| Literature DB >> 35990269 |
Ilias Giannenas1, Panagiotis Sakkas2, Georgios A Papadopoulos3, Ioannis Mitsopoulos4, Ioanna Stylianaki5, Stella Dokou1, Vasileios Tsiouris6, Theodora Papagrigoriou7, Marina Panheleux2, Fabrice Robert2, Vasileios A Bampidis4.
Abstract
Chronic exposure to high ambient temperatures is detrimental to laying hen performance and egg quality. Plant secondary metabolites may alleviate effects, partly due to their antioxidant activities. Herein, we investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with a phytonutrient solution (PHYTO) consisting of a plant extract combination of Scutellaria baicalensis and Curcuma longa on young layers (25-32 wk of age) raised under naturally elevated temperature conditions. Four hundred, 24-wk-old Lohmann hens were allocated in 50 cages and, after a week of adaptation, were offered a diet either containing 2 g/kg of PHYTO or not, for 8 wk. Hen BW was measured at the beginning and end of the trial, and egg production and feed intake were recorded weekly. At week 32, four eggs per cage were collected to determine egg quality characteristics as well as the rate of lipid and albumen oxidation in fresh eggs. At the end of the trial, two hens per cage were blood sampled for assessment of biochemical markers, one of which was euthanized for histopathological evaluation of the liver and intestine and assessment of intestinal histomorphometry. The herbal mixture supplementation significantly increased egg production rate at weeks 28 and 29 and for the overall production period, and feed efficiency at weeks 26-29. In addition, the degree of liver necrosis and microvascular thrombosis was lower (P < 0.05) whereas intestinal villosity was greater in duodenal and jejunal segments (P < 0.05) in the PHYTO compared to the control group. Supplementation also reduced (P < 0.05) blood concentrations of corticosterone, alanine aminotransferase activity, and TBARS, and a reduction in catalase activity was observed. Egg quality characteristics were not affected, except for eggshell thickness, egg diameter, and eggshell breaking strength that were superior in the PHYTO group (P < 0.05). PHYTO supplementation significantly improved egg lipid oxidation status of fresh eggs. In conclusion, supplementation with PHYTO improved laying hen productivity and egg quality, which was associated with an improvement in laying hen thermotolerance.Entities:
Keywords: Curcuma and Scutellaria; egg quality; heat stress; laying hen; liver evaluation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990269 PMCID: PMC9385105 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.957847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Ingredients and composition of the control layer diet.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Maize, grains | 552.0 |
| Wheat, grains | 50.0 |
| Soybean meal | 240.0 |
| Wheat bran | 33.0 |
| Soy oil | 5.0 |
| Limestone | 95.0 |
| Monocalcium phosphate | 10.5 |
| 3.2 | |
| Lysine | 1.3 |
| Threonine | 0.5 |
| Valine | 1.0 |
| Sodium chloride, iodized | 2.3 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 2.2 |
| Vitamin premix | 1.5 |
| Trace-mineral premix | 1.5 |
| Total | 1000.0 |
|
|
|
| Dry matter | 883.9 |
| Crude protein | 167 |
| Ether extract | 27 |
| Crude fiber | 33 |
| Ash | 84.1 |
| Calcium | 36.5 |
| Phosphorus (total) | 6.5 |
| Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) | 11.6 |
Supplying per kg feed: 4.82 mg all-trans retinol acetate, 62.5 μg cholecalciferol, 30 mg α-tocopheryl acetate, 2 mg menadione sodium bisulfite, 2 mg thiamine hydrochloride, 3 mg riboflavin, 4 mg pyridoxine hydrochloride, 0.02 mg cyanocobalamin, 20 mg niacin, 10 mg pantothenic acid, 1.0 mg folic acid, 0.07 mg biotin, 50 mg ascorbic acid, 300 mg choline chloride, and 40 mg carotenoids.
Supplying per kg feed: 80 mg Zn, 40 mg Mn, 160 mg Fe, 70 mg Cu, 0.25 mg Co, 1 mg I, and 0.2 mg Se.
