| Literature DB >> 32403458 |
Mohammad Moniruzzaman1, Taesun Min1.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is an emerging field of science that is widely used in medical sciences. However, it has limited uses in monogastric farm animal as well as fish and poultry nutrition. There are some works that have been done on curcumin and curcumin nanoparticles as pharmaceutics in animal nutrition. However, studies have shown that ingestion of curcumin or curcumin nanoparticles does not benefit the animal health much due to their lower bioavailability, which may result because of low absorption, quick metabolism and speedy elimination of curcumin from the animal body. For these reasons, advanced formulations of curcumin are needed. Curcumin nanospheres is a newly evolved field of nanobiotechnology which may have beneficial effects in terms of growth increment, anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects on animal and fish health by means of nanosphere forms that are biodegradable and biocompatible. Thus, this review aims to highlight the potential application of curcumin, curcumin nanoparticles and curcumin nanospheres in the field of monogastric farm animal, poultry and fish nutrition. We do believe that the review provides the perceptual vision for the future development of curcumin, curcumin nanoparticles and curcumin nanospheres and their applications in monogastric farm animal, poultry and fish nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: curcumin; fish; monogastric animal; nanoparticle; nanospheres; nutrition; poultry
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403458 PMCID: PMC7284824 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12050447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Outline of the production process from turmeric to curcumin nanospheres.
Effects of dietary turmeric and curcumin in swine nutrition.
| Types | Animal Category and Duration of Exposure | Diet Preparation and Experimental Design | Experimental Findings | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turmeric | 50- to 60 -days-old weaned, crossbred pigs (Large white × Landrace × Duroc), and duration was 85–90 days of age for Experiment 1 and 175 to 185 days of age for Experiment 2. | Total 48 nursery pigs (~15 kg) with four treatments fed 0.00%, 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.20% turmeric in feed. Experiment 1, visceral organ and epithelial cell morphology on villus was observed by SEM at 30 kg BW. | ↔ Growth, carcass and visceral organ weight did not differ. | [ |
| 21-days-old weaned piglets (G-Performer × Fertilium 25)/11 days of trial | Total 64 weaned piglets (~6 kg) in 2 × 4 factorial design with or without F-18 | ↑ average daily weight gain, ↓ ileal macrophages, diarrhea score and frequency of diarrhea, | [ | |
| 21-days-old weaned piglets (G-Performer × Fertilium 25)/9 days of trial | Total 64 weaned piglets (~6 kg) divided into 4 treatments; diets were: a nursery basal diet, basal diet supplemented with 10 mg/kg of capsicum oleoresin, garlic botanical, or turmeric oleoresin | ↑ expression of immunity-related genes in ileal mucosa of pigs treated with plant extracts which enhanced intestinal health status and immunity in pigs | [ | |
| Curcumin | 21-days-old weaned piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire)/21 days of trial | Total 50 weaned piglets (~6 kg) divided into 5 dietary treatments: control (basal diet), and the basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg quinocetone, or 200 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg or 400 mg/kg curcumin | ↓ FCR, crypt depth, IELs, mRNA levels of IL-1β and TLR4, and TNF-α as well as | [ |
