Literature DB >> 15053606

Proton binding to proteins: pK(a) calculations with explicit and implicit solvent models.

Thomas Simonson1, Jens Carlsson, David A Case.   

Abstract

Ionizable residues play important roles in protein structure and activity, and proton binding is a valuable reporter of electrostatic interactions in these systems. We use molecular dynamics free energy simulations (MDFE) to compute proton pKa shifts, relative to a model compound in solution, for three aspartate side chains in two proteins. Simulations with explicit solvent and with an implicit, dielectric continuum solvent are reported. The implicit solvent simulations use the generalized Born (GB) model, which provides an approximate, analytical solution to Poisson's equation. With explicit solvent, the direction of the pKa shifts is correct in all three cases with one force field (AMBER) and in two out of three cases with another (CHARMM). For two aspartates, the dielectric response to ionization is found to be linear, even though the separate protein and solvent responses can be nonlinear. For thioredoxin Asp26, nonlinearity arises from the presence of two substates that correspond to the two possible orientations of the protonated carboxylate. For this side chain, which is partly buried and has a large pKa upshift, very long simulations are needed to correctly sample several slow degrees of freedom that reorganize in response to the ionization. Thus, nearby Lys57 rotates to form a salt bridge and becomes buried, while three waters intercalate along the opposite edge of Asp26. Such strong and anisotropic reorganization is very difficult to predict with Poisson-Boltzmann methods that only consider electrostatic interactions and employ a single protein structure. In contrast, MDFE with a GB dielectric continuum solvent, used for the first time for pKa calculations, can describe protein reorganization accurately and gives encouraging agreement with experiment and with the explicit solvent simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15053606     DOI: 10.1021/ja039788m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  78 in total

1.  Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations of biological molecules.

Authors:  I V Leontyev; A A Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Continuum electrostatic calculations of the pKa of ionizable residues in an ion channel: dynamic vs. static input structure.

Authors:  M Aguilella-Arzo; V M Aguilella
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Determination of the protonation state of the Asp dyad: conventional molecular dynamics versus thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Jinfeng Huang; Yali Zhu; Bin Sun; Yuan Yao; Junjun Liu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  pH replica-exchange method based on discrete protonation states.

Authors:  Satoru G Itoh; Ana Damjanović; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-15

5.  Subunit-subunit interactions are critical for proton sensitivity of ROMK: evidence in support of an intermolecular gating mechanism.

Authors:  Qiang Leng; Gordon G MacGregor; Ke Dong; Gerhard Giebisch; Steven C Hebert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Deciphering the role of glucosamine-6-phosphate in the riboswitch action of glmS ribozyme.

Authors:  Yao Xin; Donald Hamelberg
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Accurate, conformation-dependent predictions of solvent effects on protein ionization constants.

Authors:  P Barth; T Alber; P B Harbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conformational change of the methionine 20 loop of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase modulates pKa of the bound dihydrofolate.

Authors:  Ilja V Khavrutskii; Daniel J Price; Jinhyuk Lee; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Is arginine charged in a membrane?

Authors:  Libo Li; Igor Vorobyov; Alexander D MacKerell; Toby W Allen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  pKa Calculations with the Polarizable Drude Force Field and Poisson-Boltzmann Solvation Model.

Authors:  Alexey Aleksandrov; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.