Literature DB >> 32440506

Three-dimensional distribution of cystic lesions in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Guang-Bo Liu1, Rui Li1, Qiang Lu1, Hai-Yang Ma1, Yu-Xuan Zhang1, Qi Quan1, Xue-Zhen Liang2, Jiang Peng1, Shi-Bi Lu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the location characteristics of cystic lesions in a three-dimensional context and discuss the mechanism of formation.
METHODS: A total of 155 femoral head computed tomography images from 94 patients diagnosed with stage II and III osteonecrosis of the femoral head were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional structures of the femoral head including the cystic lesions and necrotic area were reconstructed. We divided each femoral head into eight regions to observe the positional relationship of the cystic lesions, normal areas, and necrotic areas.
RESULTS: The regional distribution revealed 14 (13%), 35 (32%), 9 (8%), 25 (23%), 6 (6%), 15 (14%), 4 (4%), and 0 (0%) cystic lesions in regions Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ, Ⅵ, Ⅶ, and Ⅷ, respectively. The anteromedial zone, A (Ⅰ ​+ ​Ⅲ), contained 22% of the lesions, anterolateral zone, B (Ⅱ ​+ ​Ⅳ), contained 54%, posteromedial zone, C (Ⅴ +Ⅶ), contained 9% of the lesions, and posterolateral zone, D (Ⅵ ​+ ​Ⅷ), contained 15% of the lesions. Most of the cystic lesions (78%) were located between the normal and necrotic areas; 18% of cystic lesions were in the necrotic area ​and 4% were in the normal area.
CONCLUSIONS: Cystic lesions most often occur at the junction of the necrotic ​and normal areas and are most commonly located in the anterolateral femoral head, which is similar to the distribution of the stress concentration region. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: The study showed the location characteristics of cystic lesions in osteonecrosis of femoral head, which suggested that the formation of cystic lesions may be related to stress and could accelerate the collapse of femoral head. The results can support further research on cystic lesions and provide a reference for doctors' treatment strategies for patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Cystic lesions; Osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Three-dimensional distribution

Year:  2019        PMID: 32440506      PMCID: PMC7231955          DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Translat        ISSN: 2214-031X            Impact factor:   5.191


Introduction

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is considered a challenging disease that is induced by insufficient blood supply, although the pathological mechanism of ischaemia is still unknown [[1], [2], [3]]. Collapse of the femoral head is considered to be an important event because it can lead to secondary osteoarthritis (OA) with severe pain and dysfunction [4,5]. There are many factors that can affect collapse, such as the extent of the osteonecrotic lesion and the location of the lesion [3]. Studies on patients with ONFH have found that cystic lesions are also closely related to collapse, but at present, the research on cystic lesions in ONFH remains limited [6,7]. Cystic lesions are considered a typical sign of stage II ONFH according to the Association Research Circulation Osseous staging system, as determined by the radiological appearance of a translucent area [8]. The pathologic characteristics of cystic lesions, including the presence of single or multiple lesions within the necrotic area, are noncavitary and contain loose fibrous elements [9,10]. However, in terms of the location characteristics of cystic lesions, the findings are quite limited. A study based on X-ray images showed that cystic lesions were identified within the necrotic area, particularly along the lateral margin of the femoral head [10]. Another study based on computed tomography (CT) images indicated that the anterior area and central pillar were the main areas of distribution of cystic lesions in the hips of patients with ONFH, and cystic lesions are often found near the sclerosis rim in ONFH [6]. However, although this study was based on CT images, the analysis was only based on specific layers and thus, based on two-dimensional images rather than three-dimensional images. From our point of view, location information from two-dimensional images will inevitably be insufficient or even inaccurate because it can only reflect the distribution at a certain level; these images cannot provide a clear full view of the distribution of the cystic lesions. To the best of our knowledge, no study has been published investigating this issue in a three-dimensional space. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to reconstruct the cystic lesions, necrotic areas, and femoral heads in a three-dimensional space and analyse the distribution of cystic lesions in the femoral head and the relative positional relationship among cystic lesions, normal areas, and necrotic areas. In addition, with a reference to the formation mechanism of cystic lesion in OA, we discuss cystic lesion formation in ONFH and assume that the formation of cystic lesions may relate to stress.

