characterized by the co-expression of CD3 and CD56 molecules (TR3-56), is reduced in subjects with new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). In three independent T1D cohorts, we find that low frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells is associated with reduced β-cell function and with the presence of diabetic ketoacidosis. As autoreactive CD8+ T cells mediate disruption of insulin-producing β-cells1-3, we demonstrate that TR3-56 cells can suppress CD8+ T cell functions in vitro by reducing levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species. The suppressive function, phenotype and transcriptional signature of TR3-56 cells are also altered in T1D children. Together, our findings indicate that TR3-56 cells constitute a regulatory cell population that controls CD8+ effector functions, whose peripheral frequency may represent a traceable biomarker for monitoring immunological self-tolerance in T1D.
An unresolved issue in autoimmunity is the lack of surrogate biomarkers of immunological self-tolerance for disease monitoring. Here, we show that peripheral frequency of a regulatory T cell population, characterized by the co-expression of CD3 and CD56 molecules (TR3-56), is reduced in subjects with new-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). In three independent T1D cohorts, we find that low frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells is associated with reduced β-cell function and with the presence of diabetic ketoacidosis. As autoreactive CD8+ T cells mediate disruption of insulin-producing β-cells1-3, we demonstrate that TR3-56 cells can suppress CD8+ T cell functions in vitro by reducing levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species. The suppressive function, phenotype and transcriptional signature of TR3-56 cells are also altered in T1D children. Together, our findings indicate that TR3-56 cells constitute a regulatory cell population that controls CD8+ effector functions, whose peripheral frequency may represent a traceable biomarker for monitoring immunological self-tolerance in T1D.
T1D is an autoimmune disease characterized by T cell-mediated destruction of
insulin producing β-cells in the pancreas[2]. An unresolved issue in T1D is the lack of biomarkers able to
track immunological self-tolerance and disease progression in autoimmune disorders such
as T1D. Peripheral blood of healthy individuals contains a T cell subset co-expressing
CD3 and CD56 molecules[4], whose
peripheral frequency has been associated with different pathological
conditions[5,6]. We recently observed that the number of
CD3+CD56+ T cells present at T1D diagnosis, directly reflected
residual β-cell function one-year later[7].To gain further insight into the physio-pathological relevance and the potential
regulatory function of CD3+CD56+ T cells (herein defined as
TR3-56 cells), we first enumerated circulating TR3-56 cells
(see Supplementary Figure 1 for
gating strategy) in a large cohort (enrolled in Campania Region of Italy, herein
“Italian cohort”) of pre-puberty T1D children at disease onset (n=128), in
comparison with healthy children (n=113) (Supplementary Table 1). We found that T1D children had reduced
percentage and absolute number of TR3-56 cells compared with healthy controls
(Fig. 1a, left and
right). The observed differences were maintained also after adjusting
the comparison for sex, age and body mass index (BMI) (Extended Data 1a, left and right). The lower
frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells in T1D subjects associated, at least in
part, with their increased rate of necrotic death (1.5% ± 0.14, 3.9% ±
0.44 for healthy and T1D subjects, respectively), while no difference was observed in
apoptosis (Extended Data 1b, left and
right).
Fig. 1
TR3-56 cell enumeration predicts residual β-cell function
in T1D subjects at disease onset.
a, Percentage (left) and absolute number (right) of circulating
TR3-56 cells in pre-puberty T1D subjects (n=128 for percentage
and n=126 for absolute number, respectively) at disease onset (Italian cohort),
as compared with age-, sex-related healthy subjects (n=113). Data are presented
as box plots (min, max, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles), each dot
represents a individual subject. *p<0.0001 by two-tailed
Mann-Whitney U-test. b, Scatter plot showing positive correlation
between the frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells and serum levels of
fasting C-peptide in pre-puberty subjects (Italian cohort) affected by T1D
(n=128) at disease onset; r=0.71, p<0.0001 by two-tailed
Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading
indicates confidence interval. c, Scatter plot showing positive
correlation between the absolute number of circulating TR3-56 cells
and serum levels of fasting C-peptide in pre-puberty T1D subjects (n=126) at
disease onset from Italian cohort; r=0.57, p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and
shading indicates confidence interval. d, Box plots indicate the
percentage (left) and absolute number (right) of circulating TR3-56
cells in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=19 for percentage and n=18 for
absolute number, respectively) at disease onset (Italian cohort), as compared
with age-sex related healthy subjects (n=14). Each dot represents an individual
subject. Data are shown as described for a.
=0.0001, *p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. e, Scatter plot showing positive
correlation between the frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells and
serum levels of fasting C-peptide in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=19) at
disease onset from Italian cohort; r=0.46, p=0.0477 by
two-tailed Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and
shading indicates confidence interval. f, Scatter plot showing the
correlation between the absolute number of circulating TR3-56 cells
and serum levels of fasting C-peptide in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=18)
from Italian cohort; r=0.50, p=0.0369 by two-tailed
Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading
indicates confidence interval.
Extended Data Fig. 1
TR3-56 cell enumeration predicts residual β-cell
function and DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at disease onset.
a, Box plots indicate the percentage (left) and
absolute number (right) of circulating TR3-56 cells in
pre-puberty T1D subjects at disease onset from Italian cohort compared with
healthy subjects, after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Data are presented
as box plots (min, max, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles), each dot
represents a individual subjects (n=86 healthy subjects; n=128 T1D for
percentage of TR3-56 cells and n=126 T1D for absolute number of
TR3-56 cells). *p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. b, Box plots indicate the
percentage of necrotic (left) and apoptotic (right) rate of circulating
TR3-56 cells in healthy subjects (n=47) and T1D children at
disease onset (n=82) from Italian cohort. Data are presented as box plots
(min, max, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles), each dot represents a
individual subjects. *p<0.0001 by two-tailed
Mann-Whitney U-test. c, Left, logistic regression modeling
shows that percentage of TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or
absence of DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at diagnosis (n=128) from Italian
cohort. T1D subjects were dichotomized on the basis of the presence (Yes) or
absence (No) of DKA at disease diagnosis. Low numbers of TR3-56
cells at diagnosis associated with presence of DKA. Right, ROC curve of the
model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for the presence of
DKA. AUC=0.72. d, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that
absolute number of TR3-56 cell counts predicts the presence or
absence of DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at diagnosis (n=126) from Italian
cohort. Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of
TR3-56 cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.67.
e, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that percentage
of circulating TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or absence of
DKA in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=19) from Italian cohort. Right, ROC
curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for
the presence of DKA. AUC=0.88. f, Left, logistic regression
modeling shows that absolute number of TR3-56 cells predicts
presence of DKA in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=18) from Italian cohort.
Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56
cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.81.
Next, we asked whether TR3-56 cells associated with residual
pancreatic β-cell function (measured as circulating fasting C-peptide) in T1D at
disease onset. To this end we performed a bivariate analysis that revealed a positive
correlation between peripheral frequency and absolute number of TR3-56 cells
and fasting C-peptide levels (r=0.71, p<0.0001; r=0.57,
p<0.0001, respectively) (Fig.
