Masahiro Sugiura1, Satoshi P Tsunoda1,2,3, Masahiko Hibi4, Hideki Kandori1,2. 1. Department of Life Science and Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan. 2. OptoBioTechnology Research Center, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan. 3. PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan. 4. Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
Abstract
The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta contains a chimeric rhodopsin protein composed of an N-terminal rhodopsin (Rh) domain and a C-terminal cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) domain. The Rh-PDE enzyme (SrRh-PDE), which decreases the concentrations of cyclic nucleotides such as cGMP and cAMP in light, is a useful tool in optogenetics. Recently, eight additional Rh-PDE enzymes were found in choanoflagellate species, four from Choanoeca flexa and the other four from other species. In this paper, we studied the molecular properties of these new Rh-PDEs, which were compared with SrRh-PDE. Upon expression in HEK293 cells, four Rh-PDE proteins, including CfRh-PDE2 and CfRh-PDE3, exhibited no PDE activity when assessed by in-cell measurements and in vitro HPLC analysis. On the other hand, CfRh-PDE1 showed light-dependent PDE activity toward cGMP, which absorbed maximally at 491 nm. Therefore, CfRh-PDE1 is presumably responsible for colony inversion in C. flexa by absorbing blue-green light. The molecular properties of MrRh-PDE were similar to those of SrRh-PDE, although the λmax of MrRh-PDE (516 nm) was considerably red-shifted from that of SrRh-PDE (492 nm). One Rh-PDE, AsRh-PDE, did not contain the retinal-binding Lys at TM7 and showed cAMP-specific PDE activity both in the dark and light. These results provide mechanistic insight into rhodopsin-mediated, light-dependent regulation of second-messenger levels in eukaryotic microbes.
The choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta contains a chimeric rhodopsin protein composed of an N-terminal rhodopsin (Rh) domain and a C-terminal cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) domain. The Rh-PDE enzyme (SrRh-PDE), which decreases the concentrations of cyclic nucleotides such as cGMP and cAMP in light, is a useful tool in optogenetics. Recently, eight additional Rh-PDE enzymes were found in choanoflagellate species, four from Choanoeca flexa and the other four from other species. In this paper, we studied the molecular properties of these new Rh-PDEs, which were compared with SrRh-PDE. Upon expression in HEK293 cells, four Rh-PDE proteins, including CfRh-PDE2 and CfRh-PDE3, exhibited no PDE activity when assessed by in-cell measurements and in vitro HPLC analysis. On the other hand, CfRh-PDE1 showed light-dependent PDE activity toward cGMP, which absorbed maximally at 491 nm. Therefore, CfRh-PDE1 is presumably responsible for colony inversion in C. flexa by absorbing blue-green light. The molecular properties of MrRh-PDE were similar to those of SrRh-PDE, although the λmax of MrRh-PDE (516 nm) was considerably red-shifted from that of SrRh-PDE (492 nm). One Rh-PDE, AsRh-PDE, did not contain the retinal-binding Lys at TM7 and showed cAMP-specific PDE activity both in the dark and light. These results provide mechanistic insight into rhodopsin-mediated, light-dependent regulation of second-messenger levels in eukaryotic microbes.
Rhodopsins are heptahelical
membrane proteins containing retinal
as a chromophore. They are subdivided into animal and microbial rhodopsins.[1] While animal rhodopsins serve almost exclusively
as G protein-coupled receptors,[2−5] the functions of microbial rhodopsins are diverse,
including light-driven cation and anion pumps, light-gated cation
and anion channels, positive and negative phototaxis sensors, photochromic
sensors, and light-activated enzymes.[1,6−9] The first discovered light-activated enzyme was an algal histidine
kinase (HK).[10] In addition, the discovery
of enzyme rhodopsins functioning as a light-activated guanylyl cyclase
(GC)[11−20] and phosphodiesterase (PDE)[21−24] attracted much attention from researchers working
in optogenetics.Optogenetics has revolutionized life sciences
where light-gated
channels and light-driven ion pumps have been used to excite and silence
neurons.[25,26] This is highly advantageous for applications
in neuroscience when fast temporal resolution is required to change
transmembrane potential. In contrast, for the optogenetic control
of a wider spectrum of biological functions, light-induced enzyme
activation is more attractive because intracellular signaling processes
can be manipulated by light.[27] In particular,
the optogenetic control of secondary messengers such as cAMP and cGMP
is in high demand. Therefore, the emergence of Rh-GC and Rh-PDE was
welcomed by the field of optogenetics. Their molecular properties
have been investigated.[11−24]In the case of Rh-GC, several homologous proteins were reported
in addition to the first reported Rh-GC from Blastocladiella
emersonil (BeRh-GC), such as Rh-GC
from Catenaria anguillulae (CaRh-GC).[11−20] Therefore, optimization of these proteins can be tested using site-directed
mutagenesis. This is in stark contrast with discovery for Rh-PDEs.
