Literature DB >> 32457802

The Whole-Genome Sequencing and Hybrid Assembly of Mytilus coruscus.

Ronghua Li1,2,3, Weijia Zhang1, Junkai Lu1,2, Zhouyi Zhang1, Changkao Mu1,2, Weiwei Song1,2, Herve Migaud1,2,3, Chunlin Wang1,2, Michaël Bekaert3.   

Abstract

The hard-shelled mussel (Mytilus coruscus) is an economically important shellfish that has been cultivated for the last decade. Due to over-exploitation, most mussel stocks have dramatically declined. Efforts to study this species' natural distribution, genetics, breeding, and cultivation have been hindered by the lack of a high-quality reference genome. To address this, we produced a hybrid high-quality reference genome of M. coruscus using a long-read platform to assemble the genome and short-read, high-quality technology to accurately correct for sequence errors. The genome was assembled into 10,484 scaffolds, a total length of 1.90 Gb, and a scaffold N50 of 898 kb. Ab initio annotation of the M. coruscus genome assembly identified a total of 42,684 genes. This accurate reference genome of M. coruscus provides an essential resource with the advantage of enabling the genome-scale selective breeding of M. coruscus. More importantly, it will also help in deciphering the speciation and local adaptation of the Mytilus species.
Copyright © 2020 Li, Zhang, Lu, Zhang, Mu, Song, Migaud, Wang and Bekaert.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mytilus coruscus; genome assembly and annotation; hard-shelled mussel; mitochondria; sequencing; syntheny

Year:  2020        PMID: 32457802      PMCID: PMC7227121          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


1. Introduction

The marine mussel Mytilus is among the foremost cosmopolitan marine genera and is present in estuarine and oceanic habitats, in both the subtidal and intertidal zones (Koehn, 1991). The global distribution of Mytilus species combined with certain features, such as partial reproductive isolation, which produces natural hybrids in areas of sympatry (Hilbish et al., 2000), doubly uniparental inheritance (DUI) of mitochondria (Zouros et al., 1994), very high bio-accumulation, and a low bio-transformation potential for both organic and inorganic contaminants (Smolders et al., 2003), make them attractive models for genetic, evolution, and ecological research. Besides, mussels are commercially important molluscs: the global production of farmed mussels reached 2,164,000 tons in 2017 (Food and Agricultural Organization, 2019). Mytilus galloprovincialis was the first sequenced marine mussel, and, its genome provided valuable information for the research and sustainable management of this species (Murgarella et al., 2016). Mytilus coruscus Gould, 1861 (also recognized as Mytilus unguiculatus Valenciennes, 1858) is another important mussel species distributed along the coast of China (Ye et al., 2012), Korea (An and Lee, 2012), and Japan (Okutani, 2000). In addition to its ecological importance in the intertidal and subtidal communities, it is also a popular edible shellfish in many Asian countries. As a large-bodied mussel species, M. coruscus is valued for its high nutritional value and good commercial price (Zhang et al., 2020). It has also been reported that some of its lipids have anti-inflammatory properties (Fu et al., 2015). The mariculture of M. coruscus has been carried out in several regions of China in the past; the Shengsi Islands (Zhejiang province) are one of the oldest and largest culture areas in the Eastern China Sea and have an annual production in excess of 500,000 tons (Guo et al., 2017). The cultured juveniles primarily originate from natural populations. In the last few decades, natural juvenile stocks have decreased, while mussel farms have increased (Shen et al., 2009). Recently, breeding programs of M. coruscus have been initiated, mainly aiming to improve growth rates and disease resistance under aquaculture conditions. Despite its ecological and economic importance, genome information on this endemic mussel species is still lacking. This report presents the first draft genome assembly for M. coruscus, performed using a hybrid assembly strategy. An Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION long-read platform was used to assemble the genome and Illumina HiSeq X Ten short-read, high-quality technologies were used to accurately correct for sequence errors. The resulting assembled genome sequence has 10,484 scaffolds, a total length of 1.90 Gb, GC content of 32.22%, and a scaffold N50 of 898 kb. Furthermore, we identified 1.01 Gb (52.83% of the assembly) of repeat content, 42,684 protein-coding genes, 278 rRNAs, and a high heterozygosity of 1.64%. This high-quality reference genome will serve as a substantial resource for future studies of basic genetics as well as genome-scale selective breeding programs for M. coruscus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

