| Literature DB >> 32429375 |
Raissa Schiavoni1, Giuseppina Monti1, Emanuele Piuzzi2, Luciano Tarricone1, Annarita Tedesco3, Egidio De Benedetto4, Andrea Cataldo1.
Abstract
One of the major goals of Health 4.0 is to offer personalized care to patients, also through real-time, remote monitoring of their biomedical parameters. In this regard, wearable monitoring systems are crucial to deliver continuous appropriate care. For some biomedical parameters, there are a number of well established systems that offer adequate solutions for real-time, continuous patient monitoring. On the other hand, monitoring skin hydration still remains a challenging task. The continuous monitoring of this physiological parameter is extremely important in several contexts, for example for athletes, sick people, workers in hostile environments or for the elderly. State-of-the-art systems, however, exhibit some limitations, especially related with the possibility of continuous, real-time monitoring. Starting from these considerations, in this work, the feasibility of an innovative time-domain reflectometry (TDR)-based wearable, skin hydration sensing system for real-time, continuous monitoring of skin hydration level was investigated. The applicability of the proposed system was demonstrated, first, through experimental tests on reference substances, then, directly on human skin. The obtained results demonstrate the TDR technique and the proposed system holds unexplored potential for the aforementioned purposes.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical sensor; dielectric permittivity; health 4.0; medical services; microwave measurements; microwave reflectometry; patient monitoring; remote monitoring; skin hydration; time domain reflectometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429375 PMCID: PMC7284366 DOI: 10.3390/s20102833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Example of a TDR reflectogram and of its first derivative for the evaluation of the apparent length of the SE.
Figure 2Schematization of the configuration of the used trifilar planar SE.
Figure 3TDR reflectograms for ultrapure water with different mass concentrations of sugar.
Figure 4results for ultrapure water with different mass concentrations of sugar.
Figure 5TDR reflectograms for saline solutions ( = 0.1 S/m) with different mass concentrations of sugar. (a) zoom on the reflectograms, with focus on apparent length of SE that decreases with increasing sugar concentration; (b) 15 m trend shows the reflection coefficient that increases with decreasing of conductivity.
Figure 6of saline solution with different mass concentrations of sugar.
Figure 7SE attached on the internal surface of a running smartphone armband: (a) front; (b) back.
Figure 8Picture of the experimental setup for measurements on human skin.
Figure 9Comparison of TDR reflectograms for the four cases of forearm hydration.
Figure 10Comparison of the for the four cases of forearm hydration.
Figure 11TDR reflectograms for animal hide sample. (a) reflectograms at short distance; (b) reflection coefficient at long distance with focus on the trend of electrical conductivity.