1b,c).As diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and daily insulin dose
strongly influence T1D complication overtime[8,9], we applied a logistic
regression modeling on these parameters and revealed that low percentages of
TR3-56 cells were able to predict DKA at disease onset (Extended Data 1c, left). Prognostic
validity of the fitted model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
curve analysis and measured using the area under the curve (AUC) (Extended Data 1c, right). Low absolute counts of TR3-56
cells also associated with the presence of DKA (Extended
Data 1d, left and right). Finally, the frequency
and absolute numbers of TR3-56 cells did not associate either with HbA1c
values or with daily insulin dose (Supplementary Figure 2).We corroborated our findings also in post-puberty young T1D adults at diagnosis
(Italian cohort, n=19) (Supplementary
Table 2). Specifically, we observed that TR3-56 cell frequency and
absolute number were reduced compared to age-matched healthy subjects (n=14) (Fig. 1d, left and right),
positively correlated with plasma levels of fasting C-peptide (r=0.46,
p=0.047; r=0.50, p=0.0369, respectively) (Fig. 1e,f) and negatively associated with presence of
DKA (Extended Data 1e,f).Then, to further validate TR3-56 cells as traceable biomarker of T1D
progression, we analysed an independent cohort of children with recent-onset T1D (n=36)
recruited at Linköping University Hospital, Sweden (Supplementary Table 3). In this
validation cohort (herein defined as “Swedish cohort”), bivariate analysis
further confirmed that the frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells positively
correlated with fasting C-peptide (r=0.63, p<0.0001) (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2
Validation and specificity of TR3-56 cell predictive role.
a, Scatter plot showing positive correlation between the frequency
of circulating TR3-56 cells and serum levels of fasting C-peptide in
a validation cohort (Swedish cohort) of T1D children (n=36) at disease onset;
r=0.63, p<0.0001 by two-tailed Pearson's
correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading indicates confidence
interval. b, Scatter plot showing positive correlation between the
frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells and serum levels of fasting
C-peptide in a cohort of T1D children that developed other autoimmune conditions
after T1D diagnosis (n=23); r=0.57, p=0.0043 by two-tailed
Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading
indicates confidence interval. c, Scatter plot showing the absence
of statistical correlation between the frequency of circulating
TR3-56 cells and serum levels of fasting C-peptide in children
(n=21) that at T1D diagnosis were already affected by other autoimmune
conditions (CD or AIT); r=-0.003, p=0.9901 by two-tailed
Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading
indicates confidence interval. d, Scatter plot showing positive
correlation between the frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells and
serum levels of fasting C-peptide in T1D subjects one year after diagnosis
(Italian cohort) (n=31); r=0.53, p=0.0023 by two-tailed
Pearson's correlation. Red line indicates regression line and shading
indicates confidence interval. e, Box plot indicates the frequency
of TR3-56 cells in healthy subjects (n=113), T1D children at
diagnosis (n=128) and in 51 at-risk siblings of T1D individuals: 35 autoantibody
negative (Ab-), 9 autoantibody positive (Ab+) and 7
autoantibody positive reverted to autoantibody negative (Ab reverted) subjects.
Data are presented as box plots (min, max, median, and 25th and 75th
percentiles), each dot represents a individual subjects.
=0.0084;
=0.0456; =0.006;
=0.0007;
=0.0106; *p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test.
Next, we measured specificity of our findings in a third independent cohort of
T1D subjects (n=44) recruited at European Laboratory for the Investigation of
Food-Induced Disease (ELFID), University of Napoli “Federico II” (Supplementary Table 4), in which
T1D at diagnosis was associated or not with another autoimmune disorder/immune
dysregulation [(either autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT) or coeliac disease (CD)].
Strikingly, in 23 out of 44 children at T1D diagnosis (going to develop also CD or AIT
in the following three years), bivariate analysis confirmed the positive correlation
between TR3-56 cells and fasting C-peptide levels (r=0.57,
p=0.0043) (Fig. 2b). Logistic
regression modeling established that peripheral percentages of TR3-56 cells
indicated the presence of DKA (Extended Data 2a
left and right). On the contrary, in 21 out of the 44 children
that at T1D diagnosis were already affected by either CD or AIT, TR3-56 cells
did not show statistical correlation with fasting C-peptide levels (r=-0.003,
p=0.9901) (Fig. 2c), and
weakly associated with the presence of DKA (Extended Data
2b, left and right).
Extended Data Fig. 2
TR3-56 cells in T1D subjects with other autoimmune
diseases.
a, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that
percentage of TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or absence of
DKA in children (n=23) that developed after diagnosis of T1D another
autoimmune conditions (CD or AIT). T1D subjects were dichotomized on the
basis of the presence (Yes) or absence (No) of DKA at disease diagnosis.
Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56
cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.87. b, Left, logistic
regression modeling shows that peripheral frequency of TR3-56
cells associated with presence of DKA in children (n=21) that at T1D
diagnosis are already affected by other autoimmune conditions. Right, ROC
curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for
the presence of DKA. AUC=0.67.
To exclude that the association between TR3-56 cells and C-peptide
relied on metabolic alterations (i.e. hyperglycaemia and DKA) both typical of T1D onset,
we assessed their frequency also in T1D subjects (n=31) one year after T1D diagnosis
when metabolic alterations have been stabilized. In these subjects, we found that
TR3-56 cell frequency positively correlated with plasma levels of fasting
C-peptide (r=0.53, p=0.0023) and reflected residual β-cell mass
(Fig. 2d).Finally, to rule out the possibility of a bias induced by the presence of
possible outliers in the peripheral frequency of TR3-56 cells, analyses
excluding these subjects were performed and also revealed statistical correlation
between TR3-56 cells and fasting C-peptide (Supplementary Figure 2).To investigate whether frequency of TR3-56 cells also associated with
pre-symptomatic stages of T1D, we measured the frequency of TR3-56 cells in
51 at-risk subjects, siblings of T1D individuals from our main “Italian
cohort” followed over time every six months from 2015. This included 35
autoantibody negative (Ab), 9 autoantibody positive (Ab+) and 7 autoantibody
positive that reverted into autoantibody negative (Ab reverted) subjects. Interestingly,
we observed that frequency of TR3-56 cells was significantly higher in
“Ab reverted” subjects compared with healthy, Ab- and
Ab+ children (Fig. 2e). We also
noticed a significant reduction of TR3-56 cells in Ab+ subjects
with respect to healthy individuals (Fig. 2e). In
all, peripheral frequency of TR3-56 cells can act as specific non-invasive
T1D biomarker able to reflect disease progression and severity in T1D at onset and far
from diagnosis. However, further investigations on larger cohorts of at-risk subjects
are need to confirm TR3-56 cells as biomarker of early asymptomatic phase of
disease.Moreover, if the development of T1D was anticipated by another immune-mediated
disorder (either CD or AIT), TR3-56 cells failed to predict T1D progression,
probably as consequence of confounding factors related to an already compromised
immunological self-tolerance associated with the first autoimmune disorder.Since high frequency of TR3-56 cells associated with a preserved
residual β-cell reservoir, we hypothesised a possible, unexplored, immune
regulatory role for this cellular subset. To test this hypothesis, first we
characterized TR3-56 cells in adult healthy donors and subsequently we
assessed their function, surface phenotype and molecular profile in T1D children.
Specifically, we measured the capacity of flow-sorted human TR3-56 cells to
affect proliferation of in vitro T cell receptor (TCR)-stimulated human
CD8+ and CD4+ T cells from adult healthy donors. Strikingly,
we observed that TR3-56 cells inhibited proliferation of both CD8+
and CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3a), with the
main suppressive effect on the proliferation of the CD8+ subset (Fig. 3a). These findings prompted us to focus on the
ability of TR3-56 cells to suppress effector/cytotoxic functions of
CD8+ T lymphocytes. We evaluated the ability of TR3-56 cells
to control cytotoxicity of human CD8+ T cells (effectors) against allogeneic
target (see experimental procedure Supplementary Figure 3). Specifically, TR3-56 cells, compared
with control cells, suppressed lytic capacity of CD8+ effector cells at
different effector:target ratio (Fig.