| 26-days-old weaned piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire)/24 days of trial | Total 40 weaned piglets (~6 kg) divided into 4 dietary treatments: NBW with control diet, NC (NBW with 400 mg/kg curcumin in control diet), IUGR with control diet, and IC (IUGR with 400 mg/kg curcumin in control diet) | ↓ growth and ↑ serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance, hepatic lipid contents in pigs with IUGR and vice-versa in curcumin fed piglets; | [ | |
| 26-days-old weaned female crossbred piglets | Total 24 weaned piglets divided into 3 dietary treatments: IUGR group, NBW group, and IUGR + CUR group, which were fed diets containing 0 mg/kg (NBW), 0 mg/kg (IUGR) and 200 mg/kg (IUGR + CUR) curcumin | ↑ SOD, ↓ MDA in jejunum of IUGR pigs fed CUR diet; | [ | |
| 29-days-old weaned piglets (Large white × Landrace × Duroc)/20 days of trial | Total 192 weaned piglets (~6 kg) divided into 4 dietary levels: | ↔ Growth in all treatments; | [ | |
| 28-days-old weaned piglets (Duroc × Large white × Landrace)/28 days of trial | Total 180 (90 ♂ + 90 ♀) weaned piglets (~8 kg) divided into 6 dietary treatments: control diet (CON group) or supplemented diet (300 mg/kg of antibiotics, ANT group; 300 mg/kg of RES and CUR, respectively, HRC group; 100 mg/kg of RES and CUR, respectively, LRC group; 300 mg/kg of RES; 300 mg/kg CUR) | ↓ | [ | |
| 60-days-old male crossbred piglets (Pietrain × Erhualian)/21 days of trial | Total 18 piglets (~16 kg) divided into 3 dietary treatments: control (not treated with curcumin and not subjected to transport (CON), transport control (not treated with curcumin and subjected to 2 h transport together with the curcumin treated group, T-CON), and curcumin (treated with curcumin (8 mg/kg, p.o.) for 21 days and subjected to 2 h of transport thereafter, CUR) groups | ↑ serum cortisol, hippocampal NO content, | [ |
Abbreviations: ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; ↔ = no change; CUR = curcumin; SEM = scanning electron microscope; RES = resveratrol; IELs = intraepithelial lymphocytes; IL-1β = interleukin 1β; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-α; cNOS = constitutive nitric oxide synthase; Inos = inducible NOS; NBW = new birth weight; IUGR = intrauterine growth retardation; Nrf2 = NF-E2-related factor 2; GCLC = glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; SOD1 = superoxide dismutase 1; GCLM = glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit; NQO1 = NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1; TNFα = tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6 = interleukin-6; IFNγ = interferon gamma; IL-2 = interleukin-2; caspase3 = cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinase 3; bax = BCL2-associated X protein; bcl2 = B-cellCLL/lymphoma 2; hsp70 = heat-shock protein 70.
Effects of dietary turmeric, curcumin and nanocurcumin in poultry nutrition.
| Types | Animal Category and Duration of Exposure | Diet Preparation and Experimental Design | Experimental Findings | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turmeric | 1-day-old broiler chickens (Ross/Ross)/20-days of trial | Total 45 chickens divided into three groups; diets are: control diet, control diet supplemented with 4 mg capsicum oleoresin and 4 mg turmeric oleoresin/kg diet (XT) and uninfected or orally challenged with | ↑ BW, ↓ gut lesion score, | [ |
| 1-day-old broiler chickens (Ross)/ | Total 240 chicks allotted into 4 groups; diets are: basal, turmeric powder (TP) supplemented at 5, 7, 9 g/kg of basal | ↑ BW, liver and gizzard index, | [ | |
| 288-days-old broiler chicks (Raja II)/ | Total 288 broilers; basal diet with neem (8 g/kg), turmeric (2 g/kg) and vitamin E (0.2 g/kg) individually and in combination to form 8 test diet groups | ↑ hematological parameters in neem fed diet; | [ | |
| 1-day-old broiler chickens (Ross 308)/ | Total 288 broilers; control diet with turmeric powder, TP at 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 g/kg, and vaccinated (positive control) or unvaccinated (negative control) to form 8 test diets | ↓ BW and DFI in 20 g/kg TP fed, | [ | |
