Literature DB >> 28749575

Comparing pairwise-additive and many-body generalized Born models for acid/base calculations and protein design.

Francesco Villa1, David Mignon1, Savvas Polydorides1, Thomas Simonson1.   

Abstract

Generalized Born (GB) solvent models are common in acid/base calculations and protein design. With GB, the interaction between a pair of solute atoms depends on the shape of the protein/solvent boundary and, therefore, the positions of all solute atoms, so that GB is a many-body potential. For compute-intensive applications, the model is often simplified further, by introducing a mean, native-like protein/solvent boundary, which removes the many-body property. We investigate a method for both acid/base calculations and protein design that uses Monte Carlo simulations in which side chains can explore rotamers, bind/release protons, or mutate. The fluctuating protein/solvent dielectric boundary is treated in a way that is numerically exact (within the GB framework), in contrast to a mean boundary. Its originality is that it captures the many-body character while retaining the residue-pairwise complexity given by a fixed boundary. The method is implemented in the Proteus protein design software. It yields a slight but systematic improvement for acid/base constants in nine proteins and a significant improvement for the computational design of three PDZ domains. It eliminates a source of model uncertainty, which will facilitate the analysis of other model limitations.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proteus program; generalized Born model; implicit solvent; molecular mechanics; protein electrostatics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28749575     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  8 in total

1.  Computational Design of PDZ-Peptide Binding.

Authors:  Nicolas Panel; Francesco Villa; Vaitea Opuu; David Mignon; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  A computational protein design protocol for optimization of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding-motif affinity for human ACE2.

Authors:  Savvas Polydorides; Georgios Archontis
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Computational Design of Peptides with Improved Recognition of the Focal Adhesion Kinase FAT Domain.

Authors:  Eleni Michael; Savvas Polydorides; Georgios Archontis
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Knowledge-Based Unfolded State Model for Protein Design.

Authors:  Vaitea Opuu; David Mignon; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  pKa Calculations with the Polarizable Drude Force Field and Poisson-Boltzmann Solvation Model.

Authors:  Alexey Aleksandrov; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 6.  Recent advances in automated protein design and its future challenges.

Authors:  Dani Setiawan; Jeffrey Brender; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.098

7.  A physics-based energy function allows the computational redesign of a PDZ domain.

Authors:  Vaitea Opuu; Young Joo Sun; Titus Hou; Nicolas Panel; Ernesto J Fuentes; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Adaptive landscape flattening allows the design of both enzyme: Substrate binding and catalytic power.

Authors:  Vaitea Opuu; Giuliano Nigro; Thomas Gaillard; Emmanuelle Schmitt; Yves Mechulam; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.