3b). Next, we further explore the regulatory activity of TR3-56
cells on cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs), generated from CD8+ T cells
stimulated with human recombinant (hr) IL-2 in vitro[10,11] (see experimental
procedure Supplementary Figure
4). CTLs were co-cultured with TR3-56 cells or control cells and
stimulated for 4 hours via TCR to evaluate cytotoxic activity (measured
by CD107a/LAMP-1 expression as readout of cytotoxicity[12,13]) and
IFN-γ production by CTLs (see experimental procedure Supplementary Figure 4 and gating
strategy Supplementary Figure
5). TR3-56 cells significantly suppressed CTL effector functions,
while addition of either Natural Killer (NK) or CD8+ T cells (as internal
control), was unable to affect CD107a/LAMP-1 expression and IFN-γ production by
CTLs (Fig. 3c). We found that TR3-56
cell suppressive functions were maintained also in co-culture with allogeneic CTLs
(Extended Data 4a).
a, Suppression exerted by TR3-56 (blue) or control cells
on the proliferation of CFSE-labelled CD8+ (left panel) and
CFSE-labelled CD4+ (right panel) lymphocytes TCR-stimulated for 72
hours in vitro, at different ratios. Data are from independent
experiments, n=6 for TR3-56 cells and n=3 for CD3+ cells.
Error bars represent SEM. =0.0013;
****p<0.0001 by two-way ANOVA corrected for multiple
comparison using Bonferroni test. b, Cytolytic activity of CTLs
against allogeneic PBMCs. PBMCs (target) are CFDA-labelled and co-cultured for 3
hours with allogenic CTLs, either in the presence of TR3-56 or
control cells (see also Supplementary Figure 3). Data are from five independent experiments
(n=5). =0.0376;
=0.0460 by two-tailed Student's
t-test. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.
c, Left, CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs after
4 hours stimulation via TCR alone (grey), in the presence of
TR3-56 (blue) or control cells (see also Supplementary Figure 4).
Data are from one representative experiment out of nine. Dotted lines indicate
unstimulated cells. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Right,
cumulative data from nine independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean
± SEM. =0.0039 by two-tailed Wilcoxon
matched pairs test. d, CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ from CTLs
stimulated for 4 hours via TCR alone (grey), in the presence of
TR3-56 cells (blue) or when TR3-56 cells were
separated in transwell plate (bold blue). Data are expressed as mean ±
SEM. Data are from six independent experiments (n=6).
=0.013 by two-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs
test. e, Kinetics of DCF staining, as a measure of intracellular
ROS levels, of CTLs TCR-stimulated alone (grey) with TR3-56 (blue),
or in the presence of control cells. Numbers in plot show the MFI. Data are from
one representative experiment out of three. f, CD107a/LAMP-1 and
IFN-γ production by CTLs stimulated for 4 hours via TCR
alone (grey) or in the presence of TR3-56 cells (blue); light blue
boxes indicate co-culture of TR3-56 cells with menadione pre-treated
CTLs. Data are from six independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean
± SEM. =0.013 by two-tailed Wilcoxon
matched pairs test.
Extended Data Fig. 4
TR3-56 cells suppress CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ in both
autologous and allogeneic conditions, require cell-to-cell contact and is
independent from CD56 molecules.
a, Representative flow cytometry histograms showing
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs after 4 hours of culture
with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), in the presence of
autologous or allogeneic TR3-56 cells (blue) as indicated. Dotted
lines indicate unstimulated CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive
cells. Data are from one representative experiment out of four.
b, Representative flow cytometry histograms showing
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs cultured for 4 hours with
anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), in the presence of
TR3-56 cells or when TR3-56 cells were separated
by transwell (TW) plate system (as indicated). Dotted lines indicate
unstimulated CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are
from one representative experiment out of six. c,
Representative flow cytometry histograms showing CD107a/LAMP-1 and
IFN-γ staining of CTLs after 4 hours of culture with anti-CD3 plus
anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), or in the presence of TR3-56
cells (blue), either in the presence of the control 345.134 IgG2a or the
anti-CD56 neutralizing mAb, as indicated. Dotted lines indicate unstimulated
CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are from one
representative experiment out of three.
To identify the molecular mechanisms of TR3-56 cell suppression, we
assessed whether this function relied on either cell-to-cell contact, secretion of
soluble factors or both. Trans-well experiments revealed that TR3-56 cells
were unable to exert regulatory activity when separated from CTLs (Fig. 3d and Extended Data 4b).
Therefore, their contact-mediated suppressive activity was independent on the expression
of CD56 molecules (Extended Data 4c).ROS-mediated signalling has been frequently associated with degranulation
processes and IFN-γ production by CTLs[14,15]. We studied dynamic
changes of cytosolic and mitochondrial ROS levels upon TCR-stimulation of CTLs cultured
with TR3-56 cells. Cytosolic CTLs ROS levels, evaluated by
2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF) staining, were
significantly reduced by TR3-56 cells (Fig.
3e); control cells (NK or CD8+ T cells) did not influence cellular
ROS levels in CTLs (Fig. 3e). Conversely,
TR3-56 cells did not affect mitochondrial-derived ROS in CTLs, as
testified by mitoSOX staining (Supplementary Figure 6). To confirm the role of cellular ROS in mediating
TR3-56 cell regulatory activity, we took advantage of the ability of
menadione, an analogue of 1,4-naphthoquinone, to generate intracellular ROS
via redox cycling[16,17]. TR3-56
cells are unable to suppress CD107a/LAMP-1 expression and IFN-γ of menadione
pre-treated CTLs (Fig. 3f and Extended Data 5). In addition, menadione per se was
unable to induce in vitro CTL activation in absence of TCR stimulation
(Extended Data 5). To note, treatment with the
ROS-inhibitor, N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), completely blocked CTL activation[18], suggesting that TR3-56
cells control CD8+ responses by modulating cytosolic ROS.
Extended Data Fig. 5
Menadione pre-treated CTLs are resistant to TR3-56 cell
suppressive activity.
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs cultured for 4 hours
in the presence or absence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone or in
the presence of TR3-56 cells; light blue lines indicate CTLs
pre-treated for 15 minutes with 0.05 mM menadione. Dotted lines indicate
unstimulated cells. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are
from one representative experiment out of six.
Finally, adult TR3-56 cells were also characterized for metabolic
features (glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation) and their transcriptional signature.
Seahorse analysis revealed that upon TCR stimulation, TR3-56 cells have a
distinct metabolic phenotype compared to NK, CD8+ and CD4+ cells,
as preferentially utilizing OXPHOS as the main cellular bio-energetic source (Supplementary Figure 7).
Microarray analysis of RNA from TR3-56 cells revealed their distinct
transcriptomic signature, compared to NK, CD3+CD56- and
CD8+ subsets (Supplementary Figure 8).Compelling experimental evidence supports the central role of T lymphocytes in
immune-mediated damage of β-cells in T1D[19-21]. Autoreactive
CD8+ T lymphocytes kill β-cells through release of cytolytic
granules and by production of tissue damaging pro-inflammatory cytokines[22,23]. As specific regulatory networks targeting CD8+ T cell
functions are still poorly understood in T1D, we explored whether human
TR3-56 cells are involved in T1D pathogenesis. We evaluated suppressive
capability, phenotype, cytokine production and transcriptomic-molecular signature of
TR3-56 cells isolated from recent-onset T1D subjects in comparison with
those of healthy children. Notably, TR3-56 cells isolated from newly
diagnosed T1D subjects had a decreased ability to modulate TCR-dependent CD107a/LAMP-1
expression of autologous CTLs (Fig. 4a). This
impaired suppressive function was not due to the presence of suppression-resistant
CD8+ T cells in T1D subjects, since CTLs from T1D resulted to be
sensitive to regulatory activity of TR3-56 cells from healthy individuals
(Fig. 4b). These results indicate that
suppressive capability of TR3-56 cells is impaired in T1D children at
diagnosis.
