Literature DB >> 32476619

Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Jennifer K Lotter1, Christopher E Henderson1,2, Abbey Plawecki1, Molly E Holthus1, Emily H Lucas1, Marzieh M Ardestani1,2, Brian D Schmit3, T George Hornby1,2.   

Abstract

Background. Many research studies attempting to improve locomotor function following motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) focus on providing stepping practice. However, observational studies of physical therapy strategies suggest the amount of stepping practice during clinical rehabilitation is limited; rather, many interventions focus on mitigating impairments underlying walking dysfunction. Objective. The purpose of this blinded-assessor randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of task-specific versus impairment-based interventions on walking outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Methods. Using a crossover design, ambulatory participants with iSCI >1-year duration performed either task-specific (upright stepping) or impairment-based training for up to 20 sessions over ≤6 weeks, with interventions alternated after >4 weeks delay. Both strategies focused on achieving higher cardiovascular intensities, with training specificity manipulated by practicing only stepping practice in variable contexts or practicing tasks targeting impairments underlying locomotor dysfunction (strengthening, balance tasks, and recumbent stepping). Results. Significantly greater increases in fastest overground and treadmill walking speeds were observed following task-specific versus impairment-based training, with moderate associations between differences in amount of practice and outcomes. Gains in balance confidence were also observed following task-specific vs impairment-based training, although incidence of falls was also increased with the former protocol. Limited gains were observed with impairment-based training except for peak power during recumbent stepping tests. Conclusion. The present study reinforces work from other patient populations that the specificity of task practice is a critical determinant of locomotor outcomes and suggest impairment-based exercises may not translate to improvements in functional tasks. Clinical Trial Registration URL. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; Unique Identifier: NCT02115685.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait; high-intensity training; rehabilitation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32476619      PMCID: PMC7329565          DOI: 10.1177/1545968320927384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  45 in total

1.  Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.

Authors:  P L Ditunno; M Patrick; M Stineman; J F Ditunno
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Natalia Alexeeva; Carol Sames; Patrick L Jacobs; Lori Hobday; Marcello M Distasio; Sarah A Mitchell; Blair Calancie
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Daily stepping in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Poonam Saraf; Miriam R Rafferty; Jennifer L Moore; Jennifer H Kahn; Kathryn Hendron; Kristan Leech; T George Hornby
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-12-18

4.  Recumbent stepper submaximal exercise test to predict peak oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Sandra A Billinger; Ellie VAN Swearingen; Megan McClain; Angela A Lentz; Mathew B Good
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Effects of dynamic stepping training on nonlocomotor tasks in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  Don D Straube; Carey L Holleran; Catherine R Kinnaird; Abigail L Leddy; Patrick W Hennessy; T George Hornby
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-03-13

6.  Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Kathryn E Roach
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11-04

7.  A clinical prediction rule for ambulation outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Allard J F Hosman; A Rogier T Donders; Martin H Pouw; John F Ditunno; Armin Curt; Alexander C H Geurts; Hendrik Van de Meent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  An electric stimulation cycling protocol for gait in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Peter Levine; Jonathan Strayer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Jillian R Macdonald; Darcy S Reisman; Lara Boyd; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Sheila M Schindler-Ivens; T George Hornby; Sandy A Ross; Patricia L Scheets
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Rehabilitation Research at the National Institutes of Health.

Authors:  Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean; Diane Damiano; Linda Ehrlich-Jones; Melanie Fried-Oken; Alan Jette; Ranu Jung; Rick L Lieber; James F Malec; Michael J Mueller; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Keith E Tansey; Aiko Thompson
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Anodal transcutaneous DC stimulation enhances learning of dynamic balance control during walking in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jui-Te Lin; Chao-Jung Hsu; Weena Dee; David Chen; W Zev Rymer; Ming Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Walking and Balance Outcomes Are Improved Following Brief Intensive Locomotor Skill Training but Are Not Augmented by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Persons With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nicholas H Evans; Cazmon Suri; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Feasibility and tolerance of a robotic postural training to improve standing in a person with ambulatory spinal cord injury.

Authors:  V Santamaria; T D Luna; S K Agrawal
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-10-07

Review 4.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and rehabilitation to promote functional restoration in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer A Iddings; Anastasia Zarkou; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.283

5.  Linking gait mechanics with perceived quality of life and participation after stroke.

Authors:  David M Rowland; Michael D Lewek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.