| Literature DB >> 22892923 |
Siti Sarah Mohamad Zaid1, Siti Amrah Sulaiman, Nor Hayati Othman, Ima-Nirwana Soelaiman, Ahmad Nazrun Shuid, Norazlina Mohamad, Norliza Muhamad.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Tualang honey on trabecular structure and compare these effects with those of calcium supplementation in ovariectomized rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22892923 PMCID: PMC3400169 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Metaphyseal region of longitudinal section of distal femur. All histomorphometric parameter measurements were performed randomly at the metaphyseal region, which was located 3-7 mm from the lowest point of the growth plate and 1 mm from the lateral cortex, excluding the endocortical region.
Formula for calculating the structural parameter values.
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Formula |
| 1. Trabecular bone volume | BV/TV | % | Bone Volume (BV)/ Tissue Volume (TV) |
| 2. Trabecular bone thickness | Tb.Th | μm | 2/[(Bone Surface (BS)/Bone Volume (BV)] |
| 3. Trabecular bone number | Tb.N | mm-1 | Trabecular bone volume (BV/TV)/Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) |
| 4. Trabecular bone separation | Tb.S | μm | 1/Trabecular number (Tb.N) – Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) |
Effects of Tualang honey on bone histomorphometry.
| Control groups | Test group | ||||
| BC | SHAM | OVX | PC | TH | |
| BV/TV (%) | 56.15 (2.34)**, #,ˆˆˆ | 38.24 (5.62)**, ˆˆ | 21.41 (16.72) | 25.31 (14.81) ## | 29.13 (9.22) |
| Tb.Th (µm) | 68.79 (7.01)***, ##,ˆˆˆ | 54.75 (9.30)***,ˆˆˆ | 27.29 (8.66) | 30.66 (7.75)### | 38.64 (7.35)**, ###,ˆˆ |
| Tb.N (mm-1) | 13.01 (7.02)** | 13.52 (4.11)**, ˆ | 7.50 (4.31) | 9.00 (6.01) # | 12.51 (5.10)** |
| Tb.Sp (µm) | 90.96 (18.77)**, #,ˆˆˆ | 117.35 (4.46) | 220.27 (63.92) | 230.45 (40.75)### | 157.78 (32.85) |
BC = Baseline control group; SHAM = Sham-operated control group; OVX = Ovariectomized control group; TH = Tualang honey- treated group at 0.2 g/kg/bw; PC = Positive control group (1% calcium).
All values are expressed as the median (IR).
Kruskal–Wallis test.
p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 vs. OVX control group; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs. SHAM operated group; ˆp<0.05; ˆˆp<0.01 and ˆˆˆp<0.001 vs. PC control group (Mann-Whitney U test).
Effects of Tualang honey on body weight and food intake during six-week administration.
| Control groups | Test group | |||
| SHAM | OVX | PC | TH | |
| Body weight on D1b (g) | 234 (25) | 262.5 (12) | 259.5 (29) | 258.5 (23) |
| Body weight at sacrifice (g) | 237.5 (30) | 277.5 (24) | 276.0 (27) | 272.5 (19) |
| Changes in body weight (%) | 4.9 (4.77) | 12.3 (8.19) | 14.3 (7.63) | 14.1 (7.87) |
| Total food intake (g) | 702.5 (80) | 797.0 (230.5) | 853.0 (331.25) | 811.5 (138.5) |
SHAM = Sham-operated control group; OVX = Ovariectomized control group;
PC = Positive control group (1% calcium); TH = Tualang honey-treated group at 0.2 g/kg/bw.
All values are expressed as the median (IR).
Kruskal–Wallis test.
D1: First day of treatment.
p<0.05 vs. OVX control group (Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 2Effects of Tualang honey on structure of femur bone. All pictures are stained with Von Kossa and examined under X20 magnification: BC = Baseline control group; SHAM = Sham- operated control group; OVX = Ovariectomised control group; TH = Tualang honey treated group at 0.2 g/kg/bw; PC = Positive control group (1% calcium).
Effects of Tualang honey on weight of femur reported as relative organ weight (mg/g body weight).
| Control groups | Test group | ||||
| BC | SHAM | OVX | PC | TH | |
| Absolute weight (mg) | 808.15 (48.10) | 884.91 (86.40) | 876.51 (108.80) | 919.51 (72.51) | 877.50 (155.20) |
| Relative weight | 3.38 (0.11) | 3.64 (0.23) | 3.05 (0.22) ## | 3.13 (0.21) ### | 3.04 (0.55) ## |
| (mg/g body weight) | |||||
Absolute weight = Wet weight of tissue.
Relative weight = Wet weight of tissue normalized to final body weight.
BC = Baseline control group; SHAM = Sham-operated control group; OVX = Ovariectomized control group; PC = Positive control group (1% calcium); TH = Tualang honey-treated group at 0.2 g/kg body weight.
All values are expressed as the median (IR).
Kruskal–Wallis test.
p<0.05 vs. OVX control group; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs. SHAM-operated group (Mann-Whitney U test).