An adult female specimen of M. coruscus (133.73 g) was collected in November 2018 from the Shengsi Islands in Zhejiang province, China. Gills were dissected and stored in liquid nitrogen until DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted as previously reported (Venier and Canova, 1996) with small modifications. Briefly, gill samples were digested with RNase and proteinase K, adjusted to 2% SDS, and heated at 60°C for 10 min. Sodium perchlorate was added, and DNA was extracted once by gently shaking with 24:1 chloroform:isoamyl alcohol for 30 min at room temperature. DNA was then precipitated with cold 75% ethanol and suspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4). The quality and concentration of the extracted genomic DNA were checked using 0.3% agarose gel electrophoresis and a Qubit fluorimeter (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.2. Library Construction and Sequencing

High-quality DNA was used for subsequent library preparation and sequencing using PromethION and Illumina platforms (Biomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China). To obtain long non-fragmented sequence reads, ~15 μg of genomic DNA was sheared and size-selected (30–80 kb) with a BluePippin (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA). The selected fragments were processed using the Ligation Sequencing 1D Kit (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced using the PromethION DNA sequencer (Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK) for 48 h. For the estimation and correction of genome assembly, an Illumina DNA paired-end (PE) library with an insert size of 350 bp was constructed in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol and sequenced with an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with paired-end 150 read layout.

2.3. De novo Assembly

Reads from the two types of sequencing platforms were used at different assembly stages (Figure 1A). Long reads were filtered for length (>15,000 nt) and complexity (entropy over 15), while all short reads were filtered for quality (QC > 25), length (150 nt), absence of primers/adaptors, and complexity (entropy over 15) by using fastp (Chen et al., 2018). Using Jellyfish (Marçais and Kingsford, 2011), the frequency of 31-mers in the Illumina filtered data was calculated with a 1 bp sliding window (Vurture et al., 2017). Long reads were then assembled using wtdbg2 (Ruan and Li, 2020), which uses a fuzzy Bruijn graph. As it assembles raw reads without error correction and then builds the consensus from intermediate assembly output, multiple stages of error correction, gap closing, and polishing were applied. Original output was realigned against the long reads and polished using Minimap2 (Li, 2018) and Racon (Vaser et al., 2017), first with filtered reads to bridge potential gaps, and then with the filtered reads to correct for error. Finally, Pilon (Walker et al., 2014) was used to polish and correct for sequencing error using the short reads.
Figure 1

Genome size and quality estimations. (A) Genome assembly workflow. (B) The 31-mer distribution used for the estimation of genome size and heterozygosity. The heterozygous and homozygous peaks of k-mer depth are clearly markers, suggesting a high-complexity genome and high heterozygosity of 1.64%. (C) BUSCO assessment (Metazoa database; number of framework genes 954); 96.44% of the genes were recovered.

Genome size and quality estimations. (A) Genome assembly workflow. (B) The 31-mer distribution used for the estimation of genome size and heterozygosity. The heterozygous and homozygous peaks of k-mer depth are clearly markers, suggesting a high-complexity genome and high heterozygosity of 1.64%. (C) BUSCO assessment (Metazoa database; number of framework genes 954); 96.44% of the genes were recovered.

2.4. Gene Models

We used Braker (Hoff et al., 2019) to perform ab initio gene prediction, combining methods that integrate ab initio gene prediction and RNA-seq-based prediction to annotate the protein-coding genes in the M. coruscus genome. These raw RNA-seq reads were downloaded from the EBI for three independent transcriptomic projects, covering multiple tissues and multiple conditions: PRJNA301064 (Xu et al., 2016), PRJNA269003 & PRJNA269004. The resulting predictions were then filtered for the presence of at least one InterPro (Jones et al., 2014) pattern using InterProScan (Mitchell et al., 2019).

2.5. Repeat Sequences

The transposable elements were annotated using a de novo prediction by using RepeatModeler (Smit and Hubley, 2017) and LTR-Finder (Stanke et al., 2008). The repetitive sequences returned from these two algorithms were combined to compile a non-redundant repeat sequence library. With this library, we scanned the representative sequences in the M. coruscus genome using RepeatMasker (Smit et al., 2019).

2.6. Completeness

The completeness of gene regions was further assessed using BUSCO (Simão et al., 2015), using a Metazoa (release 10) benchmark of 954 conserved Metazoa genes.

2.7. Synteny With M. galloprovincialis

To assess the macro-synteny between M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis (Murgarella et al., 2016) genomes, we reciprocally mapped all M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis scaffolds with a minimum overlap of 100 nt.

