Literature DB >> 33530377

Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.

Mattia Pesenti1, Alberto Antonietti1, Marta Gandolla2, Alessandra Pedrocchi1.   

Abstract

While the research interest for exoskeletons has been rising in the last decades, missing standards for their rigorous evaluation are potentially limiting their adoption in the industrial field. In this context, exoskeletons for worker support have the aim to reduce the physical effort required by humans, with dramatic social and economic impact. Indeed, exoskeletons can reduce the occurrence and the entity of work-related musculoskeletal disorders that often cause absence from work, resulting in an eventual productivity loss. This very urgent and multifaceted issue is starting to be acknowledged by researchers. This article provides a systematic review of the state of the art for functional performance evaluation of low-back exoskeletons for industrial workers. We report the state-of-the-art evaluation criteria and metrics used for such a purpose, highlighting the lack of a standard for this practice. Very few studies carried out a rigorous evaluation of the assistance provided by the device. To address also this topic, the article ends with a proposed framework for the functional validation of low-back exoskeletons for the industry, with the aim to pave the way for the definition of rigorous industrial standards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assistive device; fatigue relief; industrial exoskeleton; low back; low-back pain; worker support

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33530377      PMCID: PMC7865790          DOI: 10.3390/s21030808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  25 in total

1.  Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Idsart Kingma; Gert S Faber; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Saskia Baltrusch; Han Houdijk; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

Review 3.  Advanced Neurotechnologies for the Restoration of Motor Function.

Authors:  Silvestro Micera; Matteo Caleo; Carmelo Chisari; Friedhelm C Hummel; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Saskia Baltrusch; Han Houdijk; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new passive back support exoskeleton.

Authors:  Axel S Koopman; Matthias Näf; Saskia J Baltrusch; Idsart Kingma; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Jan Babič; Michiel P de Looze; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.

Authors:  Tim Bosch; Jennifer van Eck; Karlijn Knitel; Michiel de Looze
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  Lesion-induced and training-induced brain reorganization.

Authors:  J Liepert; F Hamzei; C Weiller
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Robot-mediated therapy for paretic upper limb of chronic patients following neurological injury.

Authors:  Federico Posteraro; Stefano Mazzoleni; Sara Aliboni; Benedetta Cesqui; Alessandro Battaglia; Paolo Dario; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; J H van Dieën; A S Koopman; M B Näf; C Rodriguez-Guerrero; J Babič; H Houdijk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams.

Authors:  Matthias B Näf; Axel S Koopman; Saskia Baltrusch; Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-21
View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Christian Di Natali; Giorgia Chini; Stefano Toxiri; Luigi Monica; Sara Anastasi; Francesco Draicchio; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.