Literature DB >> 17855091

Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of peptidomimetic SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitors.

Arun K Ghosh1, Kai Xi, Valerie Grum-Tokars, Xiaoming Xu, Kiira Ratia, Wentao Fu, Katherine V Houser, Susan C Baker, Michael E Johnson, Andrew D Mesecar.   

Abstract

Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a series of peptidomimetic severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus chymotrypsin-like protease inhibitors are described. These inhibitors were designed and synthesized based upon our X-ray crystal structure of inhibitor 1 bound to SARS-CoV 3CLpro. Incorporation of Boc-Ser as the P(4)-ligand resulted in enhanced SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitory activity. Structural analysis of the inhibitor-bound X-ray structure revealed high binding affinity toward the enzyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17855091      PMCID: PMC2112940          DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett        ISSN: 0960-894X            Impact factor:   2.823


Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a contagious and fatal respiratory illness, was first reported in Guangdong province, China, in November 2002. Its rapid and unexpected spread to other Asian countries, North America, and Europe alarmed both the public and the World Health Organization. SARS is caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV.2, 3 Its emergence affected more than 8000 individuals and caused more than 800 deaths within a few months. This signifies just how rapidly a contagious illness can spread in the more mobile and highly interconnected world in the 21st century. Remarkably, the world has witnessed how concerted international cooperation allowed health experts to identify the novel etiologic agent and contain the SARS epidemic just months after its emergence. Currently, there is no known SARS transmission anywhere in the world. At the same time, there is no guarantee that this outbreak will not strike again in an even more severe form. Thus far, no effective therapy exists for this viral infection. The SARS-CoV is a positive-strand RNA virus whose genome sequence reveals only moderate relation to other known coronaviruses. During viral replication, viral replicase polyproteins undergo extensive processing by two viral proteases, namely chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro), to generate a functional viral replication complex.6, 7 Therefore, both SARS-CoV 3CLpro and SARS-CoV PLpro are recognized as logical targets for therapeutic intervention against SARS-CoV and related interactions. The structure and activity of the SARS-CoV 3CLpro have been investigated. The enzyme active site contains a catalytic dyad where a cysteine residue acts as a nucleophile and a histidine residue acts as the general acid base. SARS-CoV 3CLpro is functionally analogous to the main picornaviral protease 3Cpro and there have been significant drug-design efforts against human rhinoviral 3C protease which is also a cysteine protease. We recently described structure-based design of a number of potent SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitors. These inhibitors were designed based upon modification of AG7088, a potent inhibitor of the human rhinoviral 3C protease. While AG7088 does not exhibit inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV 3CLpro, the modified inhibitors are active in enzymatic assays as well as in cell culture assays. The X-ray structure of inhibitor-bound SARS-3CLpro revealed important molecular insight into the ligand-binding sites of enzyme. The inhibitors bind to SARS-CoV 3CLpro through covalent bonding with the active site cysteine 145 residue. Based upon this molecular insight, we have now modified our initial inhibitors to accommodate specific ligand-binding site interactions in the S4-subsite of the SARS-CoV 3CLpro active site. Herein we describe the synthesis, biological evaluation, and X-ray structures of inhibitor-bound SARS-CoV 3CLpro for two potent peptide and peptidomimetic inhibitors (Fig. 1 ).
Figure 1

Structures of SARS-3CLpro inhibitors.

Structures of SARS-3CLpro inhibitors. As described previously, inhibitor 2 makes a number of important interactions in the enzyme active site. These include, the covalent bond formed by the Cys-145 thiol with the α,β-unsaturated ester at the S1-subsite. His-172 makes hydrogen bond with the P1-lactam-NH, and the Glu-166 nitrogen makes a hydrogen bond with the ketone of the inhibitor. The P4-oxazole group appears to fill in the S4-hydrophobic pocket. Based upon this X-ray structure, we subsequently speculated that the replacement of P4-oxazole with a Boc-Serine P4-ligand would promote additional hydrogen-bonding interactions in the S4-site. This will result in further enhancement of inhibitory potency. We have also evaluated the corresponding peptide-derived inhibitors for our studies. The synthesis of inhibitor 3 is outlined in Scheme 1 . The synthetic procedure of silyl ether derivative 6 was described by us previously. Removal of the silyl protecting group with tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF provided a secondary alcohol, which was oxidized to ketone 7 with the Dess–Martin periodinane in 73% yield over 2 steps. The ketone 7 was converted to inhibitor 3 by exposure to trifluoroacetic acid (20% TFA/CH2Cl2) followed by coupling of the resulting amine with Boc-(L)-Serine to provide 3 in 72% yield.
Scheme 1

Reagents: (a) TBAF, THF; (b) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, 73% (two steps); (c) TFA, CH2Cl2; (d) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-Serine, CH2Cl2, 72%.