According to NRC (21).
Figure 1Measured in house minimum and maximum temperatures during the experimental period.
Figure 2Total daily hours of in-house temperatures exceeding 28°C.
Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO on laying hen performance.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Week 24 (adaptation) | 86.4 | 87.0 | 0.734 | 0.680 |
| Weeks 25–26 | 91.3 | 92.7 | 0.601 | 0.225 |
| Weeks 27–28 | 86.4a | 91.5b | 0.796 |
|
| Weeks 29–30 | 86.6 | 89.4 | 0.916 | 0.145 |
| Weeks 31–32 | 81.0 | 84.0 | 1.500 | 0.161 |
| Total (25–32 w) | 86.8a | 89.0b | 0.343 |
|
|
| ||||
| Week 24 (adaptation) | 107.46 | 106.36 | 0.349 | 0.118 |
| Weeks 25–26 | 112.48b | 110.34a | 0.377 |
|
| Weeks 27–28 | 114.81b | 112.66a | 0.426 |
|
| Weeks 29–30 | 115.64 | 115.26 | 0.300 | 0.530 |
| Weeks 31–32 | 118.26 | 118.08 | 0.333 | 0.791 |
| Total (25–32 w) | 113.73x | 112.54y | 0.160 | 0.061 |
|
| ||||
| Week 24 (adaptation) | 2.00 | 1.93 | 0.020 | 0.087 |
| Weeks 25–26 | 2.10 | 2.00 | 0.020 |
|
| Weeks 27–28 | 2.14 | 2.05 | 0.023 |
|
| Weeks 29–30 | 2.16 | 2.10 | 0.021 | 0.167 |
| Weeks 31–32 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 0.022 | 0.197 |
| Total (25–32 w) | 2.10 | 2.04 | 0.020 | 0.120 |
|
| ||||
| Week 25 | 1.865 | 1.864 | 4.846 | 0.866 |
| Week 32 | 1.978 | 1.981 | 7.775 | 0.851 |
a, bValues in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
x, yValues in the same row with different superscripts tend to differ (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10).
1Groups of layer hens fed the control or the supplemented diet; 2SEM, standard error of the mean.
Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO on serum biochemical parameters measured in two hens per replicate cage (n = 50 per group) at the end of the experimental period (week 32).
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ALP (IU/L) | 271.7 | 344.8 | 51.58 | 0.182 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 10.6b | 7.8a | 0.52 |
|
| AST (IU/L) | 486.1 | 368.6 | 47.41 | 0.366 |
| γ-GT (IU/L) | 15.6 | 15.1 | 0.886 | 0.683 |
| TBARS (nmol/ml) | 20.77b | 13.49a | 1.59 |
|
| CAT (U/ml) | 1.17b | 0.54a | 0.077 |
|
| SOD (U/ml) | 1.36 | 1.32 | 0.040 | 0.645 |
| GPx (nmol/ml) | 0.191 | 0.197 | 0.015 | 0.847 |
| Corticosterone μg/dL | 0.97b | 0.75a | 0.031 |
|
ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; γ-GT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances; CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase (GPx).
a, bValues in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1Groups of layer hens fed the control or the supplemented diet; 2SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 3Liver evaluation of hens at the end of the experimental period (week 32). (a) Normal liver tissue, (b–d) Presence of intravascular organized fibrin consistent with the formation of thrombi, degeneration, and necrosis of hepatic cells with micro-hemorrhages. Hematoxylin and Eosin (a). Martius-Scarlet-Blue (b–d). Scale bar: 250 μm.
Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO on hen liver evaluation at the 8th week of the trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatocellular necrosis | 1.48b | 1.36a | 0.107 |
|
| Hemorrhagic lesions | 0.96 | 0.60 | 0.144 | 0.370 |
| Microvascular thrombosis | 1.60b | 0.84a | 0.154 |
|
*N = one liver sample per replication (25 liver samples per group).
a, bValues in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1Groups of layer hens fed the control or the supplemented diet; 2SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 4Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO on duodenal, jejunal, and ileal villus height and crypt depth of laying hens at the end of the trial (1 hen per replicate cage; n = 25 per treatment). (A) Duodenum villus; (B) Duodenum crypts; (C) Jejunum villus; (D) Jejunum crypts; (E) Ileum villus; (F) Ileum crypts. Bars represent mean values and error bars standard deviation of values within each experimental group. ****P < 0.0001; **P < 0.01; ns, not significant.
Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO product on egg quality parameters at the 1st week of the trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg weight (g) | 60.82 | 60.72 | 0.700 | 0.944 |
| Yolk weight (g) | 16.20 | 16.03 | 0.192 | 0.660 |
| Egg white weight (g) | 39.01 | 39.25 | 0.664 | 0.860 |
| Egg weight in water (g) | 4.35 | 4.69 | 0.102 | 0.101 |
| Egg weight, specific (g/cm3) | 1.068 | 1.065 | 0.0018 | 0.101 |
| Haugh unit | 77.92 | 73.56 | 1.481 | 0.143 |
| Egg diameter (cm) | 43.44 | 43.36 | 0.200 | 0.836 |
| Egg lateral index (cm) | 59.07 | 59.42 | 0.452 | 0.705 |
| Egg shape index | 73.64 | 73.16 | 0.477 | 0.625 |
| Egg shell thickness (mm) | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.006 | 0.606 |
| Egg shell weight (g) | 5.61 | 5.45 | 0.104 | 0.433 |
| Egg yolk color | 14.08 | 13.69 | 0.116 | 0.136 |
| Egg shell color | 33.14 | 27.03 | 1.997 | 0.127 |
|
| ||||
| Eggshell breaking force (N/m2) | 3750.2 | 3706.9 | 0.160 | 0.606 |
| Eggshell deformation (N/m2) | 0.029x | 0.024y | 0.001 | 0.084 |
|
| ||||
| TBARS, nmol/mL | 1.709 | 1.871 | 0.038 | 0.973 |
*N = 25 (pens), four eggs per replication.
x, yValues in the same row with different superscripts tend to differ (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10).
Effect of dietary supplementation with PHYTO on egg quality parameters at the 8th week of the trial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg weight (g) | 65.48 | 67.12 | 0.625 | 0.194 |
| Yolk weight (g) | 16.37 | 16.78 | 0.156 | 0.194 |
| Egg white weight (g) | 43.41 | 44.50 | 0.414 | 0.194 |
| Egg weight in water (g) | 4.93 | 5.11 | 0.079 | 0.261 |
| Egg weight, specific (g/cm3) | 1.082 | 1.083 | 0.001 | 0.791 |
| Haugh unit | 85.15 | 89.29 | 1.363 | 0.131 |
| Egg diameter (cm) | 44.00a | 44.78b | 0.187 |
|
| Egg lateral index (cm) | 60.24 | 60.02 | 0.431 | 0.788 |
| Egg shape index | 73.21 | 74.73 | 0.557 | 0.174 |
| Egg shell thickness (mm) | 0.45x | 0.48y | 0.007 | 0.070 |
| Egg shell weight (g) | 5.69 | 5.83 | 0.054 | 0.194 |
| Egg yolk color | 13.60 | 13.68 | 0.156 | 0.800 |
| Egg shell color | 27.71 | 25.58 | 1.275 | 0.409 |
|
| ||||
| Eggshell breaking force (N/m2) | 3706.96a | 4250.16b | 119.83 |
|
| Eggshell deformation (N/m2) | 0.030 | 0.031 | 0.0015 | 0.783 |
|
| ||||
| TBARS, nmol/mL | 3.003b | 2.089a | 0.101 |
|
|
| ||||
| Albumen protein carbonyls, nmol/mL (day 1) | 56.33 | 53.19 | 2.705 | 0.567 |
*N = 25 (pens), four eggs per replication.
a, bValues in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
x, yValues in the same row with different superscripts tend to differ (0.05 < P ≤ 0.10).
1Groups of layer hens fed the control or the supplemented diet; 2SEM, standard error of the mean.