Materials and methods

Our institution's research ethics board approved this study. Using the picture archiving and communication system of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, we retrospectively reviewed CT data from 120 consecutive patients with ONFH scanned between April 2014 and September 2018; the scans had a slice thickness of ≤1 ​mm, a slice increment of ≤0.6 ​mm, and a pixel size of ≤0.8 ​mm. All of these patients were at stages II or III according to the Association Research Circulation Osseous classification systems. Eight patients without CT data and 18 patients who had undergone surgical treatment of the ONFH hip were excluded. Ultimately, 94 patients (155 hips) were included in this study.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the femur, necrotic areas, and cystic lesions

Row hip CT data were obtained in the axial plane and imported to the Mimics software (version 21.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). First, using a software tool based on Hounsfield units, which are related to intensity, a rough femoral head construction was acquired. Then, the structural details of the femoral head were refined by tracing the outline of the femoral head manually at each level (Figure 1A). Based on the reduced bone density of the necrotic zone compared with the normal zone, we manually segmented the necrotic area at each level using the previously described method (Figure 1B) [11,12]. Cystic lesions in which the bone structure was no longer present were also segmented based on differences in density (Figure 1C). After the femoral head, cystic lesions and necrotic areas were segmented at each CT level, a corresponding three-dimensional object was then created in Mimics software. Finally, the three resulting objects (femoral head, necrotic areas, and cystic lesions) were smoothed in Mimics to obtain an optimally homogeneous and anatomically faithful three-dimensional structure (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Selection of the regions of interest in the CT images. (A1-A3) The contour of each femoral layer is obtained by software semiautomatic tools and manual addition and subtraction. The yellow area is the femoral head area at a certain level. (B1–B3) The location and definition of the necrotic area. The red area is a necrotic area at a certain level. (C1–C3) The location and definition of cystic lesions. The purple area is a cystic lesion at a certain level. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Figure 2

Objects are reconstructed in three dimensions and smoothed using Mimics software (version 21.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) to obtain a three-dimensional structure that is optimally homogeneous and faithful to the patient anatomy. (A), femoral head. (B), necrotic area. (C), cystic lesion, and (D) combination picture.

Selection of the regions of interest in the CT images. (A1-A3) The contour of each femoral layer is obtained by software semiautomatic tools and manual addition and subtraction. The yellow area is the femoral head area at a certain level. (B1–B3) The location and definition of the necrotic area. The red area is a necrotic area at a certain level. (C1–C3) The location and definition of cystic lesions. The purple area is a cystic lesion at a certain level. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) Objects are reconstructed in three dimensions and smoothed using Mimics software (version 21.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) to obtain a three-dimensional structure that is optimally homogeneous and faithful to the patient anatomy. (A), femoral head. (B), necrotic area. (C), cystic lesion, and (D) combination picture.

Radiographic analysis

To determine the distribution of cystic lesions on the femoral head, we divided the femoral head into eight regions through three mutually perpendicular planes. The partitions were defined according to the previous reports [7,13]. Initially, Plane 1 was obtained, which included the centre of the femoral head, the centre of the femoral head fovea, and the centre of the calcar. Plane 2 was perpendicular to Plane 1 and passed through the centre of the femoral head and the centre of femoral head fovea. Plane 3 passed through the centre of the femoral head and was perpendicular to Plane 1 and Plane 2 (Figure 3). The femoral head, necrotic areas, and cystic lesions were then exported to the 3-matic software (version 13.0; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Using a software tool in the 3-matic software, the femoral head and cystic lesions were divided into eight regions (Ⅰ-Ⅷ) with the three planes (Figure 4). Because a cystic lesion might be distributed across multiple regions at the same time, we defined the region containing the largest volume of the cystic lesion as its distribution area. To study the relative positional relationship of cystic lesions to normal areas and necrotic areas, we divided them into three types: L1, the cystic lesions are completely located in the necrotic area; L2, the cystic lesions are distributed in both the normal and necrotic areas; and L3, the cystic lesions are completely in the normal area.
Figure 3

Determination of three mutually perpendicular segmentation planes. (A1-A3, B1-B3) The red point (A1, B1), green point (A2, B2), and blue point (A3, B3) indicate the positions of the centre of femoral head fovea, the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the calcar in the CT plane and the three-dimensional structure respectively. (C) Plane 1 (red plane) was obtained, which included the centre of the femoral head, the centre of femoral head fovea and the centre of the calcar. Plane 2 (blue plane) is perpendicular to Plane 1 and passes through the centre of the femoral head and the centre of femoral head fovea. Plane 3 (green plane) passes through the centre of the femoral head and is perpendicular to Plane 1 and Plane 2. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Figure 4

The femoral head and cystic lesions are divided into eight regions (I-VIII) by -three mutually perpendicular planes. (A) Ⅰ-Ⅳ represents superomedial region, superolateral region, inferomedial region, and inferolateral region in the anterior side of the femoral head respectively. (B) Ⅴ-Ⅷ represents superomedial region, superolateral region, inferomedial region, and inferolateral region in the posterior side of the femoral head respectively.

