PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to develop a technique for creating a computerized composite skull model and to test its accuracy. The computerized composite skull model is the combination of a 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) bone model with digital dental models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dry skull with intact dentition was used in development of the technique. The creation of the computerized composite skull model was divided into 3 steps. The first step was to create digital dental models. The second step was to create a 3D CT bone model of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. The last step was to incorporate the digital dental models into the 3D CT skull model, creating a computerized composite skull model. The accuracy of the computerized composite skull model was assessed. Bone-to-bone, tooth-to-tooth, and bone-to-tooth measurements were made on the computerized composite skull model and the dry skull. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression tests were performed. RESULTS: A technique to create a computerized composite skull model was developed. This computerized model not only represented bony structures from CT data but also reproduced dentition from digital dental models. For the bone-to-bone measurements, the mean difference between the computerized composite skull model and the dry skull was 0.5 +/- 0.6 mm. For the tooth-to-tooth measurements, the mean difference was 0.1 +/- 0.2 mm. For the bone-to-tooth measurements, the mean difference was 0.2 +/- 0.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the feasibility of creating a computerized composite skull model as well as its accuracy.
PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to develop a technique for creating a computerized composite skull model and to test its accuracy. The computerized composite skull model is the combination of a 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) bone model with digital dental models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dry skull with intact dentition was used in development of the technique. The creation of the computerized composite skull model was divided into 3 steps. The first step was to create digital dental models. The second step was to create a 3D CT bone model of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. The last step was to incorporate the digital dental models into the 3D CT skull model, creating a computerized composite skull model. The accuracy of the computerized composite skull model was assessed. Bone-to-bone, tooth-to-tooth, and bone-to-tooth measurements were made on the computerized composite skull model and the dry skull. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression tests were performed. RESULTS: A technique to create a computerized composite skull model was developed. This computerized model not only represented bony structures from CT data but also reproduced dentition from digital dental models. For the bone-to-bone measurements, the mean difference between the computerized composite skull model and the dry skull was 0.5 +/- 0.6 mm. For the tooth-to-tooth measurements, the mean difference was 0.1 +/- 0.2 mm. For the bone-to-tooth measurements, the mean difference was 0.2 +/- 0.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the feasibility of creating a computerized composite skull model as well as its accuracy.
Authors: Yu-Bing Chang; James J Xia; Jaime Gateno; Zixiang Xiong; Xiaobo Zhou; Stephen T C Wong Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Stacey L Clark; John F Teichgraeber; Ruth G Fleshman; Joi D Shaw; Carmen Chavarria; Chung-How Kau; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: J J Xia; J Gateno; J F Teichgraeber; P Yuan; K-C Chen; J Li; X Zhang; Z Tang; D M Alfi Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Bassam Hassan; Paulo Couto Souza; Reinhilde Jacobs; Soraya de Azambuja Berti; Paul van der Stelt Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.573