| Literature DB >> 32481497 |
Sofiane Safi-Stibler1,2,3, Etienne A Thévenot4, Luc Jouneau1,2, Mélanie Jouin1,2, Alexandre Seyer5,6, Hélène Jammes1,2, Delphine Rousseau-Ralliard1,2, Christine Baly1,2,7, Anne Gabory1,2.
Abstract
Nutritional changes during developmental windows are of particular concern in offspring metabolic disease. Questions are emerging concerning the role of maternal weight changes before conception, particularly for weight loss, in the development of diet-related disorders. Understanding the physiological pathways affected by the maternal trajectories in the offspring is therefore essential, but a broad overview is still lacking. We recently reported both metabolic and behavioral negative outcomes in offspring born to obese or weight-loss mothers and fed a control of high-fat diet, suggesting long-term modeling of metabolic pathways needing to be further characterized. Using non-targeted LC-HRMS, we investigated the impact of maternal and post-weaning metabolic status on the adult male offspring's metabolome in three tissues involved in energy homeostasis: liver, hypothalamus and olfactory bulb. We showed that post-weaning diet interfered with the abundance of several metabolites, including 1,5-anhydroglucitol, saccharopine and βhydroxybutyrate, differential in the three tissues. Moreover, maternal diet had a unique impact on the abundance of two metabolites in the liver. Particularly, anserine abundance, lowered by maternal obesity, was normalized by a preconceptional weight loss, whatever the post-weaning diet. This study is the first to identify a programming long-term effect of maternal preconception obesity on the offspring metabolome.Entities:
Keywords: DOHaD; high-fat diet; liver; metabolomics; obesity; weight loss
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32481497 PMCID: PMC7352523 DOI: 10.3390/nu12061572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Animal model of preconception maternal weight trajectories. C57BL/6J F0 females were fed a control diet (CD, blue), a high-fat diet (HFD, red) or an HFD for two months and then switched onto the CD. On postnatal day 21 (PND21), half of the litter was weaned onto the HFD and the other half under the paired-CD diet, resulting in six groups: CD-CD, CD-HFD, OB-CD, OB-HFD, WL-CD and WL-HFD. All male offspring were followed until the age of six months. The number of animals studied (n) is indicated for each group.
Figure 2The number of metabolites categorized per chemical classes in the initial set of metabolites analyzed did not differ between the three tissues (liver LI, hypothalamus HYP and whole olfactory bulb WOB).
Figure 3Post-weaning HFD had a global impact on the liver and hypothalamus metabolomes. Score plots from the PLS-DA classification into HFD and CD groups for the LI (a) and HYP (b). No model was built for WOB. A model is considered robust when the response variance explained (R2Y) is higher than the predictive performance of the model (Q2Y). A model with a Q2Y > 0.5 is considered to have a good predictive performance.
Figure 4Post-weaning HFD discriminated several metabolites in the three tissues. (a) Venn diagram representing the number of metabolites discriminating between CD-fed and HFD-fed male mice. Abundance of the three metabolites affected similarly in the three tissues is represented as boxplot, with dots showing individual measurements, and white dots are outliers. (b) HFD-fed mice had significantly lower anhydroglucitol levels and (c) saccharopine levels than CD-fed mice. (d) HFD-fed mice had significantly higher β-hydroxybutyrate levels than CD-fed mice. * Indicates an adjusted p-value < 0.05.
Discriminating metabolites between CD-fed and HFD-fed male mice.
| Decreased under HFD | Increased under HFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Liver (LI) | ||
| Hypothalamus (HYP) |
| |
| Whole olfactory bulb (WOB) |
When a compound has several putative annotations, they are separated by a “/”. Bold characters indicate metabolites validated by MS/MS; italic characters indicate metabolites that were not validated by MS/MS; regular characters indicate metabolites for which annotation could not be specified by MS/MS or was not tested. Underlined metabolites were affected similarly by the HFD in all three tissues.
