| Literature DB >> 35408154 |
Deepesh Agarwal1, Philip Randall1, Zachary White2, Bayleigh Bisnette1, Jenalee Dickson1, Cross Allen1, Faraz Chamani1, Punit Prakash1, Carl Ade2, Balasubramaniam Natarajan1.
Abstract
Dehydration in the human body arises due to inadequate replenishment of fluids. An appropriate level of hydration is essential for optimal functioning of the human body, and complications ranging from mild discomfort to, in severe cases, death, could result from a neglected imbalance in fluid levels. Regular and accurate monitoring of hydration status can provide meaningful information for people operating in stressful environmental conditions, such as athletes, military professionals and the elderly. In this study, we propose a non-invasive hydration monitoring technique employing non-ionizing electromagnetic power in the microwave band to estimate the changes in the water content of the whole body. Specifically, we investigate changes in the attenuation coefficient in the frequency range 2-3.5 GHz between a pair of planar antennas positioned across a participant's arm during various states of hydration. Twenty healthy young adults (10M, 10F) underwent controlled hypohydration and euhydration control bouts. The attenuation coefficient was compared among trials and used to predict changes in body mass. Volunteers lost 1.50±0.44% and 0.49±0.54% body mass during hypohydration and euhydration, respectively. The microwave transmission-based attenuation coefficient (2-3.5 GHz) was accurate in predicting changes in hydration status. The corresponding regression analysis demonstrates that building separate estimation models for dehydration and rehydration phases offer better predictive performance (88%) relative to a common model for both the phases (76%).Entities:
Keywords: hydration monitoring; hypohydration and euhydration; microwave transmission; non-invasive; regression analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408154 PMCID: PMC9003514 DOI: 10.3390/s22072536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Setup for the gel studies: (a) five agar gels with varying water content, (b) close-up image of the antennas, (c) measurement of dielectric properties, and (d) capturing of electromagnetic measurements.
p-values of two-sample t-tests for selection of frequency bands having discriminatory power in gel studies.
| Frequency Bands | Water Content | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5% | −2% | +2% | +5% | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Percentage changes in dielectric properties and electromagnetic transmission coefficient (S21) measurements of agar phantom gels with respect to the reference gel.
| Water Content Change Relative to Reference gel | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −5% | −2% | +2% | +5% | ||
|
|
| −1.62% | −0.78% | 0.18% | 1.50% |
|
| 4.31% | 2.25% | −2.18% | −3.23% | |
| S21- | −0.95% | −0.65% | 0.68% | 2.99% | |
| S21- | −1.12% | −0.54% | 0.68% | 2.62% | |
| S21- | −1.24% | −0.38% | 0.63% | 2.53% | |
| S21- | −1.28% | −0.40% | 0.61% | 2.59% | |
Figure 2Plot of changes in dielectric properties of agar phantom gels with increasing water content.
Figure 3Plot of changes in electromagnetic transmission coefficient (S21) measurements of agar phantom gels with increasing water content.
Figure 4Timeline of events in each treatment condition. Fluid balance measurements (FBM): nude body weight, urine specific gravity, hematocrit and S21 measurement; * Period 3 FBM: urine specific gravity was not assessed. BL: baseline.
Figure 5Experimental setup used to obtain S21 measurements from the participant.
Figure 6Sample plot of S21 magnitudes for one participant during different instances.
The p-values of two-sample t-tests for selection of frequency bands having discriminatory power in human participant studies.
| Frequency | Measurement Period | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| After Period 3 | After Period 4 | After Rehydration | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test decisions and p-values of two-sample t-tests for the selection of the parameter that best characterizes hydration in human body (a test decision value of 0 indicates a failure to reject the null hypothesis at 95% confidence level and a value of 1 indicates rejection of the null hypothesis at 95% confidence level).
| Sr. No. | Parameter | Measurement Time | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Period 3 | After Period 4 | After Rehydration | |||||
| Test | Test | Test | |||||
| 1 | Percentage change in | 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
| 2 | Percentage change in | 0 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
|
| 3 | Percentage change in | NA | NA | 0 |
| 1 |
|
Figure 7Summary of variations in percentage changes in body weight over different time intervals for the participants.