Reagents: (a) TBAF, THF; (b) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, 73% (two steps); (c) TFA, CH2Cl2; (d) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-Serine, CH2Cl2, 72%. The syntheses of peptide-based inhibitors are summarized in Scheme 2 . General peptide coupling reactions between (S)-valine and (S)-leucine or (S)-phenylalanine followed by ester hydrolysis gave the carboxylic acid intermediates 10 and 11 in 81% and 90% yields, respectively. Coupling of these acids with lactam fragment 12 11, 14 afforded Boc-derivatives 13 and 14 in 89% and 86% yields, respectively. Exposure of these compounds to TFA effected the removal of the Boc-group to provide the corresponding free amines. Coupling of these amines with Boc-(L)-serine furnished inhibitors 4 and 5 in 55% and 95% yields, respectively. Furthermore, reaction of the 13 or 14-derived amines with 5-methylisoxazole-3-carboxylic acid 15 afforded inhibitors 16 (75%) and 17 (81%) in very good yields.
Scheme 2

Reagents: (a) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-valine, CH2Cl2; (b) LiOH (1 M in H2O), THF; (c) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, 12, CH2Cl2; (d) TFA, CH2Cl2; (e) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-Serine, CH2Cl2; (f) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, 15, CH2Cl2.

Reagents: (a) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-valine, CH2Cl2; (b) LiOH (1 M in H2O), THF; (c) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, 12, CH2Cl2; (d) TFA, CH2Cl2; (e) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, Boc-(L)-Serine, CH2Cl2; (f) EDC, HOBt, DIPEA, 15, CH2Cl2. The inhibitory activities of the synthetic inhibitors are shown in Table 1 . The enzyme inhibitory activity of the compounds against SARS-CoV 3CLpro was determined in a FRET-based, microplate assay described by Grum-Tokars et al.11, 16 This protocol has previously been used for the determination of IC50 values for α,β-unsaturated esters. The assays were performed in 96-well microplates using a reaction volume of 100 μL which contained 50 mM Hepes, (pH 7.5), 500 nM SARS-CoV 3CLpro enzyme, and varying concentrations of synthetic inhibitors. The reaction components, with the exception of substrate, were incubated for 20 min and the reaction was initiated by the addition of FRET-substrate [AlexaFluor® 488-cys]-Glu-Ser-Ala-Thr-Leu-Gln-Ser-Gly-Leu-Ala-[Lys-QSY®-7]-Ser, giving a final substrate concentration of 1 μM.11, 16 The IC50 values for inhibitors were determined by measuring the rates of reaction with increasing inhibitor concentrations. As shown in Table 1, our structure-based incorporation of P4-Boc-Ser in place of P4-oxazole in inhibitor 2 resulted in (inhibitor 3) significant enhancement of enzymatic inhibitory potency, while its antiviral activity was not improved. It exhibited antiviral activity similar to inhibitors 1 and 2. This difference of activity may be due to the presence of peptide-like features in the inhibitors. Peptide-like molecules often exhibit poor passive transcellular diffusion across cell membranes. Antiviral assays followed our previously published protocol.11, 18 We have compared the binding affinity of the corresponding peptide-based inhibitors incorporating both P4-oxazole and P4-Boc Ser. Peptide-based inhibitors (4 and 5) with P2-Leu and P2-Phe have displayed 20-fold enzymatic potency enhancement over the respective inhibitors (16 and 17) containing P4-oxazole.
Table 1

Structures and activity of inhibitors

EntryInhibitor structure3CLpro, IC50 (μM)Antiviral, IC50 (μM)
1.87045
2.80070
3.8075
4.10100
5.15100
6.300nd
7.200nd
Structures and activity of inhibitors To obtain molecular insight into the binding properties of inhibitor 3, we determined the X-ray structure of 3-bound to SARS-CoV 3CLpro to a resolution of 1.9 Å. The refinement statistics and data collection are summarized in Table 2 . A stereoview of the inhibitor-bound structure is shown in Figure 2 . The X-ray structure reveals that the inhibitor is covalently bonded to the enzyme via a C–S bond (1.77 Å) to the active site cysteine (Cys-145). The -ethyl ester carbonyl is within proximity to Thr-26 oxygen (3.38Å). The Leu-27 side chain makes hydrophobic contacts with the -ligand. Furthermore, the P1-lactam NH forms a hydrogen bond with the imidazole ring of His-163. The P3-carbonyl group of 3 forms a hydrogen bond with the NH of Glu-166. The P4-Ser side chain is within hydrogen-bonding distance of Glu 166. This may explain its enhanced binding affinity over the oxazole-bearing inhibitor 2.
Table 2