After the first report in March 2017,[24] homologous proteins have thus far not been found. The Rh-PDE from
the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta (SrRh-PDE) was the only protein whose molecular
properties were investigated.[21−24] Nevertheless, SrRh-PDE exhibits
considerable dark activity under heterologous expression conditions,
which makes it difficult to improve for optogenetic applications.In June 2019, the situation changed dramatically after the discovery
of additional Rh-PDEs from a multicellular choanoflagellate. Brunet
et al. reported that a newly described choanoflagellate species, Choanoeca flexa (C. flexa), forms cup-shaped colonies that invert their curvature in response
to light and that these new Rh-PDEs are responsible for light-signal
transduction through the cGMP signaling.[28] Those authors showed that C. flexa contains four Rh-PDE homologs and an additional four Rh-PDEs from
other species. This was an exciting finding for both fundamental and
applied research. Although it is not clear why C. flexa contains four Rh-PDEs, these new Rh-PDEs may be more suitable for
optogenetics than the currently known Rh-PDE.In this paper,
we characterized the molecular properties of these
eight new Rh-PDEs. We first synthesized the full-length DNA, which
was expressed in HEK293 cells. The PDE activity in cells was examined
by the GloSensor assay. We also investigated the PDE activity biochemically
using a crude membrane of HEK cells. Consequently, we observed the
PDE activity from four new Rh-PDEs. While CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, and MrRh-PDE exhibited light-dependent
PDE activity, AsRh-PDE without the retinal-binding
Lys at TM7 showed cAMP-specific PDE activity both in the dark and
light. The remaining four Rh-PDEs showed no enzyme activity upon expression
in HEK293 cells. Using the hydroxylamine bleach method, we obtained
the absorption spectra of six new Rh-PDEs, whose maxima were distributed
from 491 to 527 nm. The molecular mechanism of these new Rh-PDEs is
discussed based on the present observations.
Materials and Methods
Molecular
Biology
Amino acid sequences of eight Rh-PDEs
were provided by Dr. N. King of UC Berkeley. Full-length genes encoding
Rh-PDEs were synthesized after human codon optimization (Gen Script)
and cloned into the pCS2+ vector between BamHI and XhoI sites using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara Bio).
All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Assay of the
Enzymatic Activity of Rh-PDEs in Mammalian Cells
Enzymatic
activity was evaluated by the GloSensor assay as described
previously.[21] HEK293 cells were purchased
from the JCRB Cell Bank and cultured in an E-MEM medium with -glutamine and phenol red (Wako) containing
10% (v/v) FBS and penicillin–streptomycin. The cells were co-transfected
with the pCS2+ vector carrying the Rh-PDE genes and the pGloSensor-42F
cGMP or pGloSensor-22F cAMP vector (Promega) by using Lipofectamine
2000 (Invitrogen). Transfected cells were incubated for 66–24 h at 37 °C in a medium containing 0.5 μM all-trans-retinal (Toronto Research Chemicals). Before measurements,
the culture medium was replaced with a CO2-independent
medium containing 10% (vol/vol) FBS and 2% (vol/vol) GloSensor cAMP
or cGMP stock solution (Promega). Cells were then incubated for 2
h at room temperature in the dark. The intracellular cAMP or cGMP
level was observed by monitoring luminescence with a microplate reader
(Corona Electric) at 27 °C. The cells were treated with 3.5 μM
forskolin (Wako), a direct activator of the endogenous adenylyl cyclase,
to elevate the intracellular cAMP level. Alternatively, the cells
were treated with 100 μM sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (Wako),
a direct activator of the endogenous guanylyl cyclase, to elevate
intracellular cGMP level. The cells were illuminated with 520 nm light
at 0.35 μW/mm2 from a xenon lamp (LAX-103, Asahi
Spectra Co., Ltd., Japan) through an interference filter. Light intensity
was measured using a power meter LP1 (Sanwa Electric Instruments Co.,
Ltd., Japan). Six independent experiments were averaged.
