| Literature DB >> 22949881 |
Abstract
Mytilus coruscus (family Mytilidae) is one of the most important marine shellfish species in Korea. During the past few decades, this species has become endangered due to the loss of habitats and overfishing. Despite this species' importance, information on its genetic background is scarce. In this study, we developed microsatellite markers for M. coruscus using next-generation sequencing. A total of 263,900 raw reads were obtained from a quarter-plate run on the 454 GS-FLX titanium platform, and 176,327 unique sequences were generated with an average length of 381 bp; 2569 (1.45%) sequences contained a minimum of five di- to tetra-nucleotide repeat motifs. Of the 51 loci screened, 46 were amplified successfully, and 22 were polymorphic among 30 individuals, with seven of trinucleotide repeats and three of tetranucleotide repeats. All loci exhibited high genetic variability, with an average of 17.32 alleles per locus, and the mean observed and expected heterozygosities were 0.67 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, cross-amplification was tested for all 22 loci in another congener species, M. galloprovincialis. None of the primer pairs resulted in effective amplification, which might be due to their high mutation rates. Our work demonstrated the utility of next-generation 454 sequencing as a method for the rapid and cost-effective identification of microsatellites. The high degree of polymorphism exhibited by the 22 newly developed microsatellites will be useful in future conservation genetic studies of this species.Entities:
Keywords: Korean mussel; Mytilus coruscus; genetic variability; microsatellite loci; next-generation sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22949881 PMCID: PMC3431879 DOI: 10.3390/ijms130810583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Characteristics of the 22 polymorphic microsatellite loci in Mytilus coruscus and cross-amplification in another congener species.
| Locus | Repeat motif | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Population ( | Cross-amplification( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| F | R | NA | PIC | GeneBank Accession No. | ||||||
| KMc1 † | (AT)11 | GCAGCTCTTACGTGTTGATC | ATACACGCATGTAGATGCAC | 54 | 24 | 0.83 * | 0.95 | 0.94 | JQ678740 | F |
| KMc2 † | (ATC)30 | GGCTCAGTGTGTCAATCATC | TATGTAGGTTCTGCAAAGTGG | 54 | 19 | 0.71 * | 0.93 | 0.91 | JQ678741 | F |
| KMc3 | (TGA)12 | ATGTTCGAACTGCGCTGATG | CGCTCAAACTAGTTGGGTTA | 54 | 18 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.91 | JQ678742 | F |
| KMc4 † | (TA)13 | CTGCGATGCTTTCAGATGTC | AAGCTTAAAATAGCCCGCGA | 54 | 24 | 0.47 * | 0.96 | 0.94 | JQ678743 | F |
| KMc5 | (GATT)17 | CCTAGTGTCTCTCTAGTCCA | CATAAGGAATTTCCAGCCACA | 54 | 14 | 0.59 * | 0.91 | 0.88 | JQ678744 | F |
| KMc6 | (AC)13 | CCACATCAAGTGAGAGAGAG | GACAAATGTAGTGAACGACG | 54 | 12 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.81 | JQ678745 | F |
| KMc7 | (TCAA)13 | ACGTAGCGTGAAACCTTCAC | CTATGCAAATCACGTTGCTG | 54 | 20 | 0.89 * | 0.95 | 0.93 | JQ678746 | F |
| KMc8 | (TA)11 | CCCGATGGAGAAAGTTTGTC | ATATGATCCATCGCCCCGTA | 54 | 10 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.79 | JQ678747 | F |
| KMc9 | (TA)11 | CGGTGTGGGAAGAACGTAAA | ATTCGTGCATATTCAGGACG | 54 | 17 | 0.76 * | 0.92 | 0.90 | JQ678748 | F |
| KMc10 † | (GAT)19 | ATGACGGGTAGAACCTGACA | CTCAATGTGTCGGTCTAGTA | 54 | 19 | 0.53 * | 0.95 | 0.93 | JQ678749 | F |
| KMc11 | (ATCA)12 | AGGGGCTGTTAAGACTGTCG | ATTCCACAGTCATTGGTCC | 54 | 19 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.90 | JQ678750 | F |
| KMc12 | (TA)12 | GTTAAGTGCACACCTGTGAG | AATTCACCAGGAGCATTGTG | 54 | 13 | 0.22 * | 0.76 | 0.73 | JQ678751 | F |
| KMc13 | (GAT)22 | TGGAAGTGTGTACTGGGCTA | AAGAAATGGAACAGGAGCAG | 54 | 21 | 0.87 | 0.95 | 0.93 | JQ678752 | F |
| KMc14 | (CAT)12 | AAACATTTTGCCGCTGGACG | ATGCTTCCCCAACTTGTTAC | 54 | 22 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.91 | JQ678753 | F |
| KMc15 | (ATT)16 | GAGGGCCTTAGGGAAGATTA | ACGTCTATCAACCTCAGAAG | 54 | 21 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.91 | JQ678754 | F |
| KMc16 † | (TG)12 | CCCTACACTCGGACTTTACA | CCGTTACGAACGATTACTAG | 54 | 6 | 0.10 * | 0.69 | 0.65 | JQ678755 | F |
| KMc17 † | (ATA)11 | GATCACCCTGTTTCAGAGTC | ATTGTATATGAGGGCCTCAG | 54 | 12 | 0.57 * | 0.89 | 0.86 | JQ678756 | F |
| KMc18 † | (AT)14 | GCCCAAACGACGTGTATTCA | GTATGATCCATCGCCCCGTA | 54 | 18 | 0.31 * | 0.88 | 0.86 | JQ678757 | F |
| KMc19 † | (AG)16 | GGTCGTGTCCAAAGGAATTG | CTAAATAACTGCACGACTCG | 54 | 21 | 0.73 * | 0.95 | 0.93 | JQ678758 | F |
| KMc20 † | (AT)12 | TGATCCTTTCACACAGCAGG | CTTCTCGTGCTCCATGTACA | 54 | 13 | 0.87 * | 0.90 | 0.87 | JQ678759 | F |
| KMc21 † | (TG)11 | GGGTCAGATGACTCTGGAAA | CTTTATGGCGTGTCAAATCG | 54 | 22 | 0.63 * | 0.89 | 0.87 | JQ678760 | F |
| KMc22 | (AG)11 | GGCAATCATACCACATCACC | CGGTATGTGCTGCCCTTTTA | 54 | 16 | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.86 | JQ678761 | F |
Locus † is in linkage disequilibrium at one or more loci with one another;
Primers were 5′ end labeled with the indicated dyes; The optimal annealing temperature (Ta), the number of samples (N), the number of alleles per locus (NA), expected heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and the polymorphism information content (PIC) are given for each locus. Exact tests of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium showed significant heterozygote deviation (* p < 0.002). Calculations assume that individuals with one microsatellite band are homozygous for the allele; “F” means “failed to amplify or multiple non-specific amplification”.