Determination of three mutually perpendicular segmentation planes. (A1-A3, B1-B3) The red point (A1, B1), green point (A2, B2), and blue point (A3, B3) indicate the positions of the centre of femoral head fovea, the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the calcar in the CT plane and the three-dimensional structure respectively. (C) Plane 1 (red plane) was obtained, which included the centre of the femoral head, the centre of femoral head fovea and the centre of the calcar. Plane 2 (blue plane) is perpendicular to Plane 1 and passes through the centre of the femoral head and the centre of femoral head fovea. Plane 3 (green plane) passes through the centre of the femoral head and is perpendicular to Plane 1 and Plane 2. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) The femoral head and cystic lesions are divided into eight regions (I-VIII) by -three mutually perpendicular planes. (A) Ⅰ-Ⅳ represents superomedial region, superolateral region, inferomedial region, and inferolateral region in the anterior side of the femoral head respectively. (B) Ⅴ-Ⅷ represents superomedial region, superolateral region, inferomedial region, and inferolateral region in the posterior side of the femoral head respectively.

Statistical analysis

For the statistical analysis, we use the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. A proportion was used for categorical variables. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21.0.0.0; SPSS Inc., USA) was used for the analyses. The location distribution of cystic lesion analysis and the relative positional relationship of cystic lesions to normal areas and necrotic areas are descriptive in nature.

Results

The characteristics of the enrolled patients are summarised in Table 1. Among all patients, 75 hips were at stage Ⅱ, 80 hips were at stage Ⅲ, 26 patients had unilateral ONFH, and 68 patients had bilateral ONFH, of which 7 patients with bilateral ONFH included only one side because the contralateral side was in stage Ⅰ or stage Ⅳ. There were 17 women and 77 men with a mean age of 40 years (range 20–64 years). Of the 155 ONFH hips, 67 hips contained 108 cystic lesions, 38 hips (57%) were complicated by single cysts, and 29 hips (43%) were complicated by multiple cysts. The incidence of cystic lesions in ONFH was 43% (67/155).
Table 1

The baseline characteristics and demographics of the study population.

VariableOutcome
Age (year, mean ​± ​SD)40 ​± ​10
Gender (M/F)77/17
ARCO staging
 II (%)75 (48)
 III (%)80 (52)
Hips with ONFH in 2 and 3 stage155
 Unilateral ONFH (%)26 (28)
 Bilateral ONFH (%)68 (72)
 ONFH with cyst (%)67 (43)
 ONFH without cyst (%)88 (57)
Number of cysts in per femoral head
 Single cyst (%)38 (57)
 Multiple cysts (%)29 (43)
 two cysts19 (28)
 three cysts8 (12)
 four cysts2 (3)

ARCO = Association Research Circulation Osseous, ONFH = osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

The baseline characteristics and demographics of the study population. ARCO = Association Research Circulation Osseous, ONFH = osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Three-dimensional images of each cystic lesion, necrotic area, and femoral head were reconstructed, and there were five necrotic femoral heads for which we could not accurately obtain necrotic shapes on all levels and thus could not construct three-dimensional models of necrotic area (Supplementary 1). The distribution of cystic lesions in the eight femoral head regions is shown in Table 2. The location of cystic lesions on the hip revealed that there were 14 cystic lesions in region Ⅰ (13%), 35 in Ⅱ (32%), 9 in Ⅲ (8%), 25 in Ⅳ (23%), 6 in Ⅴ (6%), 15 in Ⅵ (14%), 4 in Ⅶ (4%), and 0 lesions in region Ⅷ (0%), indicating that zone Ⅱ is the region with the largest cyst distribution. We can see that the adjacent zones II and IV contained a significantly higher number of lesions than the other zones did. To make the trend more obvious, we further divided the femoral head into four zones: the anteromedial zone, A (Ⅰ ​+ ​Ⅲ); anterolateral zone, B (Ⅱ ​+ ​Ⅳ); posteromedial zone, C (Ⅴ +Ⅶ); and posterolateral zone, D (Ⅵ ​+ ​Ⅷ) (Figure 5). The new partitioning method displays a more distinct distribution as follows: there were 24 cystic lesions in zone A (22%), 58 in B (54%), 10 in C (9%), and 16 in D (15%), which indicates that anterolateral zone B was the main distribution area of cystic lesions in hips with ONFH Table 3.
Table 2

The distribution of cystic lesions in regions Ⅰ-Ⅷ in ONFH.

