Literature DB >> 9203153

Comparison of predicted and measured contact pressures in normal and dysplastic hips.

D A Michaeli1, S B Murphy, J A Hipp.   

Abstract

Hip dysplasia, a congenital and developmental deformity characterized by malorientation and a reduction of contact area between the femur and acetabulum, is the most common cause of osteoarthritis of the hip. According to current estimates, dysplasia accounts for nearly 76% of all cases of osteoarthritis, and many who are affected require a total hip replacement before the age of 50. It is theorized that in the poorly oriented and deformed pelvis, a reduction in contact area leads to an increase in contact pressure during normal activities. Currently, clinicians attempt to reposition the joint, assuming that improving the position of the existing contact surface will lead to decreased pressures. It is also assumed that improving certain geometric parameters correlates indirectly with decreased contact pressures. Neither these simple estimates nor other non-invasive models have ever been shown to be related to contact pressure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a computerized method of predicting hip joint contact pressures, which applies known hip joint reaction forces to the three-dimensional surface of the hip joint. To this end, cadaveric and plastic pelvic models were developed to test whether the computer model could predict the magnitude and location of maximum pressure. Mechanical testing revealed that the computer model could be used to predict pressure in cadaveric pelves at prescribed locations (r2 = 0.64). The computerized model could also be used to predict the magnitude and location of maximum pressure in a series of plastic models where the load vector and the degree of dysplasia were parametrically varied (r2 = 0.7). These findings suggest that the computer model may be useful in identifying patients who will fail osteotomy or whether they can be used to select the best osteotomy for each patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9203153     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(96)00051-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  23 in total

1.  Outcome of periacetabular osteotomy: joint contact pressure calculation using standing AP radiographs, 12 patients followed for average 2 years.

Authors:  Mehran Armand; Jyri Lepistö; Kaj Tallroth; John Elias; Edmund Chao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Prospective bone density changes after periacetabular osteotomy: a methodological study.

Authors:  I Mechlenburg; J R Nyengaard; L Rømer; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Finite element contact analysis of the hip joint.

Authors:  Fuziansyah Bachtar; Xian Chen; Toshiaki Hisada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Cumulative hip contact stress predicts osteoarthritis in DDH.

Authors:  Blaz Mavcic; Ales Iglic; Veronika Kralj-Iglic; Richard A Brand; Rok Vengust
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Stephanie Y Pun; Andreas Hingsammer; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Influence of Different Boundary Conditions in Finite Element Analysis on Pelvic Biomechanical Load Transmission.

Authors:  Pan Hu; Tao Wu; Hui-Zhi Wang; Xin-Zheng Qi; Jie Yao; Xiao-Dong Cheng; Wei Chen; Ying-Ze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Hip dysplasia and the performing arts: is there a correlation?

Authors:  Robert Turner; Eilish O'Sullivan; Jaime Edelstein
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

9.  Is the damage of cartilage a global or localized phenomenon in hip dysplasia, measured by dGEMRIC?

Authors:  Andreas Hingsammer; Jenny Chan; Leslie A Kalish; Tallal C Mamisch; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does periacetabular osteotomy have depth-related effects on the articular cartilage of the hip?

Authors:  Andreas M Hingsammer; Patricia E Miller; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.