HPLC Analysis
for the in Vitro Assay of the Enzymatic Activity
of Rh-PDEs
HEK293T cells were transfected with plasmid pCS2+_Rh-PDE
by the calcium phosphate method.[21] The
DMEM/F-12 medium contained 0.5 μM all-trans-retinal as well as penicillin and streptomycin. The cells were harvested
after 24 h and washed with buffer A (140 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5). The cells were resuspended in buffer
A and homogenized using a Potter-Elehjem Grinder (Wheaton) and a syringe
with a 27G needle. The syringe was filled and drained five times while
stirring the homogenate. The amount of protein was determined by the
BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were kept in
the dark for at least 2 h before measurement. Catalytic activity was
measured at room temperature in 100 μL of buffer A with 16–18
μg (in the case of cAMP) or 1.6–1.8 μg (in the
case of cGMP) of total protein in a 1.5 mL sample tube. The sample
was illuminated with a xenon lamp (MAX-303, Asahi Spectra Co., Ltd.)
through a Y52 filter (7 mW/mm2). The reaction was initiated
by adding cyclic nucleotides (final concentration, 100 μM).
Aliquots were removed at different time points, and the reactions
were immediately terminated by adding 100 μL of 0.1 N HCl and
frozen in liquid nitrogen. After thawing, samples were centrifuged
to remove the membranes and denatured proteins. Nucleotides (20 μL
of aliquot) were separated by HPLC (Shimadzu systems) with a C18 reversed-phase
column (Waters) and 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 5.9), 4 mM tetrabutylammonium
iodide, and 10% (vol/vol) methanol as the eluent.[29] Nucleotides were monitored at 254 nm. Data were evaluated
with LabSolutions (Shimadzu). Peak areas were integrated and assigned
to the educt cyclic nucleotide based on retention times of a corresponding
standard compound.
Spectroscopy
Absorption maxima of
the new Rh-PDEs were
determined without purification.[24,30] Each rhodopsin
molecule expressed in HEK293T cells was suspended in 1.5% DDM, 0.3%
cholesteryl hemisuccinate, 50 mM hydroxylamine, 100 mM NaCl, and Na2HPO4 (pH 7.0) and illuminated at room temperature
for 1 min with a 1 kW tungsten halogen projector lamp (Master HILUX-HR,
Rikagaku, Japan) through a glass filter (Y-52, AGC Techno Glass, Japan)
at wavelengths of >500 nm.
Phylogenetic Analysis of
Rhodopsin Genes
The amino
acid sequences of either full-length proteins, transmembrane domains,
or enzyme domains of selected rhodopsins were aligned by using MEGA10
software.
Results
New Rh-PDEs from the Choanoflagellate
The genome of
the choanoflagellate C. flexa (sequenced
by the Broad Institute, NCBI accession PRJNA37927) contains four Rh-PDE
genes (NCBI Gene ID: QDH43408.1 for CfRh-PDE1, QDH43410.1
for CfRh-PDE2, QDH43407.1 for CfRh-PDE3, and QDH43409.1 for CfRh-PDE4).[28] In addition, Brunet et al. reported four Rh-PDE
genes in a recent paper (so far, undeposited in NCBI).[28]Figure a is the schematic drawing of the Rh-PDE architecture, in
which the dimer is a functional unit. An N-terminal with eight transmembrane
helical rhodopsin domains[22,23] and a cytoplasmic PDE
domain constitutes Rh-PDEs (see Figure S1 for the complete amino acid sequence). Rh-PDEs are a microbial rhodopsin
that binds all-trans-retinal as a chromophore and
where light absorption triggers protein structural changes to induce
(or modulate) their enzymatic activity.[21−24] A decrease in intracellular cyclic
nucleotide leads to each function through intracellular signaling
pathways, such as colony inversion in a multicellular choanoflagellate.[28]
Figure 1
(a) Rh-PDE composed of eight transmembrane helical rhodopsin
domains
and the cytoplasmic PDE domain, which forms a dimer. (b) Phylogenetic
tree of the eight new Rh-PDEs, SrRh-PDE, and bacteriorhodopsin
(BR). Full-length sequences were aligned.
