| Literature DB >> 32426387 |
Yi-Yu Ke1, Tzu-Ting Peng2, Teng-Kuang Yeh3, Wen-Zheng Huang2, Shao-En Chang3, Szu-Huei Wu3, Hui-Chen Hung3, Tsu-An Hsu3, Shiow-Ju Lee3, Jeng-Shin Song3, Wen-Hsing Lin3, Tung-Jung Chiang4, Jiunn-Horng Lin2, Huey-Kang Sytwu5, Chiung-Tong Chen6.
Abstract
Background: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused more than 193,825 deaths during the past few months. A quick-to-be-identified cure for the disease will be a therapeutic medicine that has prior use experiences in patients in order to resolve the current pandemic situation before it could become worsening. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is hereby applied to identify the marketed drugs with potential for treating COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: AI; COVID-19; DNN; Drug repurposing; Feline coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32426387 PMCID: PMC7227517 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed J ISSN: 2319-4170 Impact factor: 4.910
Learning datasets for Al training.
SARS-CoV active drugs - Promazine, Niclosamide. |
Influenza drugs - Favipiravir, Oseltamivir, Peramivir, Zanamivir. |
HIV drugs - Atazanavir, Darunavir, Elvitegravir, Fosamprenavir, Indinavir, Lopinavir, Remdesivir, Ritonavir, Saquinavir, Tipranavir. |
Others reported - Abacavir, Cinanserin, Deoxyrhapontin, Ebselen, Enzaplatovir, Maribavir, Shikonin, Montelukast, Polydatin, Presatovir, Raltegravir, Shikonin, Sophoradin, Tideglusib. |
Blanchard et al. (5 compounds) [ |
Chen et al. (12 compounds) [ |
Chen et al. (8 compounds) [ |
Chen et al. (8 compounds) [ |
Ghosh et al. (10 compounds) [ |
Ghosh et al. (7 compounds) [ |
Jacobs et al. (19 compounds) [ |
Jain et al. (8 compounds) [ |
Kao et al. (1 compounds) [ |
Kuo et al. (9 compounds) [ |
Lu et al. (21 compounds) [ |
Mukherjee et al. (2 compounds) [ |
Thanigaimalai et al. (5 compounds) [ |
Thanigaimalai et al. (7 compounds) [ |
Tsai et al. (27 compounds) [ |
Turlington et al. (25 compounds) [ |
Wen et al. (4 compounds) [ |
Wu et al. (11 compounds) [ |
Yang et al. (9 compounds) [ |
Zhang et al. (4 compounds) [ |
Zhang et al. (8 compounds) [ |
Results from AI model 1. |
Results from AI model 2. |
Other drugs active against FIP virus shown in |
Other drugs showing antiviral activities against FIP virus.
| Drugs | Concentration (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity | Viral Inhibition | |
| Boceprevir | >50 | 50 |
| Chloroquine | >10 | 10 |
| Homoharringtonine | >2 | 2 |
| Salinomycin | >10 | 10 |
| Tilorone | >10 | 10 |
Fig. 1Flow scheme of AI approaches along with antiviral activity verification assays. Two independent datasets were compiled as the learning inputs to generate two AI prediction models of different approaches. Firstly, Model 1 was generated form the known drugs with antiviral activities. Model 2 was generated form the 3C-like protease inhibitors. A database for the market-approved drugs were adopted in which the AI system screens for potential drugs with antiviral activities. The AI-predicted drugs were verified with antiviral activities by a cell-based FIP virus replication assay. Finally, these assay results served as feedbacks for the AI relearning and evolution progress. The Modified AI model was established to screen further and again verified by the FIP virus replication assay. The processing flows are indicated with the arrows.
