Literature DB >> 15601731

Sluggish and brisk ganglion cells detect contrast with similar sensitivity.

Ying Xu1, Narender K Dhingra, Robert G Smith, Peter Sterling.   

Abstract

Roughly half of all ganglion cells in mammalian retina belong to the broad class, termed "sluggish." Many of these cells have small receptive fields and project via lateral geniculate nuclei to visual cortex. However, their possible contributions to perception have been largely ignored because sluggish cells seem to respond weakly compared with the more easily studied "brisk" cells. By selecting small somas under infrared DIC optics and recording with a loose seal, we could routinely isolate sluggish cells. When a spot was matched spatially and temporally to the receptive field center, most sluggish cells could detect the same low contrasts as brisk cells. Detection thresholds for the two groups determined by an "ideal observer" were similar: threshold contrast for sluggish cells was 4.7 +/- 0.5% (mean +/- SE), and for brisk cells was 3.4 +/- 0.3% (Mann-Whitney test: P > 0.05). Signal-to-noise ratios for the two classes were also similar at low contrast. However, sluggish cells saturated at somewhat lower contrasts (contrast for half-maximum response was 14 +/- 1 vs. 19 +/- 2% for brisk cells) and were less sensitive to higher temporal frequencies (when the stimulus frequency was increased from 2 to 4 Hz, the response rate fell by 1.6-fold). Thus the sluggish cells covered a narrower dynamic range and a narrower temporal bandwidth, consistent with their reported lower information rates. Because information per spike is greater at lower firing rates, sluggish cells may represent "cheaper" channels that convey less urgent visual information at a lower energy cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15601731      PMCID: PMC2829294          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01088.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Parallel cone bipolar pathways to a ganglion cell use different rates and amplitudes of quantal excitation.

Authors:  M A Freed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Contrast threshold of a brisk-transient ganglion cell in vitro.

Authors:  Narender K Dhingra; Yen-Hong Kao; Peter Sterling; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional architecture of primate cone and rod axons.

Authors:  A Hsu; Y Tsukamoto; R G Smith; P Sterling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  How retinal ganglion cells prevent synaptic noise from reaching the spike output.

Authors:  Jonathan B Demb; Peter Sterling; Michael A Freed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Discrimination performance of single neurons: rate and temporal-pattern information.

Authors:  W S Geisler; D G Albrecht; R J Salvi; S S Saunders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The zeta cell: a new ganglion cell type in cat retina.

Authors:  D M Berson; M Pu; E V Famiglietti
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1998-09-21       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  The ON-alpha ganglion cell of the cat retina and its presynaptic cell types.

Authors:  M A Freed; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  How retinal microcircuits scale for ganglion cells of different size.

Authors:  C K Kier; G Buchsbaum; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spatio-temporal receptive-field structure of phasic W cells in the cat retina.

Authors:  M H Rowe; L A Palmer
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Receptive field properties of x and y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  R A Linsenmeier; L J Frishman; H G Jakiela; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  10 in total

1.  Retinal synaptic pathways underlying the response of the rabbit local edge detector.

Authors:  Thomas L Russell; Frank S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  How much the eye tells the brain.

Authors:  Kristin Koch; Judith McLean; Ronen Segev; Michael A Freed; Michael J Berry; Vijay Balasubramanian; Peter Sterling
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Receptive fields and functional architecture in the retina.

Authors:  Vijay Balasubramanian; Peter Sterling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Cross inhibition from ON to OFF pathway improves the efficiency of contrast encoding in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Zhiyin Liang; Michael A Freed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal properties of dual-peak responses of mouse retinal ganglion cells and effects of inhibitory pathways.

Authors:  Ru-Jia Yan; Hai-Qing Gong; Pu-Ming Zhang; Shi-Gang He; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Voltage-gated sodium channels improve contrast sensitivity of a retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  Narender K Dhingra; Michael A Freed; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Loss of sensitivity in an analog neural circuit.

Authors:  Bart G Borghuis; Peter Sterling; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Coding Properties of Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells with Dual-Peak Patterns with Respect to Stimulus Intervals.

Authors:  Ru-Jia Yan; Hai-Qing Gong; Pu-Ming Zhang; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Distinct roles for inhibition in spatial and temporal tuning of local edge detectors in the rabbit retina.

Authors:  Sowmya Venkataramani; Michiel Van Wyk; Ilya Buldyrev; Benjamin Sivyer; David I Vaney; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Frequency Responses of Rat Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Alex E Hadjinicolaou; Shaun L Cloherty; Yu-Shan Hung; Tatiana Kameneva; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.