Summary of X-ray data processing and refinement statistics

Resolution (Å)Rmergeb (%)% Completea (Å)b (Å)c (Å)β (deg)Rcrystc (%)Rfreed (%)Rfree after TLSRfree after TLS
20.0–1.9 (1.97–1.90)a3.1 (21.7)91.5 (53.0)108.3282.2253.68104.6723.6 (33)27.5 (36)19.6 (28)22.8 (35)

Last shell resolution statistics are shown within parentheses.

Rmerge = ∑∣I − 〈I〉∣/∑I, where I is the observed intensity and 〈I〉 is the average intensity of multiple symmetry-related observations of that reflection. 118,202 measured reflections. 31,114 unique reflections.

Rcryst = ∑∣∣Fobs∣ − ∣Fcalc∣∣/∑∣Fobs∣, where ∣Fobs∣ and ∣Fcalc∣ are the observed and calculated, respectively, structure factor amplitudes for each reflection.

Rfree is the same as Rcryst, except it is calculated over a set of reflections not used in structural refinement at any stage (5% of the observed data in all cases).

Figure 2

The X-ray crystal structure of 3 (thick stick with gray carbon) with SARS-CoV 3CLpro. Hydrogen bonds between inhibitor and 3CLpro are shown in white dotted lines.

Summary of X-ray data processing and refinement statistics Last shell resolution statistics are shown within parentheses. Rmerge = ∑∣I − 〈I〉∣/∑I, where I is the observed intensity and 〈I〉 is the average intensity of multiple symmetry-related observations of that reflection. 118,202 measured reflections. 31,114 unique reflections. Rcryst = ∑∣∣Fobs∣ − ∣Fcalc∣∣/∑∣Fobs∣, where ∣Fobs∣ and ∣Fcalc∣ are the observed and calculated, respectively, structure factor amplitudes for each reflection. Rfree is the same as Rcryst, except it is calculated over a set of reflections not used in structural refinement at any stage (5% of the observed data in all cases). The X-ray crystal structure of 3 (thick stick with gray carbon) with SARS-CoV 3CLpro. Hydrogen bonds between inhibitor and 3CLpro are shown in white dotted lines. In conclusion, our structure-based design strategies resulted in significant improvement of enzyme inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV 3CLpro. An X-ray structure of the 3-bound enzyme provided critical molecular insight into the ligand-binding site interactions in the active site. It appears that the P4-Boc-Ser is involved in important hydrogen-bonding interactions in the -subsite. The present molecular insight will facilitate the design of more effective inhibitors. Further investigations are in progress.
  17 in total

1.  Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  In vitro antiviral activity of AG7088, a potent inhibitor of human rhinovirus 3C protease.

Authors:  A K Patick; S L Binford; M A Brothers; R L Jackson; C E Ford; M D Diem; F Maldonado; P S Dragovich; R Zhou; T J Prins; S A Fuhrman; J W Meador; L S Zalman; D A Matthews; S T Worland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The Genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus.

Authors:  Marco A Marra; Steven J M Jones; Caroline R Astell; Robert A Holt; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Yaron S N Butterfield; Jaswinder Khattra; Jennifer K Asano; Sarah A Barber; Susanna Y Chan; Alison Cloutier; Shaun M Coughlin; Doug Freeman; Noreen Girn; Obi L Griffith; Stephen R Leach; Michael Mayo; Helen McDonald; Stephen B Montgomery; Pawan K Pandoh; Anca S Petrescu; A Gordon Robertson; Jacqueline E Schein; Asim Siddiqui; Duane E Smailus; Jeff M Stott; George S Yang; Francis Plummer; Anton Andonov; Harvey Artsob; Nathalie Bastien; Kathy Bernard; Timothy F Booth; Donnie Bowness; Martin Czub; Michael Drebot; Lisa Fernando; Ramon Flick; Michael Garbutt; Michael Gray; Allen Grolla; Steven Jones; Heinz Feldmann; Adrienne Meyers; Amin Kabani; Yan Li; Susan Normand; Ute Stroher; Graham A Tipples; Shaun Tyler; Robert Vogrig; Diane Ward; Brynn Watson; Robert C Brunham; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Danuta M Skowronski; Chris Upton; Rachel L Roper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Mechanisms and enzymes involved in SARS coronavirus genome expression.