Pathway (KEGG) enrichment analysis in the liver: comparison between males fed an HFD and males fed a CD.
| Pathways | Total Compounds | Hits | FDR | Impact | Metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism | 5 | 1 | 0.00002 | 100% | L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis | 3 | 1 | 0.00644 | 100% | 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid ↓ |
| Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism | 8 | 3 | 0.00002 | 71% | Cysteic acid ↑; 3-Sulfinoalanine ↑; Taurine ↑ |
| Beta-alanine metabolism | 17 | 3 | 0.00001 | 67% | Beta-alanine ↑; Ureidopropionic acid ↑; Uracil ↑ |
| Methane metabolism | 9 | 1 | 0.02049 | 40% | L-Serine ↓ |
| Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism | 31 | 5 | 0.00001 | 36% | Dimethylglycine ↑; Phosphoserine ↓ |
| Purine metabolism | 68 | 8 | 0.00001 | 28% | Xanthine ↑; AICAR ↑; Inosinic acid ↓; Deoxyinosine ↓; Xanthosine ↑; Guanosine monophosphate ↓; Guanine ↓; 2′-Deoxyguanosine 5′-monophosphate ↓ |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | 41 | 8 | 0.00001 | 28% | Uridine 5′-diphosphate ↓; Uridine 5′-monophosphate ↓; Uridine ↑; Ureidopropionic acid ↑; Cytidine ↑; Orotic acid ↑; Uracil ↑; Beta-Alanine ↑ |
| Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism | 24 | 4 | 0.00001 | 28% | Argininosuccinic acid ↑; L-Glutamic acid ↑; L-Asparagine ↓; Glucosamine 6-phosphate ↓ |
| Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism | 13 | 3 | 0.00001 | 21% | Quinolinic acid ↑; NAD ↑; Nicotinic acid ↑ |
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | 27 | 6 | 0.00001 | 20% | L-Serine ↓; L-Methionine ↑; S-Adenosylhomocysteine ↑; Cysteic acid ↑; 3-Sulfinoalanine ↑; 2-Ketobutyric acid ↓ |
| Sphingolipid metabolism | 21 | 3 | 0.00005 | 20% | Sphinganine ↑; L-Serine ↓; Sphingosine ↑ |
| Glycerolipid metabolism | 18 | 2 | 0.00019 | 13% | Glycerol 3-phosphate ↓; Glyceric acid ↑ |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 30 | 2 | 0.00012 | 13% | Citicoline ↑; Glycerol 3-phosphate ↓ |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 69 | 4 | 0.00038 | 13% | L-Asparagine ↓; L-Serine ↓; L-Methionine ↑; L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 44 | 3 | 0.00001 | 12% | Argininosuccinic acid ↑; L-Glutamic acid ↑; 4-Guanidinobutanoic acid ↓ |
| Tryptophan metabolism | 40 | 1 | 0.00056 | 11% | L-Kynurenine ↓ |
| Glycolysis or gluconeogenesis | 26 | 1 | 0.00032 | 10% | Phosphoenolpyruvic acid ↑ |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 37 | 3 | 0.00020 | 8% | Glucosamine 6-phosphate ↓; GDP-L-fucose ↓; |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 44 | 1 | 0.00645 | 7% | 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid ↓ |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 19 | 1 | 0.00002 | 7% | Deoxyribose 5-phosphate ↓ |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 18 | 1 | 0.00032 | 6% | Glyceric acid ↑ |
| Glutathione metabolism | 26 | 1 | 0.00002 | 6% | L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Vitamin B6 metabolism | 9 | 2 | 0.00002 | 5% | Pyridoxamine 5′-phosphate ↑; 4-Pyridoxic acid ↑ |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 15 | 3 | 0.00001 | 4% | Ureidopropionic acid ↑; Beta-Alanine ↑; Uracil ↑ |
| Primary bile acid biosynthesis | 46 | 1 | 0.00002 | 3% | Taurine ↑ |
| Lysine degradation | 23 | 2 | 0.00001 | 1% | N6,N6,N6-Trimethyl-L-lysine ↑; Saccharopine ↓ |
| Histidine metabolism | 15 | 2 | 0.00001 | 0% | L-Glutamic acid ↑; 1-Methylhistidine ↓ |
| Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 42 | 3 | 0.00001 | 0% | Nervonic acid ↓; Arachidic acid ↑; Gamma-Linolenic acid ↑ |
| Butanoate metabolism | 22 | 1 | 0.00002 | 0% | L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | 27 | 1 | 0.00002 | 0% | L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 9 | 1 | 0.00002 | 0% | L-Glutamic acid ↑ |
| Propanoate metabolism | 20 | 2 | 0.00003 | 0% | Beta-Alanine ↑; 2-Ketobutyric acid ↓ |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 6 | 1 | 0.00003 | 0% | 13S-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid ↑ |
| Limonene and pinene degradation | 8 | 1 | 0.00011 | 0% | Perillic acid ↑ |
| Riboflavin metabolism | 11 | 1 | 0.00012 | 0% | Riboflavin ↑ |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 20 | 1 | 0.00032 | 0% | Phosphoenolpyruvic acid ↑ |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 23 | 1 | 0.00032 | 0% | Phosphoenolpyruvic acid ↑ |
| Lysine biosynthesis | 4 | 1 | 0.00466 | 0% | Saccharopine ↓ |
| Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis | 4 | 1 | 0.00645 | 0% | 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid ↓ |
| Cyanoamino acid metabolism | 6 | 1 | 0.02049 | 0% | L-Serine ↓ |
Pathway (KEGG and SMPDB) enrichment analysis in the hypothalamus and whole olfactory bulb: comparison between males fed an HFD and males fed a CD.