LocationOutcome
NumberPercentage (%)
1413
3532
98
2523
66
1514
44
00
Total108100
Figure 5

To make the distribution characteristics more obvious, the eight areas are redivided into four areas: anteromedial zone, A (I + III), anterolateral zone, B (II + IV), posterolateral, C (V + VII), and posteromedial, D (VI + VIII). (A) The locations of zone A and B.(B)The locations of zone C and D.

Table 3

The distribution of cystic lesions in zones A-D in ONFH.

LocationOutcome
NumberPercentage (%)
A (Ⅰ ​+ ​Ⅲ)2422
B (Ⅱ ​+ ​Ⅳ)5854
C (Ⅴ +Ⅶ)109
D (Ⅵ ​+ ​Ⅷ)1615
Total108100
The distribution of cystic lesions in regions Ⅰ-Ⅷ in ONFH. To make the distribution characteristics more obvious, the eight areas are redivided into four areas: anteromedial zone, A (I + III), anterolateral zone, B (II + IV), posterolateral, C (V + VII), and posteromedial, D (VI + VIII). (A) The locations of zone A and B.(B)The locations of zone C and D. The distribution of cystic lesions in zones A-D in ONFH. For research on the positional relationship of cystic lesions to necrotic areas and normal areas in a three-dimensional space because there were five necrotic femoral heads containing 8 cystic lesions for which we could not obtain three-dimensional models of the necrotic area, we only obtained 62 cases with 100 cystic lesion data that had acceptable reconstruction quality. We found that there were 18 (18%) cystic lesions in the necrotic area, 4 (4%) in the normal area, and 78 (78%) in between the necrotic and normal areas Table 4.
Table 4

Distribution characteristics of cystic lesions in necrotic and normal areas.