(a) Rh-PDE composed of eight transmembrane helical rhodopsin
domains
and the cytoplasmic PDE domain, which forms a dimer. (b) Phylogenetic
tree of the eight new Rh-PDEs, SrRh-PDE, and bacteriorhodopsin
(BR). Full-length sequences were aligned.Figure b shows
the phylogenetic tree of Rh-PDEs based on their full-length amino
acid sequences (Figure S1). Amino acid
identities among the nine Rh-PDEs are shown in Figure S2. Phylogenetic trees of Rh-PDEs based on the amino
acid sequences of the transmembrane (TM) and PDE domains are shown
in Figure S3a,b, respectively. Many common
residues of microbial rhodopsins are conserved in Rh-PDEs, but considerable
uniqueness can be observed in the sequences (Figure S1). First, AsRh-PDE does not contain retinal-binding
Lys, which is replaced by Asn. Therefore, AsRh-PDE
probably lacks the ability to absorb light. L93 in TM3,[31] P186 in TM6,[32] and
A215 in TM7[33] in bacteriorhodopsin (BR),
known as color determinants in microbial rhodopsin, are also denoted
as the L/Q, G/P, and A/T switches, respectively. In each switch, Leu,
Gly, and Ala exhibit red-shifted absorption, while Gln, Pro, and Thr
(Ser) exhibit blue-shifted absorption.
Enzymatic Activity of Rh-PDEs
in Mammalian Cells
To
measure the enzymatic activity of Rh-PDEs in cells, we used the GloSensor
assay, which is based on a cyclic nucleotide-dependent luciferase.[21] In this assay, the Rh-PDE-expressing cells were
first incubated in a serum-containing culture medium after the addition
of all-trans-retinal in the dark at room temperature
(∼27 °C). Luminescence intensity was increased by forskolin
or sodium nitroprusside (SNP), which activates AC or GC, resulting
in an elevation of the cytoplasmic cAMP or cGMP level, respectively.
Then, photoactivated PDE activity was measured by observing the decrease
in luminescence intensity in a light-dependent manner.Figure S4 shows the time course after the addition
of forskolin into HEK293 cells expressing new Rh-PDEs (red line) and SrRh-PDE (black line) together with the luciferase. The
observed luminescence of red and black lines was smaller than that
of the gray line, whose cells expressed only a luciferase. This suggests
that the dark activity of Rh-PDEs, or that co-expression of the Rh-PDE
and luciferase may affect the level of luminescence from the luciferase.
Only AsRh-PDE exhibited no increase after the addition
of forskolin, presumably originating from its strong dark activity.
It should be noted that AsRh-PDE does not contain
retinal-bonding Lys at TM7, which may be related to the present observation.Then, we illuminated the sample and observed changes in PDE activity. Figure a shows the light-induced
PDE activity of new Rh-PDEs (red line) and SrRh-PDE
(black line). Clear light-dependent PDE activity was observed for CfRh-PDE1 and MrRh-PDE, as well as SrRh-PDE, while a small signal was observed for CfRh-PDE4. In contrast, light-dependent PDE activity was
not observed for CfRh-PDE2, CfRh-PDE3, CpRh-PDE1, CpRh-PDE2, and AsRh-PDE. Thus, the Glosensor assay showed that only three Rh-PDEs
exhibit light-dependent PDE activity among the eight proteins (Figure b). After the light
was switched off, the decreased luminescence by light gradually recovered,
and τ1/e values were 2.8, 7.6, and 3.4 min for CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, and MrRh-PDE, respectively (Figure a). These values are close to that of SrRh-PDE
(3.5 min).
Figure 2
In-cell measurements of the light-dependent PDE activity toward
cAMP. (a) Changes of luminescence signals upon 2 min irradiation of
510 nm light (light-blue dot) of HEK293 cells with the empty vector
(mock) and Rh-PDEs. Red lines represent the data for the new Rh-PDEs.
Time constants (τ1/e) of the recovery kinetics after
the light is switched off are 2.8 ± 0.3, 7.6 ± 2.8, 3.5
± 0.3, and 3.4 ± 0.6 min for CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, SrRh-PDE, and MrRh-PDE, respectively. (b) Averaged light-dependent PDE activity.
In-cell measurements of the light-dependent PDE activity toward
cAMP. (a) Changes of luminescence signals upon 2 min irradiation of
510 nm light (light-blue dot) of HEK293 cells with the empty vector
(mock) and Rh-PDEs. Red lines represent the data for the new Rh-PDEs.
