Laura M Gottlieb1, Karen J Tirozzi2, Rishi Manchanda3, Abby R Burns4, Megan T Sandel5. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Electronic address: gottliebl@chc.ucsf.edu. 2. Research and Development, Health Leads, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. HealthBegins and the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California. 4. School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley. 5. National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership, Department of Health Policy, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Service, Washington, District of Columbia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the biological pathways and mechanisms connecting social factors with health has increased exponentially over the past 25 years, yet in most clinical settings, screening and intervention around social determinants of health are not part of standard clinical care. Electronic medical records provide new opportunities for assessing and managing social needs in clinical settings, particularly those serving vulnerable populations. PURPOSE: To illustrate the feasibility of capturing information and promoting interventions related to social determinants of health in electronic medical records. METHODS: Three case studies were examined in which electronic medical records have been used to collect data and address social determinants of health in clinical settings. RESULTS: From these case studies, we identified multiple functions that electronic medical records can perform to facilitate the integration of social determinants of health into clinical systems, including screening, triaging, referring, tracking, and data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: If barriers related to incentives, training, and privacy can be overcome, electronic medical record systems can improve the integration of social determinants of health into healthcare delivery systems. More evidence is needed to evaluate the impact of such integration on health care outcomes before widespread adoption can be recommended.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the biological pathways and mechanisms connecting social factors with health has increased exponentially over the past 25 years, yet in most clinical settings, screening and intervention around social determinants of health are not part of standard clinical care. Electronic medical records provide new opportunities for assessing and managing social needs in clinical settings, particularly those serving vulnerable populations. PURPOSE: To illustrate the feasibility of capturing information and promoting interventions related to social determinants of health in electronic medical records. METHODS: Three case studies were examined in which electronic medical records have been used to collect data and address social determinants of health in clinical settings. RESULTS: From these case studies, we identified multiple functions that electronic medical records can perform to facilitate the integration of social determinants of health into clinical systems, including screening, triaging, referring, tracking, and data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: If barriers related to incentives, training, and privacy can be overcome, electronic medical record systems can improve the integration of social determinants of health into healthcare delivery systems. More evidence is needed to evaluate the impact of such integration on health care outcomes before widespread adoption can be recommended.
Authors: John R Blosnich; Mary C Marsiglio; Shasha Gao; Adam J Gordon; Jillian C Shipherd; Michael Kauth; George R Brown; Michael J Fine Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christopher A Harle; Nate C Apathy; Robert L Cook; Elizabeth C Danielson; Julie DiIulio; Sarah M Downs; Robert W Hurley; Burke W Mamlin; Laura G Militello; Shilo Anders Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Xinzhi Zhang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Philip E Bourne; Emmanuel Peprah; O Kenrik Duru; Nancy Breen; David Berrigan; Fred Wood; James S Jackson; David W S Wong; Joshua Denny Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Jennifer E DeVoe; Andrew W Bazemore; Erika K Cottrell; Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Jené Grandmont; Natalie Spach; Rachel Gold Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Anne Andermann; Gary Bloch; Ritika Goel; Vanessa Brcic; Ginetta Salvalaggio; Shanell Twan; Claire E Kendall; David Ponka; Kevin Pottie Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.275