Literature DB >> 32433998

Basic social resource needs screening in the gynecologic oncology clinic: a quality improvement initiative.

Anna Louise Beavis1, Awa Sanneh2, Rebecca L Stone1, Margaret Vitale3, Kimberly Levinson1, Anne F Rositch4, Amanda Nickles Fader1, Kristin Topel5, Ashley Abing3, Stephanie L Wethington6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health are known to contribute to disparities in health outcomes. Routine screening for basic social needs is not a part of standard care; however, the association of those needs with increased healthcare utilization and poor compliance with guideline-directed care is well established.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of basic social resource needs identified through a quality improvement initiative in a gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic. In addition, we aimed to identify clinical and demographic factors associated with having basic social resource needs. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study of women presenting to a gynecologic oncology clinic at an urban academic institution who were screened for basic social resource needs as part of a quality improvement initiative from July 2017 to May 2018. The following 8 domains of resource needs were assessed: food insecurity, housing insecurity, utility needs, financial strain, transportation, childcare, household items, and difficulty reading hospital materials. Women with needs were referred to resources to address those needs. Demographic and clinical information were collected for each patient. The prevalence of needs and successful follow-up interventions were calculated. Patient factors independently associated with having at least 1 basic social resource need were identified using multivariable Poisson regression.
RESULTS: A total of 752 women were screened in the study period, of whom 274 (36%) reported 1 or more basic social resource need, with a median of 1 (range, 1-7) need. Financial strain was the most commonly reported need (171 of 752, 23%), followed by transportation (119 of 752, 16%), difficulty reading hospital materials (54 of 752, 7%), housing insecurity (31 of 752, 4%), food insecurity (28 of 752, 4%), household items (22 of 752, 3%), childcare (15 of 752, 2%), and utility needs (13 of 752, 2%). On multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with having at least 1 basic social resource need were being single, divorced or widowed, nonwhite race, current smoker, nonprivate insurance, and a history of anxiety or depression. A total of 36 of 274 (13%) women who screened positive requested assistance and were referred to resources to address those needs. Of the 36 women, 25 (69%) successfully accessed a resource or felt equipped to address their needs, 9 (25%) could not be reached despite repeated attempts, and 2 (6%) declined assistance.
CONCLUSION: Basic social resource needs are prevalent in women presenting to an urban academic gynecologic oncology clinic and can be identified and addressed through routine screening. To help mitigate ongoing disparities in this population, screening for and addressing basic social resource needs should be incorporated into routine comprehensive care in gynecologic oncology clinics.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Leads; basic resources; cervical cancer; gynecologic cancer; healthcare disparities; ovarian cancer; routine screening; social determinants of health; supportive care; uterine cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32433998      PMCID: PMC8340269          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  24 in total

1.  County Health Rankings: Relationships Between Determinant Factors and Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Carlyn M Hood; Keith P Gennuso; Geoffrey R Swain; Bridget B Catlin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Accountable Health Communities--Addressing Social Needs through Medicare and Medicaid.

Authors:  Dawn E Alley; Chisara N Asomugha; Patrick H Conway; Darshak M Sanghavi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Screening and Referral for Low-Income Families' Social Determinants of Health by US Pediatricians.

Authors:  Arvin Garg; William Cull; Lynn Olson; Amanda Fisher Boyd; Steven G Federico; Benard Dreyer; Andrew D Racine
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Perceptions and Experience of Patients, Staff, and Clinicians with Social Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Courtnee Hamity; Ana Jackson; Lunarosa Peralta; Jim Bellows
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

6.  Moving electronic medical records upstream: incorporating social determinants of health.

Authors:  Laura M Gottlieb; Karen J Tirozzi; Rishi Manchanda; Abby R Burns; Megan T Sandel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Feasibility and Acceptability of a Best Supportive Care Checklist among Clinicians.

Authors:  Nathan A Boucher; Jonathan Nicolla; Adeboye Ogunseitan; Elizabeth R Kessler; Christine S Ritchie; Yousuf Y Zafar
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Impact of payer status on treatment of cervical cancer at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Robert E Bristow; Pamela K Donohue; Norma F Kanarek; Cornelia L Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Avoidable tragedies: Disparities in healthcare access among medically underserved women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lois M Ramondetta; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Maria E Daheri; Jessica Gallegos; Michael Scheurer; Jane R Montealegre; Andrea Milbourne; Matthew L Anderson; Charlotte C Sun
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Lifetime economic burden of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael E Stokes; Jack Ishak; Irina Proskorovsky; Libby K Black; Yijian Huang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Racial disparities in the utilization of parathyroidectomy among patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: Evidence from a nationwide analysis of Medicare claims.

Authors:  Wilson M Alobuia; Tong Meng; Robin M Cisco; Dana T Lin; Insoo Suh; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Amber W Trickey; Electron Kebebew; Carolyn D Seib
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Workforce Models to Screen for and Address Patients' Unmet Social Needs in the Clinic Setting: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sahil Sandhu; Jacqueline Xu; Howard Eisenson; Janet Prvu Bettger
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.