Fig. 4
Functional and molecular dysregulation of TR3-56 cells from
recent-onset T1D children.
a, CD107a/LAMP-1 staining of CTLs TCR-stimulated for 4 hours alone
(grey) or with autologous TR3-56 cells (blue) from one representative
healthy (upper) and T1D individual (lower). Right, suppression of CD107a/LAMP-1
in CTLs from T1D (n=11) and healthy subjects (n=15), in presence of autologous
TR3-56 cells. Each dot represents an individual subject. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM. =0.0456 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. b, CD107a/LAMP-1 expression in
CTLs, from T1D subject, TCR-stimulated for 4 hours alone (left), in the presence
of autologous (middle) or allogeneic (right) TR3-56 cells from a
control. Data are from one representative experiment out of three. Dotted lines
indicate unstimulated CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells.
c, Expression of molecules on TR3-56 cells from
healthy and T1D individuals. Data are from n=16 HS, n=24 T1D for all molecules
except for CD94 (n=16 HS, n=22 T1D), NKG2C (n=16 HS, n=21 T1D) and CXCR4 (n=14
HS, n=19 T1D). Each dot represents an individual subject. Data are expressed as
mean ± SEM. =0.04;
=0.0442;
=0.0294; =0.044;
=0.0062;
=0.0147; =0.0211;
=0.0041;
=0.0010; *p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. d, Cytokines released by
TR3-56 cells TCR-activated for 48 hours in vitro
from healthy and T1D individuals (n=4 HS, n=6 T1D for IFN-γ, IL-8 and
IL-9; n=5 HS, n=6 T1D for IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31; n=4 HS and T1D for IL-15 and
IL-17A; n=6 HS, n=9 T1D for IL-2; n=6 HS, n=10 T1D for IL-10; n=6 HS, n=8 T1D
for IL-23; n=5 HS, n=7 T1D for IL-22; n=5 and T1D for TNF-α; n=6 HS, n=7
T1D for TNF-β). Each dot represents an individual subject. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM. =0.0381;
=0.0132;
=0.0476; =0.0043;
=0.0286;
=0.0426; =0.0366;
=0.0317 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test.
e, Heatmap of z-scored RNA-Seq expression values of 33 genes
with a log2FoldChange<-1.0 in comparison of TR3-56
cells from healthy and T1D subjects (n=3 for group). f,
Protein-protein interaction network reconstructed from STRING database and
differentially expressed transcripts (log2FoldChange<-1.0 as
in e) identified by comparing RNA-Seq profiles from TR3-56 cells of
both group (n=3 for group) by non-parametric/permutation-based and multiple
testing correction according to Benjamini and Hochber. In blue, 23 genes leading
to a significant enrichment of the cellular component “membrane”
(GO:0016020) (FDR=0.0059).
Surface phenotypic analysis revealed that TR3-56 cells from
recent-onset T1D children were comparable to healthy controls for CD4, CD8, CD45RA,
CD45RO and CD27 expression while CD28 surface levels were significantly higher in
TR3-56 cells from T1D subjects (Fig.
4c and Extended Data 6a,
left and right). Also, TR3-56 cells from T1D
children had reduced surface expression of activating/inhibitor receptors (CD94, NKG2A,
NKG2C, NKG2D, DNAM-1 and CD16)[24] and
cytotoxicity-related molecule (Granzyme-B)[23], compared to healthy children (Fig.
4c). On the other hand, TR3-56 cells from recent-onset T1D
children expressed increased surface levels of chemokine receptors homing cells in the
pancreas, such as CXCR3, CXCR4 and CCR7 (Fig.
4c)[25-27]. Low or moderate levels of main
TReg cell-associated markers[28], such as CD25, the transcription factor forkhead box P3
(FoxP3), CTLA-4, CD39, GITR and PD-1 were expressed on TR3-56 cells from both
control and T1D subjects (Supplementary Figure 9).
Extended Data Fig. 6
Phenotype of peripheral TR3-56 cells in healthy and T1D
subjects.
a,Representative flow-cytometry plots showing the
gating strategy used to evaluate the expression of CD4 and CD8 on
TR3-56 cells (upper panels) and the frequency of invariant
(i)NKT cells, evaluated by Vα24 expression and CD1d tetramers loaded
with a-Galactosyl ceramide (CD1d-aGal) binding on TR3-56
lymphocytes (lower panels) on both healthy and T1D at-onset subjects, as
indicated. Numbers in plots indicate percent of positive cells.
b, Column bar showing the TCR Vβ family expression
in TR3-56 cells from healthy subjects (yellow) and T1D children
(turquoise) at diagnosis, as indicated. Data are from n=5 healthy subjects
and n=3 T1D subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. No
statistical significance differences are identified by two-way
ANOVA-corrected for multiple comparison using Bonferroni test (p
>0.9999).
Finally, FACS analysis revealed that TR3-56 cells from both healthy
controls and T1D subjects are distinct from the invariant (i)NKT subset[29,30], as they are not CD1d-restricted, do not express
Vα24/Vβ11 TCR chains and display a heterogeneous β TCR repertoire
(Extended Data 6a,b).Multiplex cytokine analysis showed that TR3-56 cells from new onset
T1D individuals released, upon 48 hours of TCR stimulation, reduced amount of
IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, IL-21, IL-22, TNF-α compared with healthy
children (Fig. 4d); on the other side,
TR3-56 cells from T1D children secreted increased amounts of IL-15 and
IL-17A (Fig. 4d), while no significant differences
were observed for other cytokines such as IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-31, TNF-β (Fig. 4d). Furthermore, an un-biased high-throughput
analysis (RNA-seq) of the transcriptome expressed by TR3-56 cells from T1D
children in comparison with age- and sex-matched healthy controls revealed the
dysregulation of several genes that may contribute to T1D-depedent functional impairment
of this cell subset. In particular, we concentrated our attention on genes (n=33, see
Fig. 4e) whose mean level was found decreased
of more than two folds in T1D cells compared to the healthy counterpart: the majority of
these genes (n=23) encoded for proteins functionally linked to the membrane, suggesting
a rearrangement of the cell surface in T1D (Fig.
4f). Specifically, TR3-56 cells from newly diagnosed T1D expressed
lower levels of the G protein-coupled receptor 65 (GPR65) gene, that has been
genetically associated with autoimmune disorders[31], KLRB1 (alias CD161) and KLRC1 (alias NKG2A), two killer cell
lectin like receptors, described to function as inhibitory determinants in human NK
cells [32,33]. Further, we also spotted in T1D TR3-56 cells
decreased expression of genes encoding for proteins related to regulatory functions,
such as Lysosomal Protein Transmembrane 4 Beta (LAPTM4B)[34] and hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase
(HPGD)[35].In summary, this study reveals that TR3-56 cells may represent a
disease biomarker with a previous undisclosed role in human T1D. In three independent
cohorts - from Italy and Sweden - of new onset T1D subjects, we found that lower
frequency of this cellular subset associates with reduced insulin-secreting capacity and
with undesirable disease outcome, such as DKA. Also, we found that TR3-56
cells possess a certain degree of specificity for T1D as their enumeration failed to
predict disease progression when T1D was preceded by another autoimmune disease as
confounding factor. Moreover, TR3-56 cells associated to C-peptide levels
also later from T1D diagnosis (one year later), when metabolic alterations have been
normalized. In all, our results also revealed functional, phenotypic and molecular
impairments in TR3-56 cells isolated at T1D onset suggesting a
"general" dysregulation of this cellular subset in T1D, also confirmed by
reduced expression of either inhibitory/activating receptors and of genes encoding for
proteins involved in canonical TReg cell-mediated suppressive functions (i.e.
