Literature DB >> 32464053

pKa Calculations with the Polarizable Drude Force Field and Poisson-Boltzmann Solvation Model.

Alexey Aleksandrov1, Benoît Roux2, Alexander D MacKerell3.   

Abstract

Electronic polarization effects have been suggested to play an important role in proton binding to titratable residues in proteins. In this work, we describe a new computational method for pKa calculations, using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to sample protein protonation states with the Drude polarizable force field and Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) continuum electrostatic solvent model. While the most populated protonation states at the selected pH, corresponding to residues that are half-protonated at that pH, are sampled using the exact relative free energies computed with Drude particles optimized in the field of the PB implicit solvation model, we introduce an approximation for the protein polarization of low-populated protonation states to reduce the computational cost. The highly populated protonation states used to compute the polarization and pKa's are then iteratively improved until convergence. It is shown that for lysozyme, when considering 9 of the 18 titratable residues, the new method converged within two iterations with computed pKa's differing only by 0.02 pH units from pKa's estimated with the exact approach. Application of the method to predict pKa's of 94 titratable side chains in 8 proteins shows the Drude-PB model to produce physically more correct results as compared to the additive CHARMM36 (C36) force field (FF). With a dielectric constant of two assigned to the protein interior the Root Mean Square (RMS) deviation between computed and experimental pKa's is 2.07 and 3.19 pH units with the Drude and C36 models, respectively, and the RMS deviation using the Drude-PB model is relatively insensitive to the choice of the internal dielectric constant in contrast to the additive C36 model. At the higher internal dielectric constant of 20, pKa's computed with the additive C36 model converge to the results obtained with the Drude polarizable force field, indicating the need to artificially overestimate electrostatic screening in a nonphysical way with the additive FF. In addition, inclusion of both syn and anti orientations of the proton in the neutral state of acidic groups is shown to yield improved agreement with experiment. The present work, which is the first example of the use of a polarizable model for the prediction of pKa's in proteins, shows that the use of a polarizable model represents a more physically correct model for the treatment of electrostatic contributions to pKa shifts in proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32464053      PMCID: PMC7428141          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  43 in total

Review 1.  What are the dielectric "constants" of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Authors:  C N Schutz; A Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Accurate prediction of absolute acidity constants in water with a polarizable force field: substituted phenols, methanol, and imidazole.

Authors:  George A Kaminski
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Microscopic theory of the dielectric properties of proteins.

Authors:  T Simonson; D Perahia; A T Brünger
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Polarizable atomic multipole solutes in a Poisson-Boltzmann continuum.

Authors:  Michael J Schnieders; Nathan A Baker; Pengyu Ren; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Comparing pairwise-additive and many-body generalized Born models for acid/base calculations and protein design.

Authors:  Francesco Villa; David Mignon; Savvas Polydorides; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Interpretation of protein titration curves. Application to lysozyme.

Authors:  C Tanford; R Roxby
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1972-05-23       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Combining the polarizable Drude force field with a continuum electrostatic Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvation model.

Authors:  Alexey Aleksandrov; Fang-Yu Lin; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Proton binding to proteins: pK(a) calculations with explicit and implicit solvent models.

Authors:  Thomas Simonson; Jens Carlsson; David A Case
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins.

Authors:  M K Gilson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterizing Protein Protonation Microstates Using Monte Carlo Sampling.

Authors:  Umesh Khaniya; Junjun Mao; Rongmei Judy Wei; M R Gunner
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field.

Authors:  Rae A Corrigan; Guowei Qi; Andrew C Thiel; Jack R Lynn; Brandon D Walker; Thomas L Casavant; Louis Lagardere; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren; Michael J Schnieders
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.006

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.