Type of cystNumberPercentage (%)
L11818
L27878
L344
Total100100
Distribution characteristics of cystic lesions in necrotic and normal areas.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the distribution of cystic lesions in ONFH on the three-dimensional level. Based on our data, we found that most of the cystic lesions (78%) are located between the normal and necrotic areas. Moreover, most of the cystic lesions that are classified into L1 and L3 are also located near the junction of normal and necrotic areas. In addition, by using our classification system, the cystic lesions were mainly located in regions Ⅱ (32%) and Ⅳ (23%) of the femoral head, and zone B comprising these two regions accounted for 54% of the total number of cystic lesions. Although it is important to identify and monitor cystic lesions because they accelerate structural collapse, a limited number studies have examined the location characteristics of these lesions [6]. Resnick et al. [10]analysed preoperative radiographs and sectional radiography of surgical specimens removed during total hip replacements and proposed that the cystic lesions were located in the superior middle and outer thirds of the femoral head, considered to be its main weight-bearing portion of the femoral head, which is similar to our three-dimensional results (zone B, anterolateral region of the femoral head). However, in contrast to our results that cystic lesions are more likely to be located between the normal and necrotic areas, Resnick's study showed that cystic lesions are located in the necrotic area. This may be because their results were based on superimposed X-ray images of the femoral head, which cannot fully reflect the real three-dimensional relationship. Compared with Resnick's study, Gao's study based on midcoronal- and midaxial-sectioned CT images improved the accuracy of the study [6]. Their study showed that cystic lesions mainly involve the lateral and central pillars and anterior hip area, which draws similar conclusions as our study. Based on our data, 78% of cystic lesions were Type L2 (presenting at the junction of the necrotic area and the normal area, close to the sclerotic rim), which seems to be a larger proportion than 43% of G2 type (cystic lesions inside the necrotic region and with a connection to the sclerotic rim, as defined in Gao's classification). In addition, our study finds that the proportions of lesions distributed on the anterior side (I-IV) and lateral side (Ⅱ, Ⅳ, Ⅵ, Ⅷ), respectively, are 76% and 69%, both of which seem to be slightly higher than the corresponding results in Gao's study (70% and 46%). One possible reason for the difference is that the shapes of the femoral head, necrotic areas, and cystic lesions are irregular, and thus we cannot obtain comprehensive information using only specific layers of CT images. Another reason is some cystic lesions may not be observed on any of the layers (the midcoronal, midaxial, or maximal necrotic lesions) that were selected in Gao's study. The reason for the specific distribution of cystic lesions remains unclear. Resnick et al. [10]reported that cystic lesions are related to osteoclastic resorption of necrotic trabeculae with fibrous replacement of bone. Gao et al. [6] further suggested that the bone resorption of osteoclasts is due to excessive stress. As shown in Table 3, Table 4, cystic lesions were mostly distributed in zone B (anterolateral region of the femoral head) and were mainly characterised as Type L2 (presenting at the junction of the necrotic area and the normal area, close to the sclerotic rim). Previous studies have shown that the anterolateral region of the femoral head is the main weight-bearing area of the femoral head [[14], [15], [16]]. In addition, the sclerotic rim is also a stress-concentrated area of the femoral head [12,17,18]. Thus, the cystic lesions in ONFH are mainly located in the stress concentration area of the femoral head. Therefore, based on above findings, we hypothesise that the formation of cystic lesions may relate to stress, similar to the developed of cysts by stress-induced bone resorption in OA [19,20]. The theory suggests that stress-induced microfracture may be the first step in the development of subchondral bone cysts. Secondary effects, such as osteoclast resorption, then induce the cystic lesion itself [20]. Near the sclerotic rim located in the anterolateral area of the femoral head, the peak levels of von Mises stress, which are within the reported range for the maximum compressive strength of trabecular bone, may result in microfracture, as in OA [21,22]. Repeated or increased loading may cause the process to occur again and again, and fragments of disrupted bone are removed by osteoclasts and replaced with fibrous tissue [19,20]. Finite element modelling (FEM) demonstrated that the presence of an intraosseous defect leads to a significant increase in the maximum pericystic stress values under mild static loading, which would promote further bone resorption and subsequent cyst expansion [22]. Furthermore, in OA cysts, pathological changes associated with increased stress could evoke a macrophage response [23]. The macrophages found within the lining of human cysts can contribute to the osteoclastic resorption of subchondral bone surrounding OA cysts by macrophage–osteoclast differentiation, which play a role in the osteolysis associated with enlargement of cysts [23]. Because of the similar tissue elements between cysts in OA and ONFH [9,10], this biological factor might also contribute to promoting the maintenance and expansion of cystic lesions in ONFH. However, we have not further verified this hypothesis and thus need to test it through additional experiments in the future. ONFH may lead to progressive destruction of the hip joint, although the pathogenesis has not been definitely characterised [24]. The prognosis of ONFH depends mainly on whether the articular surface collapses [4,5]. The location of the necrotic lesion is considered the important factor in collapse [25]. Ohzono et al. [26] indicated that the lesions involving the lateral portion of the weight-bearing surface had the worst prognosis. Nishii et al. [27] reported that lesions located in the anterosuperior portion of the femoral head were a risk factor for collapse. Furthermore, Kubo et al. [28] suggested that ONFH patients with anterior localisation of necrotic lesions can suffer collapse even if the necrotic lesions are medially located. Their results highlighted the importance of anteriorly and laterally located necrotic lesions, respectively. Our study found that cystic lesions are mainly located on the anterolateral side of the femoral head, which might further reduce mechanical strength and accelerate collapse. Moreover, Yu et al. [12]showed that he formation of a sclerotic rim can delay or prevent collapse in osteonecrosis by providing mechanical support for the femoral head. Cystic lesions, most of which are connected to the sclerotic rim, might destroy the integrity of the sclerosis rim and thus reduce protection for necrotic tissue. Therefore, the cystic lesions could further accelerate the collapse of the femoral head. Although the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, it is generally believed that active joint-preserving treatments before collapse can improve patient prognosis [24]. Considering that cystic lesions can increase the risk of collapse [6], so patients with such lesions should be evaluated carefully and followed up frequently so that the need for surgical intervention can be detected as soon as it arises. There were some limitations of this study. Firstly, although we showed a more obvious trend of cystic distribution, we only considered the location with the largest cystic variation as the distribution area, which may not accurately indicate the full cystic lesion distribution. Moreover, this study was a single centre study, and the sample size of this study may not be large enough; thus, future studies are still needed to further confirm our conclusions.

Conclusion

Cystic lesions most often occur at the junction of the necrotic area and normal area and are most commonly located in the anterolateral femoral head, which is similar to the distribution of the stress concentration region.

