Literature DB >> 3249227

The ON-alpha ganglion cell of the cat retina and its presynaptic cell types.

M A Freed1, P Sterling.   

Abstract

Anatomical circuits converging onto the ON-alpha (Y) ganglion cell were studied by computer-assisted reconstruction of substantial portions of 2 alpha cells from electron micrographs of serial sections. The alpha cells in the area centralis were labeled by a Golgi-like retrograde filling with horseradish peroxidase, and certain presynaptic amacrine processes were labeled by uptake of 3H-glycine. About 4400 synapses contacted the alpha cell. Eighty-six percent were from amacrine cells; the rest were from bipolar cells. About one-quarter of the amacrine synapses were specifically labeled by 3H-glycine and probably belong to the A4 amacrine. The bipolar inputs were provided by several types: cone bipolar CBb1 (85%), cone bipolar CBb5 (2%), the rod bipolar (5%), and some unidentified cone bipolars (11%). Contacts from each type occurred in specific strata, with the consequence that they tended to form spots or annulli over the alpha dendritic field. The CBb1 bipolars formed a moderately dense array (8000/mm2), with a nearest-neighbor distance of 8.6 +/- 1.3 microns. Most members of the array (84%) contacted the alpha cell, providing 1-7 synapses (average, 2.7 +/- 1.6). The placement of contacts from an individual CBb1 followed certain rules: they were restricted to a parent branch of the alpha arbor or to 2 daughter branches, but almost never crossed a branch of the alpha arbor. The synaptic territory of an individual CBb1 was not shared with other b1s (or cone bipolars of any sort), although it was shared with amacrine contacts. Rod bipolar cells also formed a very dense array (54,500/mm2) in the alpha dendritic field, but only a few of these (3%) contacted the alpha cell. The concentric receptive field of the CBb1, combined with the spatial organization of its array, is used to predict the CBb1 contribution to the alpha cell receptive field; this contribution resembles the spatial and temporal organization of the alpha receptive field itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3249227      PMCID: PMC6569538     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

1.  Parallel cone bipolar pathways to a ganglion cell use different rates and amplitudes of quantal excitation.

Authors:  M A Freed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Intrinsic physiological properties of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Brendan J O'Brien; Tomoki Isayama; Randal Richardson; David M Berson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Synaptic currents generating the inhibitory surround of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  N Flores-Herr; D A Protti; H Wässle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Bipolar cells contribute to nonlinear spatial summation in the brisk-transient (Y) ganglion cell in mammalian retina.

Authors:  J B Demb; K Zaghloul; L Haarsma; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities.

Authors:  Kareem A Zaghloul; Kwabena Boahen; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The influence of different retinal subcircuits on the nonlinearity of ganglion cell behavior.

Authors:  Matthias H Hennig; Klaus Funke; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A model of high-frequency oscillatory potentials in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Garrett T Kenyon; Bartlett Moore; Janelle Jeffs; Kate S Denning; Greg J Stephens; Bryan J Travis; John S George; James Theiler; David W Marshak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Centre components of cone-driven retinal ganglion cells: differential sensitivity to 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid.

Authors:  E P Chen; R A Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Sluggish and brisk ganglion cells detect contrast with similar sensitivity.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Narender K Dhingra; Robert G Smith; Peter Sterling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A unified neural network [corrected] model of spatiotemporal processing in X and Y retinal ganglion cells. I. Analytical results.

Authors:  P Gaudiano
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.