| Literature DB >> 32429429 |
Iselin Vildmyren1,2, Alfred Halstensen2,3, Adrian McCann4, Øivind Midttun4, Per Magne Ueland4, Åge Oterhals5, Oddrun Anita Gudbrandsen1.
Abstract
Large quantities of protein-rich cod residuals, which are currently discarded, could be utilized for human consumption. Although fish fillet intake is related to beneficial health effects, little is known about the potential health effects of consuming cod residual protein powder. Fifty lean adults were randomized to consume capsules with 8.1 g/day of cod residual protein (Cod-RP) or placebo capsules (Control group) for eight weeks, in this randomized, double-blind study. The intervention was completed by 40 participants. Fasting glucose and insulin concentrations were unaffected by Cod-RP supplementation, whereas plasma concentrations of α-hydroxybutyrate, β-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate all were decreased compared with the Control group. Trimethylamine N-oxide concentration in plasma and urine were increased in the Cod-RP group compared with the Control group. To conclude, the reduction in these potential early markers of impaired glucose metabolism following Cod-RP supplementation may indicate beneficial glucoregulatory effects of cod residual proteins. Trimethylamine N-oxide appears to be an appropriate biomarker of cod residual protein intake in lean adults.Entities:
Keywords: TMAO; biomarkers; dietary supplements; fish protein; hydroxybutyrate; marine protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429429 PMCID: PMC7285039 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Capsule content.
| Per Capsule | Cod-RP | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Cod residual powder * (mg) | 474 | 0 |
| Microcrystalline cellulose (mg) | 42 | 454 |
| Magnesium stearate (mg) | 5.3 | 4.6 |
| Silica (mg) | 5.3 | 4.6 |
| Total capsule weight (mg) | 527 | 463 |
| Energy † (kcal) | 1.59 | 0.02 |
* Crude protein content 64%, total fat content 8.6%. † Estimated true metabolizable energy. Cod-RP, cod residual protein powder.
Figure 1Flow of participants through the study. Participants could withdraw at any time and participants were excluded from analysis if they did not comply with the study protocol. Cod-RP, cod residual protein powder.
Participant characteristics at baseline.
| Cod-RP ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Women/Men | 7/12 | 11/10 | 0.36 |
| Age (years) | 28.0 ± 6.9 | 30.5 ± 7.2 | 0.28 |
| Body weight (kg) | 77.0 ± 16.0 | 73.1 ± 11.5 | 0.39 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 2.8 | 23.8 ± 2.3 | 0.25 |
| Body fat (%) | 19.7 ± 6.8 | 19.4 ± 6.7 | 0.89 |
| Body muscle (%) | 45.4 ± 4.7 | 45.4 ± 4.4 | 0.95 |
| Whole blood HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 32.4 ± 2.2 | 31.5 ± 2.0 | 0.23 |
| Plasma creatinine (µmol/L) | 80.1 ± 13.1 | 77.2 ± 11.1 | 0.46 |
| Urine albumin (mg/mmol creatinine) | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.9 | 0.23 |
| Serum glucose (mmol/L) | 5.1 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 0.21 |
| Serum insulin (pmol/L) | 68.1 ± 32.8 | 56.3 ± 25.9 | 0.55 |
| Plasma α-HB (µmol/L) | 44.2 ± 19.3 | 35.1 ± 17.0 | 0.80 |
| Plasma β-HB (µmol/L) | 143 ± 156 | 102 ± 108 | 0.34 |
| Plasma AcAc (µmol/L) | 76.5 ± 67.0 | 65.1 ± 52.1 | 0.86 |
| Cigarette/snus * ( | 1 | 2 | 1.00 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Groups were compared at baseline using independent samples T-test for continuous data and Pearson’s Chi-square test for categorical data. * Snus is a Scandinavian tobacco substance which is placed under the upper lip. Cod-RP, cod residual protein powder; BMI, body mass index; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; α-HB, α-hydroxybutyrate; β-HB, β-hydroxybutyrate; AcAc, acetoacetate.
Figure 2Glucose and insulin response during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) shown as change from baseline to 8 weeks after supplementation. Glucose response (a) and insulin response (b) are expressed as change (8 weeks–baseline) in the Cod-RP (―) group and the Control group (- -), at 0 (fasting), 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after oral glucose intake. The results are presented as mean with standard deviation for 18 participants in the Cod-RP group and 19 participants in the Control group. † Between-group changes were compared using the independent samples T-test, where p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Figure 3Fasting circulating concentrations of (a) α-Hydroxybutyrate (α-HB), (b) β-Hydroxybutyrate (β-HB) and (c) acetoacetate (AcAc), at baseline and after 8 weeks of supplementation. Concentrations in the Cod-RP group are indicated by blue lines and concentrations in the Control group are indicated by red lines. The means of each group are indicated by bold lines in their respective colors. The results are presented for 19 participants in the Cod-RP group and 21 participants in the Control group. † Within-group changes were tested using the paired samples T-test, where p < 0.05 was considered significant. ‡ Between-group changes were compared using the independent samples T-test.
Plasma and urine biomarkers related to cod residual protein intake.
| Baseline | 8 Weeks |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| Plasma (µmol/L) | ||||
| TMAO | 0.048 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 4.3 ± 2.2 | 5.8 ± 3.3 | 0.032 | |
| Control group | 5.2 ± 6.2 | 4.6 ± 6.3 | 0.36 | |
| Creatine | 0.11 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 24.9 ± 15.3 | 26.8 ± 15.4 | 0.36 | |
| Control group | 32.2 ± 18.2 | 30.5 ± 21.8 | 0.17 | |
| 1-MeHis | 0.17 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 13.0 ± 11.5 | 7.8 ± 7.9 | 0.16 | |
| Control group | 9.2 ± 7.2 | 10.7 ± 9.1 | 0.68 | |
| 3-MeHis | 0.24 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 0.29 | |
| Control group | 4.5 ± 1.0 | 4.7 ± 1.1 | 0.29 | |
| Urine (µmol/mmol creatinine) | ||||
| TMAO | 0.026 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 44.3 ± 22.6 | 63.2 ± 31.5 | 0.016 | |
| Control group | 53.3 ± 68.3 | 42.0 ± 43.5 | 0.30 | |
| Creatine | 0.18 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 2.7 ± 4.5 | 6.6 ± 14.9 | 0.29 | |
| Control group | 7.0 ± 11.8 | 5.6 ± 11.1 | 0.37 | |
| 1-MeHis | 0.49 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 90.9 ± 81.4 | 54.1 ± 54.0 | 0.16 | |
| Control group | 69.0 ± 62.7 | 72.1 ± 57.9 | 0.72 | |
| 3-MeHis | 0.16 | |||
| Cod-RP group | 29.5 ± 9.4 | 28.2 ± 6.5 | 0.77 | |
| Control group | 25.1 ± 5.6 | 26.4 ± 6.7 | 0.41 | |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation for 19 participants in the Cod-RP group and 21 participants in the Control group. The level of significance was set to < 0.05. † Within-group changes were tested using paired samples T-test. ‡ Between-group changes were compared using the independent samples T-test. Plasma and urine concentrations of TMAO, creatine, 1-MeHis and 3-MiHis were similar between groups at baseline. Cod-RP, cod residual protein powder; TMAO, Trimethylamine N-oxide; 1-MeHis, 1-Methylhistidine; 3-MeHis, 3-Methylhistidine.