2.8. Code Availability

The versions, settings, and parameters of the software used in this work are as follows: Genome assembly: (1) fastp: version 0.20.0, short-read parameters: -q 25 -y -Y 15 -l 150 -detect_adapter_for_pe; (2) fastp: version 0.20.0, long-read parameters: -Q -y -Y 15 -l 15000; (3) wtdbg2: version 2.4, parameters: -x rs -k 23 -p 0 -AS 6 -R -g 1567m -rescue-low-cov-edges; (4) wtpoa-cns: version 2.4, default parameters; (5) minimap2: version 2.17, parameters: -x map-ont -r2k; (6) racon: version 1.4.3, default parameters; (7) bwa: version 0.7.17, mode mem, default parameters; (8) pilon: version 1.23, parameters: -diploid -fix all -changes; (9) BUSCO: version 4.0.2, parameters: -l metazoa_odb10; (10) RepeatModeler: version 1.0.11, parameters: -database mussel; (11) LTR_Finder: version 1.07, default parameters; (12) RepteatMasker: version 4.0.9, parameters: -lib mussel-families.fa; (13) Braker: version 2.1.4, parameters: -gff3 -softmasking; (14) InterProScan: version 5.42-78.0, parameters: -f tsv -dp -iprlookup -goterms. K-mer analysis: (1) jellyfish: version 2.3.0, parameters: -m 31 -C -s 10G; (2) GenomeScope: version 2.0, default parameters. Mitochondria annotation: (1) MITOS: revision 999, online version, parameters: “Genetic code 5”. Synteny blocks: (1) nucmer: version 3.23, parameters: -simplify -maxgap = 500 -mincluster = 100; (2) circos: version 0.69-9, default parameters (tutorial 5.9).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sequencing Results

After sequencing with the PromethION platform, a total of 11.31 million (161.04 Gb) long reads were generated, and these were used for the subsequent genome assembly. The N50 of the sequences produced was 21,771 nt. The Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform produces 288.22 million (86.47 Gb) paired-ended short reads (150 nt). The genome size of M. coruscus was estimated to have 2n = 28 chromosomes (Pérez-García et al., 2014) and a C-value of 1.90 pg (Ieyama et al., 1994) or 1.85 Gb; therefore, the average sequencing coverage was 87× and 46×, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Sequencing data statistics.

CategoryNumber/length
Total number of long reads11,312,815
Total number of bases161,041,744,749
N50 length21,771 nt
Maximum read length259,852 nt
Coverage87×
Total number of PE short reads288,220,402
Total number of bases86,466,120,600
Read length150 nt
Coverage46×
Sequencing data statistics.

3.2. De novo Assembly of the M. coruscus Genome

The frequency of 31-mers in the Illumina filtered data was calculated using Jellyfish and followed a Poisson distribution (Figure 1B). The proportion of heterozygosity in the M. coruscus genome was evaluated to be 1.64%, and the genome size was estimated as 1.57 Gb, with a repeat content of 36.35% (Table 2). Long-read assembly using wtdbg2 (Ruan and Li, 2020), polished using Racon and sequence-corrected using short reads and Pilon, produced an assembled genome of M. coruscus containing 10,484 contigs with a total length and contig N50 of 1.90 Gb and 898 kb, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Statistics of the genome assembly of Mytilus coruscus.

CategoryNumber/length
K-mer = 314,311,539,104
Heterozygous peak18.87
Homozygous peak37.74
Estimated genome size1,567,289,679 nt
Estimated repeats530,204,285 nt
Estimated heterozygosity1.64%
Largest contig11,437,774 nt
Total length1,903,799,720 nt
N50664,188 nt
Largest scaffolds13,847,550 nt
Total length1,903,825,920 nt
N50898,347 nt
GC32.22%
Mapped98.42%
Properly paired77.04%
Avg. coverage depth138x
Coverage over 10×99.48%
N's per 100 kbp1.38
BUSCO recovered96.44%
Predicted rRNA genes278
Predicted gene models92,615
Predicted protein-coding genes42,684
Statistics of the genome assembly of Mytilus coruscus.

3.3. Repeat Sequences and Gene Models

The transposable elements and repetitive sequences were annotated using RepeatMasker and LTR-Finder. In total, 1.01 Gb (52.83%) of the genome was identified as repetitive sequences (Table 3).
Table 3

RepeatMasker statistics.

ElementNumber of elements*Length occupied (bp)Percentage of sequence (%)
SINEs2,854525,5720.03
  ALUs000.00
  MIRs000.00
LINEs437,682160,984,1958.46
  LINE1812607,5290.03
  LINE213,3145,148,2400.27
  L3/CR17,1193,117,4070.16
LTR elements35,69225,465,3471.34
  ERVL000.00
  ERVL-MaLRs000.00
  ERV classI000.00
  ERV classII675176,0070.01
DNA elements74,84621,072,6841.11
  hAT-Charlie000.00
  TcMar-Tigger000.00
Unclassified3,215,437784,518,33541.21
Small RNA000.00
Satellites1,170118,1980.01
Simple repeats307,09912,840,1310.67
Low complexity56,4442,732,9460.14
Total repeats1,005,864,11752.83

Repeats fragmented by insertions or deletions have been counted as one element.