Time constants (τ1/e) of the recovery kinetics after
the light is switched off are 2.8 ± 0.3, 7.6 ± 2.8, 3.5
± 0.3, and 3.4 ± 0.6 min for CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, SrRh-PDE, and MrRh-PDE, respectively. (b) Averaged light-dependent PDE activity.Figure S5a shows the
results on PDE
activity toward cGMP in the dark. Compared to the mock data (gray
line in Figure S5a), no increase upon addition
of SNP was observed for CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, and MrRh-PDE (blue lines in Figure S5a) as well as for SrRh-PDE (black line in Figure S5a).[21] This fact suggests that the light-dependent
PDE activity toward cGMP can be tested only for the remaining five
proteins, among which AsRh-PDE does not contain the
retinal-binding Lys. When the cells were illuminated, none of the
Rh-PDEs showed light-dependent PDE activity toward cGMP (Figure S5). This may be reasonable as CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, and MrRh-PDE, whose light-dependent activity toward cAMP was detectable
(Figure b), showed
no increase in luminescence (Figure S5a), presumably because of high dark activity.
HPLC Analysis of the Enzymatic
Activity of Rh-PDEs
We next characterized the enzymatic activity
of Rh-PDEs by HPLC analysis
using crude membranes of HEK293 cells. In these experiments, cAMP
or cGMP was mixed with the crude cell membranes expressing Rh-PDEs,
and time- and light-dependent hydrolysis of cyclic nucleotides into
5′AMP or 5′GMP was monitored by HPLC. Figures S6 and S7 show the time course of the HPLC profile
for cAMP and cGMP, respectively, whose concentrations were monitored.
A clear decrease was only observed for MrRh-PDE, AsRh-PDE, and SrRh-PDE in the case of cAMP
(Figure S6), while the decrease was observed
for CfRh-PDE1, MrRh-PDE, and SrRh-PDE in the case of cGMP (Figure S7).Figure summarizes the PDE activity studied by in vitro HPLC analysis.
Among the eight new Rh-PDEs, four proteins, CfRh-PDE2, CfRh-PDE3, CpRh-PDE1, and CpRh-PDE2, exhibited no PDE activity from within the cells (Figure ) or in vitro (Figure ) measurements. The
lack of a decrease in cyclic nucleotide concentration in the HPLC
analysis (Figure )
strongly suggests that the lowered luminescence after expressing these
proteins (Figure S3) did not originate
from the dark PDE activity. This is an entirely unexpected result
as these four Rh-PDEs are homologous proteins to a known Rh-PDE, SrRh-PDE. The reason is discussed below.
Figure 3
In vitro HPLC analysis
of PDE activity toward (a) cAMP and (b)
cGMP. HEK293 cell membranes expressing Rh-PDEs were incubated with
(a) cAMP or (b) cGMP, and the decrease in each substrate was measured
by HPLC in the dark (D) and light (L). Error bars represent SD.
In vitro HPLC analysis
of PDE activity toward (a) cAMP and (b)
cGMP. HEK293 cell membranes expressing Rh-PDEs were incubated with
(a) cAMP or (b) cGMP, and the decrease in each substrate was measured
by HPLC in the dark (D) and light (L). Error bars represent SD.While CfRh-PDE1 and CfRh-PDE4
showed in-cell PDE activity in response to cAMP (Figure b), no clear activity, as assessed
by HPLC, was observed for CfRh-PDE4, both in the
dark and light. In contrast, small but clear PDE activity was observed
by HPLC for CfRh-PDE1 in response to cGMP, but the
response to cAMP was unclear. One possibility is that the preparation
of the crude membrane sample caused loss of enzyme activity. Another
possibility is that both CfRh-PDE1 and CfRh-PDE4 possess PDE activity and the in-cell measurement was more
sensitive than the HPLC measurement.MrRh-PDE
showed the largest light-dependent PDE
activity in response to cAMP in the in-cell measurement (Figure b), which was larger
than that of SrRh-PDE. In the case of cGMP, dark
activity was so strong in the in-cell measurement that detectable
luminescence was not observed before illumination. PDE activities
in the dark and light were more quantitatively obtained by HPLC analysis,
where the activities of MrRh-PDE in response to cAMP
were larger than those of SrRh-PDE in both the dark
and light (Figure a). Nevertheless, the light–dark activity ratio of MrRh-PDE (1.73 times) was lower than that of SrRh-PDE (3.11 times) (Figure a). We previously reported that the light–dark activity
ratio of SrRh-PDE was 1.64 times.[21] A change in the construct of SrRh-PDE,
mainly the removal of the 1D4 tag, resulted in an improved light–dark
activity ratio for SrRh-PDE (3.11 times). Although
we used the same construct for MrRh-PDE without the
1D4 tag, its light–dark activity ratio was not high. The tendency
was more significant in response to cGMP. Figure b shows that the light–dark activity
ratio of MrRh-PDE was only 1.12 times while that
of SrRh-PDE was 1.90 times.Finally, AsRh-PDE had a unique feature. The PDE
activity in response to cAMP was significant, but it was the same
in the dark and in the light. This is reasonable since AsRh-PDE does not contain retinal-binding Lys at TM7. On the other
hand, the PDE activity in response to cGMP was negligible, indicating
that AsRh-PDE is a cAMP-specific PDE.