Authors:  Volker Thiel; Konstantin A Ivanov; Ákos Putics; Tobias Hertzig; Barbara Schelle; Sonja Bayer; Benedikt Weißbrich; Eric J Snijder; Holger Rabenau; Hans Wilhelm Doerr; Alexander E Gorbalenya; John Ziebuhr
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.891

5.  Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs.

Authors:  Kanchan Anand; John Ziebuhr; Parvesh Wadhwani; Jeroen R Mesters; Rolf Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The coronavirus replicase.

Authors:  J Ziebuhr
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 8.  Structural insights into SARS coronavirus proteins.

Authors:  Mark Bartlam; Haitao Yang; Zihe Rao
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Binding mechanism of coronavirus main proteinase with ligands and its implication to drug design against SARS.

Authors:  Kuo-Chen Chou; Dong-Qing Wei; Wei-Zhu Zhong
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection.

Authors:  Yi Jun Ruan; Chia Lin Wei; Ai Ling Ee; Vinsensius B Vega; Herve Thoreau; Se Thoe Yun Su; Jer-Ming Chia; Patrick Ng; Kuo Ping Chiu; Landri Lim; Tao Zhang; Chan Kwai Peng; Ean Oon Lynette Lin; Ng Mah Lee; Sin Leo Yee; Lisa F P Ng; Ren Ee Chee; Lawrence W Stanton; Philip M Long; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  52 in total

1.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus papain-like novel protease inhibitors: design, synthesis, protein-ligand X-ray structure and biological evaluation.

Authors:  Arun K Ghosh; Jun Takayama; Kalapala Venkateswara Rao; Kiira Ratia; Rima Chaudhuri; Debbie C Mulhearn; Hyun Lee; Daniel B Nichols; Surendranath Baliji; Susan C Baker; Michael E Johnson; Andrew D Mesecar
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Inhibitors of SARS-3CLpro: virtual screening, biological evaluation, and molecular dynamics simulation studies.

Authors:  Prasenjit Mukherjee; Falgun Shah; Prashant Desai; Mitchell Avery
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Emerging Technologies for the Treatment of COVID-19.

Authors:  Hossein Aghamollaei; Rahim Sarvestani; Hamid Bakherad; Hamed Zare; Paul C Guest; Reza Ranjbar; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Primer for Designing Main Protease (Mpro) Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Abhishek Thakur; Gaurav Sharma; Vishnu Nayak Badavath; Venkatesan Jayaprakash; Kenneth M Merz; Galia Blum; Orlando Acevedo
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.888

5.  A novel mutation in murine hepatitis virus nsp5, the viral 3C-like proteinase, causes temperature-sensitive defects in viral growth and protein processing.

Authors:  Jennifer S Sparks; Eric F Donaldson; Xiaotao Lu; Ralph S Baric; Mark R Denison
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a series of novel and reversible inhibitors for the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus papain-like protease.

Authors:  Arun K Ghosh; Jun Takayama; Yoann Aubin; Kiira Ratia; Rima Chaudhuri; Yahira Baez; Katrina Sleeman; Melissa Coughlin; Daniel B Nichols; Debbie C Mulhearn; Bellur S Prabhakar; Susan C Baker; Michael E Johnson; Andrew D Mesecar
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Coronaviruses resistant to a 3C-like protease inhibitor are attenuated for replication and pathogenesis, revealing a low genetic barrier but high fitness cost of resistance.

Authors:  Xufang Deng; Sarah E StJohn; Heather L Osswald; Amornrat O'Brien; Bridget S Banach; Katrina Sleeman; Arun K Ghosh; Andrew D Mesecar; Susan C Baker
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Characterization and inhibition of norovirus proteases of genogroups I and II using a fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay.

Authors:  Kyeong-Ok Chang; Daisuke Takahashi; Om Prakash; Yunjeong Kim
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Gain-of-Signal Assays for Probing Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro/3CLpro in Living Cells.

Authors:  Seyed Arad Moghadasi; Morgan A Esler; Yuka Otsuka; Jordan T Becker; Sofia N Moraes; Constance B Anderson; Srinivas Chamakuri; Christopher Belica; Chloe Wick; Daniel A Harki; Damian W Young; Louis Scampavia; Timothy P Spicer; Ke Shi; Hideki Aihara; William L Brown; Reuben S Harris
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 7.786

10.  Development of broad-spectrum halomethyl ketone inhibitors against coronavirus main protease 3CL(pro).

Authors:  Usman Bacha; Jennifer Barrila; Sandra B Gabelli; Yoshiaki Kiso; L Mario Amzel; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.