Literature DB >> 2621650

Centre components of cone-driven retinal ganglion cells: differential sensitivity to 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid.

E P Chen1, R A Linsenmeier.   

Abstract

1. Changes in different components of the cone-driven centre responses of cat retinal ganglion cells were studied before and during local application of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB). Responses were elicited with bar stimuli whose luminance was above ('brighter') or below ('dimmer') the photopic background luminance. The bars were centrally located, and were similar in width to the receptive field centre. 2. APB acted differently on the on- and off-centre cells. For on-centre X and Y cells, all components of the responses to bright and dim bars were diminished by APB. For the off-centre X and Y cells. APB reduced all components except the transient increase in firing rate when the bright bar was turned off or when the dim bar was turned on. 3. These results suggest that the centre response mechanism of off-centre X and Y cells comprises APB-sensitive and APB-resistant components. The APB-sensitive component is more sustained and responds to both brightening and dimming stimuli. The APB-resistant component is more transient and responds primarily to dimming stimuli. For on-centre X and Y cells only APB-sensitive components could be demonstrated. 4. Experiments with stationary sinusoidal gratings modulated at 0.5-10 Hz showed that responses of off-centre cells were more affected by APB at low than at high temporal frequencies, confirming that the APB-sensitive pathway is responsible for more of the low temporal frequency responses. As expected from the responses to bar stimuli, APB had a uniform effect at all temporal frequencies in on-centre cells. 5. For off-centre cells, the APB-sensitive component is probably derived from input from depolarizing bipolar cells, and the APB-resistant component is derived from hyperpolarizing bipolar input, although one or both pathways could also involve amacrine cells. The combination of these pathways increases the range of temporal frequencies to which the cell can respond and also increases the range of response amplitudes. 6. The lack of differential effects on on-centre cells may have several explanations. The most likely explanations are that only depolarizing bipolars contribute significantly to the centre responses of these cells under the conditions of these experiments, or that there is an APB-sensitive synapse somewhere in the retina besides the one from cones to depolarizing bipolars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2621650      PMCID: PMC1189997          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  25 in total

1.  Effects of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid on responsivity and spatial summation of X cells in the cat retina.

Authors:  E P Chen; R A Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Convergence of rod and cone signals in the cat's retina.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; B G Hertz; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Variability in ganglion cell firing patterns; implications for separate "on" and "off" processes.

Authors:  M W Levine; J M Shefner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Organization of on-off cells in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  E A Schwartz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Pure central responses from off-centre cells and pure surround responses from on-centre cells.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Functional implications of On-Off response variation in frog retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  F R Amthor; M L Wolbarsht; J L Ringo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways.

Authors:  P H Schiller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Receptive field properties of x and y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements.

Authors:  R A Linsenmeier; L J Frishman; H G Jakiela; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research.

Authors:  M M Slaughter; R F Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Sustained synaptic input to ganglion cells of mudpuppy retina.

Authors:  J H Belgum; D R Dvorak; J S McReynolds
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  11 in total

1.  Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities.

Authors:  Kareem A Zaghloul; Kwabena Boahen; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid on responsivity and spatial summation of X cells in the cat retina.

Authors:  E P Chen; R A Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Computational model of the on-alpha ganglion cell receptive field based on bipolar cell circuitry.

Authors:  M A Freed; R G Smith; P Sterling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Crossover inhibition in the retina: circuitry that compensates for nonlinear rectifying synaptic transmission.

Authors:  Alyosha Molnar; Hain-Ann Hsueh; Botond Roska; Frank S Werblin
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  A precisely timed asynchronous pattern of ON and OFF retinal ganglion cell activity during propagation of retinal waves.

Authors:  Daniel Kerschensteiner; Rachel O L Wong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Synaptic pathways that shape the excitatory drive in an OFF retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  Ilya Buldyrev; Theresa Puthussery; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Differences in adaptation between on- and off-centre ganglion cells and rod-mediated cone sensitization in cat retina.

Authors:  E Guenther; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in the spastic mutant mouse.

Authors:  C Stone; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Genetic disruption of the On visual pathway affects cortical orientation selectivity and contrast sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  Rashmi Sarnaik; Hui Chen; Xiaorong Liu; Jianhua Cang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of remote stimulation on the modulated activity of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Christopher L Passaglia; Daniel K Freeman; John B Troy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.