Molecular Properties
of Purified Full-Length Rh-PDEs
We next measured the absorption
spectra of Rh-PDEs. To determine
the absorption properties of rhodopsins, proteins are normally solubilized
with a detergent and purified by column chromatography. In contrast,
here we determined the absorption maxima of the new Rh-PDEs without
purification by applying the hydroxylamine bleach method to gently
solubilized proteins.[24,30]Figure shows the difference absorption spectra
of Rh-PDEs before illumination minus after illumination in the presence
of 50 mM hydroxylamine. The positive spectra correspond to those of
Rh-PDEs. Among the eight Rh-PDEs, six absorption maxima were determined.
The lack of an absorption spectrum for AsRh-PDE is
reasonable since the retinal-binding Lys is replaced by Asn. Even
though CfRh-PDE2 possesses retinal-binding Lys, we
were unable to obtain a spectrum. It should be noted that only CpRh-PDE1 reacted with 50 mM hydroxylamine in the dark,
forming a retinaloxime.
Figure 4
Light-induced difference absorption spectra
of Rh-PDEs in the presence
of 50 mM hydroxylamine. Positive and negative signals show the spectra
before and after illumination, corresponding to those of the rhodopsin
and retinal oxime, respectively. Red and black lines represent the
spectra of new Rh-PDEs (λmax is shown in each panel)
and SrRh-PDE (λmax: 492 nm), respectively.
Only CpRh-PDE1 reacted with hydroxylamine in the
dark.
Light-induced difference absorption spectra
of Rh-PDEs in the presence
of 50 mM hydroxylamine. Positive and negative signals show the spectra
before and after illumination, corresponding to those of the rhodopsin
and retinaloxime, respectively. Red and black lines represent the
spectra of new Rh-PDEs (λmax is shown in each panel)
and SrRh-PDE (λmax: 492 nm), respectively.
Only CpRh-PDE1 reacted with hydroxylamine in the
dark.The obtained absorption maxima,
which were distributed between
491 and 527 nm, were roughly classified into three groups. In the
first group, CfRh-PDE1 (491 nm) and CfRh-PDE4 (496 nm) possessed blue-shifted absorption, similar to SrRh-PDE (492 nm). The second group included MrRh-PDE (516 nm) and CpRh-PDE2 (519 nm), and the
most red-shifted third group is composed of CfRh-PDE3
(524 nm) and CpRh-PDE1 (527 nm). There is currently
no structural information about these Rh-PDEs, and Figure shows the 25 residues surrounding
the retinal chromophore in a light-driven proton pump BR.[34] Among the nine Rh-PDEs, only the sequence of AsRh-PDE is different, including the lack of retinal-binding
Lys and the counterion Glu. The remaining eight Rh-PDEs are highly
homologous. In fact, among the 25 residues in Figure , 15 residues are identical for eight Rh-PDEs
(gray background in Figure ). This fact strongly suggests that the remaining 10 residues
are responsible for color variation over 36 nm, from 491 (CfRh-PDE1) to 527 nm (CpRh-PDE1).
Figure 5
Twenty-five
amino acid residues surrounding the retinal chromophore
in BR (PDB: 1C3W).[34]
Twenty-five
amino acid residues surrounding the retinal chromophore
in BR (PDB: 1C3W).[34]The unique residue of MrRh-PDE and CpRh-PDE2 is Gly at TM6, whereas other Rh-PDEs contain Pro. The corresponding
position was recently identified as the color determinant of microbial
rhodopsins (G/P switch at TM6).[32] Pro is
highly conserved at TM6 in microbial rhodopsins (P186 in BR) (1),
while the replacement of Pro by Thr or Gly led to a spectral red-shift
in the light-driven sodium pump KR2. In addition, a red-shifted sodium
pump protein is found in nature.[32] The
red-shifted spectra in MrRh-PDE and CpRh-PDE2 with Gly in the G/P switch are fully consistent, although
this needs to be experimentally validated in the future. On the other
hand, the origin of the spectral red-shift in CfRh-PDE3
and CpRh-PDE1 is not obvious from known color determinants.
