Literature DB >> 34293602

Evaluation of the HeroWear Apex back-assist exosuit during multiple brief tasks.

Maja Goršič1, Yu Song2, Boyi Dai2, Domen Novak3.   

Abstract

Trunk exoskeletons are wearable devices that support humans during physically demanding tasks by reducing biomechanical loads on the back. While most trunk exoskeletons are rigid devices, more lightweight soft exoskeletons (exosuits) have recently been developed. One such exosuit is the HeroWear Apex, which achieved promising results in the developers' own work but has not been independently evaluated. This paper thus presents an evaluation of the Apex with 20 adult participants during multiple brief tasks: standing up from a stool with a symmetric or asymmetric load, lifting a unilateral or bilateral load from the floor to waist level, lifting the same bilateral load with a 90-degree turn to the right, lowering a bilateral load from waist level to floor, and walking while carrying a bilateral load. The tasks were performed in an ABA-style protocol: first with exosuit assistance disengaged, then with it engaged, then disengaged again. Four measurement types were taken: electromyography (of the erector spinae, rectus abdominis, and middle trapezius), trunk kinematics, self-report ratings, and heart rate. The exosuit decreased the erector spinae electromyogram by about 15% during object lifting and lowering tasks; furthermore, participants found the exosuit mildly to moderately helpful. No adverse effects on other muscles or during non-lifting tasks were noted, and a decrease in middle trapezius electromyogram was observed for one task. This confirms that the HeroWear Apex could reduce muscle demand and fatigue. The results may transfer to other exoskeletons with similar design principles, and may inform researchers working with other wearable devices.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exosuits; HeroWear Apex; Lifting; Low-back pain; Trunk exoskeletons

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34293602      PMCID: PMC8453127          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.789


  16 in total

1.  Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Tjaša Kermavnar; Aijse W de Vries; Michiel P de Looze; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Saskia Baltrusch; Han Houdijk; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

3.  No consensus on causality of spine postures or physical exposure and low back pain: A systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Christopher T V Swain; Fumin Pan; Patrick J Owen; Hendrik Schmidt; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Alemi; Jack Geissinger; Athulya A Simon; S Emily Chang; Alan T Asbeck
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks.

Authors:  Kirsten Huysamen; Michiel de Looze; Tim Bosch; Jesus Ortiz; Stefano Toxiri; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Matthias Näf; Saskia J Baltrusch; Idsart Kingma; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Jan Babič; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Improving Grasp Function After Spinal Cord Injury With a Soft Robotic Glove.

Authors:  Carolina Correia; Kristin Nuckols; Diana Wagner; Yu Meng Zhou; Megan Clarke; Dorothy Orzel; Ryan Solinsky; Sabrina Paganoni; Conor J Walsh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit.

Authors:  G S Faber; I Kingma; C C Chang; J T Dennerlein; J H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Low-profile elastic exosuit reduces back muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Juliana C Soltys; Keaton L Scherpereel; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  Soft Wearable Robots: Development Status and Technical Challenges.

Authors:  Yongjun Shi; Wei Dong; Weiqi Lin; Yongzhuo Gao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.847

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.