LPTMB4 and HPGD)[32-35]. In an integrate view, defects of
TR3-56 cells associate with attack of pancreatic β-cells by
islet-specific auto-reactive CD8+ T cell clones, impacting on residual
insulin production and influencing T1D progression (Extended Data 7). Further, TR3-56 cell counts may represent a
valuable criterion to monitor disease progression also improving stratification of
individuals for T1D trials and identify at-risk pre-diabetic subjects during the
asymptomatic phase of the disease. It is clear that more research is needed to further
strengthen our findings, and studies are in progress also in other autoimmune disorders
to expand the role of TR3-56 cells in immunological self-tolerance and their
potential translational relevance in a wider perspective. In conclusion, we propose a
model in which in healthy conditions, TR3-56 cells might participate to
immune regulation to preserve tissue integrity of insulin-producing β-cells
(Extended Data 7). An alteration in number
and/or function of this cellular subset could lead to β-cell damage and loss of
endogenous insulin production (measured as fasting C-peptide), thus allowing the seed of
autoimmunity to take root (Extended Data 7).
Extended Data Fig. 7
Hypothetic model showing the regulatory function of TR3-56
cells and β-cell integrity in healthy and autoimmune
conditions.
In healthy subjects, normal number and suppressive function of
TR3-56 cells control self-reactive CD8+ T cells
(green), possible contributing to maintenance of immune self-tolerance and
insulin production by live β-islet cells (red). Right, in autoimmune
T1D, a lower frequency and a reduced functional capacity of
TR3-56 cells correlated with reduced β-cell mass,
reduced serum levels of C-peptide and progressive lost of immunological
self-tolerance. The schematic model was prepared using the Motifolio
Scientific Illustration Toolkit.
Methods
Healthy and T1D subjects
Diagnosis of T1D was defined according to the Global International
Diabetes Federation/International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes
Guidelines for Diabetes in Childhood and Adolescence[36] and included symptoms of diabetes in addition
to casual plasma glucose concentration ≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dl), or
fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/l (≥126 mg/dl), or 2 hours post
load glucose ≥11.1 mmol/l (≥200 mg/dl) during an oral glucose
tolerance test, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
≥6.5[36].
Recent-onset T1D subjects and individuals one year after T1D diagnosis from
Italian cohort were recruited at the Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche
Traslazionali, Sezione di Pediatria, Università di Napoli
“Federico II” (Prof. Adriana Franzese). T1D subjects from the
validation Swedish cohort were recruited at Crown Princess Victoria
Children´s Hospital, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden (Prof.
Johnny Ludvigsson); PBMCs were isolated and frozen at the Division of
Pediatrics, Departement of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping
University, Sweden. Subjects from the cohort which developed other AIDs (CD or
AIT) before or after T1D diagnosis were recruited at European Laboratory for the
Investigation of Food-Induced Disease (ELFID), Università di Napoli
“Federico II” (Prof. Riccardo Troncone). CD were diagnosed in
accordance with the 1990 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology
Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines[37]; diagnosis of AIT was based on the presence of high
levels of antithyroid antibodies (anti-thyroperoxidase and/or
anti-thyroglobulin), normal or low thyroid function (T4, TSH), together with a
heterogenity and hypoechogenity of thyroid parenchyma at ultrasound
examination[38]. At-risk
subjects, siblings of T1D children, were recruited at the Dipartimento di
Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Sezione di Pediatria, Università di Napoli
“Federico II”. Autoantibody positive subjects were positive for at
least two autoantibodies. Healthy children were recruited at the Dipartimento di
Scienze Mediche Traslazionali, Sezione di Pediatria, Università di Napoli
“Federico II” (Prof. Adriana Franzese). Blood samples from
individuals with recent-onset T1D was achieved 10 d after glycaemic
stabilization by treatment with exogenous insulin (glucose values between 3.5-10
mmol/l or 80-180 mg/dl) and all of them were positive for at least two
anti-islet autoantibody. Healthy subjects were matched for sex, age and BMI with
T1D subjects and selected by the following criteria: fasting blood glucose of
<5.5 mmol/L (<100 mg/dl), negative personal and familial history
of autoimmune disorders, and negativity for islet autoantibodies at the
99th percentile. T1D and healthy subjects with recent
vaccinations or infections were excluded from the study. See Supplementary Tables 1-4
for demographic and clinical characteristics of T1D cohorts and healthy
subjects.Institutional Review Board of the Ethics Committee of University of
Naples “Federico II” approved the study (Prot. N. 200/16 and
N.161/18). Approval by the Research Ethics Committee by Linköping
University was obtained (Dnr 02-482). All adult human subjects, or parents of
participating children, provided written informed consent. We have complied with
all relevant ethical regulations.
Laboratory testing
Blood samples from T1D subjects, at-risk siblings and from healthy
individuals were withdrawn at 8.00 a.m. into heparinized BD Vacutainers and
processed within the following 4 hours. Serum or plasma were obtained after
centrifugation and kept at −80°C until use. Fasting C-peptide
levels were measured in duplicate serum samples, at the same time for all
samples, using a commercial ELISA kit (Merck Millipore Corporation). Results for
each assay were validated, and a high- and low-level control sample were
included. Glucose levels were measured using enzymatic hexokinase method and
HbA1c by high-performance liquid chromatography (HLC-723 G7 TOSOH, Bioscience).
Islet autoantibodies (GADA, IA-2A, IAA, ZnT8), transglutaminase IgA and
antithyroid antibodies (anti-thyroperoxidase and/or anti-thyroglobulin) were
measured by commercial ELISA (Pantec). Whole blood cells were analysed with a
clinical-grade haemocytometer to determine absolute lymphocyte numbers in each
sample. Remaining part of blood samples was processed and after Ficoll-Hypaque
(GE-Healthcare) gradient centrifugation, PBMCs were obtained.For the validation T1D Swedish cohort, blood samples were processed at
Division of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine,
Medical Faculty Linköping University, Sweden. PBMCs were obtained and
cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. An aliquot of them were shipped to our
laboratory at IEOS-CNR and kept in liquid nitrogen until use. Nitrogen
cryopreserved PBMCs from Swedish cohort were thawed as follows: cryovials
containing frozen cells were removed from liquid nitrogen storage and placed
into a 37°C water bath; the vials were gently swirling in the 37°C
water bath until there was a small amount of ice left in the vial. Pre-warmed
complete growth medium (RPMI 10% FBS) drop wise into the cryovial containing the
thawed cells. After centrifugation cells were re-suspend in complete growth
medium and utilized for flow cytometry staining. Viability was always assessed
after defrosting and was on average > 85%.