| 1-day-old Wenchang broiler chickens/ | Total 300 broilers; basal diet with turmeric rhizome extract, TRE at 0, 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg to from 4 diets | ↑ growth performance, antioxidant activity, breast muscle ↓ abdominal fat in TRE fed diets | [ | |
| 1-day-old Ross male chicks/ | Total 625 chicks divided into 5 dietary treatment groups: thermoneutral control (TN-CON), heat stress (HS-CON), heat stressed supplemented with betaine (HS-Bet), HS with TRP (HS-TRP), and HS-BT (fed Bet and TRP) | ↑ heterophil, total and IgM antibody in HS-TRP and HS-BT than HS-CON group; | [ | |
| 52-weeks-old Hisex laying hens/8-w trial | Total 150 laying hens; control diet with turmeric powder, TP at 0, 2 and 4% to form three dietary treatment groups | ↔ BW, egg weight or production at 4% TP diet; | [ | |
| 37-weeks-old Leghorn laying hens/ | Total 160 laying hens assigned to 8 diets in 2 × 4 factorial design at 2 levels of AME (11.51 and 12.35 MJ/kg) and 4 levels of CRP (0, 2, 4 and 6 g/kg) | ↑ egg shell thickness and hardness but ↓ yolk cholesterol as ↑ CRP; ↓ TG, ALT, AST and ↑ villus length, goblet cells at 2 g/kg CRP of diet | [ | |
| 1-week-old Japanese quails/4-weeks trial | Total 150 quails allotted to 5 diets: FM -CON (T1), SBM-CON (T2), SBM with 0.5% TP (T3), SBM with 0.5% TP and 0.1% phytase (T4), SBM with 0.5% TP and 0.1% panzyme (T5) | ↑ BW, FE, total protein, albumin, SOD, CAT, GSH, GSH-Px but | [ | |
| 1st stage: 15-days-old Japanese quails/1-month trial | 1st stage: 45 female quails divided into 3 groups like control (P0), control with 54 mg (P1) and 108 mg (P2) of TP/quail/day; 2nd stage: 3 groups like K0: offspring from parents of P0, K1: offspring from parents of P1 and K1: offspring from parents of P2 diets | After 3 months or 2nd stage: | [ | |
| Curcumin | 1-day-old chicks/ | Total 180 chicks in three diet groups: control diet, control diet with lipophilic turmeric extract containing curcumin and turmerones, TF-36 at 0.5% and 1% to from 3 treatment groups | ↑ BW and antioxidant | [ |
| 1-day-old broiler (Ross×Ross)/ | Two diet groups- one standard diet (control) with no curcumin and another is control with 35 mg/kg of a freeze dried | ↑ BW and ↓ fecal oocyst, gut lesion as well as ↑ serum antibodies, cellular immunity, in | [ | |
| 30-weeks-old laying hens (Hy-Line Brown)/ | Total 60 laying hens in 3 diet groups: control (T0), control diet with curcumin at 30 (T30) and 50 (T50) mg/kg of curcumin, respectively | ↑ TAC, specific gravity and yolk index of eggs, and ↓ yolk color, TBARS in eggs and | [ | |
| 1-day-old male chicks (Cobb 500)/ | Total 225 male chicks in 5 diet groups: NC-negative control feed; PC-positive control; CU-with 50 mg/kg of curcumin, PHY-100 mg/kg phytogenic; and PHY + CU, a combination of both additives at 50 mg/kg (curcumin) and 100 mg/kg (phytogenic). | ↑ total protein, globulin, | [ | |
| 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross × Ross)/ | Total 180 chicks in 6 dietary groups: basal diet, basal diet with total curcuminoids (TCMN) at 444 mg/kg, basal diet with AFB1 at 1.0 mg/kg, basal diet with 74 mg/kg TCMN and 1.0 mg/kg AFB1, basal diet with 222 mg/kg TCMN and 1.0 mg/kg AFB1, basal diet with 444 mg/kg TCMN and 1.0 mg/kg AFB1 | ↑ BW, FE in 74 and 222 mg/kg TCMN at AFB1 diets; | [ | |
| 21-days-old mixed sex slow-growing chickens (Thai indigenous crossbred)/63-days of trial | Total 480 chicks in six diet groups: basal diet with 4% tuna oil as positive control, basal diet added with curcumin removed turmeric oleoresin at 20, 40, 60 or 80 mg/kg curcuminoids (CUR20, CUR40, CUR60, CUR80, respectively) or | ↑ FCR, breast fillet, yellowness of skin in curcuminoids fed diets; ↑ LA but ↓ DHA of breast meat in CUR20 and CUR40 fed diets; ↓ TBARS in chicken meat in CUR60 fed diet; suitable level of curcuminoids in slow-growing chickens was 60 mg/kg diet | [ | |
