| Literature DB >> 34105391 |
Maki Ando1,2,3,4, Ryosuke Ikeguchi1,2,3,4, Tomoki Aoyama1,2,3,4, Mai Tanaka1,2,3,4, Takashi Noguchi1,2,3,4, Yudai Miyazaki1,2,3,4, Shizuka Akieda1,2,3,4, Koichi Nakayama1,2,3,4, Shuichi Matsuda1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Previously, we developed a Bio3D conduit fabricated from human fibroblasts and reported a significantly better outcome compared with artificial nerve conduit in the treatment of rat sciatic nerve defect. The purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term safety and nerve regeneration of Bio3D conduit compared with treatments using artificial nerve conduit and autologous nerve transplantation.We used 15 immunodeficient rats and randomly divided them into three groups treated with Bio3D (n = 5) conduit, silicon tube (n = 5), and autologous nerve transplantation (n = 5). We developed Bio3D conduits composed of human fibroblasts and bridged the 5 mm nerve gap created in the rat sciatic nerve. The same procedures were performed to bridge the 5 mm gap with a silicon tube. In the autologous nerve group, we removed the 5 mm sciatic nerve segment and transplanted it. We evaluated the nerve regeneration 24 weeks after surgery.Toe dragging was significantly better in the Bio3D group (0.20 ± 0.28) than in the silicon group (0.6 ± 0.24). The wet muscle weight ratios of the tibial anterior muscle of the Bio3D group (79.85% ± 5.47%) and the autologous nerve group (81.74% ± 2.83%) were significantly higher than that of the silicon group (66.99% ± 3.51%). The number of myelinated axons and mean myelinated axon diameter was significantly higher in the Bio3D group (14708 ± 302 and 5.52 ± 0.44 μm) and the autologous nerve group (14927 ± 5089 and 6.04 ± 0.85 μm) than the silicon group (7429 ± 1465 and 4.36 ± 0.21 μm). No tumors were observed in any of the rats in the Bio3D group at 24 weeks after surgery.The Bio3D group showed significantly better nerve regeneration and there was no significant difference between the Bio3D group and the nerve autograft group in all endpoints.Entities:
Keywords: bio 3D printer; nerve conduit; nerve regeneration; peripheral nerve
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34105391 PMCID: PMC8193652 DOI: 10.1177/09636897211021357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Figure 1.Bio3D conduit fabricated from normal human dermal fibroblasts. They were cultured in intravenous catheters until sufficient maturation. Bio3D conduit before the transplantation.
Figure 2.Reconstruction of a 5 mm nerve gap with three different methods and its schema. The schema illustrates the way of making a 5 mm nerve gap in the Bio3D group and the silicon group. The proximal stump and distal stump of the sciatic nerve was pulled 1.5 mm into the conduits in the (B) Bio3D group and the (C) silicon group. (D) In the nerve autograft group, the 5-mm-long sciatic nerve was removed and flipped to suture.
Results of the Pinprick Test for Evaluation of Sensory Recovery and the Toe-Spread Test for Evaluation of Motor Recovery at 24 Weeks After Surgery.
| Bio3D | Silicon | Autograft | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pinprick | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Toe-spread | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
In the Bio3D group and the autograft group, all rats scored grade 3 in both tests except for 2 of 5 rats who scored grade 2 in the toe-spread test in the silicon group.
Figure 3.Results of kinematic analysis. (A) Measurement of the AoA using the kinematic analysis system by tracking each marker to measure the angle between the metatarsal bone and the toe just before toe-touch. (B) The DT, which represents the ratio of dragging during continuous steps, was significantly higher in the silicon group than the other two groups. (C) Although the AoA, which represents the degree of dropped toe, tended to be better in the Bio3D group and the autograft group, a significant difference was only observed between the silicon group and the autograft group (P < .05).
Figure 4.Results of electrophysiological evaluation for the target muscle of the sciatic nerve. (A) The mean recovery of the CMAP was better in the Bio3D group (65.37% ± 7.57%) and the nerve autograft group (85.13% ± 6.46%) than in the silicon group (53.86% ± 19.51%), although there was only a significant different between the silicon group and the autograft group (P < .01). B) As for the NCV, there was no significant difference among the three groups.
Figure 5.Macroscopic observation of the transplanted sites 24 weeks after surgery (A–C). (A) The Bio3D conduit was degenerated and regenerated nerve was observed. (B) The regenerated nerve was thin in the silicon tube. (C) Regenerated nerve was observed in the autograft group.
Figure 6.Wet muscle weight of the tibial anterior muscle. (A) Little muscle atrophy was observed in the Bio3D group (79.85% ± 5.47%) and the autograft group (81.74% ± 2.83%) compared with the silicon group (66.99% ± 3.51%). (B) The whole appearance of the dissected tibial anterior muscles of (a) the Bio3D group, (b) the silicon group, and (c) the autograft group.
Figure 7.(A–I) Histology of the mid-portion regenerated nerves and (J) myelinated axon number of the middle portion of the regenerated sciatic nerve. (A–F) Semi-thin transverse sections stained with toluidine blue at different magnifications. (G–I) Ultra-thin transverse sections observed with transmission electron microscopy. Whole images of the specimens show that the regenerated nerves of the silicon group (B) were smaller than those of the Bio3D group (A) and the autograft group (C). Magnified images of semi-thin (D–F) and ultra-thin transverse sections (G–I) revealed that myelinated axons with larger diameter and thicker myelin sheath were regenerated in the Bio3D group and the autograft group than in the silicon group. (J) Myelinated axon number of the middle portion of regenerated sciatic nerve. The Bio3D group (14708 ± 3021) and autograft group (14927 ± 5089) showed a significantly greater number than the silicon group (7429 ± 1465), and there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Figure 8.Morphological evaluations of the myelinated axon. (A) The mean myelinated axon diameter of both the Bio3D group (5.52 ± 0.44 µm) and the autograft group (6.04 ± 0.84 µm) was significantly larger than that of the silicon group (4.36 ± 0.21 µm). (B) The mean axon diameter of the autograft group (3.9 ± 0.55 µm) was significantly larger than that of the silicon group (3.04 ± 0.24 µm) although there was no significant difference between it and the Bio3D group (3.58 ± 0.28 µm). (C) Myelin sheath was significantly thicker in the Bio3D group (0.97 ± 0.08 µm) and the autograft group (1.07 ± 0.19 µm) than in the silicon group (0.66 ± 0.08 µm). (D) The mean G-ratio was significantly lower in the Bio3D group (0.63 ± 0.02) and the autograft group (0.63 ± 0.02) than in the silicon group (0.69 ± 0.04).
Figure 9.Immunohistochemistry of the middle portion of a regenerated sciatic nerve harvested from a rat in each of the three groups. The upper row shows overall images of the transverse section (scale bar indicates 100 µm) in each of the three groups. Control is an intact sciatic nerve harvested from a healthy rat. The middle row shows magnified images of the transverse section (scale bar indicates 50 µm), and the lower row shows magnified images of the longitudinal section (scale bar indicates 50 µm) fluorescent stained by NF200, S-100, DAPI, and merged in the Bio3D group. An S-100-positive lesion can be observed around nerve fibers stained by NF200, which implies nerve regeneration at the middle portion of the sciatic nerve defect lesion bridged by a Bio3D conduit.