| Literature DB >> 32429929 |
Robert Wesolowski1,2,3, Andrew Stiff4,5, Dionisia Quiroga4,5, Christopher McQuinn4,6, Zaibo Li7, Hiroaki Nitta8, Himanshu Savardekar4, Brooke Benner4, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy5, Maryam Lustberg5, Rachel M Layman5, Erin Macrae5, Mahmoud Kassem4, Nicole Williams5, Sagar Sardesai5, Jeffrey VanDeusen5, Daniel Stover5, Mathew Cherian5, Thomas A Mace4, Lianbo Yu9, Megan Duggan4, William E Carson4,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While combinations of immune checkpoint (ICP) inhibitors and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have begun testing in patients with breast cancer (BC), the effects of chemotherapy on ICP expression in circulating T cells and within the tumor microenvironment are still unclear. This information could help with the design of future clinical trials by permitting the selection of the most appropriate ICP inhibitors for incorporation into NAC.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; CD8+ T cells; Immune checkpoint receptors; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429929 PMCID: PMC7236344 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06949-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient demographics
| Characteristic | N | pCR rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Patients | 26 | 46.2% | |
| Race | White | 19 | 52.6% |
| African American | 6 | 16.7% | |
| Hispanic | 1 | 100% | |
| Age (years) | Median | 48 | |
| Range | 32–70 | ||
| ECOG performance status | 0 | 21 | 47.6% |
| 1 | 5 | 40% | |
| Menopause status | Pre-menopausal | 16 | 37.5% |
| Post-menopausal | 7 | 85.7% | |
| Unknown | 3 | 0% | |
| Tumor size (cm) | Median | 2.8 | |
| Range | 0.6–8.7 | ||
| Clinical node stage | 0 | 14 | 35.7% |
| 1 | 11 | 54.5% | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | |
| Clinical stage | IA | 1 | 100% |
| IIA | 14 | 35.7% | |
| IIB | 8 | 50% | |
| IIIA | 3 | 66.7% | |
| Grade | 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | 0% | |
| 3 | 17 | 63.2% | |
| Receptor status | HR+ and HER-2- | 8 | 37.5% |
| HR+ and HER-2+ | 3 | 33.3% | |
| HR- and HER-2+ | 4 | 75% | |
| Triple Negative | 11 | 45.5% |
Fig. 1Representative flow cytometry plots demonstrating gating strategy to identify CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as expression of various immune checkpoint receptors. (a) Representative scatter plots to show gating for CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (b) Histograms of isotype controls are shown in gray and checkpoint receptor (CTLA4, Lag3, OX40, PD-1, and Tim3) expressions are shown in blue. Positive measurement of each checkpoint receptor is demonstrated within brackets. (c) Representative histograms for pre-NAC (blue) and post-NAC (red) checkpoint receptor expression are shown
Fig. 2Changes in the frequency of CD4+ T cells expressing immune checkpoint receptors. Pre- and post-NAC levels of specified CD4+ T cells are shown with each pair of connecting circles representing individual patient levels of (a) CTLA4+, (b) Lag3+, (c) OX40+, (d) PD-1+, or (e) Tim3+ cells at these time points. Bars are representative of mean ICP levels. Paired Student’s t test was used to compare pre- and post-NAC levels of specified T cell subsets
Fig. 3Changes in the frequency of CD8+ T cells expressing immune checkpoint receptors. Pre- and post-NAC levels of specified CD8+ T cells are shown with each pair of connecting circles representing individual patient levels of (a) CTLA4+, (b) Lag3+, (c) OX40+, (d) PD-1+, or (e) Tim3+ cells at these time points. Bars are representative of mean ICP levels. Paired Student’s t test was used to compare pre- and post-NAC levels of specified T cell subsets
Fig. 4Representative images for immuno-histochemical (IHC) analysis of CD8, PD-L1, and PD-1 expression. (a) Representative H&E staining showing a portion of tumor outlined in black and a portion of stroma outlined in red. (b) Representative image showing multicolor IHC staining for all three markers: PD-L1, PD-1, and CD8. Brown staining identifies PD-L1 expression, red identifies PD-1 expression, and green represents CD8 expression. Percentage of cells expressing various markers was determined as the area expressing the marker divided by the total tumor area, total stromal area, or tumor and stromal area together. (c) Additional representative H&E staining showing tumor outlined in black and stroma outlined in red. (d) Representative multicolor IHC staining showing PD-L1 (brown) and CD8 (green) staining in the stroma only with no staining in the tumor. (e) Representative H&E staining. (f) Representative multicolor IHC staining showing only rare CD8 (green) staining within the stroma and no PD-L1 (brown) or PD-1 (red) staining
Changes in TILs and CD8+ T cells following NAC
| Pre-NAC cohort ( | Post-NAC cohort ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Stromal TILs | 29.8% (1–80%) | 24.9% (2–70%) |
| Overall CD8+ T cells | 18.3% (0.5–60%) | 15.7% (1–50%) |
| Stromal CD8+ T cells | 24.6% (1–70%) | 21.2% (1–60%) |
| Intratumoral CD8+ T cells | 12.0% (0–50%) | 7.9% (0–40%) |
Values are denoted as means with ranges in the parentheses
Number of patients with PD-L1/PD-1 positive tumors and stroma
| Pre-NAC cohort ( | Post-NAC cohort ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall PD-L1+ | 4 (66.7%) | 9 (52.9%) |
| Intratumoral PD-L1+ | 3 (50.0%) | 5 (29.4%) |
| Stromal PD-L1+ | 4 (66.7%) | 10 (58.8%) |
| Overall PD-1+ | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (23.5%) |
Values are denoted as the number of patients in each group with percentage of cohort that is PD-L1 or PD-1 positive in the parentheses
Fig. 5Percentage of TILs, CD8+ T cells, and PD-L1+/PD-1+ cells in patients with paired samples. Pre- and post-NAC levels of specified CD8+ T cells are shown with each pair of connecting circles representing individual patient levels of (a) stromal TILs, (b) overall CD8+ cells, (c) stromal CD8+ cells, (d) intra-tumoral CD8+ cells, (e) overall PD-L1 intensity, (f) stromal PD-L1 intensity, (g) intra-tumoral PD-L1 intensity, and (h) overall PD-1 intensity at these times points. N = 4 for each group, if a sample is not graphed it is due to values being 0