Literature DB >> 32495223

Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans.

F Baan1,2, R Bruggink3,4, J Nijsink3, T J J Maal3,5, E M Ongkosuwito4,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using two commercially available software packages.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten dry human skulls were subjected to structured light scanning, CBCT scanning, and intra-oral scanning. Two commercially available software packages were used to perform fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT scan to create an accurate virtual head model: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™. The structured light scanner was used as a gold standard and was superimposed on the virtual head models, created by IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, using an Iterative Closest Point algorithm. Differences between the positions of the intra-oral scans obtained with the software packages were recorded and expressed in six degrees of freedom as well as the inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The tested software packages, IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, showed a high level of accuracy compared to the gold standard. The accuracy was calculated for all six degrees of freedom. It was noticeable that the accuracy in the cranial/caudal direction was the lowest for IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ in both the maxilla and mandible. The inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient showed a high level of agreement between the observers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ are reliable software packages providing an accurate fusion of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT. Both software packages can be used as an accurate fusion tool of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT which provides an accurate basis for 3D virtual planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD; Digital imaging/radiology; Oral implants/implantology; Orthodontic(s); Orthognathic surgery; Treatment planning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32495223     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03336-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

1.  A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model.

Authors:  Jaime Gateno; James Xia; John F Teichgraeber; Andrew Rosen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery.

Authors:  Tabea Viktoria Flügge; Katja Nelson; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Marc Christian Metzger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants.

Authors:  Ralf Kurt Willy Schulze; Dorothea Berndt; Bernd d'Hoedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  V Hirschinger; S Hanke; U Hirschfelder; E Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue simulation in bimaxillary osteotomies.

Authors:  Jeroen Liebregts; Tong Xi; Maarten Timmermans; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Theo Hoppenreijs; Thomas Maal
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Orthognathic positioning system: intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  John W Polley; Alvaro A Figueroa
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.

Authors:  Luc M Verhamme; Gert J Meijer; Stefaan J Bergé; Rik A Soehardi; Tong Xi; Anton F J de Haan; Filip Schutyser; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 8.  Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  K Stokbro; E Aagaard; P Torkov; R B Bell; T Thygesen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Dental occlusal-surface-supported titanium guide to assist cutting and drilling in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

Authors:  C Savoldelli; C Vandersteen; O Dassonville; J Santini
Journal:  J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.569

10.  A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.

Authors:  Gwen R J Swennen; Wouter Mollemans; Calix De Clercq; Johan Abeloos; Philippe Lamoral; Frank Lippens; Nathalie Neyt; Jan Casselman; Filip Schutyser
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.046

View more
  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of Constructing Digital Hybrid Skull-Dentition Images Using an Intraoral Scanner and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Joo-Hee Lee; Soo-Hwan Byun; Sang-Min Yi; In-Young Park; Byoung-Eun Yang; Hye-Lim Lee
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.932

2.  Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Awad; Andy Häfner; Siegmar Reinert; Susanne Kluba
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-05

3.  Registration-free workflow for electromagnetic and optical navigation in orbital and craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  R Schreurs; F Baan; C Klop; L Dubois; L F M Beenen; P E M H Habets; A G Becking; T J J Maal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.