Correlation coefficients corresponding to different predictor variables during all measurement times. denotes the percentage change in the mean of S21 magnitudes corresponding to frequency band x at measurement time t, as compared to baseline. is calculated as shown in Equation (6).
| Sr. No. | Predictor | Measurement Time | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| After Period 3 | After Period 4 | After Exercise | After Rehydration | ||
| 1 |
| −0.26 | −0.07 | −0.17 | 0.12 |
| 2 |
| −0.11 | −0.06 | −0.04 | 0.21 |
| 3 |
| −0.30 | −0.09 | −0.17 | −0.02 |
| 4 |
| −0.24 | −0.14 | −0.20 | 0.08 |
Figure 8Correlation plots for selected cases. Percentage changes in (a): body weight vs. mean of S21 magnitudes in frequency band 1 during the measurement time “After Period 3”; (b): body weight vs. mean of S21 magnitudes in frequency band 2 during the measurement time “After Rehydration”; (c): body weight vs. mean of S21 magnitudes in frequency band 3 during the measurement time “After Exercise”; (d): body weight vs. mean of S21 magnitudes in frequency band 4 during the measurement time “After Period 3”.
Results for general analysis—Case 1: building separate regression models for dehydration and rehydration phases (RM-I: regression models built using , , , and as predictors; RM-II: regression models built using and as predictors).
| Sr. No. | Regression | Metric | Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dehydration | Rehydration | |||||
| RM-I | RM-II | RM-I | RM-II | |||
| 1 | Linear Regression | MSE | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.37 | 0.16 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.15 | ||
| Predictive | 58.55% | 46.38% | 22.10% | 21.56% | ||
| 2 | Decision Tree | MSE | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.41 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.35 | ||
| Predictive | 69.31% | 57.21% | 39.13% | 28.63% | ||
| 3 | Support Vector | MSE | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.78 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.75 | ||
| Predictive | 88.55% | 78.47% | 87.30% | 75.39% | ||
Results for general analysis—Case 2: building a common model for both dehydration and rehydration phases (RM-I: regression models built using , , , and as predictors; RM-II: regression models built using and as predictors).
| Sr. No. | Regression | Metric | Model Specification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RM-I | RM-II | |||
| 1 | Linear Regression | MSE | 0.32 | 0.38 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.19 | 0.13 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.16 | 0.11 | ||
| Predictive | 34.26% | 26.87% | ||
| 2 | Decision Tree | MSE | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.53 | 0.39 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.51 | 0.35 | ||
| Predictive | 56.99% | 45.33% | ||
| 3 | Support Vector | MSE | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.73 | 0.61 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.72 | 0.58 | ||
| Predictive | 76.32% | 70.14% | ||
Results for sex-specific analysis—Case 1: using the models originally trained on the entire data (both male and female participants).
| Sr. No. | Regression | Metric | Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dehydration | Rehydration | |||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| 1 | Linear Regression | MSE | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 0.15 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.32 | 0.09 | ||
| Predictive | 65.52% | 50.96% | 41.56% | 32.47% | ||
| 2 | Decision Tree | MSE | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.11 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.44 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.33 | ||
| Predictive | 77.76% | 58.73% | 34.10% | 42.24% | ||
| 3 | Support Vector | MSE | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.85 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.82 | ||
| Predictive | 88.02% | 88.74% | 85.34% | 89.89% | ||
Results for sex-specific analysis—Case 2: training separate models using data from male and female participants.
| Sr. No. | Regression | Metric | Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dehydration | Rehydration | |||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| 1 | Linear Regression | MSE | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.13 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.50 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.59 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.39 | ||
| Predictive | 81.35% | 59.24% | 48.91% | 34.67% | ||
| 2 | Decision Tree | MSE | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.17 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.18 | 0.18 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.09 | ||
| Predictive | 76.62% | 55.70% | 11.97% | 17.50% | ||
| 3 | Support Vector | MSE | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Ordinary R2 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.88 | ||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.86 | ||
| Predictive | 91.78% | 90.57% | 87.28% | 90.02% | ||
Figure 9Sample plots of true response vs. predicted response and residuals for predictions with SVR for male participants in sex-specific Analysis—Case 2.