Literature DB >> 32481829

Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells.

Johnson H Y Chung1, Sina Naficy, Zhilian Yue, Robert Kapsa, Anita Quigley, Simon E Moulton, Gordon G Wallace.   

Abstract

Additive biofabrication (3D bioprinting) makes it possible to create scaffolds with precise geometries, control over pore interconnectivity and architectures that are not possible with conventional techniques. Inclusion of cells within the ink to form a "bio-ink" presents the potential to print 3D structures that can be implanted into damaged/diseased tissue to promote highly controlled cell-based regeneration and repair. The properties of an 'ink' are defined by its formulation and critically influence the delivery and integrity of structure formed. Importantly, the ink properties need to conform to biological requirements necessary for the cell system that they are intended to support and it is often challenging to find conditions for printing that facilitate this critical aspect of tissue bioengineering. In this study, alginate (Alg) was selected as the major component of the 'bio-ink' formulations for extrusion printing of cells. The rheological properties of alginate-gelatin (Alg-Gel) blends were compared with pre-crosslinked alginate and alginate solution to establish their printability whilst maintaining their ability to support optimal cell growth. Pre-crosslinked alginate on its own was liquid-like during printing. However, by controlling the temperature, Alg-Gel formulations had higher viscosity, storage modulus and consistency which facilitated higher print resolution/precision. Compression and indentation testing were used to examine the mechanical properties of alginate compared to Alg-Gel. Both types of gels yielded similar results with modulus increasing with alginate concentration. Decay in mechanical properties over time suggests that Alg-Gel slowly degrades in cell culture media with more than 60% decrease in initial modulus over 7 days. The viability of primary myoblasts delivered as a myoblast/Alg-Gel bio-ink was not affected by the printing process, indicating that the Alg-Gel matrix provides a potential means to print 3D constructs that may find application in myoregenerative applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 32481829     DOI: 10.1039/c3bm00012e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Sci        ISSN: 2047-4830            Impact factor:   6.843


  40 in total

Review 1.  Freeform 3D printing of soft matters: recent advances in technology for biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Shengyang Chen; Wen See Tan; Muhammad Aidil Bin Juhari; Qian Shi; Xue Shirley Cheng; Wai Lee Chan; Juha Song
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Einollah Sarikhani; Hossein Montazerian; Samad Ahadian; Marco Costantini; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Stephanie Willerth; Konrad Walus; Mohammad Mofidfar; Ehsan Toyserkani; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-05-26

Review 4.  3D bioprinting and craniofacial regeneration.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-14

5.  Cell Death Persists in Rapid Extrusion of Lysis-Resistant Coated Cardiac Myoblasts.

Authors:  Calvin F Cahall; Aman Preet Kaur; Kara A Davis; Jonathan T Pham; Hainsworth Y Shin; Brad J Berron
Journal:  Bioprinting       Date:  2019-12-25

6.  Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  A Ribeiro; M M Blokzijl; R Levato; C W Visser; M Castilho; W E Hennink; T Vermonden; J Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 7.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

9.  Long-Term Outcome of Sciatic Nerve Regeneration Using Bio3D Conduit Fabricated from Human Fibroblasts in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Model.

Authors:  Maki Ando; Ryosuke Ikeguchi; Tomoki Aoyama; Mai Tanaka; Takashi Noguchi; Yudai Miyazaki; Shizuka Akieda; Koichi Nakayama; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels.

Authors:  Amin GhavamiNejad; Nureddin Ashammakhi; Xiao Yu Wu; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.