Flow cytometry and cell isolation
PBMCs from human healthy donors, T1D subjects and at-risk siblings of
T1D were stained with the following antibodies for the evaluation of
TR3-56 cells: FITC anti-human CD3 (BD Pharmingen, clone UCHT1),
PE-Cy7 anti-human CD56 (BD Pharmingen, clone B159).For the evaluation of TR3-56 death cell, PBMCs were stained
with the following antibodies: FITC human Annexin V (BD Pharmingen), PE-Cy7
anti-human CD56 (BD Pharmingen, clone B159), APC anti-human CD3 (BD Pharmingen,
clone UCHT1), propidium iodide (BD Pharmingen); Annexin V buffer (BD Pharmingen)
was used for the staining according the manufactories’ instructions.Multiparametric flow cytometry were used for the evaluation of surface
markers on TR3-56 cells from PBMCs: FITC or APC anti-human CD3 (BD
Pharmingen, clone UCHT1), PE or APC-H7 anti-human CD4 (BD Pharmingen, clone
RPA-T4), BV421 anti-human CD8 (BD Pharmingen, clone RPA-T8), PE anti-human CD16
(BD Pharmingen, clone 3G8), BV510 anti-human CD27 (BD Pharmingen, clone M-T271),
PE anti-human CD28 (BD Pharmingen, clone CD28.2), APC anti-human CD45 (BD
Pharmingen, clone HI30), FITC anti-human CD45RA (Miltenyi Biotec, clone REA562),
APC anti-human CD45RO (BD Pharmingen, clone UCHL1), PeCy7 or APC anti-human CD56
(BD Pharmingen, clone B159; BD Biosciences, clone NCAM16.2), APC anti-human CD94
(BD Pharmingen, clone HP-3D9), BB700 anti-human CCR7 (BD Horizon, clone 3D12),
BV510 anti-human CXCR3 (BD Optibuild, clone 1C6/CXCR3), BB700 anti-human CXCR4
(BD Horizon, clone 12G5), BV510 anti-human DNAM-1 (BD Optibuild, clone DX11),
BB700 anti-human NKG2A (BD Optibuild, clone 131411), BV510 anti-human NKG2C (BD
Optibuild, clone 134591), APC anti-human NKG2D (BD Pharmingen, clone 1D11), PE
labelled CD1d tetramers loaded with α-galactosyl ceramide (ProImmune), PE
labelled CD1d negative control tetramers (ProImmune), FITC anti-human
Vα24 (Beckman Coulter, clone C15), BV421 anti-human Granzyme B (BD
Horizon, clone GB11), PECy7 anti–human CD25 (BD Pharmingen, clone
M-A251), BV421 anti–human PD-1 (BD Horizon, clone EH12-1), PE anti-human
FoxP3-all (BD Pharmingen, clone 259D/C7), APC anti–human CD152/CTLA-4 (BD
Pharmingen, clone BN13), APC anti-human CD39 (BD Pharmingen, clone TU66), BV421
anti-human GITR (BD Horizon, clone V27-580). FITC and PE labelled mAbs against
TCR Vβ epitopes; anti-human Vβ1, Vβ2, Vβ3,
Vβ4, Vβ5.1, Vβ5.2; Vβ5.3, Vβ7.1,
Vβ7.2, Vβ8, Vβ9, Vβ11, Vβ12, Vβ13.1,
Vβ13.2, Vβ13.6, Vβ14, Vβ16, Vβ17,
Vβ18, Vβ20, Vβ1.3, Vβ22 and Vβ23 all from
Beckman Coulter. Granzyme B expression was performed by using the
fixation/permeabilization solution kit BD Cytofix-Cytoperm (BD Biosciences),
according the manufacturer’s instructions. Staining for intracellular
factors was performed by using fixation and permeabilization FoxP3 buffer kit
(BD Pharmingen), according the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were
acquired by using a two lasers equipped FACSCanto II (BD Bioscience); at least
3x104 events in the lymphocyte gate. For the evaluation of
positive events, fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were used for setting the
gate; non-viable cells were detected by 7-AAD viability staining (BD
Pharmingen). See Supplementary
Figure 1 for gating strategy of TR3-56 cells.
Cytofluorimetric analyses were performed by using FlowJo Software (FlowJo,
LLC).Human CD3+CD56+ (TR3-56),
CD3− CD56+ (NK),
CD3+CD56-, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
were isolated from PBMCs of human healthy donors and T1D subjects by
high-performance cell sorting (BD FACS-Jazz, BD Bioscience) in the IEOS-CNR
Sorting Facility in Naples, after staining with the following antibodies: FITC
anti-human CD3 (BD PharMingen, clone UCHT1), APC anti-human CD56 (BD
Biosciences, clone NCAM16.2), APC anti-human CD4 (BD Pharmingen, clone RPA-T4),
APC anti-human CD8 (BD Pharmingen, clone RPA-T8) or by magnetic cell separation
with microbeads CD3+CD56+ isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec),
Dynabeads™ CD8 Positive Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher
Scientific) and Dynabeads™ Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T
Cell Kit for CD4+ cell isolation (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher
Scientific). Purity of isolated cells was 95%-99% as reported in figures.
Proliferation assays
To analyse cell division, flow-sorted CD4+ and
CD8+ T cells were labelled with
5,6-carboxyfluorescein-diacetate-succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Thermo Fischer
Scientific) before the culture[39]. For the assessment of cell proliferation, 3x104
CD4+ or CD8+ cells were cultured for 72 hours in the
presence of TR3-56 cells (or CD3+CD56- control
cells) stimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads (0.2 beads/cell)
(Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at different cell ratio (1:1,
1:2, 1:4, 1:8), as previously indicated[39]. All tests were performed in the presence of RPMI 1640
medium supplemented with 5% heat inactivated AB human serum (Euroclone). CFSE
analyses were performed using BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo
software V.10 (FlowJo, LLC).
Cytotoxicity assays
To obtain CTLs directed against allogeneic targets, flow sorted
CD8+ cells (purity > 95%) from adult healthy donor
(effectors) were cultured with 30 Gy-irradiated allogeneic PBMCs (stimulators)
for 10 days with regular hrIL-2 supplementation (20 IU/ml); allogeneic targets
were obtained by anti-CD3 treatment and hrIL-2 expansion of stimulator PBMCs;
specific cytotoxicity of effector cells was measured by using the
5,6-carboxyfluoresceindiacetate (CFDA) cytotoxicity assay (Molecular Probes,
Eugene). Briefly, the target cells were labelled with CFDA mixed with effector
cells at different E:T ratio and incubated at 37°C for 3
hours in 96-well round-bottom plates (Falcon, Becton Dickinson). The specific
lysis of target cells was calculated as follows: % specific lysis = (CT-TE/CT)
x100, where CT indicates mean number of fluorescent target cells in control
tubes and TE indicates mean number of fluorescent cells in target plus effector
tubes[40,41]. TR3-56 cells (or
CD8+ control cells) and effector CTLs were co-cultured (at 1:1
ratio) in order to evaluate the ability of TR3-56 cells to suppress
lytic capacity of effector CTLs against the CFDA-labeled allogeneic target (see
experimental procedure Supplementary Fig. 3).
Degranulation assay, CD107/LAMP-1 expression and IFN-γ
production
To obtain activated CTLs, flow-sorted CD8+ T cells were
cultured for 36 hours in RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Life Technologies) supplemented with
5% AB human serum (Euroclone) in the presence of hrIL-2 (Roche) at 200 IU/ml.
After 36 hours, CTLs were labelled with BV421-conjugated anti-human CD8 and then
cultured alone or in the presence of freshly flow-sorted TR3-56, NK
and CD8+ T lymphocytes at different ratio, with or without
TCR-stimulation (1 bead/cell) in 96-well round-bottom plates (Falcon, Becton
Dickinson). PE-conjugated anti-human CD107a/LAMP-1 (BD Pharmingen, clone H4A3)
was added to the cell culture for the whole culture period (4 hours).To avoid extracellular cytokine export, the cultures were performed in
the presence of 5 μg/ml of Brefeldin-A (Sigma-Aldrich), as
described[42]; in
particular for CD107a/LAMP-1 experiments Brefeldin-A was added in the last 3
hours of culture. For IFN-γ production, CTLs were cultured as described
above, while 5 μg/ml of Brefeldin-A was added to the cell culture for the
whole culture period (4 hours)[12,13,42]. Then to evaluated
IFN-γ expression, samples were fixed and permeabilized (Cytofix-Cytoperm,
BD Bioscience) and stained for PE-conjugated anti-human IFN-γ (BD
Pharmingen, clone B27), following the manufacturer’s instructions.For transwell experiments, the co-culture of TR3-56 cells
with CTLs was performed in the above condition using transwell inserts (Corning
Life Sciences) in 24-well round-bottom plates (Falcon, Becton Dickinson). For
the degranulation assay in the presence of CD56 blocking soluble human
recombinant cell adhesion molecule NCAM-1/CD56 (R&D Systems Inc.) was
used (10 ng/ml). The control 345.134 IgG2a mAb, recognizing a glycoprotein
widely expressed on human leucocytes[43] was a kind gift of Dr. S. Ferrone, and was used as
described above.In all the experiments, non-viable cells were detected by 7-AAD
viability staining and both CD107a/LAMP-1 expression and IFN-γ production
were evaluated in labelled-CTLs, using fluorescence values of unstimulated CTLs
(medium) as negative values to identify positive gate, as described in
experimental procedure in Supplementary Figure 4 and gating strategy in Supplementary Figure 5.