From Figure , their
sequential uniqueness can be seen (i) in Q or E at TM1 and (ii) in
N at TM4.
Discussion
Enzymatic Activity of New
Rh-PDEs
Here, we report the
enzymatic and molecular properties of novel Rh-PDEs from choanoflagellates
by heterologously expressing them in HEK293 cells and comparing them
with those of SrRh-PDE. Among the eight Rh-PDEs, AsRh-PDE did not contain the retinal-binding Lys at TM7,
so we expected light-dependent PDE activity for the remaining seven
proteins. However, the HPLC analysis in Figure showed no PDE activity for half of the new
Rh-PDEs, CfRh-PDE2, CfRh-PDE3, CpRh-PDE1, and CpRh-PDE2, which is consistent
with the results of the GloSensor assay (Figure ). The lack of enzyme activity may originate
from different membrane and cellular environments between native choanoflagellate
cells and HEK293 cells, such that the PDE domain, or other regulatory
protein(s) associated with it, is post-translationally modified (phosphorylated)
in a native environment. Another possibility is that these proteins
do not possess PDE activity in a native choanoflagellate. C. flexa contains four Rh-PDEs, among which CfRh-PDE2 and CfRh-PDE3 may be pseudogenes
or have different functional roles other than serving simply as light-activated
enzymes.Brunet et al. reported that Rh-PDEs are responsible
through the cGMP signaling for colony inversion of C. flexa.[28] The present
study revealed the PDE activity of CfRh-PDE1 and CfRh-PDE4 for cAMP but only CfRh-PDE1 for
cGMP (Figures and 3). Thus, it is likely that CfRh-PDE1
contributes to colony inversion, though CfRh-PDE4
may have the PDE activity toward cGMP under physiological conditions.
Then, the action spectrum of colony inversion should have a peak at
around 490–500 nm since CfRh-PDE1 and CfRh-PDE4 absorb maximally at 491 and 496 nm, respectively.
If CfRh-PDE3 contributes to that function, the action
spectrum is more red-shifted since CfRh-PDE3 absorbs
maximally at 524 nm. Since each protein was not purified in this study,
information on their molecular mechanism is very limited. Nevertheless,
recovery kinetics of luminescence after illumination (Figure a) provides the reaction cycle
of PDE activity. The time constant of CfRh-PDE1 (τ1/e = 2.8 min) or CfRh-PDE4 (τ1/e = 7.6 min) was faster and slower, respectively, than that of SrRh-PDE (τ1/e = 3.5 min). Note that the
photocycle of the Rh domain is much faster in SrRh-PDE.[21,24]The PDE activity of MrRh-PDE is very similar
to
that of a known Rh-PDE, SrRh-PDE. The enzymatic reaction
turnover between MrRh-PDE (τ1/e =
3.4 min) and SrRh-PDE (τ1/e = 3.5
min) was very similar. Higher PDE activity toward cGMP than toward
cAMP was also observed for MrRh-PDE and SrRh-PDE. These similarities are reasonable as the amino acid sequence
of MrRh-PDE is closest to that of SrRh-PDE (identity: 79% in Figure S2) among
the eight new Rh-PDEs. Nevertheless, MrRh-PDE shows
more enhanced dark activity.
Color Tuning Mechanism of Rh-PDEs
No absorption spectra
were obtained for CfRh-PDE2 and AsRh-PDE, and the latter result is presumably because the retinal-binding
Lys at TM7 is replaced by Asn (Figure ). The obtained absorption maxima for the remaining
seven Rh-PDEs were distributed from 491 to 527 nm (Figure ). Figure also shows that 15 residues among 25 residues
surrounding the retinal chromophore in these Rh-PDEs are identical.