| 1-day-old Arbor Acres broiler chickens/ | Total 400 chicks in four diet groups: control (CRM0), basal diet added with 100 (CRM100), 150 (CRM150) and 200 (CRM200) mg/kg curcumin | ↑ BW, FE in CRM200 fed diet; ↑ APE and ↓ abdominal fat in CRM150 and CRM200 fed diets; ↑ villus length and width in intestine up to CRM200 fed diets | [ | |
| 1-day-old Arbor Acres broiler chickens/ | Total 200 chicks in four diet groups: basal diet without carotenoid (control), basal diet added with 300 curcumin (CRM), basal diet added with 300 lutein (LTN) or with a combination | ↑ redness and yellowness of fresh meat in C + L fed diet; | [ | |
| 21-days-old male Arbor Acres broiler chickens/ | Total 320 chicks in four diet groups: basal diet (C1), basal diet added with 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg curcumin (C2, C3, C4, respectively) | ↑ redness value of meat, CAT, ABTS radical scavenging activity and ↓ drip loss at 48 h in curcumin supplemented groups | [ | |
| 21-days-old male Arbor Acres broiler chickens/ | Total 400 chicks in five diet groups: basal diet + 22 °C (CON), 34 °C for 8 h (0900-1700) + basal diet supplemented with 0, 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg curcumin (HS, CMN1, CMN2, and CMN3 treatments, respectively) | ↓ FCR in CMN1 & CMN2 diets; ↑ liver GSH in CMN1 & CMN2; ↑ | [ | |
| 1-day-old male broiler chickens (Ross 308)/ | Total 1200 chicks in four diet groups: control diet, control diet supplied with 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg curcumin | ↓ BW, ADG, liver weight in 1000 and 2000 mg/kg CUR groups; ↓ plasma LDL and hepatic TG in 2000 mg/kg curcumin group; ↑ hepatic glycogen and hepatic lipase activities in 1000 and 2000 mg/kg curcumin groups; | [ | |
| 160-days-old male chicks (Ross 308)/ | Total 160 chicks in four diet groups: basal diet in thermoneutral condition (23 °C), basal diet in 8 h thermal stress (34 °C), basal diet with 100 mg/kg curcumin (CR) at thermal stress (34 °C), basal diet with 1 g/kg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) at thermal stress (34 °C) | ↑ ADFI, ADG, FBW in CR added than the other diets; | [ | |
| 1-day-old male broiler chickens/ | Total 120 chicks in four diet groups: a 2 × 2 factorial design was used where the main factors included adding aflatoxin B1, AFB1 (< 5 vs. 100 µg/kg) and curcumin, CM (0 vs. 150 mg/kg) in a corn/soybean-based diet | ↑ liver injury, ALT, AST, MDA, but ↓ albumin, total protein, CAT, GSH, GSH-Px and induced AFBO-DNA in AFB1 fed; these attributes are lowered, prevented or protected by CM added diets | [ | |
| 1-day-old male Arbor Acres broiler chickens/ | Total 120 chicks in six diet groups: | ↓ liver weight and toxicity, | [ | |
| 22-weeks-old Roman laying hens/ | Total 336 laying hens in 3 diet groups: first group as a thermoneutral control (25 °C), second group at high temp (32 °C, 6 h/day), given a basal diet, third group was five treatment groups (100, 150, 200, 250, 300 mg/kg curcumin) (H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, respectively) fed a basal diet under high temp conditions (32 °C, 6 h/day) | ↑ SOD at H2 and H3 fed diets; | [ | |
| 10-days-old Japanese quails/ | Total 180 birds reared at either 22 °C (thermoneutral) or 34 °C (heat stress) for 8 h/day (0900-1700) until the age of 42 days. Birds in both environments were randomly fed 1 of 3 diets: basal diet and basal diet added with 0, 200 or 400 mg of curcumin per kg of diet. | ↑ BW, FI, and ↓ FE, MDA, nuclear factor, HSP70 in response to increasing supplemental curcumin level in the diets | [ | |
| 1-day-old White Pekin ducklings/ | Total 540 mixed-sex birds in three dietary treatments: controls (fed only the basal diet), a group fed an OTA-contaminated diet (2 mg/kg feed), and a group fed the same OTA-feed plus 400 mg/kg of curcumin | ↑ BW, ADG, and no enterotoxicity in curcumin fed diet compared to OTA diet; | [ | |
