PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We seek to validate the prognostic impact of TILs in primary TNBCs in two adjuvant phase III trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Full-face hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of 506 tumors from ECOG trials E2197 and E1199 were evaluated for density of TILs in intraepithelial (iTILs) and stromal compartments (sTILs). Patient cases of TNBC from E2197 and E1199 were randomly selected based on availability of sections. For the primary end point of DFS, association with TIL scores was determined by fitting proportional hazards models stratified on study. Secondary end points were OS and distant recurrence–free interval (DRFI). Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies criteria were followed, and all analyses were prespecified. RESULTS: The majority of 481 evaluable cancers had TILs (sTILs, 80%; iTILs, 15%). With a median follow-up of 10.6 years, higher sTIL scores were associated with better prognosis; for every 10% increase in sTILs, a 14% reduction of risk of recurrence or death (P = .02), 18% reduction of risk of distant recurrence (P = .04), and 19% reduction of risk of death (P = .01) were observed. Multivariable analysis confirmed sTILs to be an independent prognostic marker of DFS, DRFI, and OS. CONCLUSION: In two national randomized clinical trials using contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy, we confirm that stromal lymphocytic infiltration constitutes a robust prognostic factor in TNBCs. Studies assessing outcomes and therapeutic efficacies should consider stratification for this parameter.
PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We seek to validate the prognostic impact of TILs in primary TNBCs in two adjuvant phase III trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Full-face hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections of 506 tumors from ECOG trials E2197 and E1199 were evaluated for density of TILs in intraepithelial (iTILs) and stromal compartments (sTILs). Patient cases of TNBC from E2197 and E1199 were randomly selected based on availability of sections. For the primary end point of DFS, association with TIL scores was determined by fitting proportional hazards models stratified on study. Secondary end points were OS and distant recurrence–free interval (DRFI). Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies criteria were followed, and all analyses were prespecified. RESULTS: The majority of 481 evaluable cancers had TILs (sTILs, 80%; iTILs, 15%). With a median follow-up of 10.6 years, higher sTIL scores were associated with better prognosis; for every 10% increase in sTILs, a 14% reduction of risk of recurrence or death (P = .02), 18% reduction of risk of distant recurrence (P = .04), and 19% reduction of risk of death (P = .01) were observed. Multivariable analysis confirmed sTILs to be an independent prognostic marker of DFS, DRFI, and OS. CONCLUSION: In two national randomized clinical trials using contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy, we confirm that stromal lymphocytic infiltration constitutes a robust prognostic factor in TNBCs. Studies assessing outcomes and therapeutic efficacies should consider stratification for this parameter.
Authors: Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sahar M A Mahmoud; Emma Claire Paish; Desmond G Powe; R Douglas Macmillan; Matthew J Grainge; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Curigliano; G Viale; M Ghioni; A A Jungbluth; V Bagnardi; G C Spagnoli; A M Neville; F Nolè; N Rotmensz; A Goldhirsch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nathan R West; Katy Milne; Pauline T Truong; Nicol Macpherson; Brad H Nelson; Peter H Watson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Luke D Rothermel; Arvind C Sabesan; Daniel J Stephens; Smita S Chandran; Biman C Paria; Abhishek K Srivastava; Robert Somerville; John R Wunderlich; Chyi-Chia R Lee; Liqiang Xi; Trinh H Pham; Mark Raffeld; Parthav Jailwala; Manjula Kasoji; Udai S Kammula Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Mirjolet; C Charon-Barra; S Ladoire; F Arbez-Gindre; A Bertaut; F Ghiringhelli; A Leroux; D Peiffert; C Borg; J F Bosset; G Créhange Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Kimberly R Kalli; Matthew S Block; Pashtoon M Kasi; Courtney L Erskine; Timothy J Hobday; Allan Dietz; Douglas Padley; Michael P Gustafson; Barath Shreeder; Danell Puglisi-Knutson; Dan W Visscher; Toni K Mangskau; Glynn Wilson; Keith L Knutson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephen J Luen; Roberto Salgado; Stephen Fox; Peter Savas; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Emma Clark; Astrid Kiermaier; Sandra M Swain; Jose Baselga; Stefan Michiels; Sherene Loi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Heather L McArthur; Adi Diab; David B Page; Jianda Yuan; Stephen B Solomon; Virgilio Sacchini; Christopher Comstock; Jeremy C Durack; Majid Maybody; Janice Sung; Arielle Ginsberg; Phillip Wong; Afsar Barlas; Zhiwan Dong; Chunjun Zhao; Brian Blum; Sujata Patil; Deirdre Neville; Elizabeth A Comen; Elizabeth A Morris; Alan Kotin; Edi Brogi; Y Hannah Wen; Monica Morrow; Mario E Lacouture; Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison; Clifford A Hudis; Jedd D Wolchok; Larry Norton Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 12.531