Courtnee Hamity1, Ana Jackson2, Lunarosa Peralta3, Jim Bellows4. 1. Evaluation Principal Consultant for the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (courtnee.l.hamity@kp.org). 2. Director of Evaluation at the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (ana.h.jackson@kp.org). 3. Evaluation Consultant in the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (lunarosa.peralta@kp.org). 4. Managing Director of the Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute Center for Evaluation and Analytics in Oakland, CA (jim.bellows@kp.org).
Abstract
CONTEXT: Assessment of social needs is expanding at Kaiser Permanente (KP), but little is known about how members and clinicians experience the incorporation of social needs into health care. OBJECTIVE: To assess how KP members and clinicians experience social needs assessments incorporated into care. DESIGN: Qualitative and descriptive analysis of data from member and clinician focus groups, interviews, and surveys among 68 members and family caregivers who had participated in social needs assessment programs and 90 clinicians and staff in the KP Colorado, Georgia, Northern California, Northwest, and Southern California Regions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Members' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences of social needs assessment. RESULTS: Members and clinicians understood the impact of social needs on health and why a health care system representative would ask about food, housing, transportation, and other social needs. Members and clinicians supported social needs assessment at KP and agreed that KP should help address identified social needs. However, both groups emphasized the importance of assessments yielding actionable information. Members were also concerned about how the information would be used and by whom. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the continuing assessment of social needs at KP and identify issues that require attention as it expands. Assessment should not outpace organizational capacity to connect members with resources. Careful attention to communications is required because members may be uncertain or concerned about the purpose of the assessment and the dissemination of sensitive information. Messaging should assure members about data use and dissemination and what they can expect after screening.
CONTEXT: Assessment of social needs is expanding at Kaiser Permanente (KP), but little is known about how members and clinicians experience the incorporation of social needs into health care. OBJECTIVE: To assess how KP members and clinicians experience social needs assessments incorporated into care. DESIGN: Qualitative and descriptive analysis of data from member and clinician focus groups, interviews, and surveys among 68 members and family caregivers who had participated in social needs assessment programs and 90 clinicians and staff in the KP Colorado, Georgia, Northern California, Northwest, and Southern California Regions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Members' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences of social needs assessment. RESULTS: Members and clinicians understood the impact of social needs on health and why a health care system representative would ask about food, housing, transportation, and other social needs. Members and clinicians supported social needs assessment at KP and agreed that KP should help address identified social needs. However, both groups emphasized the importance of assessments yielding actionable information. Members were also concerned about how the information would be used and by whom. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the continuing assessment of social needs at KP and identify issues that require attention as it expands. Assessment should not outpace organizational capacity to connect members with resources. Careful attention to communications is required because members may be uncertain or concerned about the purpose of the assessment and the dissemination of sensitive information. Messaging should assure members about data use and dissemination and what they can expect after screening.
Authors: Dorota Szymkowiak; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Erin E Johnson; Todd Manning; Thomas P O'Toole Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: J Nwando Olayiwola; Rachel Willard-Grace; Kate Dubé; Danielle Hessler; Rebecca Shunk; Kevin Grumbach; Laura Gottlieb Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2018
Authors: Mary E Morales; Michael H Epstein; Danelle E Marable; Sarah A Oo; Seth A Berkowitz Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Anna Louise Beavis; Awa Sanneh; Rebecca L Stone; Margaret Vitale; Kimberly Levinson; Anne F Rositch; Amanda Nickles Fader; Kristin Topel; Ashley Abing; Stephanie L Wethington Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-05-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Artair J Rogers; Courtnee Hamity; Adam L Sharp; Ana H Jackson; Adam B Schickedanz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Taressa K Fraze; Amanda L Brewster; Valerie A Lewis; Laura B Beidler; Genevra F Murray; Carrie H Colla Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-09-04
Authors: Emilia H De Marchis; Danielle Hessler; Caroline Fichtenberg; Eric W Fleegler; Amy G Huebschmann; Cheryl R Clark; Alicia J Cohen; Elena Byhoff; Mark J Ommerborn; Nancy Adler; Laura M Gottlieb Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-10-01
Authors: Frances Murray; Meghan Allen; Collin M Clark; Christopher J Daly; David M Jacobs Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emilia H De Marchis; Danielle Hessler; Caroline Fichtenberg; Nancy Adler; Elena Byhoff; Alicia J Cohen; Kelly M Doran; Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba; Eric W Fleegler; Cara C Lewis; Stacy Tessler Lindau; Elizabeth L Tung; Amy G Huebschmann; Aric A Prather; Maria Raven; Nicholas Gavin; Susan Jepson; Wendy Johnson; Eduardo Ochoa; Ardis L Olson; Megan Sandel; Richard S Sheward; Laura M Gottlieb Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Rachel L Berkowitz; Linh Bui; Zijun Shen; Alice Pressman; Maria Moreno; Stephanie Brown; Anne Nilon; Chris Miller-Rosales; Kristen M J Azar Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 2.497