RepeatMasker statistics. Repeats fragmented by insertions or deletions have been counted as one element. We used a combined method that integrates ab initio gene prediction and RNA-seq-based prediction to annotate the protein-coding genes in the M. coruscus genome. In total, 42,684 distinct gene models were annotated.

3.4. Evaluating the Completeness of the Genome Assembly

To estimate the quality of the hybrid genome assembly, short reads were aligned to the consensus genome, and 98.42% did align overall, suggesting that our assembly results contained comprehensive genomic information. The completeness of the gene models was also assessed using BUSCO (Simão et al., 2015) using a Metazoa (release 10) benchmark of 954 conserved Metazoa genes: 91.09% had complete gene coverage (including 13.63% duplicated ones), 5.35% were fragmented, and only 3.56% were missing (Figure 1C). This largely supports a high-quality M. coruscus genome assembly and gene models.

3.5. Synteny With M. galloprovincialis

To uncover the macro-synteny between the M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis (Murgarella et al., 2016) genomes, we reciprocally mapped all M. coruscus and M. galloprovincialis scaffolds with a minimum overlap of 100 nt (Table 4). A total of 28.12% of M. galloprovincialis scaffolds mapped to a M. coruscus scaffold while 70.25% M. coruscus scaffolds mapped to a M. galloprovincialis scaffold. Figure 2A reports the synteny blocks of over 3,000 nt; the map shows a good synteny between the two genomes despite M. galloprovincialis genome fragmentation.
Table 4

Comparison between Mytilus spp. assemblies.

CategoryM. galloprovincialis*M. coruscus
Num. scaffolds1,002,33410,484
Span1,500,149,602 nt1,903,825,920 nt
Longest scaffold67,529 nt13,847,550 nt
Shortest scaffold200 nt3,201 nt
N502,931 nt898,347 nt
GC31.71%32.22%
Syntenic281,841 (28.12%)7,365 (70.25%)

Sequences deposited and reported by Murgarella et al. (.

Figure 2

Genome comparisons. (A) Circos Krzywinski et al. (2009) mapping of longest synteny blocks between M. galloprovincialis (287 dark gray scaffolds) and M. coruscus (104 blue scaffolds). (B) M. coruscus annotated mitochondrial genome.

Comparison between Mytilus spp. assemblies. Sequences deposited and reported by Murgarella et al. (. Genome comparisons. (A) Circos Krzywinski et al. (2009) mapping of longest synteny blocks between M. galloprovincialis (287 dark gray scaffolds) and M. coruscus (104 blue scaffolds). (B) M. coruscus annotated mitochondrial genome.

3.6. Mitochondrial Genome

The mitochondrial genome was manually recovered from the genome assembly. The contig was validated for continuity and circularity and annotated using MITOS (Bernt et al., 2013). The complete mitochondrial genome (Figure 2B) was compared to the reference M. coruscus genome (Lee and Lee, 2016). Only one haplotype was recovered, which differed from the reference by only 6 SNPs and one 2-nucleotide insertion.

4. Conclusion

This study is the first to present a high-quality genome sequence assembly of the hard-shelled mussel M. coruscus. We generated a hybrid genome assembly of 1.90 Gb with an N50 of 898 kb. The assembled genome was predicted to contain 42,684 protein-coding genes, 278 rRNAs, 1.01 Gb (52.83%) of repetitive elements, and high heterozygosity of 1.64%. We also recovered and annotated the whole circular mitochondrial genome of 16.65 kb lacking atp8 gene. This high-quality reference genome will serve as a substantial resource for future studies of basic genetics as well as genome-scale selective breeding programs for M. coruscus.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing reads of all libraries are available from EBI/ENA via the accession numbers ERR3415816 and ERR3431204. The assembled genomes are available in EBI with the accession numbers ERZ1292486 (nuclear genome) and ERZ1195933 (mitochondrial genome), Project PRJEB33342.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Care and Use committee at the School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University.

Author Contributions

RL, MB, and CW conceived, initialized, and guided the entire project. JL, ZZ, CM, and WS collected the sample. WZ, JL, and ZZ prepared the sample and performed the genome sequencing. MB performed the data processing and genome, and gene model analysis. RL and MB drafted the manuscript. HM helped with the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  21 in total

1.  A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers.

Authors:  Guillaume Marçais; Carl Kingsford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics.