This fact strongly suggests that the remaining 10 residues determine
color variation over 36 nm, from 491 (CfRh-PDE1)
to 527 nm (CpRh-PDE1). Color-determining residues,
which have thus far been reported for microbial rhodopsins, are discussed
next.The L/Q switch is a famous color determinant, where Leu
and Gln at position 105 of TM3 discriminate red-shifted (green-absorbing)
and blue-shifted (blue-absorbing) proteorhodopsins, respectively.[31] In the case of Rh-PDEs, Leu is highly conserved,
while MrRh-PDE contains Ile at the corresponding
position. A previous mutation study of green-absorbing proteorhodopsin
(GPR) reported that L105I GPR shows an about 2 nm red-shift for the
deprotonated form and an about 10 nm red-shift at pH 8.0.[35] A larger red-shift for the latter originates
from the higher pKa value in the L105I mutant. Thus, the L/Q switch
partly affects the spectral red-shift in MrRh-PDE.The A/T switch (A/TS switch) is located at TM7, one residue before
the retinal-binding Lys. It is well known that the introduction of
an O–H-bearing residue such as Ser and Thr causes a spectral
blue-shift.[1,30,33,36−38] In the case of Rh-PDEs,
Ala is fully conserved except for AsRh-PDE (Figure ). The presence of
Ala at the corresponding position suggests that Rh-PDEs have an intrinsically
red-shifted nature from the A/S switch. This further suggests that
absorption maxima of CfRh-PDE (491 nm), SrRh-PDE (492 nm), and CfRh-PDE4 (496 nm) are attained
by a specific spectral blue-shift mechanism. A previous FTIR study
of SrRh-PDE suggested a strong electrostatic interaction
of the protonated Schiff base with D292 at TM7.[24]We recently reported the presence of another color
determinant,
a G/P switch at TM6.[32] Pro is highly conserved
at TM6 in microbial rhodopsins (P186 in BR), while replacement of
Pro into Thr or Gly led to a spectral red-shift in a naturally found
light-driven sodium pump KR2. MrRh-PDE and CpRh-PDE2 contain Gly at the corresponding position, while
other Rh-PDEs contain Pro. The red-shifted spectra in MrRh-PDE (516 nm) and CpRh-PDE2 (519 nm) with Gly
in the G/P switch is fully consistent with established knowledge. MrRh-PDE and CpRh-PDE2 contain Ile and
Leu in the L/Q switch, respectively, and a similar λmax suggests that the G/P switch is more influential for the color tuning
of MrRh-PDE and CpRh-PDE2.Interestingly, CfRh-PDE3 (524 nm) and CpRh-PDE1 (527 nm) exhibit the most red-shifted spectra,
although the mechanism cannot be explained by known color switches.
Unique residues can be seen at TM1 and TM4. CfRh-PDE3
and CpRh-PDE1 contain Gln and Glu, respectively,
at the position of M20 in BR (TM1), while other Rh-PDEs possess Ala
or Gly. CfRh-PDE3 and CpRh-PDE1
contain Asn at the position of I119 in BR (TM4), while other Rh-PDEs
possess Leu or Val. These residues may cause a spectral red-shift,
or other residues not listed in Figure might contribute to the spectral red-shift. Identification
of the color determinant is our future focus.
Applicability of Rh-PDEs
for Optogenetics
The strong
motivation of the present study was to find a better optogenetic tool
than SrRh-PDE. However, the functional experiments
provided rather negative results regarding application to optogenetics.
Among the eight new Rh-PDEs, AsRh-PDE did not contain
retinal-binding Lys. In addition, four proteins showed no enzymatic
activity. Even though they are functional under native cell conditions,
these proteins cannot be used in mammalian cells. Light-dependent
PDE activity was observed for CfRh-PDE1, CfRh-PDE4, and MrRh-PDE, but the activity
of the former two proteins was not significant. The activity of MrRh-PDE is comparable to that of SrRh-PDE,
but the dark activity is higher for MrRh-PDE. Thus,
the best Rh-PDE for optogenetics is SrRh-PDE at present,
which is the first discovered Rh-PDE.Although new Rh-PDEs are
not promptly usable for optogenetics, there are several useful aspects.
The PDE activity of AsRh-PDE is specific to cAMP,
a property that is in contrast to SrRh-PDE, which
has PDE activity toward both cAMP and cGMP, the latter being stronger.
Thus, for example, the recovery of the retinal-binding Lys may lead
to a substrate-specific Rh-PDE. The present data will stimulate further
experimental and theoretical efforts to understand the molecular mechanism
underlying the function of enzyme rhodopsins, which is also important
for application to optogenetics.
Authors: Oliver P Ernst; David T Lodowski; Marcus Elstner; Peter Hegemann; Leonid S Brown; Hideki Kandori Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Klaus Peter Hofmann; Patrick Scheerer; Peter W Hildebrand; Hui-Woog Choe; Jung Hee Park; Martin Heck; Oliver P Ernst Journal: Trends Biochem Sci Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 13.807
Authors: Thibaut Brunet; Ben T Larson; Tess A Linden; Mark J A Vermeij; Kent McDonald; Nicole King Journal: Science Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 47.728