UNLABELLED: Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, Hornby TG, Ross SA, Scheets PL. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how much movement practice occurred during stroke rehabilitation, and what factors might influence doses of practice provided. DESIGN: Observational survey of stroke therapy sessions. SETTING: Seven inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation sites. PARTICIPANTS: We observed a convenience sample of 312 physical and occupational therapy sessions for people with stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded numbers of repetitions in specific movement categories and data on potential modifying factors (patient age, side affected, time since stroke, FIM item scores, years of therapist experience). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize amounts of practice. Correlation and regression analyses were used to determine whether potential factors were related to the amount of practice in the 2 important categories of upper extremity functional movements and gait steps. RESULTS: Practice of task-specific, functional upper extremity movements occurred in 51% of the sessions that addressed upper limb rehabilitation, and the average number of repetitions/session was 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]=20-44). Practice of gait occurred in 84% of sessions that addressed lower limb rehabilitation and the average number of gait steps/session was 357 (95% CI=296-418). None of the potential factors listed accounted for significant variance in the amount of practice in either of these 2 categories. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of practice provided during poststroke rehabilitation is small compared with animal models. It is possible that current doses of task-specific practice during rehabilitation are not adequate to drive the neural reorganization needed to promote function poststroke optimally.
UNLABELLED: Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Reisman DS, Boyd L, Jacobson Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens SM, Hornby TG, Ross SA, Scheets PL. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how much movement practice occurred during stroke rehabilitation, and what factors might influence doses of practice provided. DESIGN: Observational survey of stroke therapy sessions. SETTING: Seven inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation sites. PARTICIPANTS: We observed a convenience sample of 312 physical and occupational therapy sessions for people with stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded numbers of repetitions in specific movement categories and data on potential modifying factors (patient age, side affected, time since stroke, FIM item scores, years of therapist experience). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize amounts of practice. Correlation and regression analyses were used to determine whether potential factors were related to the amount of practice in the 2 important categories of upper extremity functional movements and gait steps. RESULTS: Practice of task-specific, functional upper extremity movements occurred in 51% of the sessions that addressed upper limb rehabilitation, and the average number of repetitions/session was 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]=20-44). Practice of gait occurred in 84% of sessions that addressed lower limb rehabilitation and the average number of gait steps/session was 357 (95% CI=296-418). None of the potential factors listed accounted for significant variance in the amount of practice in either of these 2 categories. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of practice provided during poststroke rehabilitation is small compared with animal models. It is possible that current doses of task-specific practice during rehabilitation are not adequate to drive the neural reorganization needed to promote function poststroke optimally.
Authors: R P S Van Peppen; G Kwakkel; S Wood-Dauphinee; H J M Hendriks; Ph J Van der Wees; J Dekker Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Carol L Richards; Francine Malouin; Sylvie Nadeau; Joyce Fung; Line D'Amours; Claire Perez; Anne Durand Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2018 Impact factor: 1.037
Authors: Edmund F Hodkin; Yuming Lei; Jonathan Humby; Isabel S Glover; Supriyo Choudhury; Hrishikesh Kumar; Monica A Perez; Helen Rodgers; Andrew Jackson Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Carey L Holleran; Patrick W Hennessey; Abigail L Leddy; Gordhan B Mahtani; Gabrielle Brazg; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.649