Assay results of the drugs predicted by AI Model 1.
| AI predicted drugs | Concentration (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity | Viral Inhibition | |
| 5-Azacytidine | >10 | NA |
| Agomelatine | >50 | >50 |
| Carprofen | >50 | >50 |
| >50 | >10 | |
| Cobicistat | >50 | >50 |
| Cyclofenil | >10 | NA |
| Cytarabine | >2 | NA |
| Diosmetin | >50 | >50 |
| Dolasetron | >50 | >50 |
| Flurbiprofen | >50 | >50 |
| >50 | ≧2 | |
| Histamine | >50 | >50 |
| Ipriflavone | >50 | >50 |
| Loratadine | >10 | NA |
| Melatonin | >50 | >50 |
| Pexidartinib | >2 | NA |
| Ramosetron | >50 | >50 |
| Ruxolitinib | >10 | NA |
| Sennoside A | >50 | >50 |
| Torsemide | >50 | >50 |
| Triclabendazole | >2 | NA |
| Tropisetron | >50 | >50 |
| GC376 | >50 | 0.4–2 |
Abbreviations: NA: not available to detect due to cytotoxicity;
GC376: a reference compound.
Assay results of the drugs predicted by AI Model 2.
| AI predict drugs | Concentration (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity | Viral Inhibition | |
| ABT-199 | >2 | NA |
| Baricitinib | >50 | >50 |
| Bifonazole | >10 | NA |
| ≧50 | 50 | |
| Chlorothiazide | >50 | >50 |
| Clorsulon | >50 | >50 |
| Dapsone | >50 | >50 |
| Dihydroergotamine | >50 | >50 |
| Dolasetron | >50 | >50 |
| Eletriptan HBr | >50 | >50 |
| Eptifibatide | >50 | >50 |
| Etodolac | >50 | >50 |
| Fenbufen | >50 | >50 |
| Flufenamic acid | >50 | >50 |
| Fomepizole | >50 | >50 |
| Histamine | >50 | >50 |
| Hydrochlorothiazide | >50 | >50 |
| Indapamide | >50 | >50 |
| Naratriptan | >50 | >50 |
| Nimesulide | >50 | >50 |
| Nitazoxanide | >10 | NA |
| Nitisinone | >50 | >50 |
| Quinapril | >50 | >50 |
| Rizatriptan | >50 | >50 |
| Ruxolitinib | >10 | NA |
| Serotonin | >50 | >50 |
| Sorafenib | >50 | >50 |
| Sumatriptan | >50 | >50 |
| Tadalafil | >50 | >50 |
| Thiabendazole | >50 | >50 |
| Tofacitinib | >50 | >50 |
| >50 | 50 | |
| Trichlormethiazide | >50 | >50 |
| Triclabendazole | >2 | NA |
| Triflusal | >50 | >50 |
| Tropisetron | >50 | >50 |
| Vemurafenib | >10 | NA |
| Zinc Pyrithione | >0.4 | NA |
Abbreviation: NA: not available to detect due to cytotoxicity.
Assay results of drugs predicted by the modified Al model.
| AI predicted drugs | Concentration (μM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Cytotoxicity | Viral Inhibition | |
| >50 | 50 | |
| Bifonazole | >10 | NA |
| >50 | 2 | |
| Clotrimazole | >2 | NA |
| >50 | 50 | |
| Duvelisib | >50 | >50 |
| Econazole | >10 | NA |
| Fenticonazole | >2 | NA |
| Fumaric acid | >50 | >50 |
| Lapatinib | >10 | NA |
| Miconazole | >2 | NA |
| Miconazole (nitrate) | >10 | NA |
| Pranlukast | >50 | >50 |
| Sertaconazole | >10 | NA |
| Sulconazole | >10 | NA |
| Sulconazole (nitrate) | >10 | NA |
| Tacrolimus | >50 | >50 |
| Telmisartan | >50 | >50 |
| Tipifarnib | >10 | NA |
| >50 | 50 | |
Abbreviation: NA: not available to detect due to cytotoxicity.
Fig. 2Fcwf-4 cells infected with FIP virus showed cytopathic effects, crystal violet staining. FIP virus (NTU156) infected cells treated with brequinar of various concentrations (0.4, 2, 10, 50 μM) in duplicate wells (Row A and B) and cytotoxicity of brequinar at 0.4, 2, 10, 50 μM was also investigated (Row C). FIPV-infected cells treated with a positive control, anti-FIP virus compound GC-376 (Row D) and vehicle only (Row E). Uninfected cells without drugs in parallel treatments were shown (Row F).