| Literature DB >> 32471398 |
Siti Suraya Ruslee1, Siti Sarah Mohamad Zaid2, Ikmal Hisyam Bakrin3, Yong Meng Goh4, Noordin Mohamed Mustapha5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the protective effects of Tualang honey against the toxicity effects induced by cadmium (Cd) on the ovary.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Cadmium; Ovary; Oxidative stress; Tualang honey
Year: 2020 PMID: 32471398 PMCID: PMC7260854 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-02960-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1Illustration of the study design
Effects of Tualang honey on body and ovarian weights
| Group | Body weight gain (g) | Changes in body weight gain (%) | Ovarian wet weight (mg) | Relative weight of ovary (wet weight/ body weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 117.76 ± 15.79 | 84.31 ± 7.41 | 86.60 ± 3.21 | 0.35 ± 0.01bbb |
| CD | 97.65 ± 13.58 | 69.07 ± 6.37 | 102.80 ± 2.84 | 0.45 ± 0.02aaa,c,dd |
| TH | 105.49 ± 14.30 | 76.50 ± 6.70 | 88.93 ± 3.64 | 0.38 ± 0.02b |
| THC | 110.01 ± 14.71 | 79.42 ± 6.90 | 87.71 ± 3.44 | 0.37 ± 0.02bb |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
1) aaaP < 0.001 vs. NC
2) bP < 0.05, bbP < 0.01 and bbbP < 0.001 vs. CD
3) cP < 0.05 vs. TH
4) ddP < 0.01 vs. THC
Fig. 2Weekly body weight growth curve of four experimental groups. NC (Negative Control) = Vehicle deionized water. CD (Positive Control) = Cd at 5 mg/kg body weight. TH (Tualang honey + Cadmium) = Tualang honey at 200 mg/kg body weight followed by Cd at 5 mg/kg body weight. THC (Tualang honey Control) = Tualang honey at 200 mg/kg body weight
Effects of Tualang honey on the follicular ovarian development after 6 weeks of administration
| Group | Primordial follicle | Primary follicle | Secondary follicle | Antral follicle | Corpora luteum | Atretic follicle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 6.00 ± 0.99 | 4.71 ± 0.54 | 4.16 ± 0.18 | 7.00 ± 0.55bbb | 8.67 ± 1.03 | 9.43 ± 0.71bb |
| CD | 4.50 ± 0.87 | 3.81 ± 0.39 | 3.95 ± 0.38 | 9.93 ± 0.50aaa,c,dd | 7.95 ± 0.97 | 12.51 ± 0.83aa,dd |
| TH | 5.00 ± 0.57 | 4.02 ± 0.44 | 4.00 ± 0.39 | 8.16 ± 0.55b | 8.19 ± 0.89 | 11.00 ± 0.79 |
| THC | 5.90 ± 0.91 | 4.40 ± 0.48 | 4.14 ± 0.16 | 7.71 ± 0.37bb | 8.19 ± 0.88 | 9.26 ± 0.86bb |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
1) aaP < 0.01 and aaaP < 0.001 vs. NC
2) bP < 0.05, bbP < 0.01 and bbbP < 0.001 vs. CD
3) cP < 0.05 vs. TH
4) ddP < 0.01 vs. THC
Fig. 3Representative ovarian section in all experimental groups. NC (Negative control) = vehicle deionized water; CD (Cadmium) = Cd at 5 mg/kg; TH (Tualang honey + Cadmium) = Tualang honey at 200 mg/kg followed by Cd at 5 mg/kg; THC (Tualang honey Control) = Tualang honey at 200 mg/kg. A: Antral; CL: Corpus luteum; At: Atretic; PO: Preovulatory. Scale bar = 250 μm
Effects of Tualang honey on the hormonal profile of the rats after 6 weeks of administration
| Group | Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) | Luteinizing hormone (LH) | 17β-Estradiol (E2) | Progesterone (P4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 14.80 ± 0.24bbb,ccc,ddd | 0.27 ± 0.03bb,c | 3.52 ± 0.11bbb,c | 53.29 ± 1.68bbb,c |
| CD | 8.05 ± 0.13aaa,ccc,ddd | 0.14 ± 0.03aa | 4.16 ± 0.08aaa | 42.35 ± 1.97aaa,dd |
| TH | 9.81 ± 0.25aaa,bbb,ddd | 0.19 ± 0.03a | 3.96 ± 0.10a | 46.10 ± 1.39a |
| THC | 12.73 ± 0.35aaa,bbb,ccc | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 3.76 ± 0.11 | 52.12 ± 1.55bb |
Data were presented as mean ± SEM
1) aP < 0.05, aaP < 0.01 and aaaP < 0.001 vs. NC
2) bbP < 0.01 and bbbP < 0.001 vs. CD
3) cP < 0.05 and cccP < 0.001 vs. TH
4) ddP < 0.01 and dddP < 0.001 vs. THC
Effects of Tualang honey in lipid peroxidation and enzymatic antioxidant activities in the ovary from all experimental groups
| Group | Malondialdehyde (MDA) (μmol/L) | Catalase (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 1.28 ± 0.22 b | 294.40 ± 2.12 b |
| CD | 2.62 ± 0.32 a,c,d | 282.28 ± 2.54 a,c,ddd |
| TH | 1.41 ± 0.30 b | 293.15 ± 3.24 b |
| THC | 1.33 ± 0.26 b | 298.18 ± 2.20 bbb |
Data are expressed as Mean ± SEM
1) aP < 0.05 vs. NC
2) bP < 0.05 and bbbP < 0.001 vs. CD
3) cP < 0.05 vs. TH
4) dP < 0.05 and dddP < 0.001 vs. THC