| 1-day-old male Cherry Valley Pekin ducklings/ | Total 720 male ducklings in four dietary treatments: control group were fed a basal diet and the remainder were fed the basal diet supplemented with 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg curcumin | ↑ jejunal and hepatic curcumin contents with 400 and 800 mg/kg; ↑ | [ | |
| Nanocurcumin | 30-days-old Japanese quails/ | Total 60 birds in four diet groups: | ↓ FCR and ↑ egg production in T30 and T10 fed diets; ↓TBARS in egg yolk and ↑ antioxidant capacity against peroxyl | [ |
| 1-day-old male broiler chickens (Ross 308)/ | Total 500 chicks in five diet groups divided into two identical houses: diets were (1) control; (2) and (3) Control + 200 or 400 mg/kg curcumin; (4) and (5) Control + 200 or 400 mg/kg nanocurcumin, respectively under recommended temp up to 14 days, when the temp was dropped in one house from 28.5 to 13–15 °C and maintained at this level to induce ascites until 42 days. Whereas, in the second house the temperature was maintained according to the hybrid production guidelines | ↓ WG and ↑ FCR in birds reared in cold temp than the normal temp; |
Abbreviations: ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; ↔ = no change; ɔ = restore; BW = body weight; FE = feed efficiency; FCR = feed conversion ratio; SOD = superoxide dismutase; Cho = cholesterol; TG = triglycerides; FAS = fatty acid synthase; SREBP-1c = sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c; MDA = malondialdehyde; PPARα = peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor α; CPT-I = carnitine palmitoyl transferase-I; Nrf2 = NF-E2-related factor 2; HO-1 = Heme oxygenase-1; Cu/ZnSOD = Copper and zinc superoxide dismutase; CAT = Catalase; γ-GCLc = catalytic subunit of γ-glutamate cysteine ligase; γ-GCLm = modulatory subunit of γ-glutamate cysteine ligase; GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase; AFBO = exo-AFB1-8,9-epoxide; TAC = total antioxidant capacity; TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; AFB1 = aflatoxin B1; HSP70 = heat shock protein 70; OTA = ochratoxin A; HTC = hematocrit; pCO2 = partial pressure of carbon dioxide; TLR4 = Toll-like-receptor 4 mRNA; NDV = Newcastle Disease Virus; IBV = infectious bronchitis virus
Effects of dietary turmeric and curcumin in rabbit nutrition.
| Types | Animal Category and Duration of Exposure | Diet Preparation and Experimental Design | Experimental Findings | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turmeric | 84-weeks-old weaned broiler rabbits/ | Three treatment groups: basal diet, basal diet added with turmeric rhizome powder, turmeric rhizome powder (TRP)at 0.15% or 0.30% in the diets | no beneficial effect of dietary TRP on blood biochemical and meat characteristics of broiler rabbits reared under summer stress | [ |
| Curcumin | 8-months-old New Zealand white rabbits/ | Total 24 rabbits in four groups: control diet, control diet with 10, 25 and 40 mg aqueous extract of curcumin /kg body weight | curcumin decreased | [ |
Effects of dietary turmeric and curcumin in fish nutrition.
| Types | Animal Category and Duration of Exposure | Diet Preparation and Experimental Design | Experimental Findings | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turmeric | Common carp, | Experiment 1, total 240 fingerlings in four groups: diets supplemented with 0, 5, 10 and 20 g/kg turmeric for 3 weeks, then fish were exposed to lethal 3.5 mg/L copper for 24 h; | Experiment 1, mortality was 65.3%, 41.8%, 22.7% and 20.6% according to dietary treatments; | [ |
| Curcumin | Rainbow trout ( | Total 300 juveniles in four groups: control was fed with the basal diet without CUR, the remaining groups were fed with 1% (E1), 2% (E2), 4% (E3) CUR; fish were challenged by | ↑ WG, SGR, survival in E2 group; ↓ FCR, RBC, Hb, Ht in CU-fed fish; ↑ SOD, CAT, GSH-Px but ↓ MDA in liver, head kidney and spleen in CU-fed fish; ↑ hematological, immunological, antioxidant activities in fish of E2 group | [ |