| Pathways | Total Compounds | Hits | FDR | Impact | Metabolites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Aspartate metabolism | 34 | 3 | 0.00818 | 35% | L-Asparagine ↑, Argininosuccinic acid ↑, L-Arginine ↑ |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 48 | 2 | 0.00586 | 24% | Argininosuccinic acid ↑, L-Arginine ↑ |
| Urea cycle | 23 | 2 | 0.00586 | 22% | Argininosuccinic acid ↑, L-Arginine ↑ |
| Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism | 25 | 2 | 0.01921 | 12% | L-Phenylalanine ↑, L-Tyrosine ↑ |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 19 | 1 | 0.00586 | 7% | Pantothenic acid ↑ |
| Ammonia recycling | 25 | 1 | 0.03670 | 3% | L-Asparagine ↑ |
| Lysine degradation | 20 | 1 | 0.01921 | 3% | Saccharopine ↓ |
| Beta-alanine metabolism | 26 | 2 | 0.00586 | 0% | 3-Methylhistidine ↑, Pantothenic acid ↑ |
| Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation | 51 | 1 | 0.02030 | 0% | L-Valine ↑ |
| Catecholamine biosynthesis | 14 | 1 | 0.03065 | 0% | L-Tyrosine ↑ |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 55 | 1 | 0.03065 | 0% | L-Tyrosine ↑ |
|
| |||||
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 44 | 1 | 0.00233 | 4% | Hydroxyproline ↓ |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 15 | 1 | 0.00430 | 2% | Pantothenic acid ↑ |
| Lysine degradation | 23 | 2 | 0.00015 | 1% | L-Lysine ↓; Saccharopine ↓ |
| Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 42 | 3 | 0.00015 | 0% | 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid ↓; Gamma-linolenic acid ↑; Eicosapentaenoic acid ↓ |
| Lysine biosynthesis | 4 | 2 | 0.00015 | 0% | L-Lysine ↓; Saccharopine ↓ |
| Biotin metabolism | 5 | 1 | 0.00430 | 0% | L-Lysine ↓ |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 69 | 1 | 0.00430 | 0% | L-Lysine ↓ |
|
| |||||
| Alpha linolenic acid and linoleic acid metabolism | 17 | 3 | 0.00032 | 26% | Eicosapentaenoic acid ↓; 8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid ↓; Gamma-Linolenic acid ↑ |
| Lysine degradation | 20 | 2 | 0.18397 | 3% | L-Lysine ↓; Saccharopine ↓ |
| Biotin metabolism | 7 | 1 | 0.72255 | 0% | L-Lysine ↓ |
| Carnitine synthesis | 16 | 1 | 0.72255 | 0% | L-Lysine ↓ |
Figure 5Two liver metabolite levels were affected by maternal diet group. (a) In the OB offspring, the abundance of anserine was significantly lower than that in CTRL and WL offspring. Anserine abundance did not differ significantly between the CTRL and WL offspring. This effect was independent of the post-weaning diet. (b) In the CTRL offspring, the abundance of P/H-P was significantly lower in animals fed the HFD. In the OB offspring, the opposite trend was observed: the abundance of P/H-P was significantly increased by the HFD. Furthermore, CTRL-CD and OB-CD offspring differed significantly from each other, as did CTRL-HFD and OB-HFD offspring. Finally, WL-CD and WL-HFD offspring were not significantly different from other offspring groups. Each dot represents an individual, and * indicates an adjusted p-value < 0.05.