Carlos E Cardenas1, Abdallah S R Mohamed2,3, Jinzhong Yang1, Mark Gooding4, Harini Veeraraghavan5, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer6, Sweet Ping Ng2,7, Yao Ding2, Jihong Wang2, Stephen Y Lai8, Clifton D Fuller2, Greg Sharp9. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Mirada Medical Ltd., Oxford, UK. 5. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy treatment planning has rapidly increased due to its ability to evaluate patient's anatomy without the use of ionizing radiation and due to its high soft tissue contrast. For these reasons, MRI has become the modality of choice for longitudinal and adaptive treatment studies. Automatic segmentation could offer many benefits for these studies. In this work, we describe a T2-weighted MRI dataset of head and neck cancer patients that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck normal tissue auto-segmentation systems through comparisons to available expert manual segmentations. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: T2-weighted MRI images were acquired for 55 head and neck cancer patients. These scans were collected after radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) simulation scans using a thermoplastic mask to replicate patient treatment position. All scans were acquired on a single 1.5 T Siemens MAGNETOM Aera MRI with two large four-channel flex phased-array coils. The scans covered the region encompassing the nasopharynx region cranially and supraclavicular lymph node region caudally, when possible, in the superior-inferior direction. Manual contours were created for the left/right submandibular gland, left/right parotids, left/right lymph node level II, and left/right lymph node level III. These contours underwent quality assurance to ensure adherence to predefined guidelines, and were corrected if edits were necessary. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The T2-weighted images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest are named based on AAPM's Task Group 263 nomenclature recommendations (Glnd_Submand_L, Glnd_Submand_R, LN_Neck_II_L, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, LN_Neck_II_R, LN_Neck_III_L, LN_Neck_III_R). This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) by the National Cancer Institute under the collection "AAPM RT-MAC Grand Challenge 2019" (https://doi.org/10.7937/tcia.2019.bcfjqfqb). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides head and neck patient MRI scans to evaluate auto-segmentation systems on T2-weighted images. Additional anatomies could be provided at a later time to enhance the existing library of contours.
PURPOSE: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy treatment planning has rapidly increased due to its ability to evaluate patient's anatomy without the use of ionizing radiation and due to its high soft tissue contrast. For these reasons, MRI has become the modality of choice for longitudinal and adaptive treatment studies. Automatic segmentation could offer many benefits for these studies. In this work, we describe a T2-weighted MRI dataset of head and neck cancer patients that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck normal tissue auto-segmentation systems through comparisons to available expert manual segmentations. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: T2-weighted MRI images were acquired for 55 head and neck cancer patients. These scans were collected after radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) simulation scans using a thermoplastic mask to replicate patient treatment position. All scans were acquired on a single 1.5 T Siemens MAGNETOM Aera MRI with two large four-channel flex phased-array coils. The scans covered the region encompassing the nasopharynx region cranially and supraclavicular lymph node region caudally, when possible, in the superior-inferior direction. Manual contours were created for the left/right submandibular gland, left/right parotids, left/right lymph node level II, and left/right lymph node level III. These contours underwent quality assurance to ensure adherence to predefined guidelines, and were corrected if edits were necessary. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The T2-weighted images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest are named based on AAPM's Task Group 263 nomenclature recommendations (Glnd_Submand_L, Glnd_Submand_R, LN_Neck_II_L, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, LN_Neck_II_R, LN_Neck_III_L, LN_Neck_III_R). This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) by the National Cancer Institute under the collection "AAPM RT-MAC Grand Challenge 2019" (https://doi.org/10.7937/tcia.2019.bcfjqfqb). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides head and neck patient MRI scans to evaluate auto-segmentation systems on T2-weighted images. Additional anatomies could be provided at a later time to enhance the existing library of contours.
Authors: David N Teguh; Peter C Levendag; Peter W J Voet; Abrahim Al-Mamgani; Xiao Han; Theresa K Wolf; Lyndon S Hibbard; Peter Nowak; Hafid Akhiat; Maarten L P Dirkx; Ben J M Heijmen; Mischa S Hoogeman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: B W Raaymakers; J J W Lagendijk; J Overweg; J G M Kok; A J E Raaijmakers; E M Kerkhof; R W van der Put; I Meijsing; S P M Crijns; F Benedosso; M van Vulpen; C H W de Graaff; J Allen; K J Brown Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Vincent Grégoire; Kian Ang; Wilfried Budach; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Johannes A Langendijk; Anne Lee; Quynh-Thu Le; Philippe Maingon; Chris Nutting; Brian O'Sullivan; Sandro V Porceddu; Benoit Lengele Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Patrik F Raudaschl; Paolo Zaffino; Gregory C Sharp; Maria Francesca Spadea; Antong Chen; Benoit M Dawant; Thomas Albrecht; Tobias Gass; Christoph Langguth; Marcel Lüthi; Florian Jung; Oliver Knapp; Stefan Wesarg; Richard Mannion-Haworth; Mike Bowes; Annaliese Ashman; Gwenael Guillard; Alan Brett; Graham Vincent; Mauricio Orbes-Arteaga; David Cárdenas-Peña; German Castellanos-Dominguez; Nava Aghdasi; Yangming Li; Angelique Berens; Kris Moe; Blake Hannaford; Rainer Schubert; Karl D Fritscher Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Gregory Sharp; Karl D Fritscher; Vladimir Pekar; Marta Peroni; Nadya Shusharina; Harini Veeraraghavan; Jinzhong Yang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jinzhong Yang; Rivka R Colen; Steven J Frank; Jihong Wang; Eslam Y Wassal; Wenjie Wang; Michael E Kantor; Peter A Balter; David I Rosenthal; Stephen Y Lai; John D Hazle; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-12-17
Authors: Christopher M Nutting; James P Morden; Kevin J Harrington; Teresa Guerrero Urbano; Shreerang A Bhide; Catharine Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Aisha B Miah; Kate Newbold; MaryAnne Tanay; Fawzi Adab; Sarah J Jefferies; Christopher Scrase; Beng K Yap; Roger P A'Hern; Mark A Sydenham; Marie Emson; Emma Hall Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Peijin Han; Pranav Lakshminarayanan; Wei Jiang; Ilya Shpitser; Xuan Hui; Sang Ho Lee; Zhi Cheng; Yue Guo; Russell H Taylor; Sauleh A Siddiqui; Michael Bowers; Khadija Sheikh; Ana Kiess; Brandi R Page; Junghoon Lee; Harry Quon; Todd R McNutt Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Dong Joo Rhee; Carlos E Cardenas; Hesham Elhalawani; Rachel McCarroll; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Adam S Garden; Christine B Peterson; Beth M Beadle; Laurence E Court Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Kareem A Wahid; Enrico Glerean; Jaakko Sahlsten; Joel Jaskari; Kimmo Kaski; Mohamed A Naser; Renjie He; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 5.421
Authors: Wen Chen; Yimin Li; Brandon A Dyer; Xue Feng; Shyam Rao; Stanley H Benedict; Quan Chen; Yi Rong Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 3.481