| Literature DB >> 32398794 |
Peter Schausberger1,2,3, Demet Çekin4.
Abstract
Both close inbreeding and extreme outbreeding may negatively affect direct fitness. Optimal outbreeding theory suggests that females should preferentially mate with distantly related males. (K)in breeding theory suggests that, at similar direct fitness costs of close inbreeding and extreme outbreeding, females should prefer close kin to non-kin. Empirical evidence of plastic female choice for an optimal balance between close inbreeding and extreme outbreeding remains elusive. We tested the combined predictions of optimal outbreeding and (k)in breeding theories in predatory mites Phytoseiulus persimilis from two origins, Sicily and Greece, which suffer from both close inbreeding and extreme outbreeding depression. In three separate experiments, virgin females were presented binary choices between familiar and unfamiliar brothers, and between familiar/unfamiliar brothers and distant kin or non-kin. Females of Greece but not Sicily preferred unfamiliar to familiar brothers. Females of both origins preferred distant kin to unfamiliar and familiar brothers but preferred unfamiliar brothers to non-kin. Females of Sicily but not Greece preferred familiar brothers to non-kin. The suggested kin recognition mechanisms are phenotype matching and direct familiarity, with finer-tuned recognition abilities of Greece females. Overall, our experiments suggest that flexible mate choice by P. persimilis females allows optimally balancing inclusive fitness trade-offs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32398794 PMCID: PMC7217829 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64793-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Experimental design used to assess female choice. Single females from two populations, Sicily and Greece, were offered two males differing in relatedness and/or familiarity to the female (F for familiar, UF for unfamiliar). Distant kin males came from the same population as the female but were no siblings, non-kin males came from the other population. All females and males were virgin and used only once in experiments.
| Experiment | Female origin (replicates) | Male 1 | Male 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sicily (17); Greece (15) | Sibling (F) | Sibling (UF) |
| 2 | Sicily (16); Greece (19) | Sibling (F) | Distant kin (UF) |
| Sicily (16); Greece (16) | Sibling (UF) | Distant kin (UF) | |
| 3 | Sicily (16); Greece (15) | Sibling (F) | Non-kin (UF) |
| Sicily (15); Greece (16) | Sibling (UF) | Non-kin (UF) |
Figure 1Female choice between familiar and unfamiliar siblings. Mate preference of virgin predatory mite females Phytoseiulus persimilis from Sicily and Greece presented a binary choice of a familiar brother and an unfamiliar brother. Dotted vertical lines indicate the expected proportions at no preference. P-levels inside bars refer to GLM within each population and choice scenario, assuming random choice; the P-level between bars refers to GLM between the two populations, assuming same choice. N = 15 (Greece) and 17 (Sicily).
Figure 2Female choice between siblings and distant kin. Mate preference of virgin predatory mite females Phytoseiulus persimilis from Sicily and Greece presented a binary choice of a familiar or an unfamiliar brother and a distant kin male (coming from the same population but no siblings). The dotted vertical line indicates the expected proportion at no preference. P-levels inside bars refer to GLM within each population and choice scenario, assuming random choice; the P-level between bars refers to GLM between the two populations, assuming same choice. N = 19 (Greece) and 16 (Sicily) for familiar sibling vs. unfamiliar distant kin and 16 (Greece) and 16 (Sicily) for unfamiliar sibling vs. unfamiliar distant kin.
Figure 3Female choice between siblings and non-kin. Mate preference of virgin predatory mite females Phytoseiulus persimilis from Sicily and Greece presented a binary choice of a familiar or an unfamiliar brother and a non-kin male (coming from another population). Dotted vertical lines indicate the expected proportions at no preference. P-levels inside bars refer to GLM within each population and choice scenario, assuming random choice; the P-level between bars refers to GLM between the two populations, assuming same choice. N = 15 (Greece) and 16 (Sicily) for familiar sibling vs. unfamiliar non-kin and 16 (Greece) and 15 (Sicily) for unfamiliar sibling vs. unfamiliar non-kin.