Declarations

Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the cystic lesions, necrotic areas, and femoral head are available in supplementary materials.

Funding

This study was supported by the (Funding Number: 81572148).

Compliance with ethical standards

This article was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2019-019-01).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this article.
  28 in total

1.  Subchondral cysts create increased intra-osseous stress in early knee OA: A finite element analysis using simulated lesions.

Authors:  David D McErlain; Jaques S Milner; Todor G Ivanov; Lubica Jencikova-Celerin; Steven I Pollmann; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Tensile and compressive properties of cancellous bone.

Authors:  L Røhl; E Larsen; F Linde; A Odgaard; J Jørgensen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Changing structure of the femoral neck across the adult female lifespan.

Authors:  Kenneth E S Poole; Paul M Mayhew; Collette M Rose; J Keenan Brown; Philip J Bearcroft; Nigel Loveridge; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  A sclerotic rim provides mechanical support for the femoral head in osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Tong Yu; Limin Xie; Fulei Chu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The fate of nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. A radiologic classification to formulate prognosis.

Authors:  K Ohzono; M Saito; N Sugano; K Takaoka; K Ono
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Subchondral fracture begins from the bone resorption area in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a micro-computerised tomography study.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Hamada; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The formation and function of the sclerosis rim in the femoral head: A biomechanical point of view.

Authors:  ZhiPing Chen; Yong Xu; ZhenXi Qi; JinShui Zho
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 8.  Osteonecrosis of the hip: management in the 21st century.

Authors:  Jay R Lieberman; Daniel J Berry; Michael A Mont; Roy K Aaron; John J Callaghan; Amar D Rajadhyaksha; James R Urbaniak
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

Review 9.  Predicting the collapse of the femoral head due to osteonecrosis: From basic methods to application prospects.

Authors:  Leilei Chen; GuoJu Hong; Bin Fang; Guangquan Zhou; Xiaorui Han; Tianan Guan; Wei He
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Etiology, Investigations, and Management.

Authors:  Shakoor A Baig; M N Baig
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  High-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave prevents the occurrence of glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Lijun Shi; Tao Zhang; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun; Peixu Wang; Xinjie Wu; Zirong Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.889

2.  Combining frog-leg lateral view may serve as a more sensitive X-ray position in monitoring collapse in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Qiu-Shi Wei; Min-Cong He; Xiao-Ming He; Tian-Ye Lin; Peng Yang; Zhen-Qiu Chen; Qing-Wen Zhang; Wei He
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-03-09

3.  Prediction of the progression of femoral head collapse in ARCO stage 2-3A osteonecrosis based on the initial bone resorption lesion.

Authors:  Shan Shi; Ping Luo; Li Sun; Limin Xie; Tong Yu; Zhenchang Wang; Xuedong Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  General recommendation for assessment and management on the risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Wenlong Li; Zeqing Huang; Biao Tan; Gang Chen; Xugui Li; Kan Xiong; Ruizheng Zhu; Ruihan Li; Shuwen Li; Hengli Ye; Zhi Liang; Xiaojun Dong; Shijing Zhou; Song Chen; Haixiang Xi; Hao Cheng; Rongpeng Xu; Shenghao Tu; Zhe Chen; Lihua Qi; Jiandong Song; Ruoran Xiao; Huilan Liu; Qian Nan; Huiyong Yu; Hongsheng Cui; Yanguang Shen; Chengxiang Wang; Na Lin; Yanqiong Zhang; Weiheng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The Therapeutic Effect of Huo Xue Tong Luo Capsules in Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) Stage II Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Clinical Study With an Average Follow-up Period of 7.95 Years.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming He; Min-Cong He; Peng Yang; Qing-Wen Zhang; Zhen-Qiu Chen; Wei He; Qiu-Shi Wei
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 6.  The Role of Structural Deterioration and Biomechanical Changes of the Necrotic Lesion in Collapse Mechanism of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Cheng Wang; Haoye Meng; Guangbo Liu; Huo Li; Jianming Gao; Hua Tian; Jiang Peng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Effect of femoral head necrosis cystic area on femoral head collapse and stress distribution in femoral head: A clinical and finite element study.

Authors:  Zhaoming Zhang; Tianye Lin; Yuan Zhong; Wenting Song; Peng Yang; Ding Wang; Fan Yang; Qingwen Zhang; Qiushi Wei; Wei He
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-07-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.