| Literature DB >> 28640216 |
Martina Goffredo1, Nicola Santoro2, Domenico Tricò3,4, Cosimo Giannini5,6, Ebe D'Adamo7,8, Hongyu Zhao9, Gang Peng10, Xiaoqing Yu11, Tukiet T Lam12, Bridget Pierpont13, Sonia Caprio14, Raimund I Herzog15.
Abstract
Dysregulation of several metabolite pathways, including branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), are associated with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and insulin resistance in adults, while studies in youth reported conflicting results. We explored whether, independently of obesity and insulin resistance, obese adolescents with NAFLD display a metabolomic signature consistent with disturbances in amino acid and lipid metabolism. A total of 180 plasma metabolites were measured by a targeted metabolomic approach in 78 obese adolescents with (n = 30) or without (n = 48) NAFLD assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and subsets of patients underwent a two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and/or a second MRI after a 2.2 ± 0.8-year follow-up. Adolescents with NAFLD had higher plasma levels of valine (p = 0.02), isoleucine (p = 0.03), tryptophan (p = 0.02), and lysine (p = 0.02) after adjustment for confounding factors. Circulating BCAAs were negatively correlated with peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, higher baseline valine levels predicted an increase in hepatic fat content (HFF) at follow-up (p = 0.01). These results indicate that a dysregulation of BCAA metabolism characterizes obese adolescents with NAFLD independently of obesity and insulin resistance and predict an increase in hepatic fat content over time.Entities:
Keywords: branched chain amino acids; insulin resistance; metabolomics; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; obesity; youth
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28640216 PMCID: PMC5537762 DOI: 10.3390/nu9070642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of the study population stratified by hepatic fat content (HFF %).
| HFF < 5.5% ( | HFF ≥ 5.5% ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 13.6 ± 3.0 | 12.8 ± 2.8 | 0.30 |
| Gender (M/F) | 17/31 (35%/65%) | 21/9 (70%/30%) | 0.003 |
| Race (Caucasian/African American/Hispanic/Asian) | 15/19/13/1 (31%/40%/27%/2%) | 11/3/16/0 (37%/10%/53%/0%) | 0.02 |
| Glucose tolerance (NGT/IGT) | 41/7 (85%/15%) | 20/10 (67%/33%) | 0.10 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 34.1 ± 7.2 | 33.6 ± 5.1 | 0.64 |
| BMI | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 0.24 |
| Body Fat (%) | 44.27 ± 7.17 | 45.35 ± 7.53 | 0.34 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 91 ± 7 | 94 ± 6 | 0.15 |
| Fasting insulin (µU/mL) | 25 ± 11.3 | 45.4 ± 23.9 | <0.001 |
| 2 h glucose (mg/dL) | 114 ± 22 | 128 ± 28 | 0.01 |
| Hemoglobin A1C (%) | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 0.31 |
| WBISI | 2.12 ± 0.89 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | <0.001 |
| IGI | 4.1 ± 2.8 | 5.93 ± 5.6 | 0.08 |
| DI | 8.0 ± 6.4 | 6.7 ± 7.1 | 0.50 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 148 ± 26 | 159 ± 36 | 0.19 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 45 ± 9 | 42.47 ± 10 | 0.23 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 87 ± 23 | 92 ± 30 | 0.55 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 78 ± 38 | 127 ± 80 | 0.002 |
| Alanine Transaminase (U/L) | 16.5 ± 6.9 | 40.2 ± 28.5 | <0.001 |
| Aspartate Transaminase (U/L) | 19.7 ± 4.3 | 30.3 ± 15.0 | 0.001 |
| Visceral (cm2) | 55.6 ± 28.6 | 79.7 ± 24.8 | <0.001 |
| Deep Subcutaneous (cm2) | 188.6 ± 141.6 | 177.1 ± 57.1 | 0.40 |
| Subcutaneous (cm2) | 552.1 ± 224.5 | 527.9 ± 167.4 | 0.90 |
| Superficial Subcutaneous (cm2) | 168.1 ± 70.3 | 129.8 ± 52.8 | 0.002 |
| Deep/Superficial Subcutaneous | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 0.02 |
| Hepatic Fat Fraction (%) | 1.1 ± 1.6 | 18.3± 10.2 | <0.001 |
HFF, hepatic fat content; BMI, Body Mass Index; DI, Disposition Index; IGI, Insulinogenic index; NGT, Normal Glucose tolerance; IGT, Impaired Glucose Tolerance; WBISI, Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were made by either Student’s t-tests for continuous variables or Chi-square tests for categorical variables.
Figure 1Random forest importance plot for subjects without vs. with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Random forest plot of top-ranked metabolites with the highest Mean Decreased Gini index for the classification of obese adolescents with and without NAFLD.
Figure 2Metabolites associated with NAFLD in obese youth: (A) BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids (isoleucine, leucine, and valine); (B) C4 and C5; (C) tryptophan, lysine, and glutamate; (D) PC.aa.C32.1 (long-chain phosphatidylcholine C32:1); and (E) C14:1-OH (Hydroxytetradecenoylcarnitine). Statistical comparisons between the two groups were made by Student’s t-tests.
Figure 3Association between hepatic glucose suppression during a two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and: (A) isoleucine; (B) leucine; and (C) valine concentrations. Rank correlations between variables are indicated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r).
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of valine for predicting HFF progression in obese youth. The area under the ROC curve was 0.803. With a cutoff of 276 μmol, valine levels had 66.7% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity to predict increases in HFF.