Literature DB >> 19276829

A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.

Gwen R J Swennen1, Wouter Mollemans, Calix De Clercq, Johan Abeloos, Philippe Lamoral, Frank Lippens, Nathalie Neyt, Jan Casselman, Filip Schutyser.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to present a new approach to acquire a three-dimensional virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning without the use of plaster dental models and without deformation of the facial soft-tissue mask. A "triple" cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan procedure with triple voxel-based rigid registration was evaluated and validated on 10 orthognathic patients. First, the patient was scanned vertically with a wax bite wafer in place (CBCT scan No1). Second, a limited dose scan of the patient with a Triple Tray AlgiNot impression in place was carried out (CBCT scan No2). Finally, a high-resolution scan of the Triple Tray AlgiNot impression was done (CBCT scan No3). Sequential and semiautomatic triple voxel-based rigid registration (RNo1-RNo3) was performed to augment the patient's skull model with accurate occlusal and intercuspidation data (Maxilim, version 2.1.1., Medicim NV, Mechelen, Belgium). All registrations were based on the Maximisation of Mutual Information registration algorithm. Because the accuracy and stability of the voxel-based registration (RNo1) between the Triple Tray AlgiNot impression scan and the limited low-dose patient scan were not known, this particular registration step needed to be validated. The accuracy of registration was measured on a synthetic skull and showed to be highly accurate. A volume overlap of 98.1% was found for registered impression scan No1. The mean distance between registered impression scan No1 and registered impression scan No2 was 0.08 +/- 0.03 mm (range, 0.04-0.11 mm). As far as the stability of registration was concerned, successful registration with a stable optimal position was obtained with a maximum variability of less than 0.1 mm. The results of this study showed that semiautomatic sequential triple voxel-based rigid registration of the triple CBCT scans augmented the 3-D virtual skull model with detailed occlusal and intercuspidation data in a highly accurate and robust way. The method is therefore appropriate and valid for 3-D virtual orthognathic surgery planning in the clinical routine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276829     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181996803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  30 in total

Review 1.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the relationship between masticatory performance and skeletal malocclusion.

Authors:  Jung-Chul Park; Hyun-Seung Shin; Jung-Yul Cha; Jong-Tae Park
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

3.  Regional 3D superimposition to assess temporomandibular joint condylar morphology.

Authors:  J Schilling; L C R Gomes; E Benavides; T Nguyen; B Paniagua; M Styner; V Boen; J R Gonçalves; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  An automatic and robust algorithm of reestablishment of digital dental occlusion.

Authors:  Yu-Bing Chang; James J Xia; Jaime Gateno; Zixiang Xiong; Xiaobo Zhou; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Alexandre Motta; William R Proffit; James L Ackerman; Martin Styner
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  MRI vs. CT for orthodontic applications: comparison of two MRI protocols and three CT (multislice, cone-beam, industrial) technologies.

Authors:  Andreas Detterbeck; Michael Hofmeister; Elisabeth Hofmann; Daniel Haddad; Daniel Weber; Astrid Hölzing; Simon Zabler; Matthias Schmid; Karl-Heinz Hiller; Peter Jakob; Jens Engel; Jochen Hiller; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Three-dimensional surgical simulation.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Scott Tucker; Martin Styner; Hyungmin Kim; Jonas Chapuis; Mauricio Reyes; William Proffit; Timothy Turvey; Michael Jaskolka
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  3D analysis of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible in mono- and bimaxillary orthognathic surgery - a methodology study in 18 patients.

Authors:  Florian Guy Draenert; Christina Erbe; Viola Zenglein; Peer W Kämmerer; Susanne Wriedt; Bilal Al Nawas
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

10.  Outcome quantification using SPHARM-PDM toolbox in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Beatriz Paniagua; Lucia Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Martin Styner
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.