Literature DB >> 32483363

Dual base editor catalyzes both cytosine and adenine base conversions in human cells.

Xiaohui Zhang1, Biyun Zhu1, Liang Chen1, Ling Xie1, Weishi Yu1,2, Ying Wang3, Linxi Li1, Shuming Yin1, Lei Yang1, Handan Hu1, Honghui Han4, Yongmei Li1, Liren Wang1, Geng Chen1, Xueyun Ma1, Hongquan Geng5, Wanfeng Huang1, Xiufeng Pang1, Zuozhen Yang2, Yuxuan Wu1, Stefan Siwko6, Ryo Kurita7, Yukio Nakamura8, Li Yang3, Mingyao Liu1, Dali Li9.   

Abstract

Although base editors are useful tools for precise genome editing, current base editors can only convert either adenines or cytosines. We developed a dual adenine and cytosine base editor (A&C-BEmax) by fusing both deaminases with a Cas9 nickase to achieve C-to-T and A-to-G conversions at the same target site. Compared to single base editors, A&C-BEmax's activity on adenines is slightly reduced, whereas activity on cytosines is higher and RNA off-target activity is substantially decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483363     DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0527-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  4 in total

1.  Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice.

Authors:  Shuai Jin; Yuan Zong; Qiang Gao; Zixu Zhu; Yanpeng Wang; Peng Qin; Chengzhi Liang; Daowen Wang; Jin-Long Qiu; Feng Zhang; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Erwei Zuo; Yidi Sun; Wu Wei; Tanglong Yuan; Wenqin Ying; Hao Sun; Liyun Yuan; Lars M Steinmetz; Yixue Li; Hui Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells.

Authors:  Holly A Rees; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Kevin T Zhao; Michael S Packer; Nicole M Gaudelli; Amanda L Waterbury; Luke W Koblan; Y Bill Kim; Ahmed H Badran; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total
  44 in total

1.  Development and Characterization of a Modular CRISPR and RNA Aptamer Mediated Base Editing System.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Collantes; Victor M Tan; Huiting Xu; Melany Ruiz-Urigüen; Amer Alasadi; Jingjing Guo; Hanlin Tao; Chi Su; Katarzyna M Tyc; Tommaso Selmi; John J Lambourne; Jennifer A Harbottle; Jesse Stombaugh; Jinchuan Xing; Ceri M Wiggins; Shengkan Jin
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2021-02

2.  Identification of novel HPFH-like mutations by CRISPR base editing that elevate the expression of fetal hemoglobin.

Authors:  Nithin Sam Ravi; Beeke Wienert; Stacia K Wyman; Henry William Bell; Anila George; Gokulnath Mahalingam; Jonathan T Vu; Kirti Prasad; Bhanu Prasad Bandlamudi; Nivedhitha Devaraju; Vignesh Rajendiran; Nazar Syedbasha; Aswin Anand Pai; Yukio Nakamura; Ryo Kurita; Muthuraman Narayanasamy; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian; Saravanabhavan Thangavel; Srujan Marepally; Shaji R Velayudhan; Alok Srivastava; Mark A DeWitt; Merlin Crossley; Jacob E Corn; Kumarasamypet M Mohankumar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Detect-seq reveals out-of-protospacer editing and target-strand editing by cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Haowei Meng; Zhicong Lv; Menghao Liu; Huanan Zhao; Hao Wu; Xiaoxue Zhang; Lulu Liu; Yuan Zhuang; Kailin Yin; Yongchang Yan; Chengqi Yi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  Recent advances in CRISPR technologies for genome editing.

Authors:  Myeonghoon Song; Taeyoung Koo
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.946

6.  Single-nucleotide-level mapping of DNA regulatory elements that control fetal hemoglobin expression.

Authors:  Li Cheng; Yichao Li; Qian Qi; Peng Xu; Ruopeng Feng; Lance Palmer; Jingjing Chen; Ruiqiong Wu; Tiffany Yee; Jingjing Zhang; Yu Yao; Akshay Sharma; Ross C Hardison; Mitchell J Weiss; Yong Cheng
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Tony P Huang; Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Highly Efficient CRISPR-Mediated Base Editing in Sinorhizobium meliloti.

Authors:  Longxiang Wang; Yuan Xiao; Xiaowei Wei; Jimin Pan; Deqiang Duanmu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Versatile and efficient in vivo genome editing with compact Streptococcus pasteurianus Cas9.

Authors:  Zhiquan Liu; Siyu Chen; Wanhua Xie; Yuning Song; Jinze Li; Liangxue Lai; Zhanjun Li
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.