All the experiments were performed in autologous condition except when
indicated. Experiments in adult healthy subjects were performed co-culturing
1x105 CTLs and 1x105 TR3-56 or control
cells; experiments in T1D and control children were performed co-culturing at
least 3x104 CTLs and 3x104 TR3-56 or control
cells due to the reduced volume of blood withdrawn from children and also due to
the reduce frequency of this population in T1D.
ROS production
For intracellular ROS production CTLs were stained using
2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF) (Sigma-Aldrich).
Briefly, CTLs were stained with DCF and cultured alone or with TR3-56
or control cells in the presence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28; ROS production was
detected after 5, 20 e 40 min of culture. Induction of intracellular ROS was
obtained by treating CTLs with menadione (0.05 μM). Mitochondrial ROS was
measured by MitoSOX Red Mitochondrial Superoxide Indicator (Thermo Fisher
Scientific), according to manufactore's instructions. DCF and mitoSoX
levels were evaluated by flow cytometry using BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences)
and FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC).
Seahorse analyses
Metabolic profile was evaluated in TR3-56, NK,
CD3+CD56- and CD8+ cells from adult healthy
subjects, in the presence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads (1 bead/cell)
(Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 hour. Real time measurements of
extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were
performed by an XFe-96 Analyzer (Agilent Technologies). Specifically, cells were
plated in XFe-96 plates (Agilent Technologies) at the concentration of 2 x
105 cells/well and cultured with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented
with 5% AB human serum. ECAR was measured in XF DMEM medium (Agilent
Technologies) in basal condition and in response to 10 mM glucose, 5 μM
oligomycin and 100 mM of 2DG (all from Sigma-Aldrich). OCR was measured in XF
DMEM medium (supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 2 mM L-glutamin, and 1 mM sodium
pyruvate), under basal conditions and in response to 5 μM oligomycin, 1.5
μM of carbonylcyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy)-phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and 1
μM of antimycin A and rotenone (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Experiments with
the Seahorse were done with the following assay conditions: 3 minutes mixture; 3
minutes wait; and 3 minutes measurement.
Transcriptome analysis
For microarray analysis flow sorted cell populations (TR3-56,
NK, CD3+CD56-, CD8+ isolated were isolated from
helathy adults (n=3 biological replicates for each cell population obtained from
adult healthy individuals) were quantified through microarray-based human
Affymetrix Clariom S Assays (Eurofins Genomics), which provides extensive
coverage of all known well-annotated genes (21448 gene probes for 19525
annotated unique genes). The raw intensity values were background corrected,
log2 transformed and quantile normalized using the Robust Multi-array average
(RMA) algorithm. Data were imported and analysed using MultiExperimentViewer
(MeV). Sample similarity was described by multivariate Principal Component
Analysis (PCA) and Pearson's correlation. For supervised sample
clustering, significant genes were selected by one-way ANOVA, followed by
Pearson's correlation. In order to identify a TR3-56 cell
specific gene expression pattern, we selected genes for having a consistent log2
fold change (either > +1 or < -1) compared to all other evaluated
populations (NK, CD3+CD56- and CD8+ cells) and
a significant Student’s t-test
(p<0.05) for all three comparisons: TR3-56
vs NK, TR3-56
vs CD3+CD56- and TR3-56
vs CD8+ T cells.For NGS analysis, RNA sequencing was performed by IGA technology
(IGATech) services (Udine, Italy). Total RNA was extracted from
TR3-56 cells isolated from either healthy subjects (n=3) or
recent-onset T1D subjects (n=3) using the RNeasy Micro Kit from QIAGEN,
according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were then
quantified and quality tested by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA assay (Agilent
technologies, Santa Clara, CA) or Caliper (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Libraries
were prepared by the ‘Ovation SoLo RNA-seq Library Preparation
kit’ (NuGEN, San Carlos, CA), following the manufacturer’s
instructions and checked with both Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA) and Agilent Bioanalyzer DNA assay or Caliper (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).
Sequencing was performed on single-end 75 bp mode on NextSeq 500 (Illumina, San
Diego, CA) and number of reads ranged from 29.1x106 to
32.5x106. Raw data were processed by Bcl2Fastq 2.0.2 version of
the Illumina pipeline for both format conversion and de-multiplexing and lower
quality bases and adapters were removed by ERNE Version 1.4.6[44] and Cutadapt 1.16[45] software. Reads were then
deduplicated based on unique molecular identifier (UMI) composed of 8 random
bases for unambiguous identification of unique library molecules by IGATech
proprietary script; and aligned on reference GRCh38 genome/transcriptome with
STAR3 2.6[46]. Full-length
transcripts representing multiple spliced variants for each gene locus were
assembled and quantified by Stringtie 1.3.4d[47]. RNA-Seq data was preprocessed by counting the overlap
of reads with genes through htseq-count 0.9.1[48] and DESeq2 1.14.1[49] was used to perform comparisons between
expression levels of genes and transcripts. Normalization was performed using
the median-of-ratios method[50]
and statistical significance determined using a Wald test[49].
Cytokine assessment
A total of 40.000 flow-sorted TR3-56 cells from healthy and
T1D subjects were cultured with RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5% serum
autologous in the presence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads (0.1 bead/cell)
(Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After 48 hours supernatant were collected and
stored at -20° C until use. Cytokine production was analyzed using the
bead-based multianalyte immunoassay (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, and then was measured by
Multiplex technology (Luminex 200, Luminex). xPONENT 3.1 software (Luminex) was
used for data acquisition.
Statistical analysis
Modelling and statistical analyses of data were carried by JMP
Statistical Discovery software 6.0.3 (SAS, North Carolina, USA),
and GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad, California, USA).
Comparisons were performed by Mann-Whitney U-test, Student’s
t-test, one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA-corrected for
multiple comparison using Bonferroni test and Wilcoxon matched pairs test as
indicated. Correlation analyses were performed by Pearson's correlation.
A linear model was used for the adjustment of the comparison for sex, age and
BMI variables. To identify outliers, ROUT (Q=0.1%) method has been applied.For all analyses, we used two-tailed tests, with
p<0.05 values denoting statistical significance. A
univariate logistic regression modeling was fitted to predict DKA at T1D
diagnosis as described: T1D subjects were dichotomized on the basis of the
presence (Yes) or absence (No) of DKA at disease diagnosis. Prognostic validity
of the fitted models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
curve analysis and measured using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The black
line represents the ROC curve that derives from sensitivity (the probability
that X value is true positive) versus 1-specificity (the probability that X
value is false positive). The yellow line indicates the optimal combination of
sensitivity and specificity according to the Youden criterion. The optimal
combination between sensitivity and specificity is represented by the
interception between the ROC curve and the yellow line.
TR3-56 cell enumeration predicts residual β-cell
function and DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at disease onset.
a, Box plots indicate the percentage (left) and
absolute number (right) of circulating TR3-56 cells in
pre-puberty T1D subjects at disease onset from Italian cohort compared with
healthy subjects, after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Data are presented
as box plots (min, max, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles), each dot
represents a individual subjects (n=86 healthy subjects; n=128 T1D for
percentage of TR3-56 cells and n=126 T1D for absolute number of
TR3-56 cells). *p<0.0001 by
two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. b, Box plots indicate the
percentage of necrotic (left) and apoptotic (right) rate of circulating
TR3-56 cells in healthy subjects (n=47) and T1D children at
disease onset (n=82) from Italian cohort. Data are presented as box plots
(min, max, median, and 25th and 75th percentiles), each dot represents a
individual subjects. *p<0.0001 by two-tailed
Mann-Whitney U-test. c, Left, logistic regression modeling
shows that percentage of TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or
absence of DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at diagnosis (n=128) from Italian
cohort. T1D subjects were dichotomized on the basis of the presence (Yes) or
absence (No) of DKA at disease diagnosis. Low numbers of TR3-56
cells at diagnosis associated with presence of DKA. Right, ROC curve of the
model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for the presence of
DKA. AUC=0.72. d, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that
absolute number of TR3-56 cell counts predicts the presence or
absence of DKA in pre-puberty T1D subjects at diagnosis (n=126) from Italian
cohort. Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of
TR3-56 cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.67.
e, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that percentage
of circulating TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or absence of
DKA in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=19) from Italian cohort. Right, ROC
curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for
the presence of DKA. AUC=0.88. f, Left, logistic regression
modeling shows that absolute number of TR3-56 cells predicts
presence of DKA in post-puberty young adults T1D (n=18) from Italian cohort.
Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56
cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.81.
TR3-56 cells in T1D subjects with other autoimmune
diseases.
a, Left, logistic regression modeling shows that
percentage of TR3-56 cells predicts the presence or absence of
DKA in children (n=23) that developed after diagnosis of T1D another
autoimmune conditions (CD or AIT). T1D subjects were dichotomized on the
basis of the presence (Yes) or absence (No) of DKA at disease diagnosis.
Right, ROC curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56
cells for the presence of DKA. AUC=0.87. b, Left, logistic
regression modeling shows that peripheral frequency of TR3-56
cells associated with presence of DKA in children (n=21) that at T1D
diagnosis are already affected by other autoimmune conditions. Right, ROC
curve of the model-based prognostic scores of TR3-56 cells for
the presence of DKA. AUC=0.67.
Correlation between TR3-56 cells and fasting C-peptide in the
absence of outliers.
a, Scatter plot showing statistical correlation between
frequency of TR3-56 cells and fasting C-peptide in the absence of
TR3-56 cell outliers (n=5) in pre-puberty T1D subjects
(n=123) at disease onset from Italian cohort. Red line indicates regression
line and shading indicates confidence interval. r=0.52,
p<0.0001 by two-tailed Pearson’s correlation.
b, Scatter plot showing statistical correlation between
absolute numbers of TR3-56 cells and C-peptide in the absence of
TR3-56 cell outliers (n=7) in pre-puberty T1D subjects
(n=119) at disease onset from Italian cohort. Red line indicates regression
line and shading indicates confidence interval. r=0.31,
p=0.0007 by two-tailed Pearson’s correlation.
c, Scatter plot showing positive correlation between the
frequency of circulating TR3-56 cells and serum levels of fasting
C-peptide in absence of TR3-56 outliers (n=4) in Swedish cohort
of T1D children (n=32) at disease onset; Red line indicates regression line
and shading indicates confidence interval. r=0.72,
p<0.0001 by two-tailed Pearson's correlation.
To identify outliers ROUT (Q=0.1%) method has been applied.
TR3-56 cells suppress CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ in both
autologous and allogeneic conditions, require cell-to-cell contact and is
independent from CD56 molecules.
a, Representative flow cytometry histograms showing
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs after 4 hours of culture
with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), in the presence of
autologous or allogeneic TR3-56 cells (blue) as indicated. Dotted
lines indicate unstimulated CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive
cells. Data are from one representative experiment out of four.
b, Representative flow cytometry histograms showing
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs cultured for 4 hours with
anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), in the presence of
TR3-56 cells or when TR3-56 cells were separated
by transwell (TW) plate system (as indicated). Dotted lines indicate
unstimulated CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are
from one representative experiment out of six. c,
Representative flow cytometry histograms showing CD107a/LAMP-1 and
IFN-γ staining of CTLs after 4 hours of culture with anti-CD3 plus
anti-CD28 microbeads alone (grey), or in the presence of TR3-56
cells (blue), either in the presence of the control 345.134 IgG2a or the
anti-CD56 neutralizing mAb, as indicated. Dotted lines indicate unstimulated
CTLs. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are from one
representative experiment out of three.
Menadione pre-treated CTLs are resistant to TR3-56 cell
suppressive activity.
CD107a/LAMP-1 and IFN-γ staining of CTLs cultured for 4 hours
in the presence or absence of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 microbeads alone or in
the presence of TR3-56 cells; light blue lines indicate CTLs
pre-treated for 15 minutes with 0.05 mM menadione. Dotted lines indicate
unstimulated cells. Numbers indicate percentage of positive cells. Data are
from one representative experiment out of six.
Phenotype of peripheral TR3-56 cells in healthy and T1D
subjects.
a,Representative flow-cytometry plots showing the
gating strategy used to evaluate the expression of CD4 and CD8 on
TR3-56 cells (upper panels) and the frequency of invariant
(i)NKT cells, evaluated by Vα24 expression and CD1d tetramers loaded
with a-Galactosyl ceramide (CD1d-aGal) binding on TR3-56
lymphocytes (lower panels) on both healthy and T1D at-onset subjects, as
indicated. Numbers in plots indicate percent of positive cells.
b, Column bar showing the TCR Vβ family expression
in TR3-56 cells from healthy subjects (yellow) and T1D children
(turquoise) at diagnosis, as indicated. Data are from n=5 healthy subjects
and n=3 T1D subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. No
statistical significance differences are identified by two-way
ANOVA-corrected for multiple comparison using Bonferroni test (p
>0.9999).
Hypothetic model showing the regulatory function of TR3-56
cells and β-cell integrity in healthy and autoimmune
conditions.
In healthy subjects, normal number and suppressive function of
TR3-56 cells control self-reactive CD8+ T cells
(green), possible contributing to maintenance of immune self-tolerance and
insulin production by live β-islet cells (red). Right, in autoimmune
T1D, a lower frequency and a reduced functional capacity of
TR3-56 cells correlated with reduced β-cell mass,
reduced serum levels of C-peptide and progressive lost of immunological
self-tolerance. The schematic model was prepared using the Motifolio
Scientific Illustration Toolkit.
Authors: Slobodan Culina; Ana Ines Lalanne; Georgia Afonso; Karen Cerosaletti; Sheena Pinto; Guido Sebastiani; Klaudia Kuranda; Laura Nigi; Anne Eugster; Thomas Østerbye; Alicia Maugein; James E McLaren; Kristin Ladell; Etienne Larger; Jean-Paul Beressi; Anna Lissina; Victor Appay; Howard W Davidson; Søren Buus; David A Price; Matthias Kuhn; Ezio Bonifacio; Manuela Battaglia; Sophie Caillat-Zucman; Francesco Dotta; Raphael Scharfmann; Bruno Kyewski; Roberto Mallone Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2018-02-02
Authors: Matthew E Pipkin; Jilian A Sacks; Fernando Cruz-Guilloty; Mathias G Lichtenheld; Michael J Bevan; Anjana Rao Journal: Immunity Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Ken T Coppieters; Francesco Dotta; Natalie Amirian; Peter D Campbell; Thomas W H Kay; Mark A Atkinson; Bart O Roep; Matthias G von Herrath Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2012-01-02 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Mark A Atkinson; Jeffrey A Bluestone; George S Eisenbarth; Matthias Hebrok; Kevan C Herold; Domenico Accili; Massimo Pietropaolo; Peter R Arvan; Matthias Von Herrath; Dorene S Markel; Christopher J Rhodes Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Mario Galgani; Rosa Nugnes; Dario Bruzzese; Francesco Perna; Veronica De Rosa; Claudio Procaccini; Enza Mozzillo; Corrado M Cilio; Helena Elding Larsson; Ake Lernmark; Antonio La Cava; Adriana Franzese; Giuseppe Matarese Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Naiara G Bediaga; Alexandra L Garnham; Gaetano Naselli; Esther Bandala-Sanchez; Natalie L Stone; Joanna Cobb; Jessica E Harbison; John M Wentworth; Annette-G Ziegler; Jennifer J Couper; Gordon K Smyth; Leonard C Harrison Journal: Diabetes Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 9.461