Authors:  Martin Krzywinski; Jacqueline Schein; Inanç Birol; Joseph Connors; Randy Gascoyne; Doug Horsman; Steven J Jones; Marco A Marra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Karyotypic diversification in Mytilus mussels (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) inferred from chromosomal mapping of rRNA and histone gene clusters.

Authors:  Concepción Pérez-García; Paloma Morán; Juan J Pasantes
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Lipid extract from hard-shelled mussel (Mytilus coruscus) improves clinical conditions of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuanqing Fu; Guipu Li; Xinhua Zhang; Gengyan Xing; Xiaojie Hu; Lifeng Yang; Duo Li
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations.

Authors:  Alex L Mitchell; Teresa K Attwood; Patricia C Babbitt; Matthias Blum; Peer Bork; Alan Bridge; Shoshana D Brown; Hsin-Yu Chang; Sara El-Gebali; Matthew I Fraser; Julian Gough; David R Haft; Hongzhan Huang; Ivica Letunic; Rodrigo Lopez; Aurélien Luciani; Fabio Madeira; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Huaiyu Mi; Darren A Natale; Marco Necci; Gift Nuka; Christine Orengo; Arun P Pandurangan; Typhaine Paysan-Lafosse; Sebastien Pesseat; Simon C Potter; Matloob A Qureshi; Neil D Rawlings; Nicole Redaschi; Lorna J Richardson; Catherine Rivoire; Gustavo A Salazar; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Christian J A Sigrist; Ian Sillitoe; Granger G Sutton; Narmada Thanki; Paul D Thomas; Silvio C E Tosatto; Siew-Yit Yong; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Development of microsatellite markers for the Korean Mussel, Mytilus coruscus (Mytilidae) using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Hye Suck An; Jang Wook Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  A First Insight into the Genome of the Filter-Feeder Mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis.

Authors:  Maria Murgarella; Daniela Puiu; Beatriz Novoa; Antonio Figueras; David Posada; Carlos Canchaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Benchmarking Oxford Nanopore read assemblers for high-quality molluscan genomes.

Authors:  Jin Sun; Runsheng Li; Chong Chen; Julia D Sigwart; Kevin M Kocot
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Molluscan phylogenomics requires strategically selected genomes.

Authors:  Julia D Sigwart; David R Lindberg; Chong Chen; Jin Sun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Massive gene presence-absence variation shapes an open pan-genome in the Mediterranean mussel.

Authors:  Marco Gerdol; Rebeca Moreira; Fernando Cruz; Jessica Gómez-Garrido; Anna Vlasova; Umberto Rosani; Paola Venier; Miguel A Naranjo-Ortiz; Maria Murgarella; Samuele Greco; Pablo Balseiro; André Corvelo; Leonor Frias; Marta Gut; Toni Gabaldón; Alberto Pallavicini; Carlos Canchaya; Beatriz Novoa; Tyler S Alioto; David Posada; Antonio Figueras
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Comparative analysis of the Mercenaria mercenaria genome provides insights into the diversity of transposable elements and immune molecules in bivalve mollusks.

Authors:  Sarah Farhat; Eric Bonnivard; Emmanuelle Pales Espinosa; Arnaud Tanguy; Isabelle Boutet; Nadège Guiglielmoni; Jean-François Flot; Bassem Allam
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Evidence of multiple genome duplication events in Mytilus evolution.

Authors:  Ana Corrochano-Fraile; Andrew Davie; Stefano Carboni; Michaël Bekaert
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.547

6.  Transcriptomic analysis of shell repair and biomineralization in the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis.

Authors:  Tejaswi Yarra; Kirti Ramesh; Mark Blaxter; Anne Hüning; Frank Melzner; Melody S Clark
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Reconstruction of ancient homeobox gene linkages inferred from a new high-quality assembly of the Hong Kong oyster (Magallana hongkongensis) genome.

Authors:  Yiqian Li; Wenyan Nong; Tobias Baril; Ho Yin Yip; Thomas Swale; Alexander Hayward; David E K Ferrier; Jerome H L Hui
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genomics and Transcriptomics of the green mussel explain the durability of its byssus.

Authors:  Koji Inoue; Yuki Yoshioka; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Azusa Kinjo; Mieko Sassa; Ikuo Ueda; Chuya Shinzato; Atsushi Toyoda; Takehiko Itoh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Adaptive Differences in Gene Expression in Farm-Impacted Seedbeds of the Native Blue Mussel Mytilus chilensis.

Authors:  Marco Yévenes; Gustavo Núñez-Acuña; Cristian Gallardo-Escárate; Gonzalo Gajardo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.