Literature DB >> 34174445

Versatile and efficient in vivo genome editing with compact Streptococcus pasteurianus Cas9.

Zhiquan Liu1, Siyu Chen1, Wanhua Xie2, Yuning Song1, Jinze Li1, Liangxue Lai3, Zhanjun Li4.   

Abstract

Compact CRISPR-Cas9 systems that can be packaged into an adeno-associated virus (AAV) show promise for gene therapy. However, the requirement of protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) restricts the target scope. To expand this repertoire, we revisited and optimized a small Cas9 ortholog derived from Streptococcus pasteurianus (SpaCas9) for efficient genome editing in vivo. We found that SpaCas9 enables potent targeting of 5'-NNGYRA-3' PAMs, which are distinct from those recognized by currently used small Cas9s; the Spa-cytosine base editor (CBE) and Spa-adenine base editor (ABE) systems efficiently generated robust C-to-T and A-to-G conversions both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, by exploiting natural variation in the PAM-interacting domain, we engineered three SpaCas9 variants to further expand the targeting scope of compact Cas9 systems. Moreover, mutant mice with efficient disruption of the Tyr gene were successfully generated by microinjection of SpaCas9 mRNA and the corresponding single guide RNA (sgRNA) into zygotes. Notably, all-in-one AAV delivery of SpaCas9 targeting the Pcsk9 gene in adult mouse liver produced efficient genome-editing events and reduced its serum cholesterol. Thus, with distinct PAMs and a small size, SpaCas9 will broaden the CRISPR-Cas9 toolsets for efficient gene modifications and therapeutic applications.
Copyright © 2021 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAV; Acr; CRISPR; Pcsk9; SpaCas9; base editor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34174445      PMCID: PMC8753289          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


  46 in total

1.  Precise, predictable multi-nucleotide deletions in rice and wheat using APOBEC-Cas9.

Authors:  Shengxing Wang; Yuan Zong; Qiupeng Lin; Huawei Zhang; Zhuangzhuang Chai; Dandan Zhang; Kunling Chen; Jin-Long Qiu; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Improving CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Efficiency by Fusion with Chromatin-Modulating Peptides.

Authors:  Xiao Ding; Timothy Seebeck; Yongmei Feng; Yanfang Jiang; Gregory D Davis; Fuqiang Chen
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2019-02

3.  In Vivo Base Editing of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) as a Therapeutic Alternative to Genome Editing.

Authors:  Alexandra C Chadwick; Xiao Wang; Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Improved base editor for efficient editing in GC contexts in rabbits with an optimized AID-Cas9 fusion.

Authors:  Zhiquan Liu; Huanhuan Shan; Siyu Chen; Mao Chen; Quanjun Zhang; Liangxue Lai; Zhanjun Li
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes.

Authors:  Dongdong Zhao; Ju Li; Siwei Li; Xiuqing Xin; Muzi Hu; Marcus A Price; Susan J Rosser; Changhao Bi; Xueli Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Structural basis for the promiscuous PAM recognition by Corynebacterium diphtheriae Cas9.

Authors:  Seiichi Hirano; Omar O Abudayyeh; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Takuro Horii; Ryuichiro Ishitani; Izuho Hatada; Feng Zhang; Hiroshi Nishimasu; Osamu Nureki
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Peyton B Randolph; Jessie R Davis; Alexander A Sousa; Luke W Koblan; Jonathan M Levy; Peter J Chen; Christopher Wilson; Gregory A Newby; Aditya Raguram; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  ACBE, a new base editor for simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G substitutions in mammalian systems.

Authors:  Jingke Xie; Xingyun Huang; Xia Wang; Shixue Gou; Yanhui Liang; Fangbing Chen; Nan Li; Zhen Ouyang; Quanjun Zhang; Weikai Ge; Qin Jin; Hui Shi; Zhenpeng Zhuang; Xiaozhu Zhao; Meng Lian; Jiaowei Wang; Yinghua Ye; Longquan Quan; Han Wu; Kepin Wang; Liangxue Lai
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition.

Authors:  Eva K Brinkman; Tao Chen; Mario Amendola; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR Modeling and Correction of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 23.213

2.  Contribution of CRISPRable DNA to human complex traits.

Authors:  Ranran Zhai; Chenqing Zheng; Zhijian Yang; Ting Li; Jiantao Chen; Xia Shen
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-10-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.