| Literature DB >> 35062496 |
Pasquale Arpaia1,2, Federica Crauso3, Egidio De Benedetto2, Luigi Duraccio4, Giovanni Improta3, Francesco Serino5.
Abstract
This work addresses the design, development and implementation of a 4.0-based wearable soft transducer for patient-centered vitals telemonitoring. In particular, first, the soft transducer measures hypertension-related vitals (heart rate, oxygen saturation and systolic/diastolic pressure) and sends the data to a remote database (which can be easily consulted both by the patient and the physician). In addition to this, a dedicated deep learning algorithm, based on a Long-Short-Term-Memory Autoencoder, was designed, implemented and tested for providing an alert when the patient's vitals exceed certain thresholds, which are automatically personalized for the specific patient. Furthermore, a mobile application (EcO2u) was developed to manage the entire data flow and facilitate the data fruition; this application also implements an innovative face-detection algorithm that ensures the identity of the patient. The robustness of the proposed soft transducer was validated experimentally on five individuals, who used the system for 30 days. The experimental results demonstrated an accuracy in anomaly detection greater than 93%, with a true positive rate of more than 94%.Entities:
Keywords: LSTM; deep learning; health 4.0; machine learning; remote health monitoring; telemonitoring; vital sign monitoring; wearable sensors; wearable systems
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35062496 PMCID: PMC8777728 DOI: 10.3390/s22020536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1General architecture of the proposed soft transducer.
Figure 2Implementation of the proposed telemonitoring system.
Figure 3Application level of the proposed telemonitoring system.
Figure 4Window of the EcO2u mobile application: Main menu of the application (a); Patient registration (sensitive data are hidden) (b); Data calibration (c).
Figure 5Vitals monitoring with face recognization (a); Visualization of vitals after completing the measurement (b).
Average values of vitals acquired in two sessions with related 1- repeatability.
| Subject | HR (Bpm) | HR (Bpm) | SP/DP (mmHg) | SP/DP (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 85 ± 3 | 82 ± 2 | 112/80 ± 2 | 112/79 ± 2 |
| #2 | 71 ± 2 | 68 ± 2 | 130/82 ±1 | 128/82 ± 2 |
| #3 | 88 ± 4 | 85 ± 4 | 125/85 ± 2 | 124/84 ± 1 |
| #4 | 75 ± 1 | 73 ± 2 | 126/84 ± 2 | 125/84 ± 1 |
| #5 | 70 ± 2 | 67 ± 1 | 136/82 ± 1 | 134/82 ± 2 |
Figure 6Reconstruction error (blue line) as a function of the training and test data. The identified threshold for the anomaly detection is shown in red.
Results of data classification.
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
|
| 68 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 0.94 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 0.99 |
|
| 0.81 |
|
| 0.96 |
|
| 0.93 |
Figure 7Area under the curve.