| Silver catfish ( | Total 40 fingerlings in four groups: A-uninfected and non-supplemented fish (negative control), B-uninfected fish with 150 mg/kg CUR, C- infected & non-supplemented fish (positive control), and D- infected & added fish with 150 mg/kg CUR | 100% disease resistance against | [ | |
| Tilapia | Total 300 juveniles in five groups: supplemented with 0 (basal diet), 50, 100, 150 or 200 mg CUR/kg diet (CUR50, CUR100, CUR150, CUR200, respectively) | ↑ WG, ADG, SGR, lysozyme, IgG, IgM in CUR50 group; | [ | |
| Tilapia | Total 180 juveniles in three groups: supplemented with 0% (basal group), 0.5%, or 1% CUR in the basal diets for juvenile tilapia | ↑ growth, FE and GH, IGF-1, IGF-2 in fish fed the CUR supplemented diets; | [ | |
| Nile tilapia | Total 60 fingerlings in two groups: commercial diets supplemented with 0% (control) and 2% CUR (weight/weight) at 2% body weight | ↑ peroxidase, serum bactericidal activity, serum protein in CUR fed diet; 100% survivability in CUR fed diet challenged with | [ | |
| Gift tilapia | Total 375 juveniles in five groups: basal diet was supplemented with 0 (control), 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg CUR/kg diets | ↑ WG, FBW, SGR, ↓ CF, FCR, MDA in 150 mg/kg CUR fed diet; ↑ Serum total protein, liver HSP70 in fish fed 100-200 mg/kg CUR diets | [ | |
| Tilapia | Total 180 fingerlings in ten groups: T1, negative control; T2, injected IP with AFB1 at 6 mg/kg in basal diet; T3-T6 were fed with garlic (T3 and T4) and CUR (T5 and T6) at 10 and 20 g/kg diet, respectively; T7-T10 injected IP with AFB1 and fed both garlic and CUR at 10 and 20 g/kg diet | ↓ HSI ↑ hepatic lesion in AFB1 group; ↑ HSI ↓ hepatic lesion in garlic + CUR fed groups at 10 mg/kg diet; ↑ | [ | |
| Total 72 juveniles in three groups: diets supplemented with 0% (basal group), 0.5%, or 1% CUR in 40% protein feeds | ↓ lipid peroxidation, TBARS, but | [ | ||
| Salicylcurcumin (0.5%) as CUR analog was supplemented along with the basal diet | ↓ TBARS, GSH, CAT, GSH-Px, | [ | ||
| Jian carp ( | Juvenile carp were fed 0.1%, 0.5%, or 1.0% curcumin for 60 days, then injected IP with 30% | ↓ AST, ALT, hepatocyte degeneration, MDA ↑ SOD, antioxidant capacity, GSH in liver and ↓ | [ | |
| Crucian carp ( | Total 585 juveniles in three groups: diets supplemented with 0 (basal group), 1, or 5 g/kg CUR | ↑ FW, PWG, FE, in 5 g/kg CUR diet; ↑ hepatopancreas weight, protein content, trypsin and lipase activities, AKP, γ-GT, CK activities in intestine, but in ↓ MDA, protein carbonyl content in 5 g/kg CUR diet; ↑ SOD, CAT, GR, GSH, GSH-Px, GST in intestine of CUR fed diets; | [ |
Abbreviations: ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; ↔ = no change; CUR = curcumin; FBW = final body weight; PWG = percentage weight gain; SGR = specific growth rate; ADG = average daily gain; FI = feed intake; FE = feed efficiency; FCR = feed conversion ratio; HSI = hepatosomatic index; CF = condition factor; PER = protein efficiency ratio; CP = crude protein; CL = crude lipid; AFB1 = aflatoxin B1; IP = injected intra peritoneal; Ig = immunoglobulin; SOD = superoxide dismutase; CAT = catalase; GSH = glutathione; GSH-Px = glutathione peroxidase; GST = glutathione-S-transferase; GR = glutathione reductase; MDA = malonaldehyde; AST = aspartate transaminase; ALT = alanine transaminase; RBC = red blood cells; Hb = hemoglobin; TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; ACH50 = alternative complement hemolytic; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL1-β = interleukin 1-beta; HSP70 = heat shock protein 70; CCl4 = carbon tetrachloride; AKP = alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; CK = creatine kinase; NKA = Na+, K+-ATPase;
Figure 2Eight different types of important nanocarriers. SPION: super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; MSN: mesoporous silica nanoparticles.